Monday, February 22, 2016

The Baptism of John

Acts 19:19 "And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples, 2 He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost. 3 And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. 4 Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. 5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied."
 I've been avoiding going here for a few days. Why? It's controversial among modern Christians. Rather than bringing together in one accord, it sows discord. Not at that time, but now. Since then Christians, rather than embracing the Holy Ghost, run in fear. Are they afraid of ghosts or is it Jesus they fear?  They spoke with their tongues, but this being common, context is that they spoke languages. By implication it's a previously unknown language which they spoke. However, it is not said to be an unknown language here, even in English, nor even elsewhere in the Greek. "Unknown" was an implied adjective meaning what? A language which was new to their tongue, not an ancient language which God spoke.

With that said some readers will flee. However, never fear... that's just scripture! Did they speak because they had the gift of the Holy Ghost? Yes they did! Does the Holy Ghost still come into Christians now? Most assuredly. Then the argument remains: "Was tongues to be a lasting witness for the reception of the Holy Ghost or was it only a miracle as were many to cause church growth? I can't answer that and so as not to "grieve the Holy Ghost" I shall not entertain or be so prideful to think that meek me should address this issue. As for me, I don't speak in tongues, not even Spanish, but if God gives me that, I can never refuse what I have been given. On the other hand, all Christians must be cautious of whose ghost it is that they're getting!

We do know one thing: From a history standpoint "speaking in tongues" was not the normative from 300 A.D. or earlier until the 20th Century.  Would that imply that all those who were martyred for Jesus' sake weren't full of the Holy Ghost? That's a logic issue, but that must be considered. Now on to today's commentary.

What is important to address here is twofold: 1) What is the Baptism of John and 2) What is the Baptism of Jesus?

John baptized before Jesus made the sacrifice for our sins. Let's look at what John said:
Mark 1:3 "The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. 4 John did baptize in the wilderness, and preach the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. 5 And there went out unto him all the land of Judaea, and they of Jerusalem, and were all baptized of him in the river of Jordan, confessing their sins."
Here is John's Baptism. This is the baptism of the disciples who Paul  met in Ephesus. They were obviously Jews who had believed what scripture taught. Being disciples they were "followers" of Christ, and being righteous Jews who understood prophecy in their own scripture knew that Jesus is the promised Messiah! Their baptism paved the way or set the example for others (Mark 1:3). They had faith that Jesus would die for their sins. Hence, they confessed their sins as they were baptized. Because they were admonished by John they repented and by God's grace they were forgiven, not by the shed blood of Jesus, but by the belief that Christ's blood was forthcoming for redemption.

The faith of those disciples who had John's Baptism were much like the faith of Abraham. The disciples just like the Christians of the Book of Acts "shall be saved (made safe)".  They were genuine Christians who had the hope of salvation, but no where did scripture say that they had the Holy Ghost! We see (Acts 19:6 above) that they were willing Christians who did not fear ghosts nor Jesus even though they didn't have God's Spirit at that instant.

It's for certain that they had not the Holy Ghost after John's Baptism, but one did!
John 1:32 "And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. 33 And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. 34 And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God."
When Jesus was baptized by John, the Holy Ghost descended on him and stayed there! That Jesus received and kept the Holy Ghost is said two times above: "abode on him" (verse 32) and "descending and remaining on him" (verse 33).  By that it is implied that all the others were touched by God's Spirit during baptism, but it was a temporary visitation. For Jesus and Jesus only did the Holy Ghost remained! It was different for him.

Those who had only John's Baptism were Christians, in that they were his disciples (Acts 19:19), but they were lacking in something. They had not been filled with the Holy Ghost. They had faith in what John SAID, but had yet to have faith in what Jesus DID!

They could have said "I'm a Christian... I don't need to be baptized again." They indeed were, but something was still missing! Jesus had yet to suffer and die. Christians must believe that Jesus not only SAID that he would DO that, but that he actually DID that. Jesus had not died yet, so how could his "Ghost" come into them? He didn't! Now the Ghost was there to Comfort them and they needed as assurance;  that their hope is real! How do I know that Jesus is real? He lives within me! Christians experience a change. Out temple is filled with the Baptism of Jesus and his Ghost resides in each of us! It's my desire to serve him that I know that he lives within me even though I continue to fail him.

In Ephesus Paul found Christians walking around who were not filled with the Holy Spirit. They were believers (verse 2), but had not even heard of the Holy Ghost. Paul taught them what they must do. They were to be baptized in Jesus' name (verse 5). Some put the importance on SAYING the name "Jesus". Some argue that SAYING "in the name of Father, Son and Holy Ghost" won't work. That's Simonism, not in a monetary perspective, but in a magical transformation. Circumcision (baptism) is of the heart, not of words! (Romans 2:29). The "magic" is "grace" wrought by the blood of Jesus and that is the Baptism of Jesus! It's where the Ghost comes on those who have been redeemed and stays. The Holy Ghost doesn't come and go, but many believe that the devil can infiltrate a believer to the extent that Jesus' Ghost "has no room at the inn: so to speak! (Apostasy).

There is a difference in the Baptism of John and the Baptism of Jesus. Some will argue about the point of efficacy, but that's for another day. Was it with enlightenment that allowed the Holy Ghost to enter in or was it the act of baptism? That's controversial and not for today! Either way, in this instance the Holy Ghost came at the Baptism of Jesus, not at the time they first believed. These were special disciples in a special time in a special place. Never put God in a box!







Sunday, February 21, 2016

Coatesville; Part 7

The pillar to the community when I was growing up was Joe Davidson.  Joseph H. Davidson was the son of James and Ellen Davidson of Coatesville. At an early age Joe was a carpenter by trade. His father owned the general store in Coatesville back in the early 1900s.  His brother Frank was a public school teacher even before Joe was, quite a respectable profession! I remember that Joe told me that he went to Central Normal College in Danville. Here are the years that he was a student:

Davidson Joe Hendricks County, Indiana 1912-1913 General List
Davidson Joe H. Hendricks County, Indiana 1904-1905 General List
Davidson Joe H. Hendricks County, Indiana 1906-1907 General List
Davidson Joe H. Hendricks County, Indiana 1912 High School Course - Graduate
Davidson Joe H. Hendricks County, Indiana 1918-1919 General List
Davidson Joe Harris Hendricks County, Indiana 1919 Standard Normal Course - Graduate
(Students of Central Normal College, Danville, Indiana; 1877-1934; Index © Meredith Thompson)

Joe was born in 1886 and married Mabel Artie Ruark October 22, 1916 in Putnam County, Indiana.

It was Mabel's brother, Lewis Clyde Ruark who lived in the Gibson home before my family according to Annie Johnson. Mabel and Clyde were children of Gilbert Ruark and Allie Walton of Fillmore, Indiana.  Peter Ruark and his wife moved circa 1831 to Marion County, Indiana then to Putnam County. This vicinity was a popular place for migrations from Kentucky.

