ON CONFORMITY AND NON-COMFORMITY

 

In vogue at the present, maybe worse now since the day of Louis the XIV^th, is everyone doing their own thing and presenting their own image to the public. (see Louis in the figure below.)

If Louis was alive today, he would be a spectacle. Everyone would notice him immediately because he is dressed so gaudily, even androgenous!

He meant to stand out above the citizenry who dressed more appropriately for their class and professions. Imagine the local blacksmith dressing as if royalty; it is hard to even imagine!

Louis wanted himself to be the center of attention. So much so that he spent much on his wigs and wardrobe. Real men, as seen by most, would want to look masculine and rugged. Louis was admired by many, so much that many dressed like him, but they were more trying to identify with royalty than this vain old man.

Vanity is “inflated pride in oneself or one's appearance” (Merriam-Webster, Inc. 1982). Do you not think that Louis just might have inflated pride in both himself, and his appearance? The best guess is that Louis was a vain man.

It is likely that beneath that wig was either one or three things: a balding head, gray hair, or perhaps even lice or disease. Rather than fix what they had, since they could not, they concealed it. Louis, although covering his true appearance was still an old, balding gray-haired man beneath the façade!

What real men do is deal with it. What true woman do is deal with it. This portrait was the French monarch’s way of death becoming him, in the same manner as the modern movie, “Death Becomes Her.”

Louis was dying and so was the House of Capet. By the time the XVI^th came along, his grandson, he was mere “Citizen Louis Capet” during the First French Republic. The pomp of the royal house was circumcised and with the Revolution, sans coulottes was the style, and further royalty were reimaged as mere citizens.

The Capets all lost their pomp. Like prideful Lucifer in the beginning, their “Image” was cast out of “paradise.”

However, this commentary is neither about French royalty nor even Lucifer; it is about society today. Today’s society is little different than at any other time. In fact, mankind’s problem is not even Satan but themselves. Satan is weak and has no power to force anyone to do anything. Each man (and woman) is in it for themselves. However, everyone is born with the pompous nature of Lucifer, even Louis the XIV^th. You and I are as well but most often not to that degree.

During the 1980s I was General Motors High-Tech representative, and I played the part. When visiting my contractors and assembly plants, I would always wear a dark three-piece suit as was the custom of that time.

One day as six of us were on the elevator, I noticed that all of us were wearing black three-piece suits, and it struck me that we all looked like penguins. We had all conformed, not to society, but to the business model. Our clothing made a statement about us; that was shouted loud and clear; we work for the biggest corporation in the world, and we are important! We were all as pompous as Louis the XIV^th.

I had conformed to my world, but to society, we stuck out; our importance was overly exaggerated because of our manner of dressing.

Soon, I changed my apparel to nice khakis and sports jacket. In a short time, I was only wearing khakis, a button-down shirt and a necktie.

That was ordinary dress of that era. I had gone from Louis the XIV^th in dress to “Citizen Herrin.”  I no longer conformed to my world but was reformed to a less noticeable image. My apparel matched my self-estimation. I was not a GM executive at all, but mid-level manager. I was one of the ordinary. To this day, I still do not seek to stand out from the ordinary.

Let us put this in more perspective. Let us say that today is beach day. If a woman dresses in a teensy-weensy tiny bikini, they will stand out. Surely, some women do that to be noticed and noticed they are. No longer is the beach the center of attraction; they are!

Or suppose that same woman wears extremely modest garb like many Muslim women do at the present. No longer does the beach stand out but the woman does as well. It draws as much attention as the tiny bikini.

However, if the same woman dresses both modestly and unobtrusively, she will go unnoticed.

On the other hand, if all the women someday dress immodestly, a woman should not conform to them because they would all be immodest.

When the word, “modest” is used, it has more than one meaning. It is not only keeping the flesh covered but also unpretentiousness (ibid).

Louis the XIV^th was well-covered but pretentious. Even though he was of the House of Capet, in his day, he magnified their name by being over pretentious. He was royalty and everybody knew it.

Peter the Great was royalty as well but he dressed unpretentiously not to be noticed. Louis and Peter were both royalty with equal powers, but Peter was merely “Citizen Romanov” to the public and when he visited France.

Pretending to be who you are not is pretentious.

When I was dating, to attract younger women, I “cleverly” disguised myself as “Youthful Larry.” I died my hair dark brown and played volleyball with the younger folks. I was pretending to be what I was not — a middle-aged man who wanted to be accepted by those younger than myself.

It was when I dated a younger woman that I came to realize that I was not young. Hair dye and running shorts did not make me young. Probably to the younger set, I may have looked more like Louis the XV^th than I did Peter the Great.

At that time, I had conformed to the dress code of the younger generation to be young again, but others of my age may have seen me as a spectacle. Being with a much younger woman did not make me any younger than the brown dye on my hair. I had conformed to their world to be accepted in it but all the while, inside, I felt like I was their babysitter!

I did not look like a young man but stood out amongst them as a silly-looking older man. I was pretentious and was as pompous as Louis and probably looked that way to the younger set.

We are to be what we are! When I was poor, I dressed appropriately as a poor man would dress — modest and without pretense. That is genuine.

When I was more successful, I dressed for success but still did not overdress for my social status. I was proud that I was better off but did not pretend that I was better off than I was. Neither did I underdress to flaunt my poor roots. I fit into the world but was not of the world. By that I mean that the world did not make me, God did, and I had not conformed to the world but to God.

God does not want us to fit into the world but stick out. Not so far out that we become the center of attention but just enough that others would want to model us.

For instance, I do not drink alcohol but am modest about it so as not to offend others nor to appear self-righteous. I try to model Jesus who I believe was a tee-totaling Nazarite.

However, I am not a Nazarite and never pretend to be but by observation, some of my friends have either ceased drinking alcoholic beverages or reduced their consumption. They may see that I am content with being just me and not a “party animal.” On the other hand, if I act righteous, knowing that I am often not, then they would see me as pretentious. So, pretentiousness can also be behavior oriented.

Some visiting or lay preachers, when they are called upon to preach, put on their “preacher suits” to pretend that they are real, honest to goodness preachers. They spit-shine their shoes just for that hour and dress impeccably to present an image as if they are preachers. To some, those pretenders look more like Louis the XIV^th than they do Jesus! They overdress to seem what they are not.

On the other hand, some preachers dress too casually to appear to be just one of the guys. Contemporary preachers do that often and in doing so, they look pretentious as well. They should wear modest clothing and that pertains to both gaudiness and casualness. To appear too casual reeks of slothfulness.

What should we be and what should we do? 

Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect. (Rom 12:2 ESV)

 In whatever we do, we are not to conform to this world. Just as God has His standards, so does the world! God’s standards are written in scripture, but the standards of the world are beyond scripture, to wit: 

“In those days there was no king in Israel. Everyone did what was right in his own eyes” (Jud 17:6)

 Therefore, conforming to the world is doing whatever it is that you want to do without regard to God’s standards. It is doing things as if there are no standards at all. We see that often today with cross-dressing and transsexuality, or even as androgyny.

We see it in immodest dress and dressing as if you are someone that you are not.

I was not that cool guy with dark brown hair but a mature man with graying hair. Some saw the “old man” in me despite the hair dye and underperformance as an obsolete athlete.  I did much better with the genuine me than the pretentious me and obtained a beautiful wife closer to my age who accepts me as me!

Today, tattoos and piercings are in vogue. Some young girls and guys look cute with them, but old guys and gals who try to exaggerate their beauty the same way look pretentious. They do not look cute but often enhance their “ordinariness” to put it mildly. Rather than fitting in they stand out much as a tattooed fat lady becomes a “circus freak” that some will pay to see.

Not to pick on just the obvious, but those big lips from Botox® look hideous compared to naturally thick lips of girls still in their prime and as age increases so will the pretentiousness!

