GENES AND THE COLOR PURPLE

 This commentary is a blurb from my new book in process about the genes of God's different creatures, and what they have to do with the color purple:

Purple is not so important from a biological aspect but is in symbolism. It represents the mysterious and supernatural and is also usually associated with royalty and religion. The color purple is associated with transformation in psychology; hence, purple is mysterious and esoteric in nature. That aligns well with the aspirations of Lucifer, who said:

¹³ “…I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: ¹⁴ I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High” (Isa 14:13:14)

 Lucifer aspired to be supreme to God and reign from another realm. His “color” was purple, and his aspirations were esoteric, or beyond nature. The “north” (sapon) in that verse is not directional but “hidden” in the “dark.” (ibid).

As such, Lucifer is hidden inside his people. Since Lucifer and phosphorus have the same meaning, perhaps Lucifer was speaking of the phosphorus compounded in phosphates that make up the boney components of the human body.

Adam referred to Eve as, “bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh” (Gen 2:23). Lucifer was not! Was Adam referring to the phosphorus that God had endowed him with in his bones?

The proper amount of phosphorus is necessary to regulate the vital organs. God would optimize them to exist forever. Perhaps Lucifer’s genes from his realm had more or less of the optimal phosphate to make the organs die rather than live forever!

Bones do live much longer than tissue, and that is due to the phosphorus in them. That name is from the Greek phos (light) and phorus (bringing) and is essentially the name of Satan as much as Lucifer.

What happened to the Serpent for punishment? “On his belly he would go!” That may indicate either a loss of limbs or a soft, rather than boney structure. Either way, that “Image” could not stand erect before God, and perhaps God removed the phosphorus from his bones. That it was a “Serpent” is assumed but it was certainly an image that God cut down as He did Dagon years later (1 Sam 5:3).

If the Serpent was of a different composition, then his DNA and genetic identity would differ from man’s. He was indeed of another kind and that was a species from the dark realm in the heavens.

When anyone thinks of heaven, think not of a place but an invisible realm that is divided into compartments. Lucifer is a heavenly creature but not of Paradise in the heavens, but from Hell therein. Paradise and Hell are separated by a great gulf (Luke 16:26) that cannot be crossed by human beings but certainly can by angels and demons because they are different kinds of creatures.

It is a great “interval” (ibid), not of distance or time, but merely a fixed boundary that humans can never cross, even in death. Think of Paradise as existence and Hell as horrible non-existence in isolation from God and love, along with torments as well.

The point to that explanation is that things of heaven are different than things on Earth. “In the beginning, God created the heaven and the Earth” (Gen 1:1), but made them much different spatially, massively, and in volume. Furthermore, the “waters from the waters” that He separated were genetic — literally the semen from the semen (ibid).

God put two very different kinds of semen in the heaven and the Earth. Semen has two components: sperm in seminal fluid. God made two very different genetic beings; the first in the second process and the second, in the sixth process.

Angels and men, based on the Hebrew language, would have much different chromosomes carrying their DNA. They are of a different kind and a different species, and they have two gens: good and evil — the righteous and the unrighteous… those made right and those not!

From old creature to new is “regeneration” that was finished when Adam was resurrected alongside Jesus. Perhaps his DNA changed since Jesus finished him! Perhaps Jesus passed His “cup” of DNA along to Adam and many of the other saints who had died and were sprinkled with the blood of Jesus!

I surmised that Calvary (the cranium) means Adam’s cranium and wrote the book, The Skull of Adam. I learned much later that Golgotha is “the place of the skull” but more precisely, the place of Adam’s cranium.

Sacred literature states that the bones of Adam were buried under the calvariae locus, “the place of the cranium.” If that is true, then the blood of Jesus with its white blood cells, containing chromosomes and His genes, changed Adam from a dead man to one made alive! If it can do that for Adam, it can for all who have sinned!