More on Joe shortly, but let's look at Mabel for just a bit. In the 1920-1 school year Mabel taught Domestic Science in District No. 4 at New Winchester, Indiana. By then she and Joe would have been married 4 years. This is the same school at which Joe's brother S. Frank had taught in 1905-6 and 1909-10 school years, and it would seem that Frank laid the groundwork for Mable and Joe to teach there. Joe H. Davidson was principle of New Winchester School in 1913-1914 over his brother Frank who had taught as early as 1910, but as late as 1923-4 he was teaching English, History and Biology, perhaps as well as being principle. Mabel added to her teaching duties that same year: music and art. In 1920-1 Joe taught history. In 1922-3 Mabel was the music teacher. (History of Schools, Marion Township, Hendricks County, Indiana; Printed 1970).
"She (Mable Ruark) married her teacher, after graduating at 18 and going to school at DePauw University in Greencastle. Shewas 20 in 1916 when she married my Dad, Joe Davidson, who happened to be her senior teacher at Fillmore where he taught school after graduating from Central Normal College in Danville, along with his brother, Frank Davidson. Frank went on to become a Professor of English and Literature at Indiana University for over 60 years. He named Ballentine Hall on the campus there when it was built. He was given a permanent office at the University for the rest of his life after he retired." (Annie Johnson, "If you grew up in Coatesville" Facebook Group; parenthesis mine).
It appears that Mabel pursued further studies at Central Normal College in Danville as well. She is listed as a student there several years:

Davidson Mabel Hendricks County, Indiana 1917-1918 General List
Davidson Mabel Putnam County, Indiana 1917-1918 Public Music Supervisor
Davidson Mabel Putnam County, Indiana 1918-1919 Harmony
Davidson Mabel Putnam County, Indiana 1918-1919 Voice
Davidson Mable Putnam County, Indiana 1918 Music Supervisor - Graduate
Davidson Mable Hendricks County, Indiana 1918-1919 General List
Davidson Mable Hendricks County, Indiana 1922-1923 General List
Davidson Mable Coatesville, Indiana 1934-1935 General List
(Students of Central Normal College, Danville, Indiana; 1877-1934; Index © Meredith Thompson)

I stand corrected on an earlier statement in a previous part. It is changed from "I never knew a Democrat" to "I never knew that I knew a Democrat", because Mabel Davidson was the President of the Hendricks County Democratic Women's Organization in 1968 (The Daily Banner; May 22, 1968). That was the same year that Hubert Humphrey won the nomination at a brokered convention and the same year the Progressive Party joined with the Democratic Party forming what's there now.

Memories of the political parties for us Coatesville citizens wasn't a big issue because at that time both parties were of the same fabric. In George Wallace's words, "There is not a dime's worth of difference..." because although the Davidsons and the Herrins were of the same fabric, we voted differently.  We had the same needs which required attention and both parties provided like attention. There were no far out "wings" at that time, and what is considered to be conservative now, for the most part was the norm then in this small community. We never knew each others politics. Most people were just good neighbors.

There were socialists in those days, but the bulwark of activity for them was the urban areas where labor was strong and areas where those from Appalachia had a dependence on the New Deal, Fair Deal Programs and The Great Society programs. Whereas, "Elston Herrin is the most radical man that I ever met!" according to Mrs. Beulah Shipley who taught at Cascade, his "radicalism" at that time was the norm outside of academia. Dad was pretty well mainstream just as were the Davidsons of the opposite political party. You see friends can coexist, even with different ideas for the same problems! Herrins were Republicans; Davidsons were Democrats; they were friends. So simple!

It's the piracy of the Progressive Party USA which hijacked the Democratic Party from the Democrats. It's the split now which has divided the nation and the Coatesville of the 1960s was never the same. I can see from those that I know, that "dead little Coatesville" has changed!

Don Wood took issue with me calling Coatesville "A dead little town." I can see why if it is taken out of context, and I can agree! From a population standpoint Coatesville failed to grow! Many came, but more went away. Many died, but those who multiplied did so only to keep up with attrition. Mr. Wood correctly points out that there was much to do in Coatesville in our time. He is so right because we were happy not knowing what we failed to have! "We listened to the corn grow!" may seem that the town was dead, but corn growing can be heard, and most of us had gardens or farms and could hear on hot summer nights in the humidity, corn growing!

In most places today if kids have games to play, stereos for music, television for the visual and fast food to get fat on, they are happy campers. Obesity among the young is a tell-tale sign that things have changed! We all worked hard and played hard, just as Mr. Wood offered.  People were always out of doors. I knew few families, none that I remember, who had central air conditioning, but a few may have had window units. Air conditioning is a blessing, but also a curse! It refreshes us when Hoosier humidity is unbearable, but it makes couch potatoes out of some who should be more than that.

1950s Coatesville teens normally had no air conditioning, often slept upstairs where the devil must have built his fires, had no stereo and few had television "sets" as they were called. Perhaps the T.V. was one-half the set and us the other half!  This was the "Pre-technology era" advertised today because the space age had yet to influence rural Coatesville. Even the hippies of the '60s didn't arrive in our town until the '70s! (Herrins wore torn jeans before tears in jeans were chic!)

With the official goal set in 1962 of a space program by John F. Kennedy, things changed quickly! In 1969, as I was a freshman in college, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin landed on the moon! "It's one small step for man, but one large step for mankind!" said Armstrong, but that was a vast understatement!  Almost all the technology we have today, compared to then, was due to the space program!

In the early 1950s Dad and I would sit by his short-wave radio and listen to the Russian Sputnik in orbit. The sound was merely a bleep-bleep-bleep signal keeping technicians on earth aware of it's technological health, but we entertained ourselves at length with all those bleeps, just as school children do today at the bleeps where filth on the media is censored to keep young ears young! Yes, even bleeps have changed in Coatesville!

I remember telling Dad when photos came back from the moon "Those are just signals made into pictures. We aren't seeing real things. They have just been constructed." In essence the one who would be an engineer, like most people, didn't know nor understand what we were seeing! Now, even two-year-olds know that digital images represent planar images perfectly and that what they are seeing is real! In fact even 3-D images are represented quite well from a visual aspect and holography can fool even the wisest. This growth happened suddenly from 1962 for a purpose! It was for America to lead in space, but thereafter we lead in everything!

The  most prosperous years in Coatesville was between the 1962 until 1973 when the recession hit hard! There are many reasons for that and Coatesville wasn't exempt!

Things change! We are no longer a product of gradual growth, but economic boom! We heard the warplanes of the Cold War in Coatesville in the 1950s. They flew low and had several bombs. They scared us kids and the booms as they broke the sound barrier were frightening. The doomsday clock was set at 5 'til midnight and Coatesville felt that fear. The boom of planes was a constant reminder, but the boom of prosperity helped us cope!

No, Joe Davidson was not forgotten! Let's take a look at Joe for awhile. He was the principle at Coatesville when I was there in the late 1950s. I never had his teaching from books nor the paddle! In fact Joe was a gentle giant.  He was a lean man of six feet and intellectually prolific. His manner was pleasant, he was amiable, but could be stern with a sly smile. He was likely more strict with "Lois Ann" than he was with us because that's the way things are in families.

Joe Davidson at 30 (Courtesy Annie Johnson)

Joe knew his history, having taught it! His Brief History of Coatesville, Indiana is representative of his knowledge and intellect, but not his creativity. In person he made history come alive! Although he was never my school teacher, he was my life teacher. I've sat and listened to how things were in his long life, but never thought to record what he told me. For that lack of forethought, I recorded my own parents for three hours when they were both alive and with all their faculties. I wish that I had done that for Joe Davidson. That's one reason why I'm writing about Coatesville! If it ever ends up a shuttered forgotten small town as many have before, at least a knowledge of the people will be remembered!  It's the realization that it CAN HAPPEN that will allow the citizens to let it NEVER HAPPEN!