God wants us to be as He designed us, not according to our own designs. Speaking of the pretentious, Paul wrote: 

¹⁹ Their end is destruction, their god is their belly, and they glory in their shame, with minds set on earthly things. 20 But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, 21 who will transform our lowly body to be like his glorious body… (Phil 3:19-21)

 The pretentious are those who conform to the world “with their minds set of earthly things” that are unimportant in the long term. Even genuine people are not to conform to the world even for special occasions. We are all to live with who we are and without pretention. Sure, people are looking at us, but our desire should not be looked upon in awe but at who we really are!

It is written that the pretentious “glory in their shame;” that magnify themselves as if they are gods rather than glorifying God in whose Image they were made.

Conforming to the world may gain friends, for a while, but glory from God is eternal. Glory is not in earthly things, but are in the new creatures who reject conformance to the world. Get this; we are to be like Jesus, who will “transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body.”

We need not change our appearance or character to fit the world but wait for God to glorify us. Adorning the body with dyes and flashy clothes is us making ourselves to be the “gods” but what God awaits is us presenting our bodies a living sacrifice to Him (Rom 12:1).

An acceptable sacrifice to God is not a made-up creature but the purest of the pure. It is the prime firstborn of the flock (Deut 15:9) and for Jacob, those lambs with brown streaks that God provided to him were acceptable sacrifices. He brought them to God just as they were, not all shorn of the brown streaks but just as they were.

Ironically, many who try not to conform to the world often end up conforming to the worst of the world. Many dress alternately in defiance of others, and as such cause a counter-culture of a bunch of conformers who fail to realize that even as non-conformists, they have conformed!

It works the other way as well; even those ordinary women who act as if they are the “Real Housewives of Whatever County,” conform to pretend standards as well.

The only one to whom we should conform is Jesus. He wore unobtrusive, non-pretentious clothing that was hardly worth gambling to gain! His claim to fame was as a mere carpenter but the Greeks knew that He was the Technician (Tekon) of the highest degree. This man who created heaven and earth, was satisfied with carrying His own cross, even though Simon stepped in.

Jesus was never pretentious, never claimed to be king of the Jews nor even High Priest. He showed that He was merely God in the Flesh and did so without fanfare. He came not to sin but to deliver from sin. He did not want the Jews to conform to the man, Jesus, but to the God, Jesus! It was not His flesh that he cared for but the Holy Ghost within that humble flesh.

So, you act like royalty, or maybe act as if you are a bum. Either way, God is not impressed; He wants you as you are!

When I was a youth, I worked at being good, but all attempts were futile. It was not in my nature to be good, but God was not after pure sheep, He was after those with Jacobian brown streaks within. Finally, when I came to Jesus streaks and all — unpretentious — only then was I an acceptable sacrifice.

How is it that God wants you? Just as you are. You should not put on airs, nor should you falsely present yourself in any manner; ““God opposes the proud but gives grace to the humble.” Submit yourselves therefore to God (Jas 4:6-7).

The one that looks as outrageous as Louis XIV^th  in any way is not an acceptable sacrifice, whether it be in gaudy wedding attire or party animal. We should come the wedding just as we are; that is the wedding of the Church to the Bridegroom, Jesus.

Just as we are is not a made up version but plain for all to see!

ON TRANSHUMANISM - Part 26

 CRISPR AND AI

 The doctor rolled his eyes when I mentioned CRISPR. He either had not heard of it or was surprised that I knew about it.

CRISPR is an acronym for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. That sounds benign, but is it really? 

Palindromic is simply the same repeat forward and backward. So far, so good.

Cas9 enzymes are protein sequences that are used to edit genes in any organism, not necessarily just bacteria and archaea. Together CRISPR-Cas9 can be used for editing the human genome by cutting out one sequence and splicing in another sequence in its place.  (Roll your eyes now! That sounds like science fiction, but it is not.)

Ostensibly, CRISPR-Cas9 was developed for the good of mankind. One source, calling it “The Genesis Engine,” instructing readers to “buckle up” because the easy DNA editing CRISPR enables will change the world” (Harper 2015).

Note that CRISPR was known previously to COVID19 and merely awaited a “serious crisis” such as a pandemic. The pandemic changed the world and changed the attitude of the people within it. It proved that people would obey at any cost to do things sane people would never do… such as stand in line to take a series of injections which had not been sufficiently proven.

The messenger-RNA in the jabs for COVID was a sort of test run; to see if people would subject themselves to experimentation even in a very Mengelian fashion. [1] Biden was disappointed because many astute people failed to comply with his mandates and the President showed the same anger as my primary-care physician.

Eugenics is basically for the “good” of the genetics of organisms, and especially for human organisms.

The problem with eugenics is good for whom?

Mengele presented eugenics as good for the infirm but as it turned out; it was for the good of the regime. That meant that many human organisms had to die for the good of the people. Among those were millions of Jews who would die for the common good. They lined up at train stations as mandated just to be taken to slaughterhouses like swine.

Because of the times, genes could not be edited so the logical thing to do was for Nazis to edit out unwanted genetics and splice in nothing.

Jewish people were treated as if beasts or even sub-human parasites! When they died, it was as much as treating a plague. They were gassed much like spiders and mosquitos, all for the good of the Reich.

So be careful what “good” means! Dysgenics is “the study of the accumulation and perpetuation of defective genes and traits in a population, race, or species” (Merriam-Webster Dict. 1828-2022).

Saying they were “studying eugenics,” Nazis were performing dysgenics. It was more than studying genetically inferiors but eliminating them! Not that Jews and the infirm were lesser people, but by Nazi metrics, they were considered inferiors, notwithstanding that the Jewish population was the brightest and most successful!

CRISPR-Cas9 is said to be good: 

The ability to rewrite the genetic code for life is a powerful one.

In the past few years, scientists have revolutionized our ability to do so with the discovery and refinement of a molecular tool called CRISPR that allows us to edit sections of DNA. This tool can snip specific parts of genetic code out and replace them with new segments, eliminating diseases or giving creatures whole new traits. (Loria 2018)

 Bill Gates and his colleagues financed the development of CRISPR-Cas9 for $120,000,000. His goal was to provide extended life by eliminating disease. Scripture says things like to make a name for themselves (Gen 11:4). Perhaps that is Gates’s desire!

Christians rely on God for eternal life and here we have Bill Gates, the modern-day “Nimrod,” stalking God with his own fabricated “tower to heaven.” If Christians depend on Gates and technology, just where will the Tekton, Jesus, come into the picture? Jesus revealed that with the recount of how the Israelites who were bitten by deadly snakes would live if they only looked to Jesus, but if by their own devices, they would die (John 3:14).

Even if CRISPR-Cas9 is good; it is bad because God is canceled out of culture, and the “mighty hunter,” Gates, takes a shot at God and not just at ourselves.

If you want an extra fifteen years or so, just pray earnestly for it; King Hezekiah did that and by the use of a poultice of figs: 

⁵ Thus, saith the Lord, the God of David thy father, “I have heard thy prayer, I have seen thy tears: behold, I will heal thee: on the third day thou shalt go up unto the house of the Lord. ⁶ And I will add unto thy days fifteen years… (2 Kings 20:5-6)

 The poultice was credited, and not God, so the next fifteen years was one tribulation after another, even with that godly man.

God added time to Hezekiah’s life, and so may Bill Gates’s concoction. The problem was that Hezekiah was no longer the same inside because he trusted the poultice and Christians would not be the same inside for trusting Bill Gates’s solution! Remember from the story of Moses how magicians could mimic the miracles of God. That still applies!