Over the centuries, not only was Canaan’s chromosomes the color purple, but because of miscegenation — inbreeding of different peoples — all mankind has clear chromosomes when colored with sin, turn purple; as all have sinned and come short of God’s chromosomes in whose image we were made.

If you think of that as racist, then blame God! He warned the Israelites to keep their blood pure and they were instructed not to inbreed with the Canaanites, specifically not Isaac, as God commanded Abraham:

³ I will make thee swear by the Lord, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell: ⁴ But thou shalt go unto my country, and to my kindred, and take a wife unto my son Isaac. (Gen 24:3-4)

 “Why Isaac?” you ask. To keep Abraham’s bloodline pure through Isaac and Israel (Jacob). As was previously concluded in my thesis, Isaac was “adopted” by Abraham because he was sterile and Sarah barren. Isaac was an image of God Himself planted in the belly of Sarah, just as Jesus in Mary. No, Isaac was not Jesus but was made in the same manner as Adam. He was a new “Adam” and a regeneration of Adam’s kind.

God did that for a reason and that was to produce the purest Kind ever — He would “clone” Himself in Mary and save the DNA of all mankind. To do that, he commanded that the progeny of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob remain genetically pure. Like it or not, the entire Bible is about “clean genes” just as your mother told you!

Isaiah was speaking of chromosomes, perhaps, rather than colors or insects. He may have been speaking of the genes that Lucifer passed along to mankind, and the clean genes of Jesus that would correct the degeneration over all the millennia.

Not only is the Bible the “Last Will and Testament” of God wherein he leaves His “Estate” to His heirs, but it is also a book defining the heirs! The heirs of God have the genes of God, and are in Christ, as Jesus is the only native Son of God.

Think of a true vaccine: Either a dead or living sample of a virus is introduced into the flesh of an otherwise healthy person to activate the natural immune system to ward off viral infection that may later be encountered.

The Blood of Jesus contains an antiviral agent of some sort. The Holy Ghost of Jesus imbues the antidote for the genetic iniquity (depravity) in all who are natural born, and with that divine “vaccination,” the virus of sin is attacked by the divine “antibodies” from the blood of Jesus and the sinner is made whole.

Born again, in that comparison, is the “vaccine.” It takes the perfect genetics of God, and the sick person is engendered from above with healthy genes, not ones that can be seen microscopically, but invisible genes from the realm above.

Just as it is fair and reasonable that anyone should be persuaded, and never cursed, to take a vaccine, the same goes for the divine intervention.

Paul was reasoning with King Agrippa II about the efficacy of the divine “vaccination,” and “then Agrippa said unto Paul, ‘Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian’” (Acts 26:28).

Persuading is cognitive. Evidence must first be presented, and Paul did that. Then Agrippa considered the evidence, evaluated it and either had a choice to accept or reject. He used his free will, without any coercion at all, and rejected Paul’s case.

Almost persuaded is not enough; Agrippa had to be fully persuaded, or as Paul said to the Romans, “Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind” (Rom 14:5).

Calvary is so important because it is the place of the cranium — the “shield” that protects the mind. Agrippa required persuasion of that what Jesus did on the Cross of Calvary was efficacious for eternal life. What had Jesus done there? He had shed the genes in His Blood to cover the genetic sin of all mankind; He corrected the iniquity in the flesh by replacing carnal genes with heavenly genes!

The result was that for that moment, Agrippa rejected the argument. Agrippa was a spoiled and proud man, being the great-grandson of Herod the Great, Herod was not king, but he would be king thereafter. He aspired, not to be a Christian, but to be king, and if he was a Christian, Claudius likely would not have made him king.

The key phrase in Acts 26:28 is “to be” (a Christian). In the Greek, to be is “ginomai” — “to cause to be (“gen” -erate) (ibid).” It is becoming the family of God and having the gens of Jesus, the Christ. Gens are a group of people who are related through their male ancestor,” according to Roman nomen-clature  (Oxford University Press 2022).

 

Color of chromosomes in the liver when exposed to a typical dye (credit: Quiora)