What is written about Joseph H. Davidson is just a small mention of who he was! He was on the publication committee of the Hendricks County Historical Bulletin in 1974 and was a member of the historical society. Wherever the past was there, so too was Joe Davidson. He was a historian exemplary!

In 1918 Joe was teaching in Putnam County, at Fillmore where Mabel was reared. I should have remembered this, but Joe Davidson and I shared the same birthday, February 15; 63 years apart! We laughed at that several times! Below in Figures #8 and #9 can be seen a copy of Joseph Harris Davidson's WWI and WWI draft registrations.


Figure #8: Joseph Davidson WWI Draft Registration 1918



Figure #9: Joe Harris Davidson WWII Draft Registration 1942
I find no military service for Mr. Davidson. Perhaps it was because he was a teacher.

Joseph Harris Davidson was born February 15, 1886 and died in 1982. His earthly presence is in two places: Coatesville Cemetery  and the memories of Coatesvillans.

Much more of Joe's personality and contact with 1960s residents of Coatesville can be found on the pages of the Greencastle Daily Banner  to which Joe was the Coatesville Correspondent.

I have few memories to share of the man. He was just a pleasant individual. Although authoritarian to outsiders, it would seem that Mabel was the dominant figure in the household. Although he was firm, she was stern. She had a ready smile, but an intense demeanor. Hopefully, without fear of offending, I can offer some evidence of her frugality!

Of course my first work was in the tomato fields of Johnson County, but during the summertime Mabel would hire me to edge her walks and weed her flower beds. In those days we didn't have edgers nor poison to aid in our work. Pulling weeds was all by perseverance and brute force by tugging until the knuckles turned purple. Our pay was 25 cents and hour. To put this in perspective with inflation at 10 times, that's $2.50 in today's wages. Compare that to Indiana minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. That's for teenage fast food service! I was making very little, but I had a job and Mabel provided it! She was the epitome of frugality!

Of course I was happy to work. Kids were then. We didn't compare what others were making and complain. We were merely thankful for the opportunity to work! We learned early that hard work provides things which are wanted and without the hard work, in those days, poor people didn't have extra things! Mabel instilled in me the work ethic. She paid sub-par wages, but I had a choice. I could work and have spending money or I could not work and not have it! It was that simple because in those days people didn't give able-bodied males anything and there was no "leveling field"!

I found that although Mabel's money would buy sweet things, just like Billie Jamison at a young age, I opened my own savings account. Billy Lydick at Coatesville Bank oftentimes handled this 12-year old boy's savings account himself. I believe that he was a teller at that time and later became bank president.

At that time we got a passbook. Ours was blue. When a deposit was made, the teller would record the transaction and the same when a withdrawal was made. Providing I left it in there for a sufficient time, I would get "free money". I learned that there were two ways to make money: 1) work for it, or 2) let it work for you! This notion was ingrained to me early on thanks to those who gave me work when I was young. Although Mable was tight with her money, I'm tight with mine still! Thanks, Mabel.  In fact if a bag of cookies cost 25 cents more than I think they're worth I won't buy them. Thank you Mabel for my own frugality!

However, Mabel was one step beyond frugal. I don't intend to hurt feelings of living family and friends, but Dale and I took care of her pekingese dog and cat for over a week while they were on vacation. Twice a day we went to the Davidsons, and fed their pets. When they returned we went over and Mabel gave us a quarter. She said "Here's a quarter. You can decide who gets the extra penny." That was just Mabel! We fail to remember that those who suffered hardships in the great depression thought this way. "Buddy, can you spare a dime?" was to them like "hello" is to us. People hurt and they learned to pinch pennies to survive. That's surely where Mabel got her fiscal conservatism.

That's Mabel and that was many of this era! She was tight, but remember, as one reads this, Mabel treated all of us well. She was mom's friend when Appalachian speaking women wasn't that common in Indiana. The Davidsons were solid loving neighbors. I used them for references as my life progressed; when I applied for scholarships, employment and college; they were always my references.

Mabel Davidson (center front) Fillmore High School (courtesy of Annie Johnson)

I disappointed them greatly on one occasion. I never was a "drinker". However, someone, when we were seniors the week before graduation, brought a bottle of whisky to school. I tasted it. That's all!  However, when the first  person was caught we all got in trouble. It was threatened by the principle I.E. Lewis, that none of us would get our diploma. We all did! Because of this incident I lost my National Honor Society Scholarship, a token amount, to which Joe and Mable had been my reference. Mable said that they were going to withdraw my recommendation and maybe they did. They were so disappointed in me!

A book could be written on the Davidson's. I'll let their daughter do that!  As a child I never knew Lois Ann "Annie" personally, but I told her recently that she was a legend in her own time! College was not even a dream for Herrins, but Annie was away at college. She was a bragging right to her parents and brag they did. We knew that Annie was somewhat independent and she has since confirmed it! Perhaps she too will write her own story.






A Method to this Madness

This commentary is political in nature, because as in every place, there is a spiritual war going on in politics. This thought comes to mind because sincere Christian people vote for candidates who are the opposite to what they themselves ascribe.

As Christians were are taught early on that Satan, aka the devil, aka Baal, aka the Prince of the Air, etc. is responsible for evil. One name we neglect oftentimes is that he is also Lucifer.
Isaiah 14:12 "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High."
Lucifer is a "fallen angel" who does devilish things. He exalted himself above God and emulates God. As such he has communed with God, knows God and can act like God. As a created being he is less than the Creator, but God has given him authority. It's not Lucifer who did God's Plan, but God!

When Lucifer was created, it was before mankind came into existence. We have a history of the "seen", but know little of "the unseen". However, God doesn't change plans. He had in his foreknowledge that he would create mankind, and that for them to be more than mere automatons, they needed a choice in revering him. Lucifer was created to give mankind a choice, he didn't fall on his own, but he was a mere tool in God's plan for mankind, and he has little power. God didn't make him fall, but he allowed it!

Satan must travel "to and fro" to do his deception and he has as his helpers other fallen angels. Satan is free to use all manner of temptation, but Satan can never kill us if we're Christians! If we die it's because of God's will. (Read the Book of Job to see what God allows Lucifer to do.)

Therefore, Lucifer is part of God's plan for mankind. This commentary is on A Method to this Madness. Why do "good" people do "bad" things. Why do those who are supposed to be "righteous"  do unrighteous things and why does mankind know better than God?

We are all born with the same view of ourselves that Lucifer had! "I will be like the most High"! Lucifer declared. Knowing how he exalted himself Satan said to God's creation "ye shall be as gods" (Genesis 3:5). Note that in Isaiah 14:14 that Lucifer is a pretender to the throne. He wanted to be like "the most High", of God himself!  On the other hand he told Adam and Eve, that they shall be "as gods". In other words they were to be cheap imitations of what Lucifer pretended to be. Lucifer in essence declared himself "most High" and relegates God to subjection to him.