Not said but imperative; Hezekiah depended on figs for healing. Not by coincidence, Adam depended on figs for wisdom beyond what God gave in partaking of the fig tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Just as the Tree of Life is in each of us, and by that, I mean the Genome of God, so is the Tree of Knowledge. Mankind has two “trees” within and because God is still in us to some extent, He has grace. The forbidden fruit of the tree is genetic as well and it is in all of us… in our nature: 

¹⁹ Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, ²⁰ idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, ²¹ envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like… (Gal 5:19-20)

 How much clearer does it need to be? The flesh is our genomes. Within the nature of man are all those evil things. Because sin is in our very identity — in our DNA — means that any work that we do is not efficacious. CRISPR-Cas9 has the capability of gene editing. It would be good if CRISPR could edit out all those genetic traits but that would make mankind the gods!

On the other hand, what could be spliced-in? 

²² But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, ²³ meekness, temperance: against such there is no law. (Gal 5:22-23)

 God could have genned us that way and He did. However, the genes of the Wicked One edited-out those traits and provided the traits that lead to death from the previous list.

If technology removes the choices from those, then God is history. Relying on mankind to do the things of God would be as crucifying Him again.

But what if the doctors are like Mengele? What if they require super-soldiers as Hitler needed for the Blitzkreig? Whereas Nazis invented crystal methadone to create fearless and carefree soldiers, what if nefarious governments desire to do the same?

Well, China has announced that initiative; they will create a new strand of Nazi super-soldiers [2] using CRISPR-Cas9. (Keown 2020). Not that they already have done that, but that is their goal, and according to CRISPR claims, that seems quite rational and possible.

Recall the two trees of the Garden of Eden? The Tree of Life was the bright side. If it was a genetic tree, then all things would be good! On the other hand, the Tree of Knowledge had both a bright side and a dark side — good and evil. Since it was of God, it was good, but because of its misuse, it could be evil. All things have two sides now, especially people!

Referring to CRISPR-Cas9, many find it worrisome:

But there’s a dark side to CRISPR. A scientist or biohacker with basic lab know-how could conceivably buy DNA sequences and, using CRISPR, edit them to make an even more panic-inducing bacteria or virus. What’s to stop a rogue scientist from using CRISPR to conjure up an even deadlier version of Ebola or a more transmissible SARS? (Baer 2020)

 That is indeed a dark side to CRISPR technology, but it could get darker! What if China is successful with their creation of super-soldiers? What if some dictator mandates silly things and people fail to comply? Then that foolish government could create “compliant man”!

Is it possible to change the nature of man so that all good is gone and evil spliced in? With Lucifer, nearly anything is possible! What is not possible for him is goodness.

Looking further down the pike, would it be possible to create transhumans with CRISPR-Cas9? Satan already has done that, but can the depraved be made totally depraved? Depravity is in those with the nature of the Beast. Is it possible to make androids that think and act as humans? Recent technology reveals that we are close:

LaMDA’s conversational skills have been years in the making. Like many recent language models, including BERT and GPT-3, it’s built on Transformer, a neural network architecture that Google Research invented and open-sourced in 2017. That architecture produces a model that can be trained to read many words (a sentence or paragraph, for example), pay attention to how those words relate to one another and then predict what words it thinks will come next.

But unlike most other language models, LaMDA was trained on dialogue. During its training, it picked up on several of the nuances that distinguish open-ended conversation from other forms of language. One of those nuances is sensibleness…

But the most important question we ask ourselves when it comes to our technologies is whether they adhere to our AI Principles. Language might be one of humanity’s greatest tools, but like all tools it can be misused. Models trained on language can propagate that misuse — for instance, by internalizing biases, mirroring hateful speech, or replicating misleading information. And even when the language it’s trained on is carefully vetted, the model itself can still be put to ill use. (Collins 2021) 

LaMDA is the model for WOKE speech and WOKE-think. The synthetic speech and thoughts of whatever transhumans that come about must be acceptable speech. What have we learned from the current administration? That MAGA speech is hate speech and his (Biden’s) meanness is love.

What principle is that? Popper’s Paradox of Tolerance — “in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must retain the right to be intolerant of intolerance” (Wikipedia 2001). It is therefore okay to hate the hateful, or at least hate those who the intolerant has defined as “hateful.”

With that said, LaMDA could be programmed with that paradox and kill with the motivation of improving the world.

LaMDA would merely be the speech and thought of the transhuman. LaMDA would require a body to be considered human. Already, technicians have created a robot that can excel any activities of human beings that is even more flexible and daring than the best acrobats. 

The conference covers a wide range of topics related to Robot and Human Interactive Communication, involving theories, methodologies, technologies, empirical and experimental studies. Papers related to the study of robotic technology, psychology, cognitive science, artificial intelligence, human factors, ethics and policies, interaction-based robot design and other topics related to human-robot interaction are welcome. (31st IEEE International Conference 2022)

 To view the robots with artificial intelligence (AI) one only need to view a video on YouTube® (World Robot Conference 2022). Even Albert Einstein was created in physical features and thoughts!

Artificial intelligence (AI) is here! AI is more intelligence than all the knowledge of the world combined. Remember the earlier chapter about Wikipedia and its synthetization in genetics? That is AI. Why would anyone even need all that artificial knowledge? To overcome God!

Now back to my discussion with the doctor. His knowledge base was greater than mine, but his wisdom was certainly not as keen. I believe that I have a gift of discernment as I test all things by scripture.

My doctor, I am sure, means well but he is looking at only the positive aspects. All goodness can be abused and transformed into evil. Why fear genetic editing? Because of its potential to be used for harm.

Who generally receives the harm? Those who fail to comply with the standards of the economy in which they live.

Jews suffered harm because their genes were considered inferior, even dangerous. Christians — the “Confessing Church” — led by Dietrich Bonnhoeffer suffered greatly because they just would not comply with Nazi standards. True Christians would not stand idly by as any group suffers persecution but today Christians stand silently by as the germline of so many is cut off with abortion!

Jews are always the persecuted, but after they gained power, the Nazis had their “Night of Long Knives” wherein their allies were killed. They had even used homosexuals to gain power but once they had power, homosexuals were targeted by the long knives.

Likewise, the Nazis used the church but once they had power, they took over the church and Christianity became Aryanism wherein other races were unwelcome.

The nature of man since the fall has been to misuse good for evil. It is in the genes. Those who think that CRISPR is for the good of mankind do not know the nature of mankind.

My doctor has that mentality. He sees only good. He is a United Methodist and for the most part, their gospel is the “social gospel,” and church is for the good of mankind.  That doctrine is humanism, but a great many confessing Christians still attend the United Methodist Church even though they deviate from traditional Christianity on abortion, homosexuality, and true divine justice.

Rather than blaming the doctor for his attitude, perhaps he is only following his religion.

The German Nazi Church was called “Positive Christianity” wherein Jewishness was eliminated, and the genome of Jesus was even made Aryan. United Methodism has many similarities to Positive Christianity.

I was once a United Methodist but saw the error in their doctrine. Just as with any denomination, the doctrine does not define the Christian and there remain many righteous Methodists. The problem is their future. Just to whom will they serve?

My doctor may possibly serve science. His attitude revealed his inner self. It was obvious that he trusted science over Christian doctrine as he rolled his eyes when I quoted scripture.

Much can be said about transhumanism but in this age, we are there. The Tree of Knowledge has budded a new creature that is neither human nor machine but transhuman. They are meant to serve us but with superior knowledge and Luciferin wisdom, perhaps we shall serve them.

Ironically, just as the created turned on the Creator in the beginning, the created androids may turn on their creators in the ending. Imagine, if you can, artificial pseudo-Einstein making a fool of Bill Gates. That could happen with modern technology, or even Satan making a fool of us for standing silently by while it happens. (Eye-roll here, I guess.)

---

[1] Josef Mengele was the Nazi doctor who ran genetic experiments on Germans during the Third Reich. Those experiments in eugenics were so grotesque that Mengele is now known as the epitome of evil. Nazism differs from regular Marxist fascism in that its purpose was to rid the world of inferior peoples using eugenics.

[2] Because eugenics defines Nazis, then any Marxist government that uses eugenics would be Nazi-like, and that applies to American political ideology.

ON TRANSHUMANISM - Part 25

 THE APOCALYPSE 

Thus far, this book has been about the ontology of the world — its beginning and existence. People, even Christians, roll their eyes at even the mention of the apocalypse as if it will never take place — it is the complete and final destruction of the world. They miss the point about the restoration of the world as it will be as in the beginning… with a new heaven and a new earth, as the prophet, Isaiah called to mind: “For, behold, I (God) create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind” (Isa 65:17). John was revealed that new heaven and earth (Rev 21:1) in much the same manner that Enoch was revealed the existing heaven and earth.

Christians ought to look forward to the end because on the other side of the ending is a new beginning, The “Utopia” that Marx dreamed of on Earth is not that Paradise. Marx’s “paradise” will go up in flames! People generally look toward the land and prosperity (“It is the economy, stupid,” as Bill Clinton declared), but it is a brand new economy to which Christians should look forward.

The economy of the world is obvious; What is in it for me? as each asks himself. Everybody has devolved to that state.

In the beginning, the economy was already free things: “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat” (Gen 2:16), people would have eternal lives, and both men and women would have dominion above all the others of the animal kind (Gen 1:26).

Adam and Eve lived in the perfect economy and all things were “very good” (Gen 1:31). However, sin revealed that they were not happy with that economy because there was a forbidden economy available “beautiful, pleasant, good-testing things that belonged to God that Lucifer would take from God and freely redistribute. Right then, the concept of socialism was created, and the Jew, Marx, may have understood that; that essentially shiny things will distract about anybody whether they are good or not!

The economy after the apocalypse will not be “very good” but totally good because there will only be one economy to desire, and that is God the Provider of all things.

The LORD GOD was the “Lord” in the original economy and Adam and Eve desired to obey Him, but the shiny objects were just too attractive. After sin, it is implied that the economy changed: Lucifer — the other “image” became her new lord (Gen 4:1).

Thereafter, until God covered her with a coat of skin alongside Adam, Lucifer was her “lord” and afterward Lucifer often endeavored for them to take off the Garments of God so that his fiery darts could further alter their nature. With sin, the “natural man” was created from the “divine man” and the economy altered to suit the new nature of the two human beings.

The economy of post-sin Eden is described in Genesis chapter three, and it was not good at all, but hard work just to exist.

First off, the change was their flesh. Before sin, their flesh was divine like Jesus (Gen 1:26). It would have been incorruptible flesh like at the Resurrection of Jesus and would be eternal. Something huge happened to Adam and Eve. Their flesh changed, and it was no longer in the Image of God but the very image of the Wicked One. (The Hebrew word for “serpent” corresponds with “image” as well.)

That their flesh changed is significant! Before their genes were dominant and there were no recessive genes to be found in them. I propose that the fiery darts of the Wicked One penetrated the flesh of Adam and Eve with some newfound carnal knowledge. That Cain is of the Wicked One (1 John 3:12) validates that hypothesis. The assumption is that since Eve was directly from the image of Adam that God engendered her from the genome of the man, and was thus “woman.” They were both engendered with the Genome — the Image of God — but with a slight difference. As one flesh they must complement each other, and the female’s purpose was to complement the male’s (Gen 2:18). Their genders were not important because in that economy, reproduction would be genetic in a sort of “cloning” process.

With sin and new flesh of which they felt guilty, especially of their newly acquired pudenda, they felt shame and covered it with fig leaves. (Gen 3:7). The reproductive activity would be altered with sin, and the natural man would become as the beasts that copulate instinctively. [1] Hence, the natural man is still of the Genome of God but with the recessive genes of that unholy “awful image” called the “Serpent.”

So, what is a recessive gene and why should anyone care? 

Recessive, as related to genetics, refers to the relationship between an observed trait and the two inherited versions of a gene related to that trait. Individuals inherit two versions of each gene, known as alleles, from each parent. In the case of a recessive trait, the alleles of the trait-causing gene are the same, and both (recessive) alleles must be present to express the trait. A recessive allele does not produce a trait at all when only one copy is present. This contrasts to a dominant trait, which requires that only one of the two alleles be present to express the trait. (US Gov 2022)

 Adam and Eve while in the Garden both would have dominant genes — two versions of the same gene (ibid) and with them both different than the other species. With that said, natural man cannot even mate with beasts, although some tried mating humans to gorillas. The result was death! In other words, physical “death” in the eyes of God is transhumanism and as such bestiality is offensive to God, and “Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death” (Exod 22:19).

Not only will copulation cause the offspring to die but by that offense the “beast” in the woman or man deserves death. By this time in history, pornography is the new economy of doing such things. Whereas beasts have coitus without shame, mankind is worse; they even film it!

God desires to protect what of His Genes that still resides in us, even recessive genes. He wants His experiment in human beings to be so successful that he will provide grace to all who seek it… even transsexuals and trans-kinds.

When Abraham and Lot ventured north out of Egypt, they stumbled upon Sodom and Gomorrah, “even as the Garden of the Lord” (Gen 13:10). Not only that, they saw the River of the Garden (the Jordan) and its valley. Abraham had been drawn to the Garden of Eden and what he found there was disgusting: 

¹ There came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground… ⁴ But before they lay down (later that evening), the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: ⁵ And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them. (Gen 19:1,4-5) 

There were two offenses in one: homosexuality and bestiality, not that the holy angels were “beasts,” but the men of Sodom were. Like lions in the prowl, they encircled the men-angels to have sex with them… right there in the Garden of Eden that had devolved to that degree.

God never intended for recessive genes to be in humans. They were dominant; both Adam and Eve and with sin, recessive genes were introduced, referring “to the relationship between an observed trait and the two inherited versions of a gene related to that trait.”

The observable trait of Adam and Eve was that they were human beings. They were not angels, either good or demonic. However, lying within their alleles were two inherited traits of both good and evil. Rather than divine, after sin, they retained the Genome of God which is “good” but were somehow regenned by the other “Image” with evil.

Sin should be recessive and may even be in children. On the other hand, even tame animals revert to a feral nature when released into a new economy. That is what God did to Adam and Eve; God gave them their freedom and in the wild, and before long, mankind had all become feral thanks to the recessive gene from the “Serpent.”

When I write “Serpent,” I am not writing about a snake at all, but the nature of the “Shadow” of Lucifer. Snakes are deaf and dumb, but their nature is for survival. They will mate at will and kill with impunity! Mankind has received the nature of the beasts and would fight for their own survival to remain the dominant species. Hence, mankind is much more like the animal kingdom than we think!

Cain was of the germline of Lucifer and Eve. He was the first “transhuman.” It appears that Abel was the son of God and Eve, and he transcended sin because the Genome of God was multiplied in him.

Seth was the son of Adam and Eve — the replacement for Abel who died for the sin of Cain. What was the sin of Cain? He cut off the righteous branch from the Tree of Life and left his intact. Grace could have increased with Abel, but Cain cut off his genome with the divine Genome of God within. With that, Adam and Eve created their own kind, recessive genes and all, and grafted Seth’s genome back onto the Tree of Life. They did that, not God. Adam became the “husbandman” in the place of God.

The germline of Seth lived righteously on Holy Mount Herman until they saw the “shiny objects” on the plain below: hard alcohol, hard music, Hedonism, homosexuality, pedophilia, and the mixing of the genes of Cain, possibly marked with giantism and angelic beings from above. [2]

All those sins would be abominations, but depravity is associated with the genome of the people. The worst depravity, total or not, was symbiosis: “the living together in more or less intimate association or close union of two dissimilar organisms” (Merriam-Webster, Inc. 1982). The angels and humans were dissimilar and so were the giants and the natural men and women.