What Lucifer wants is for all his subjects to be as he is! His desire is for us to be "the other gods besides God" who do as he says. God has a Plan, but Lucifer does too. Lucifer knows his own limitations and knows the outcome. He knows God! However, even with defeat, he accepts a win if he can merely antagonize God! He knows that God won't fall, but his desire is to be just like the most High! Right now he SEEMS to be, because even weak Christians do his will. We are his individual gods whose role it is to antagonize God for him!
Ephesians 4:30 "And grieve not the holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption."
Paul is speaking to Christians. Lucifer does deceive everybody to keep them from becoming Christians, but that's an easy feat because the soul of the wicked is empty of God's Spirit. Satan went to change Job, a righteous man, not some wicked tyrant who was already submissive to him! If Job had fallen for the temptation and succumbed to persecution, he would have "grieved the Holy Spirit", and with that done, Lucifer would be as "the most High". Lucifer failed his mission. (Job's temptation was a picture of Jesus' temptation to come much later). God is still on his throne and Satan is limited in what he can do! What is that? He can lie and deceive!
John 8:44  "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it."
The biggest lie that Satan ever told was in his character of Lucifer. It's called "the wall of separation of church and state". Lucifer deceived the fine hearts of Baptists to inspire Thomas Jefferson to write on this subject. It is NOT in the U.S. Constitution and neither did Jefferson write that document!  Jefferson merely supported the protection of Baptists from persecution by the established "state churches".  (Read my commentary at this link: THE LIE OF SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE)

Jefferson, being a Deist was a "good" man in secular terms, but much less than who most would consider to be a Christian! Lucifer used Jefferson to do what appeared to be "good" and Jefferson performed well. Now the U.S. government, most people, and even most churches fall for that lie! Satan did his "bad" deed (evil) by deception. He knows God well and he used "good" to bring about "evil". That's the "Madness" which is our malady! Christians fall to his method and become tools for him to endeavor to increase his own power.

Aren't we to turn to God in all things!
Philippians 4:6 "Be careful for nothing; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God. 7 And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus."
Yes! We even as we vote are to be in obedience to God, yet people still vote for candidates who propagate wicked policies and the agenda of the the evil one. They still vote the slate of those who are tools of Satan to undermine the most High! Of course none of the political parties are ordained by God, but each do a degree of what's right. The problem lies in the part platform of those parties who minimize the most High and aggrandize the less high!

For instance, a party whose platform is to abort babies and allow same-sex marriage may be progressive in secular eyes, but are quite regressive in God's eyes. Their platform is a mere pedestal to their god Lucifer and even many Christians, even the elect. are deceived by the propaganda "the party of the working man", "the charitable party" and the like. Satan always uses positive sounding themes to introduce evil. That's his job. His forte' is deception and he's extremely good at it!

Right now Lucifer us using Bernie Sanders as a pawn to further his agenda. What he promises sounds so good and charitable "free stuff for everybody"! People like free stuff because free stuff appeases their own little god, each of them. In order to sway even godly people, Lucifer waves the shiny object that is desire into our collective faces and many people take the bait! Wanting what others have without the effort is a very shiny object! I would rather have had that than all the work I had to succeed to be honest with the reader, but that's not God's will!

Socialism is a massive shiny object. It knows that it can SEEM to offer prosperity, giving a little bait, but it can never give the whole fish because in socialism there is no fish! They can only use the fish which capitalism grows!  Not only is socialism deceptive,  but he's a thief as well! Lucifer used socialism and it's appeal to our little god to make him like the most High!

In Lucifer's arsenal are many tactics. Here are some:

  • Evil always uses good things to deceive even Christians.
  • Lucifer twists the thinking of people to convince. Good aids in that.
  • Lucifer changes the focus of what we see. (For instance, rather than seeing the methods of socialism and it's disdain for Christianity, it's the charitable attitude on which people focus).
  • Unfairness is always a method to create unfairness. (For instance, taking what others worked hard for is theft and unfair, but income equality sounds fair to ignorant or deceived people).
  • Satan focus only on the possible positive outcomes (You will have more, but neglects to tell it's your own pockets from which it comes!)
  • Lucifer uses the young because they are more gullible. (The serpent caught Adam and Eve before they had been around for awhile and came to know God better. He still works that way!)
  • Lucifer uses propaganda to persuade. He uses words to convince and his words are powerful if not tested against God's will! He said "you won't surely die" although God said they would (Adam and Eve), so they did their sin. He tells the millennials, "The socialists won't do the evil things they always do this time. It'll be different for us!"
  • Lucifer has us forget! People tune out what Lucifer doesn't want them to hear. (For instance, in this modern age, they socialists won't persecute!" without regard that they always do!)
  • Lucifer points to what works, not the failures of socialist systems. (For instance Scandinavians have free health care and education, without mentioning that their tax rate is 60%).
  • Lucifer uses smooth words. He gives nice-sounding names to evil concepts (example: "pro-choice" for favoring death).
  • Lucifer teaches that his way provides freedom when in fact it enslaves. The freedom which socialism offers is sexual liberty guaranteed by abortion, freedom from the repression of Christianity, and the enjoyment of what the masses have. It neglects to mention the regulation which comes with all that false freedom and the victims in the bondage of freedom! Their ideology is to "do what is right in your own eyes", but never mentions that it has to be "what's right in the eyes of the state"! Their eyes are controlled by Lucifer who laughs at naive people putting on his glasses!
  • I could go on and on, but you get the idea. Socialism is a evil tool to undermine the Most High!
Now for the crux of the problem! Christians are turning to socialism. They even think that there is a difference between the socialism of Bernie Sanders and that of Hillary Clinton. It's documented history that communists turned to the Democrat Party in 1969 as little different than what they believed. As time went by the Democrats are now the socialists. If not where are all the capitalists and conservatives to be found in that party? They aren't there!

The question for the naive Christians and the malleable young Americans, the  millennials, is this "What do you know about socialism?"  Read my commentary (link below) of The Communist Manifesto and what Marx said about it being just as well The Socialist Manifesto!


Christians must read this! Those who vote for Democrats are voting socialist and even against their own most High God! If the Republicans are repugnant to you, then just don't vote. This is not a defense of the Republican Party, but a repudiation of the socialism for which Democrats stand!

There is "A Method to this Madness" and it's the method of Lucifer. Consider how he may be using you to advance his cause.



Friday, February 19, 2016

Unfair Judgment

Paul was at Achaia and was accused of the Jews, because Gallio was deputy there, the events of history narrow this date down to 51-52 A.D. Jesus was crucified in April of  33 A.D. by using astronomical estimates for precision. He ascended into heaven approximately 40  days after his resurrection. Therefore, the date of his ascension is set at around May 14, 33 A.D. At the time of Paul's preaching in Achaia, Jesus had been gone approximately nineteen years! Surely this heresy (sic) would have died out by then, yet it grew!
Acts 18:12 "And when Gallio was the deputy of Achaia, the Jews made insurrection with one accord against Paul, and brought him to the judgment seat, 13 Saying, This fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law. 14 And when Paul was now about to open his mouth, Gallio said unto the Jews, If it were a matter of wrong or wicked lewdness, O ye Jews, reason would that I should bear with you: 15 But if it be a question of words and names, and of your law, look ye to it; for I will be no judge of such matters. 16 And he drave them from the judgment seat."
Gallio ( Lucius Junius Gallio Annaeanus) was a real person in the Roman government judging a Roman citizen, Paul, who was guilty of killing Christians, and also of loving another king: Jesus Christ! The Jews never bothered with him when he killed Christians. That was of no concern to them. He was one of them and a Pharisee. However, when he spoke things contrary to their understanding, their pride could not handle it. They colluded, as a mob, and took him to be judged.