The disgusting things of the days of Noah appear to be many, but more predominantly, the mixing of recessive genes with dominant ones seems to cause total depravity.

When theologians refer to Adam’s sin, it is called “original sin” and since “all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23), original sin changed the nature of man from glorious to inglorious. Implied is that sin is genetic and that we all have the genome of Lucifer in us. His nature is ours, and the Shadow of the Wicked One is in our recessive genes. It is the nature of man to be as beasts!

Generally, our nature is to act righteous in one economy and act the beast in another economy. Just as the economy of Sodom was paradisical in the beginning and disgusting by the time Abraham arrived, even the Church is suffering in this day from carnality!

When the Church becomes as the world, then it must be by the Great Reset of God — destruction followed by a new heaven and a new earth. The modern church will go up in flames with the destruction of the world. When? In God’s time not ours!

“Germline” has been mentioned several times. I end this chapter with a personal account.

A germline is “the population of a multicellular organism's cells that pass on their genetic material to the progeny (offspring)” (Wikipedia 2001). For humans, our germline is our offspring. They share the genome of both the mother and the father and are a symbiotic representation of the two. They are little you’s whether male or female. Your germline is the planting of your seed into the world. If that germline is interrupted, one branch of the Tree of Life is pruned off for good and the “germ” from you dies.

Mankind is the Tree of Life and Jesus is the “Vine” and we are the “branches” (John 15:55). The Tree of Life is the very Genome of God, the “Husbandman.” That Jesus is the “Vine” from which all mankind has sprung, then we all had a figment of Jesus in us from the start.

“In Christ” is in the Genome of the Flesh of God, albeit we remain endangered because of the recessive genes of Lucifer. Like Seth’s germline, we can be attracted to the world and fall away.

The point there is that the germline of mankind is imperative doctrine. Murder is an offense because it is us who become the “husbandman” rather than God. We become “as God” just as the Serpent said (Gen 2:5).

Murder is cutting off a branch of the Genome of God. He can do that as the Husbandman, but our responsibility is to “dress and keep the Garden” (Gen 2:15) (That would be God’s Genome that He planted). But death is more than killing the flesh but cutting off the soul. The soul is the inner nature of man, and only God has the right to perish the soul (Mat 1:28).

Murder is cutting off human potential in that God planted immortal souls in the Garden of God. He planted His on “Seed” — the very “Semen” of God as the figurative meaning of “waters.”

Nobody has the right to prune from the Tree of Life but God. Murder violates that authority. Lucifer violated that right when he “murdered” Cain, so to speak. Cain’s genome was different, and Lucifer became the recessive gene in him, and by the time of the flood, Cain’s germline had become dominant.

With that background, my own doctor yelled with arrogance when I mentioned the dangers of CRISPR technology. CRISPR are synthetic genetics that are passed down to the germline. Even fools who take illicit drugs would not endanger passing along addictions to their offspring… until now that is common because they do not care about their own germline!

When I told the doctor that, he responded, “I don’t care about the germline!” He said that harshly and angrily. Indeed, I got the point; he does not care about potential life, and he calls himself “doctor”!

The problem with abortion fanatics is that they do not care about their own germline, and especially not your germline. Because humans are nothing more than “organisms” in their domain, then organisms are inhuman. To them, our souls are not worth the genes that they are imprinted upon.

My doctor may as well have asked, “Who cares about human life?” His obvious answer, would be “Not me!”

I did not ask, but that declaration seemed to make him an abortion proponent as well as favorable to CRISPR. CRISPR cuts and pastes in synthetic DNA which results in a person and a potential child a little less than human. How much less depends on how many generations use CRISPR. The good doctor said, “That is the future, so get used to it!”

“Not me!” I responded as he rolled his bulging eyes.

---

[1] I doubt that you will ever hear a sermon that may tell it like this, but about anyone knows how powerful the sexual instinct can be, and there was no such instinct while in the Garden.

[2] This economy was not assumed by the writer but collected from the various sources of pseudepigrapha.

(picture credit: expii.com; "Alleles")

ON THEODYNAMICS

 Many have heard of thermodynamics, but how about "Theodynamics"?

Look for a moment at the scientific word, “thermodynamics.” The suffix “ics” implies science, and “thermo” means heat. Dynamics is “the moving physical or moral force in anything” (Etymology Online), so “thermodynamics” is the scientific representation of the physical or moral force in anything. Most scientists exclude the moral force that acts on things and think only of the physical forces.

When God created the heaven and the earth, “day” therein is literally a time of warming, and evening is literally, a “twisting from the warming” (Strong’s Dictionary). Therefore each “day” of the creation was a “process in time” (Gen 4:3). Hence, days are not so much twenty-four-hour periods but each “day” a different period in time, of which “day” could be the duration of the processes, but not necessarily.

Of course, God, because He is God, could have created all things in six days, but did He? The evidence of existence is that He did not: “For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made…” (Rom 1:20).

God made all things, thusly all things point to God. The process of creation was one of the invisible things! Processes can be measured, and the results seen, but the transfer of energy to mass can only be measured. We assume that because nothing was there in the beginning, and now it exists, then it was not magic but a very great process in which God provided the seven steps.

The first six processes were making real things; the heaven and the earth are both real things. Heaven cannot be seen but earth can be. Earth is not the world per se but matter and the heaven is not the sky per se but the unseen.

When God created the heaven and the earth — space and matter — literally he “cut” the elements that is figuratively “wood.” God cut wood, so to speak. He shaped the matter into different things. Of course, Jesus is said to be a “carpenter” (Mark 6:3), but the Greek word is “tekton” (ibid). The man may have been a carpenter but the God in Him was a Great Technician. Therefore, God was the first and greatest, “Almighy Dynamo,” who did things that others so far failed to do, except in the laboratory.

Now for the moral dynamics of thermodynamics. I have already shown that God was the “Energy” in Existence (I AM THAT I AM; Exod 3:14) that provided the heat in the form of Energy to make all things, even old things anew (Rev 21:5).

Making old things new is a thermodynamic impossibility except for God. The concept of aging is based on entropy; that what has deteriorated is lost forever. Entropy is the losses due to gravity, friction, heat due to changes in state and so forth. Degeneration, up until the present age, was non-isentropic in that the losses were irrecoverable because in the world there is both spiritual and physical gravity. “Non-isentropic” means that the losses due to energy are not negligible.

In biogenetics, scientists do things to alter the genes. They rewrite the code and edit the DNA. Once altered, the DNA of any individual is lost. They are who they are forever… unless — unless God intervenes and makes things anew which He will do in the end to those who endure the “gravity” of the world (Mat 10:22).

When Jesus healed those who reached out to Him, especially the woman with the blood issue, “Straightway the fountain of her blood was dried up; and she felt in her body that she was healed of that plague. And Jesus, immediately knowing in himself that virtue had gone out of Him… (Mark 5:29-30). To modify the woman’s blood, even perhaps the inheritable chromosomes within her, Jesus gave up virtue to heal what plagued her.

The Greek word, translated “plagued” is mastix (ibid), inferring that she had an inherited disease of cancer. In today’s jargon, she had stage four cancer and there would be no recourse for it, but Jesus gave up virtue to heal her genetics. In a short process in time (“immediately”) the goodness in Jesus overecame the world and her genetics encoded in her blood! “Virtue” therein is the Greek word, “Dynamis.”

Jesus used dynamics, in a moral sense, to change the woman’s genes and He did so in the process of time. That “moral” force is called Theo by Latins. (Latin is used for the suffix of many scientific words.)