What was his crime? "This fellow persuadeth men to worship God contrary to the law"! What was Paul doing that was so criminal? He was teaching love and that Jesus Christ is God. It was out of ignorance that the Jews condemned him because the Law is all about Jesus who said:
Galatians 5:14 "For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself."
Jesus said that he came to fulfill the Law (Matthew 5:17). How so? One word: "love". The Pharisees were great "keepers of the law", but yet had no love. What Jesus (and Paul) taught is this simple formula:
10 = 1 (The Ten Commandments equals love)
Love is the derivative and it's operationalized by the Law.  The Greatest Commandment and the one like unto it, is the "what" and the Law is the "how"! We're told to love God and we demonstrate our love by loving others. (And some Calvinists think that the Law is of no concern!) We show that love by fair treatment:

  • honoring our parents
  • recognizing the sanctity of life
  • honoring the sanctity of marriage
  • appreciating property rights
  • valuing another's reputation
  • not being jealous of another
The Jews did these things quite well, but for wrong reasons. They obeyed the Law to keep their lousy skins out of hell. It was for their own salvation that they did what they had to do, but they missed the point; they failed to love others, which is demonstrative of loving God! 
  • Worship no other
  • Material things provide no salvation
  • Revere God
  • Set aside one day to honor God
Jews were really good at honoring the Sabbath. That was a day they didn't have to work! They even failed at that because they made "not working" a chore. They wrote so many do's and don'ts for the Sabbath that little time was left to worship! They revered God through prayer and fasting, but it was for their own aggrandizement. They did it in public so that all could see!  As such they worshiped another god, who just happened to be each of their own "selves"!

I'll give them some credit: throughout history they learned the hard way. At one time the Jews were always syncretic, worshiping other gods and building idols to other gods. They learned their lesson with the destruction of the temple, their nation fallen and the dispersion of their people. Because of their knee-jerk reaction, they failed to recognize their own Messiah, believing he claimed godhood. They denied Christ because they saw him as another god!  Because of their own spiritual blindness they failed to see the hand in front of the face. Judaism IS "all about Jesus" and they missed the entire point of their own religion!

In short, the Jews failed to love God who came as Jesus, and they failed to do lawful things out of love, but only duty!  Now comes Jesus and Paul, pointing this out to them! The Jews handled it two different ways: 1) Some applied it and changed or 2) most rejected it. Does that sound familiar? It should!  I'm sure that others took another route. 3) apathy!

When preachers preach now in modern times, if they preach whole truth, parishioners who all sin in some manner, should be convicted of their sin and feel guilty! Some think "They all (others) need to hear that!" but fail to apply it to themselves! They walk out without repentance. These folks are self-righteous. 

Others hear truth and think "I do those things and the preacher is pointing at me!" They reject the word and walk out in anger!

The third response to truth is "That's me. I sinned. Lord, forgive me!" That's the road least taken and is the path to salvation. 

The Jews, for the most part, were the hard-hearted "I won't change for anyone!" or worse yet "I don't believe what Jesus did and who he is." That's why Paul turned to the Gentiles. They weren't bound by all the rituals and meaningless works and were ripe to fill longings within the soul which myths could not quench!

So it was this situation that the Jews indicted Paul: he was guilty of preaching "love", they failing to see that the Law as all about love (and they still fail to see that).  They wanted Paul to stop so they went to Gallio. He judged fairly! Isn't that ironic that a pagan would be more fair than a righteous (sic) Jew! 

Gallio kicked the back-biters out. He said in effect "Don't bother me with your doctrinal differences!" and recused himself from harsh judgment as Christians are called to do out of love:
Luke 6:37 "Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:"
Yes, we can have opinions, but the Jews took it to the extreme; they condemned Paul, but God still had a purpose for him and God put a fair judge there to prolong his purpose. Gallio's legacy is that act of grace which was fair, the epitome of what Christians should be!

There is a judicial lesson here as well! Our own court system and unfair judges should stay out of religious quarrels and stick to legal ones. To be as fair as the judge Gallio, the Ameican Civil Liberties Union should be ejected from civil courts. Judges can rightfully judge what is theirs to judge. They need to be as Gallio and be fair and recuse themselves from religious arguments!

Thursday, February 18, 2016

Convincing With Reason

Acts 18:4 "...he (Paul) reasoned in the synagogue every sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks. 28 For he (Apollos) mightily convinced the Jews, and that publicly, shewing by the scriptures that Jesus was Christ."
These passages are from Paul from the beginning of Chapter 18 and Apollos at the end of Chapter 18. Paul was in Corinth and Apollos was in Achaia. There was considerable time between these two events, but their common theme is how to "convert" people to Christianity. Paul persuaded Jews and Gentiles. Apollos persuaded the Jews.

Let's look at four words in the process of salvation: reason, persuasion, convincing, and showing. Before we examine those four words, there are four words not part of the conversion process: intimidating, judging, name-calling and deceiving. Just look at the contrast!

The objective of any religion is to convert others to a new belief system. The belief of the Jews was Mosaic Law, The belief of the Gentiles was in pagan gods, what is called mythology today, but was very real then! The former was the practice of asceticism and the latter hedonism. The former is Stoicism and the latter Epicureanism. Paul spoke against both. Because Jews were religious didn't mean they were not also philosophers. Their religion is very much a philosophy!

Acts 17 mentions those two philosophies, and I believe that the Law implies one and paganism the other! Hence, there are two diverse philosophies, each with their version of "the unknown god", and both Paul and Apollos endeavor to convince them otherwise. The same process was used for all!

The original state was that two groups of people failed to understand and believe in Jesus Christ. The desired state was to be that both groups believe in Jesus Christ; not in his existence, but that he is the One True God in whom salvation is available! How do we get from state #1 to state #2? Truth! State #1 is deception, ignorance or a lack of understanding. State #2 is enlightenment. It's when a person has an epiphany: it's when truth is revealed!

Neither Paul nor Apollos threatened, accused, derided nor used deception. Neither resorted to anger nor name-calling! Think about it: when people fail to be convinced, deceived people resort to name-calling because their argument isn't convincing. Their "facts" are wrong and they have no other place to go, but toward anger! Using anger as a technique in the conversion process (or in any argument) is not effective. In fact in verse 6 when Paul failed to persuade some of the Jews, he merely went where he had "the biggest bang for his buck". He turned to the Gentiles because that field was the most fertile! Paul realized that some people aren't reasonable. Regardless of truth some people prefer to hang onto what's false because their position seems threatened. They have been wrong and pride prevents them from submitting!

Paul and Apollos used reason. For the Jews it was to show that their Messiah to whom they waited had indeed come. He is Jesus. All that they had to do is read and believe their own scripture. For the Gentiles it was only necessary to understand that their statues offered no hope; that only Jesus could save.

Previously I commented on "reason" (Link:THE CREATION STORY). Reason is of God, but it can be abused. It's a power which God gave his creation for truth, but was skewed through deception. Before the fall of mankind, reason was merely glorifying God. After that, with the new knowledge, Satan taught men how to use reason for evil. Today this is called "spin". In spin there is much truth, but it is tainted with falsehoods.

Well, Paul and Apollos used truth. They presented factual information. For the Jews it was using their own scripture to show that it was all about Jesus. Because they had ears to hear, but could not hear and eyes to see, but could not see; as they always had; their nut was hard to crack!

With the Gentiles, the shell was easier to penetrate because they had little confidence in what they already believed, plus Roman citizens were tolerant toward new thinking. They had a pantheon of Gods and all were welcome at that time except the God of the Jews who were dispersed from Rome under Claudius. (It turned out later that even Christianity wasn't welcome because Christ changes people!)