Because the Virtue from Jesus changed the woman, and reversed her genetics, Jesus used “Theodynamics;” He used God’s moral force to change an otherwise irreversible state of equilibrium. God masked-over her genetic identity, that being the genetic propensity to have cancer in her blood.

Cancer is metastasizing of the organism.  Her white blood cells had the cancer removed from her genome. The woman became a new woman! Jesus reversed the process of death and gave her more time. It is assumed that she died at a ripe old age because Jesus reversed the process of dying!

Yes, even death is a process, of course, of different durations for different people. Adam died in 930 years but now we all are destined to die at around eighty years. Death is a warming, generally with either a fever or at least a thermodynamic change from warm to cold. The state of equilibrium is death wherein the warmth that comes from nourishment twists to a coldness without nourishment.

So, just as death is a process, so is life!

Up until now, only Jesus could reverse time and the death process. Doctors could operate and treat, but God did the healing. When given many people, “The whole multitude sought to touch Him: for there went virtue out of him, and healed them all” (Luke 6:19). Jesus has the power to heal one, many, or whosoever believes in Him (John 3:16). He is the Great Technician that can cut and paste genes to heal or destroy. He is the one who has the power to kill the body and the soul — the visible and the invisible (Mat 10:28) or to preserve either of them (1 Thes 5:23). He has the power to heal the nations (Rev 22:2) and all by losing goodness from Himself to others; so much that He is weakened to the state of death. He had to die to preserve the nations!

Given that, as an engineer I understand thermodynamics, but all things are of God. Therefore, rather than the unknown god of heat, my God is “Theo” and He alone is the Great Technician with the Dyamis to alter all things; even our awful genetic code of depravity — a real irreversible blood issue unless performed by Him!

The First Law of Thermodynamics — the Law of Conservation of Energy — is “the total energy of an isolated system is constant; energy can be transformed from one form to another but can be neither created nor destroyed” (Wikipedia 2001). That physical Law negates the notion that all things just happened without a cause; that the generation of heaven and earth had no energy to form it. Science calls that exception a “discontinuity” in physical laws but it is alchemy — that something came from nothing.

It recalls the ancient “science” of making gold from lead, but in the case the universe, everything came from nothing, not even energy.

Of course, you may ask, “What about Higg’s Boson?” It may have been the energy that started it all but from where did the energy in the boson come? That is as silly as suggesting that ancient aliens came from elsewhere to make all things! Where did the aliens get their start?

The Law of Conservation of God is that God always existed. He said so to Moses. He is the “Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending… which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.” (Rev 1:8).

Only God could make something from nothing because otherwise “science” would be only alchemy. God is the totality of Energy that pre-existed all other things. He is the “E” in the equation E=mc² and the Almighty Existence to generate all things. He must have generated, or else all hope is lost because without generation there could never be a regeneration!

God is the “Creator” in the Law of Conservation of Energy. Science ostensibly recognizes the “Creation” but does not identify the Creator. As such, science has stolen the valor of Almighty God and has given that Valor to the Unknown God of Chance. 

ON TRANSHUMANISM - Part 24

 JEWISHNESS

God still loves the Jews. Christ insured that! 

My friends that are Jewish are few because in America most Jews dwell in the large metropolitan areas. The stereotypical Jew is not a “husbandman” of any sort; they seem to favor city life.

However, I admire the Jewish religion in that Jews and Christians have common Hebrew spiritual genes. When it is written “a Christian is a Jew inwardly,” that has great significance in that both races of people have “God” in their DNA. We are “brothers” in a spiritual sense, and both are of Adam’s kind. The question, therefore, is why have Christians always sought to kill their fellow humans? That is inhumane behavior!

To be honest, Judaism has little to do with transhumanism other than in changing their genome with God in it. Those who claim to be Christians are the ones who most often try to cut off their genealogical branch.

In ancient times, the Devil tried to wipe them out by intermarriage, so that very well indicates why Judaism endeavors to have Jews marry their own kind.

Now, the who limb of the Tree of Life has been “pruned” many times by their adversaries. A real Christian would never do that to their kindred, but it is done often in the Name of Christ.

Why would Jews deny Christ? Because Christ, as represented by false Christianity, rather than Savior of all mankind, has become a killer of Jews. The crucifixion, rather than making them a viable limb of the Tree of Life cut them off, as they see it.

Shem, Japheth, and Ham were all faulty limbs as time proved, even for the Semites, who denied God so often, not by Name but by neglect. Jews still neglect God, but before you look at them, examine your own inner selves. Do you not, Christian, neglect Christ? Do you live for Him or for yourselves? You get the point; you neglect God as much as the Jews! As such, a Christian, in practice, is a Jew inwardly.

Even Jews should read Rambam’s Thirteen Principles of the Jewish faith: 

An (1) omnipresent God who is the creator of all things; (2) God's absolute unity; (3) God's non-corporeality; (4) that God is eternal; (5) to worship God and only one God; (6) that God uses prophecy to speak to men; (7) the importance of Moses' prophecy; (8) the divinity of the Torah; (9) the Torah's unchangeable nature; (10) God's providence; (11) God's just rewards and retributions; (12) the messianic era; and (13) the eventual resurrection of the dead. (Ramon 2017)

 Christian, which of those tenets would you argue against? Both religions believe in all those things! The difference is one; the Age of Pisces was the Christian Era. However, in this New Age of Aquarius that began recently is not the Christian Era any longer; it is the Luciferin Era since the world was reset in 2020 with all the economy changes.

No longer is the “economy” for either Jew or Christian, Messianic, but governmental. It has gone from God will take care of you to “Caesar” will take care of you, as it was in the time of the Messiah’s ministry.

What is meant by that accusation? Caesar always ordained the kings of Judea and without his blessing, a king to the throne of Judea was nothing more than a fraud. “Fake Alexander” is an example of that. The Jews and even many Romans accepted the fake son of Herod the Great as legitimate king, but Caesar did not!

Well, Jesus was accused of portending to the throne of Judea, but He said that His kingdom was “not of this world” (John 18:36). However, the Jews argued that point and denied their rightful king as Jesus was of the gens of King David. As such, Jesus was a rightful contender for kingship. Some of the Jews demanded that Jesus be crucified; they did not need Him for Caesar would take care of them as he had with every other king since Herod the Great.

However, “Caesar” was there at the crucifixion. Pontius Pilate, as prelate, was Caesar in abstentia. Pilate as much as ordained Jesus as “King of the Jews” when he posted that sign on the Cross of the Crucifixion, and when he said, “I, having examined him before you, have found no fault in this man touching those things whereof ye accuse him” (Luke 23:14).

Pilate by finding no wrong in which Jesus was accused, venerated Him as King of the Jews, as if Caesar did so himself! The people, all the mob whether Jew of Gentile, killed their legitimate king. The proof of Jesus as king was in the genealogies of both Joseph and Mary, but Jesus was “king” on the order of Abraham.

In ancient Jewish sacred literature, The Book of Jasher, Abraham was identified as a king but in the land ruled by Canaanites. Implied therein is that Abraham’s “Promised Land” was in the Kingdom of Heaven and his kingdom, like Jesus’s, was not of this world. Hence, Jesus is both the “son of David” and the “son of Abraham” in his genome, and He was a king on the order of Abraham.

Then, David, the writer of the Psalms, wrote about the Messiah, “Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek” (Psalm 110:4) as a prophecy of the one to come. David also identified that Jesus would be Priest and even king of the Jews.

Jews, if they study scripture, have the provenance that Jesus is who he claimed to be, and both the Jew, Matthew, even a Jewish tax-collector, and the Jewish physician, Luke, attested to the veracity of Jesus as the king of the Jews and as High Priest.

With that said, Caiaphas was high priest and as Annas was the high priest five before, both were at the crucifixion to attest to the veracity of Caiaphas’s claim to high priesthood. The priests had set up a dynasty as well on the order, or gens, of Annas.

Some of the Hasmonean dynasty, John Hyrcanus for instance, had been both priest and king, so the Hasmonean’s had issue with Jesus as well! They would not be so disturbed that Jesus would be king but that He would be a Higher Priest in the order of Melchizedek.

Then consider the thieves: John, Simon, and Eleazer, who formed a triumvirate much on the order of Rome’s under Gaius Julius Caesar, Gnaeus Pompeius Magnus, and Marcus Licinius Crassus. Rather than a government of citizens as the Romans, the Jewish triumvirate were rascals consisting of thieves, the seditious, and the knife-wielding sacari. The Jewish anti-government destroyed their own country, city, and temple before their end came with the coming of Titus.

In other words, they all were would-be kings, and politicians destroyed Judaism and Jesus in the same century. The Jews “pulled the trigger,” so to speak but people of all genetics either stood still or cheered them on! Mankind killed their Savior, and the Jews got the blame.

No wonder Jews dismiss Jesus as their Yahweh in the Flesh and their Messiah! We all killed Jesus, the Son of God as hatefully as Cain killed God’s first son, Abel.

Abel, meaning “breath,” would be from the Breath of God, the God-given life directly from Yahweh to righteous Abel. Abel was the son of God and Eve and was as much a “proxy” for the Messiah until Jesus would be born. Abel was the sacrifice just for the sins of Cain just as Jesus was the perfect sacrifice for all mankind.

The Jews, and even theologians, think of Abel as the son of Adam and Eve but just as Cain was of the Wicked One, Abel was of the Righteous One, and was called “Righteous Abel” Mat 23:35). The Jew, Matthew, attested to that!

There were always two genres of Jews: 1) Those who would trust Yahweh and credit Him with the Creation, and 2) those who would trust another and discredit God. The same goes for Jesus; there were Jews who trusted Jesus to be who He said He was, and those who would see Jesus as just another pretender to the throne. They admit that He was a good man but failed to see Jesus as God in the flesh that He claimed to be, “He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father” (John 14:10).

Jesus existed, did He not? Even Jews admit that the man, Jesus, was a real person. Just as the Jews saw Canaan, as a “land of milk and honey,” but failed to see the heavenly Paradise that Abraham saw, the Jews saw the man Jesus but failed to see the Spirit of God.

Adam and Eve with their bright natures saw unto the heavens. Abraham did as well. Abraham was King of the heavenly realm but had no land! He squatted on Canaanite land but was yet a king in the real Paradise. Jews, for the most part, do not have bright eyes to see beyond this realm, unlike Adam, Eve, and even Abraham. No wonder they failed to see as their Messiah!

I have spoken with many Jews. When I told them that they were special people because Isaac was likely the son of God and that their genes were of God, they looked confused yet believed.

Isaac was a “miracle baby” and there is no doubt about it. God’s Genome was in that man for he was created in the image of God. God tested Abraham; Will you cut My Branch from the Tree of Life? That Abraham was willing to do that impressed God because God’s Son was Isaac, Abraham’s son!

With the death of Isaac, divine Potential would cease to Exist. Isaac was the “Potential” of the Messiah, and if nothing else a divine “Proxy” for Jesus to forgive the sins of the Hebrews. Just as Abel was the Proxy for the Messiah who died for the sins of Cain, Isaac would die for all of Shem’s kind. If Isaac had died at the hands of Abraham, then the divine Genome in the Semites would have been pruned from the Tree of Life and the Potentiality of the Messiah would have ceased to Exist!

With Isaac dead, if that had happened, then mankind would have remained without hope. Hope kept the Israelites alive during the exodus from Egypt from sin: 

¹⁴ And God said unto Moses, “I Am That I Am:” and He said, “Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, ‘I Am hath sent me unto you.’” ¹⁵ And God said moreover unto Moses, “Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, ‘the Lord God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.’” (Exod 3:14-15)

 First God identified Himself to the Israelites; He is “Existence” (I AM THAT I AM). Moses would be the “Voice” of God just as Jesus would later be (John 1).

Then God reminded Moses from whom his genes came: Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, renamed “Israel.” Because of his genealogy, Moses was heir to the throne of Abraham, and that throne was in another realm, as I wrote before. As such, Pharoah Ahmose I (Ahmosis), conquered the friendlier Hyksos kings that adopted Joseph, and he most certainly was the wicked pharaoh of Moses time: 

⁷ And the children of Israel were fruitful, and increased abundantly, and multiplied, and waxed exceeding mighty; and the land was filled with them. ⁸ Now there arose up a new king over Egypt, which knew not Joseph. ⁹ And he said unto his people, “Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we…” (Exod 1:7-9)

 Pharoah would trim the branch of the Tree of Life — the very genes of “Israel” — from the sacred tree whose root was from the Genome of God. Isaiah wrote, “There shall be a root of Jesse, and He that shall rise to reign over the Gentiles; in Him shall the Gentiles trust” (Rom 15:12; Isa 11:1).

“The Root of Jesse” was not just David himself, but the “son of David,” Jesus. The Branch that would not be cut off was the branch of Jesse. Just as Moses was heir to the invisible Kingdom of God as the “son of Abraham” Jesus was heir, not just to the Kingdom of David, but the invisible Kingdom of Abraham.

So, if Jews do not recognize Abraham in Moses and in Jesus, then their eyes are not bright enough to be the special people chosen by God.

Who else, other than Jesus, would be the king of a Kingdom in another world? Do not the Jews recognize Abraham as their progenitor and rightful grantee to the Promised Land that would someday be the Kingdom of David?

Ahmose was a sinful king as he endeavored to cut off the branch from Abraham who had prospered in Egypt under the Hyksos pharaoh, and as such, was even a co-king in Egypt whose reign therein was only to his people. The Hyksos pharaoh discovered that Sarai was Abram’s wife, and not legitimately his, and returned her to Abram (Gen 12:18_19). I am implying that because of Abram’s faithfulness to God, wherever he went, he was a king there, and by design, Egypt from the Nile River to Canaan land was part of the Promised land.

The Hyksos pharaoh, whoever he was, refused to modify the genes of God that God had gifted him with to withstand the fiery furnace of Ur in Shinar.

The point to the life of Abraham is that as Jesus was of the root of Jesse, He was also of the root of Abraham, David, and all the righteous patriarchs, even Moses! Abraham was established as the Abrahamic Family, or gens, when God made a Covenant with him, and Jesus was heir to Abraham and David as Matthew wrote.

Matthew was a Jewish tax collector, and he collected taxes for Caesar. Matthew recognized Judea as the legal property of Jesus as the rightful owner to Judea (Mat 1). Why the genealogy of Jesus in the beginning of the New Testament? To establish His rightful claim to all the Promised Land.

Because Jesus was born in 6 B.C., by most accounts, many believe that Cyrenius (Quirinus).  had taxed before, when he was in Syria, and had residence there.

The Jews were taxed by Caesar, on and off, according to Josephus, long before Quirinius became governor in 6 A.D. That Joseph brought Mary to Bethlehem to be enumerated for taxes supports the notion that Jesus was heir to some amount of land in Bethlehem, the land of David’s birth, although his family were Galatians of Nazareth.

Implied is that Jesus was rightful heir to at least part of the Davidic Kingdom, at least where David was born and was rightfully called the “son (gens) of David” making Him of the House of David and rightful heir to kingship in Judea where in His day, there was no king there!

The Jews accused Jesus of being a pretender to the Herodian throne. Only Caesar or his proxy, the governor Pilate, could anoint a king. Pontius Pilate did just that! Jesus said to Pilate, “My kingdom is not of this world: if My kingdom were of this world, then would My servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence” (John 18:36).