When reasoning with people the change results through "persuasion". That's merely using the facts against their false beliefs. It's replacing falsehoods with truth.  Satan is the roadblock between false and true and the arguments in favor of good must be 100% truth. For instance to persuade agnostics today, we can't present Christianity as valid through scientific proof. We must admit that God is not verifiable by scientific means, but he's a belief, requiring faith. But we can show them that their own scientific "proof" is not proof; that it's theory and as such requires the same degree of faith!

In order to persuade people, they must be shown the truth. For the Jews the proof exists right in their own scripture. Paul and Apollos only had to "show" them and then explain what they failed to understand. This activity is called "convincing". If you'll remember the eunuch "showed" himself the truth by reading scripture. However, Philip used what he was reading to "convince" him of the truth (Acts 8).

That is the process of conversion. If truth fails, people are absorbed in pride. Resulting to emotion can't cause change in anyone, only resentment and ridicule. It's reason that skeptics require, so use reason on skeptics! There is no branch of philosophy where they used name-calling, ridicule, threats and intimidation to convert. Those techniques belong to Islam. We are better than that because God is truth!

On the political front, it's not reason being used in this election. Each candidate should present the situation and the vision they have; then a realistic plan to get there. It's fine to use a person's record to convince the people who is the most qualified, but it's better to say "that was false" (then why so), than to call another candidate a liar! It's just not effective, especially when the candidate will eventually need the followers of those candidates they demean!

Wednesday, February 17, 2016

The Creation Story

We're enlightened now as a people. "Only the ignorant would believe in a Creator God", even many Christians imply!  The time known as "The Age of Enlightenment" was European in origin and was based on the concept that man's faculty of reason is of paramount importance. As such authority was minimized in favor of liberty, and the importance of church and the monarchy in daily life was seen as more obstacles than truth.  Practical democracy was born of the "Age of Enlightenment" and the drive for a republican form of government virtually eliminated monarchical rule and church/state control in subsequent years.

"Reason" is mankind's faculty to process input and form conclusions. It's the power of the mind to accomplish. Reason became so important as a result of the Enlightenment that in France under the Estates General it replaced the Third Estate and a new "other god" was worshiped: the god of Reason.

However, that other god is what God revealed would happen. As Adam and Eve became "as gods" with their new power, "reason", it was Reason who became the other god after eating of the fruit of the forbidden tree. Since reason is the power of the mind, in effect the mind of Adam and Eve became the other god and their idol was the flesh. Thus, "The Age of Enlightement" truly started with Adam and Eve and "the other god" was always Reason; man's reason.

Logic is the use of reasoning power. For human's things must always be logical! It's not logical that an invisible powerful being created it all, skeptics reason. It's not logical! Mathematics and the physical sciences are the most prominent tools of logic. The Enlightenment in Europe occurred when certain philosophers became skeptical of what religion taught as truth. It all started with Galileo's finding that things were not geocentric; that the earth was not the center of the universe, but the sun was, heliocentric. This ignited the fire which exploded in the 1700s. As such educated people came to see the church as mere mythology and that truth could be found in science. Ever since science supersedes God with all theories and believers in the creation are seen as the "ignorant".

Just as predicted by the serpent, Adam and Eve would "be as gods" and Reason is now firmly established even in this Christian nation as the official god, not to be questioned!

Among Catholics in the U.S. 58% support evolution theory, independents Christians 55%, and mainline protestant 51%. Even evangelicals support evolution by 23% and God's own people, the Jews an overwhelming 77% ! (Pew Forum; Religious Differences on the Question of Evolution United States).

As such all these religious organizations fail to believe the first thing God revealed to mankind:
Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
For the majority of Christians their God is a liar! He says "I did it all!" and they say "I know better... you're a liar God!" Rejection of a Creator God is a rejection of Christianity because if God lied about his power to create, he lied about his power to resurrect. As such reason would say that Jesus was never resurrected and heaven is not for real, if they believe that! However, reason picks and chooses: although they find creation unreasonable for the Almighty God they find salvation and the resurrection as reasonable. Logic tells us that the majority of Christians have a mental disconnect in their faculty of reason. That disconnect is interference from the mind of Satan.

Of course reason tells people that Satan isn't real even as they feel him tempting!  That mental disconnect is temptation which short circuits reason. Reason is of God, but it's a tool of Satan! God uses reason to save; Satan uses it to destroy! Free will, the ability to use reason and make informed decisions, is an human attribute where people can select their own destiny. However, Satan uses that same reasoning to deceive, even the elect, into believing lies.

With that said, evolution is a lie and those Christians who believe in evolution believe a lie! "Well", you say "Creation belief is not essential to Christianity!" It certainly is! Did Jesus who's God, lie about his miracles, death and resurrection? You see, a liar God is not reasonable! Paul, when presenting the gospel taught Creationism. It was an essential part of the gospel; it was the gospel truth!
 Acts 17:1 "I found an altar with this inscription, To The Unknown God. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. 24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands... 26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; 27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us: 28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring. 29 Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. 30 And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: 31 Because he hath appointed a day, in the which he will judge the world in righteousness by that man whom he hath ordained; whereof he hath given assurance unto all men, in that he hath raised him from the dead. 32 And when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some mocked..."
Paul linked Creation with the Resurrection. He made the tie between Creator God and Savior God! To convince the enlightened ones, the philosophers,  he credited the God who made the world and all things in it, including man, as the God who has the power to resurrect. This is Holy Scripture! Was Paul a liar too? Did he die a martyrs death for a lie? I think not! Before then, Paul taught, God overlooked men's skepticism (winked at), but now they were to be held accountable! As such Paul says "Are you going to believe reason through philosophy or are you going to accept truth?" Many of those who heard this mocked him! Can you imagine what they may have said "You're ignorant Paul. Look around you and into the heavens. It's silly to think God did all this when you know it happened by chance!"

Man, being of reason, credits chance for it happening! Chance created it all! Therefore, men build their god of self up by their power of reason and credit the fictitious god of Chance of having done the creation. That in a nutshell is evolution. It denies the Almighty God! It's merely unsupported theory and even scientists will tell you that it's a theory accepted as fact! Now use God's portion of reason: did it just happen by chance and where did even Higg's Boson originate? Where did unlimited empty space come from before that? You see reason can be the use of  logic to dispel untenable theories.

In summary, my faith is in God. You take your Chance. If you're wrong there is a penalty for eternity. If I'm wrong, I just die! However, if I'm right, which I assure you I am, I shall have eternal life. Chance offers no hope. God does!

It's imperative for Christians to believe in the creation because not to is heresy! Heretics go to hell! God no longer winks at their ignorance.





Coatesville: Part 6

There were numerous places for leisure in 1950s/1960s Coatesville. Foremost among them were the gasoline stations, colloquially called "fillin' stations". Not only did the attendant fill the tank at that time, but they checked the oil and if requested, even the tire pressure and radiator water level. Many quarts of oil were sold because of this free service. These things don't exist today!

My former wife had a low tire one day. She stopped at the Marathon Fillin' Station. Someone there, presumably a teenage worker, told her that she needed new air in the tire, and that old stale air is what made it lose it's pressure. He changed her tire air for her and she came home and shared this new information with me. That was a good joke on her, but it paled compared to the number of "mud valves" women were tricked into believing the problem to be.