Pilate said that he found no fault in Jesus (John  18:38). Pilate, on behalf of Caesar, had anointed Jesus as the King of the Jews to the dismay of all the other pretenders to the throne who had Jesus murdered.

That the Jews failed to see Jesus as their legitimate king, all the while excepting “fake Alexander,“ the pretend son of King Herod the Great, made them just as naïve as Eve who accepted the “Serpent” as her new “Lord” (Gen 4:1).

The Jewish people, proud as they have always been, still will not admit that when they crucified Jesus, that they killed their rightful High Priest on the order of Melchizedek for Caiaphas on the order of Annas; that they killed their King rather than fake Alexander, and they killed the gens of Abraham from whom the genome of Moses came!

Just like Abraham whose kingdom was not of this world, and who lived under Canaanite kings, the Kingdom of Jesus was not of this world, but He served under the Herodian Arabians. It was never about the Promised Land at all but the Promised Invisible Realm of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. By mistake, the Jews have already killed their Messiah — the very source of their chosen and peculiar genetics that made them “sons of God” in the same manner as Seth long before.

However, the Jews were merely “words” of the mob that killed God. They represented the vocal minority as the crucifixion was a political rally gone wild!

Rather than ask Pilate to judge Jesus as not the rightful king, they knew that He was, and demanded blood in a very “democratic” way, of course. The vote was by who screamed the loudest, and those majority Jews who had honored Jesus as king and legitimate heir to the House of David only one week before, on “election day” became the “silent majority.”  Therefore, the Jews did not kill Jesus, narcissists did that! It was only the mob who incited the minority that were the loud voices that yelled “crucify Him!”

The majority of the Jews stood there in silence just as they would centuries later when Hitler un-genned them! Just as Jesus was the “Holocaust” that day for the sins of the people, Jews were the holocaust that the Germans sacrificed for Aryan Gentile sins, all in the name of the volks, prosperity, and a thousand-years reign in triumph!

Of course, Jesus, contrary to pseudo-history, had no children. Like Herod and Julius Caesar before, His gens were cut off the Tree of Life. However, most other Roman dictators pretended to the House of Julii and called themselves “Caesars” although that gens had died out.

Just like Julius, who was murdered by those who contended for his throne, it was the same for Jesus. The “House of Caesar” finally died out by the hands of the Germanic tribes. Ironically, Germans “pruned” the Caesarian gens as they would later trim the Jewish gens under Hitler.

Ptolemy XV Caesar, called “Caesarion” (Little Caesar), was the last Pharoah of Ptolemaic Egypt. The gens of “Little Caesar” was cut off from Egypt. Soon there was another pretender, Caesarius of Terracina, the “Christian Caesar” after whom the “cesarean section” is named, of course to save the gens of the potential “little caesars.”

Thus, throughout history, God has allowed “pruning” of the Tree of Life until the time of Jesus when the “Tree of Life” was restored to its original life-giving purpose: “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).

Yahweh did that! The Jewish Elohymn did that; He provided the perfect sacrifice once and for all (Heb 7:27).

Like Abraham, who had Yahweh in himself, and was willing to sacrifice His only God-begotten Son, Isaac, God carried it out with His Own flesh, called “Jesus.” With the birth of Jesus, God manifested Himself to mankind. Yahweh already has done that! Whereas Jews require a sign but Greeks wisdom (1 Cor 1;22), Jesus was the “sign” that the vocal Jews missed, even asking that the sign in three languages be altered.

Most Jews had cheered for God only a week before. What went wrong? The scare tactics of the political figures kicked in and the propaganda campaign started. Jesus was made out to be the liar that He was not, and just what was His claim? I and the Father are one; that the man, Jesus, is God manifested in the flesh. Therefore, Jews deny Yahweh even though Jesus IS Him!

Jews know from Josephus and their Herodian kings what was meant by the “right hand” of one person to another. It was not a physical position or even a right-hand handshake, but wherein one king is allied to another in a bond of unity. That Jesus, “being by the right hand of God” (Acts 2:33) is not Him on one throne and the Father another, but that they are One God in homeostasis — with different Substances in One Body acting as One.

One Jew told me about a universal “god” of all nations and that they are the same God as understood by different races. To that I replied, “But only the True God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob came in the flesh to provide salvation.” Test the other gods; are they of flesh and blood and are they real? Do they have spiritual substance as well? If not, then they are not gods at all, but imaginations created by others of our kind. Yahweh is the universal One True God and almost all of mankind fail to understand that! If the “God” is not Jesus, then question their myths.

I previously quoted from the book of Exodus, “The God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you: this is my Name for ever, and this is my memorial unto all generations.” What is the Name of God, or at least how is His Existence pronounced? JHWH (Yahweh). That, it is written, is His Name forever. The “Name” is called “Jesus” first by the angels, then the Jews, and now by the Gentiles. The Genome of God in the Flesh was called “Jesus” the “Christ” (“Messiah” in the Hebrew) (Mat 1:16).

What is in a name? God is in the Name of Jesus! Jesus, (Hebrew; יהושע - Yəhōšūaʿ) means “Ya Saves.” Ya is short for Yahweh. Jesus is the theophoric Name of God that includes His purpose as names in scripture so often do. By the time of Jesus, there were many Joshua’s, even some who claimed to be the Messiah, but there is only One Messiah who overcame the World by walking right out of the tomb from death to life.

God is not dead! He sits now on His Throne in Heaven as Yahweh — the One True “Living God.”

Yahweh saves. That is His purpose. If Jesus is not Yahweh, then by now the Genome and gens of God has transpired.

Just who today is of the gens of David? Who can prove that? That Jesus was taxed for David’s land is vital proof of his genealogy! Where is yours? Just who, other than Jesus, would be heir to land of Israel and Abraham’s Invisible Empire (Abraham’s Bosom in Paradise) (Luke 16:22)? The “Antichrist,” whoever he is, Jew or Gentile, will make claim to that, but beware the cunning of the serpentine “Judas’s” that will even kill God for the love of money!

The conclusion is that in the end, by then, everyone — Jews included — will become so depraved that God is not real to them. How many of the Jews that remain believe that God is real? Even in Israel itself, secular Jews outnumber the religious and of the latter, they are a small minority. When the Jews cease to believe in such numbers, it is a sign of the end of times just as in the days of Noah when only Noah believed, and in the days of Sodom, when only Lot’s family believed.

Before the time comes, mankind — Jews and all — will be essentially totally depraved to such an extent that Yahweh will come in the Flesh to rapture them. It is the Name “Yahweh” that will save the righteous whether dead or alive, so long as their God wears the flesh that Jesus wore.

Only those of the glorious Adamic race shall be saved whether Jew or Gentile because Adam represents the genetics of all mankind. The depraved “trans-Adams” will perish as did the transhumans of Noah’s time.

The end of time is close when transhumanism is achieved; not by android look-alikes who behave like humans, but when human genes are altered and inherited by their germline. That occasion is when CRISPR-Cas9 is first introduced into mankind.

That may have already been done! For the Jews, it means they would no longer be Jews and for Christians, that they would no longer be in Christ but synthetic images of them which displace the life that God breathed unto them in the beginning.

No longer, if that jab is taken, would they be in Yahweh or in Christ, but would have the knowledge of the world imbued within their genome.

In an earlier chapter, I wrote about science and Wikipedia. Perhaps some of the data from the generic Wikipedia would be spliced into the compliant men and women to make them seem knowledgeable. That is not a stretch of my imagination but now it seems that scientists have become the “gods” as the Serpent foresaw (Gen 3:5), and with “them” all things are possible. That would be a vicarious “re-crucifixion” of God and if a second “Messiah” comes, be for sure; he or she will be the “Anti-messiah.”

(picture credit: Wikipedia; "Hourglass")