"Mud valves" are a non-existent creation of fertile young minds. Gullible people were often told "It's the mud valve gone bad!" That invisible valve was located somewhere and maybe everywhere under the hood. It was in a straight line from the pointing finger. They never had a replacement, but it was always the problem. It made squealing noises and thumps. Sometimes it just caused silent trouble and the mud valve was always elusive!

The mud valve was the fillin' station version of "Snipe Hunting". Snipes are much like mud valves. They too are elusive, but snipe hunting is always done after dark and in a distant woods. Most teenage boys are introduced to snipe hunting at about thirteen and girls at sixteen. I remember that Colby Johnson took Sandi Beaman snipe hunting. I don't know if she caught one, using a burlap bag, but she caught a red face! No one had ever actually caught the elusive snipe. They are of the same genre as mud valves; a non-existent creation of fertile young minds!

What was there to do at fillin' stations? It was a meeting place for camaraderie. It's where men met for companionship and a few of the less cautious girls came for attention. When I think of gas stations, I think of Ratchet. (Behind his back he was called Ratsh__... and some did it to his face). Being amicable, those types of comments only encouraged him. Ratchet is Ronnie Walters. Gas stations were where "everyone knew his name"! Ratchet somehow was always at all gas stations. He must have had an itinerary. Of course the Cities Service was the place he ought to be, because his dad owned it: Jim Walters. Ratchet worked there some as well. later on Everett Smith took it over.

Ratchet was an unusual person. He was sort of on the wild side, and somewhat crude, but when Billy Graham had a televised revival, Ratchet rushed home. He really liked Billy Graham and Ratchet needed the grace which Billy proffered in God's behalf.

I remember one time when I was at the Cities Service Station when I was 13. I remember that a young man came swerving in almost hitting the pumps. He opened the door of his car and stumbled into the station, possibly to buy cigarettes. I don't recall him pumping gasoline. His trip back he was virtually carried by two of his adult "friends" who put him in the car, turned the steering wheel to the right for a full u-turn, pressed his foot down on the accelerator as they shut his door, and off he went on Milton Street toward Reno.  He was obviously quite inebriated and this made a profound effect on me not being a consumer of alcoholic beverages. Why so?

Not long after everybody rushed off toward Reno. I learned later that this young man had hit a tree north of town at high speed and was killed instantly! I went later, I forget exactly where, but somewhere on Waters St.,, to where the wreck was stored (there was a garage there), and saw his bloody loose shoe still in the car. I believe that my alcohol free life was due to his alcohol related death. I never ever believed that I had to try things to be against things! That's why any type of illicit use of drugs or alcohol is not for me and never was!

I also learned that friends protect you, not neglect you! I'm sure that those who abetted this outcome had no evil intentions, but a catastrophe happened regardless. "Friends don't let friends drive drunk!" is more than a cliche.  Friends have "got your back", not be lax!

Over the years I have had much grief because even though I like the taste of hard liquor, although I hate the taste of beer, I have no desire to burn automobile fuel in my brain! You see, whether we know it or not, where we grow up effects our destiny. As people ridiculed me often, especially since many business dealings were in lounges, I often told them this incident. Coatesville was with me in Detroit, Ontario, Indianapolis and wherever I went. Thank you, Coatesville.

Many happy things happened at gas stations, though. We sat around, most of us smoking, and just being friends. Oops! I guess smoking was a vice too! Maybe I should not have frequented gas stations so much! Regardless, many friendships were lived out there and many the reputation of descent women were surely as well!

In those days young boys most often did not have sex. They just said they did. You see, they got the glory without the girly. The girl kept her virginity, but lost her reputation.  That was the system. It was unfair, but that's how things worked then. On the whole, other than us all being liars, most youngsters were pretty good people. There were instances where innocence were lost, but it would be unfair to mention names at this late date.

There was one place where parents worked and things happened. I was there at 12 and was shocked! I had learned about life from Colby Johnson when I was eight. Colby told me how I got here; not in Coatesville, but how I was conceived. I told him "My parents would never do anything like that!" "Colby must b pulling my leg!" I thought! I found out for sure when I was 12 that Colby was a straight shooter. His version of how I was conceived was presented as evidence to this kid. My innocence was lost. Coatesville stole my innocence and it was never the same again. I became just another brain damaged teen boy who spent eighteen hours a day fantasizing. What's more the virus of fantasy is incurable without regard to what Dr. Robert Heavin would say! (Of course, he was one of us only smarter and more isolated.) Coatesville, you see, bred successful kids as well as the "not so successful". The community should be proud of Dr. Heavin!

Let me resume my seat now back at the Cities Service. The time has changed now. It's when Everett had it if I remember right or maybe an owner in between. Well, anyway, we had made a boxing ring out of the lift bay. We had someone's boxing gloves and I had the tar knocked out of me. I learned right then and there, that I had more sense than let a kid twice my size knock me up side the head. They continued on, I watched. I really don't remember who hit me so hard, but I remember the blow!

After a couple of years the "action" for us boys moved to the Marathon beside the grain elevator. Patty Fishel reminded me that her grandfather Alden McCloud owned the Marathon. She is the daughter of Dorothy McCloud and Ray Runnells. Gary McCloud is the son of Alden.

Some things happen even among friends. The Delp family had always been friends of mine. Billy Delp had been a close friend. Well, for some reason in high school I must have looked at Jim Delp's girlfriend with too much of a sparkle in  my eye and we got into it there at the Marathon.

Jim was one year younger, but taller and more muscular. I was very skinny to put it mildly, but very strong from hard work and putting up hay. Normally I was an extremely peaceful person, but Jim kept egging me on. He hit a nerve, I grabbed a coke bottle like a crazy man, broke it on the floor and took after him. Before I got to my target, my mind sprung back into it's vacancy and I laid the bottle down. If I had not, no telling how badly this larger and stronger guy would have demolished me! Sometimes God watches over us fools.

Jim and I weren't as close after that, but we remained casual friends until I went off to college. I get reports that Jim has his own very successful business and a fine family. I still value the friendship and good times we had and as I sometimes still find a 7 ounce coke I reflect on that day!

Later on the fillin' station in vogue was Bill Stanton's. He didn't tolerate what others would. Bill was a great and sincere man and we loved that guy! His was the Standard Station on Milton and Main.

His Dad, Roy, I believe, hung around the station quite a bit. I believe the Stanton's were Kentuckians or maybe from West Virginia, but at any rate they were fellow hill people. Well, Roy did a hill thing for me!

I had a wart on my big knuckle on my right hand for six years. I tried everything to no avail. At Cascade I even eye dropped full strength sulfuric acid on that big old wart. It ran down the wart and burned me severely. I had to use baking soda at home to neutralize the acid (I had learned a little chemistry from this) because the pain was horrible. When the fire went out, I learned that the skin around the wart was burnt up, but the wart lived on!

Well, that's where Roy comes in. He said "Let me 'look' that wart away."This is some mountain heeby- jeebies",  I thought, because there are many superstitions in the hills. Well, old Roy took my hand, rubbed that wart and said "It will be gone in two weeks." I laughed, but thought little more about it. However, a week and a half later, after six years and numerous treatments which all failed, my wart was totally gone! Roy Stanton had "looked my wart away".

Upon investigation years later some authority told me what happened. It appears from what I'm told that some people have an oil in their skin which kills the virus that causes the wart. I don't know the truth of that, but it's more reasonable than Roy "looking it away". Perhaps Roy could show Dr. Ellett a thing or two at that time.

Fillin' stations were a part of our life, teen and adults, in Coatesville. That's where teens became adults. Children got their sex education there and it wasn't the best. Lying makes a good story and many lies were told at the Cities Service, Marathon and Standard Oil. I still have a proclivity for things oil. As I rummage flea markets there is a strong pull for those old memoirs on the shelves of stores which at one time were on the racks of gas stations.

One of our own; one of the gas station buddies lost his life in 1962. My brother remembers him well because he worked on that nice Chrysler for him. He died in the prime of life.  The Greencastle newspaper said it so short: "Gene Brock age 28 Feb 19, 1962 car accident". He is buried in Clayton Cemetery where all my family members are buried.  RIP Gene.

Yes, there are good and bad memories in Coatesville, but remembering the bad helps us all to create more good. Each person who lived then had his own fillin' station story. Mine are a few of many. Those were our second homes and the people there were our second families. The smell of gas to many of us is just a inducement to remember the past.

I wish I could tell other stories because it's those which may harm which come to mind. Because of living family members many secret stories shall remain secret. With that said, let's move on with our village people!

I remember James Allen "Jack" Bottorff and his wife Clara Belle Starr Bottorff. She was born in 1875 and he in 1883. Jack was from Clark County, Indiana and married Clara Belle in 1911 Marion County where they lived until at least 1940. They were in Coatesville when we moved there in 1957. Just about all memories of them were of them sitting on their front porch. Clara was quite an elderly woman by that time being 84 when we moved there.  She passed away in 1971. He died in 1976. Jack lied about his age probably to conceal that Clara was so much older. He told me before his death that he was 99 years old.

They lived north of Poff's on Milton Street. They would always wave as us kids passed by. After Clara Belle died, Jack lived with my parents who by that time lived next to the auction across from the cemetery. Jack was urinating with the bathroom door open. Mom passed by and jumped all over him. His excuse was "I thought we were just one big family!" Mom set him straight fast. They kept him for a year or two and I lost track of him. Likely he ended up in a nursing home before he died.

I told Jack that I was an engineer. He replied "I am too!" with glee. I then asked "What kind of engineer were you?" He shouted "There are only two kinds; stationary and locomotive and I was stationary!" I would suppose that he operated a steam boiler probably at Power and Light in Indianapolis where he lived until he retired. Of course he never realized that there were many kinds of engineers and that the definition had changed in modern times!

Albert Buffo lived next to us and across from Jack. He was a brother to George Boffo, Mike's and Pat's dad who lived on North Milton Street. When asked why his name was different Albert replied "Boffo sounded too proud." He was probably alluding to "boffo" meaning "successful".

He ran a small appliance store located between our home and his. By the time we moved there he was virtually retired. Albert was born in 1901 and his wife was Edith.  In 1965 there was a tragedy. Albert got breast cancer. That's not too common in men, but it does happen. At that time the prognosis was dire and death a painful one. Albert spared himself and Edith pain by taking his own life in 1965. Edith lived on there alone until 1980 when she passed.

Albert was always friendly to us because as a good neighbor his yard was our yard and his business was us kids business. Albert was out often tending his barn and one or two calves. Bobbi Runnells says that he had several ponies, Shetlands and horses; and built a pony cart. After being prompted, I do remember them! We used his yard for croquet at times because it was much smoother than ours and Bobbi Runnells and us kids would pitch ball and play in Albert's yard. Thank you belatedly Mr. Buffo for us kids ruining your privacy, but he was always gracious to us!

Beside Albert to the north was the widower Harmon Hathaway who owned Hathaway Printing on the corner of Milton and Main St. The paper was named The Coatesville Herald and according to Davidson, it was started by Harmons's father. Any news we had was given to Harmon. If I stayed all night with another kid, it would be in the weekly paper. The news in Coatesville seldom challenged the mind, but allowed us all to know our far away neighbors on North Milton much better!  There was little crime on which to report, but mostly pleasant and useful things. If one read the paper it was easily discovered why Coatesville was a dead little town!

In fact I would venture to say that little of wrong ever appeared in the paper. Good people exercise discretion, and I'm sure many well-known violations went unreported to save embarrassment to good families.

Harmon Halliday Hathaway was born in 1897 in Delaware County, Indiana and died in 1978. He was married to Grace Walton who died in 1976 after being hospitalized in Madison, Indiana. His father was Horace Hathaway. Grace's dad was John Walton. Pete Walton, who later became marshal, was Doris Runnells' cousin. Harmon was a thinned haired man, almost bald with a full face and nose. He wore wire rimmed glasses and seemed to have an air of business about him continually His attire was always a dark green uniform. . He was a friendly person, taking time out to give us kids attention. Herb Hathaway was his son. He was called "Mugs", but I remember little about him.

Doris was Harmon's daughter and was divorced from Robert Runnells to whom was born a daughter Roberta (duh, 2 + 2 does equal 4!). I called her Roberta until high school when she took on the name Bobbi long before that. Her sister was Joanna Runnells and was a few years older than Bobbi.

Bobbi was a close friend from day one and still is. She married Pete Kelley and still lives in Coatesville. Many hours were spent playing boy games with Bobbi, she willingly being a tomboy.

Doris and Mom visited quite often. The most prominent thing I remember about Doris is that she loved her cigarettes. (Since I too was a smoker, it's fair to tell on others as well!). In those days in Coatesville women smoking was rare. That's why I remember it. Women may have smoked, but in secret. Doris smoked in public. It may seem strange that I mention this to you many women smoking, but yes "you've come a long way baby!" and all of it isn't so good.

Like all our neighbors these people are good people. Doris died in 1973. Her memory is still alive right here! Joanna got married and lived on the corner of Heavin Street and IN-75.

As for men, most men smoked. Many smoked cigars and some chewed. Tom Underwood's father did both. I remember him well. He was part of the grapevine at the gas stations. Andrew was born in 1905 and was from Marion County, His wife was Ruth.  Andy died in 1990. He was really a nice guy. He was a large man of noble girth, unlike Tom whose Indiana State Police vocation kept him lean, but not mean!

We all loved Andy. He was a good man. Likewise, if a person would ask me who was the most respected man in Coatesville, I would say Joe Davidson. If they asked "In the county?" I would say Tom Underwood. He lived outside town with his family more south of Amo, but he was always considered a part of Coatesville. It's great to see that he is still active!

Herrin's often got in trouble with the law. It was usually car related, but Tom always treated is fairly. On a couple occasions he offered our family good advice.  Police were respected in the mid 1960s. They don't get the respect they're due today. They risk their lives even sitting in the comfort of their own home!

Tom had a brother, Jerry Underwood. He was with IBM and had moved to Pennsylvania where he died at the young age of 47. Tom and Jerry (I need some ice cream for some reason) had a sister named Peggy.

There are many stories in Coatesville. I wish I could remember them all. Dad would sit with Joe Davidson, his good friend, and talk history and genealogy quite often. Joe had a mind like a steel trap. Because he was one of the older men, and most intelligent, he was virtually a walking history book. Just as Joe did before me as a mentor in school and as a neighbor, I will do the same in Bowling Green and Franklin, Kentucky; I always take note of changes and speak of what "was there" and who "formerly lived there".  Because Joe trapped it in his mind, it reappeared in his Brief History of Coatesville. For those who have not read it the link is:Brief History of Coatesville. This is the revised version by Jerri Bryant Wingler. I think you will enjoy it!