Jesus was glorified in the process of death and resurrection. There is evidence
of that:
He has made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made
the righteousness of God in Him. (1 Cor 5:21)
“He” therein is “Father God” and as the Father, and Jesus, the Son, the
genetics (Genome) of the Father would have been in the Son. However, Jesus was
made sin for is since He knew no sin and never sinned.
The question that you may ask is, “How was Jesus made sin for us?” Jesus was born with human flesh as “the Son of
Man.” Jesus spoke these words:
The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, “Behold a man
gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners…” (Mat 11:19)
Jesus was born like any
beast of the field that eats and drinks.
Jesus was also from the genetics of Eve — the first to sin and the “mother”
of Jesus (Gen 3:20) like all common, mortal men and women. The sin of Jesus
would have been acquired by Jesus in the womb of Mary who passed along the
genetics of Eve to Jesus.
Jesus was both fully God as the gens of God and fully human as the gens
of both Eve and Mary. Jesus inherited sin from only the virgin Mary and He
inherited righteousness from “Father God” because God was in Him; for He was
the physical, biological manifestation of Father God.
What are sons of men known for? Eating and drinking. We are biological
creatures whereas Father God is a Spirtual non-creature. Jesus was made a “Holy
Thing” (Luke 1:35) in the womb of Mary, and like all common, mortal men, Jesus
did eat and drink just like any person might do.
Jesus was therefore accused of being a common man like any other, and that
remains the accusation to this day.
Father God had overshadowed Mary and created the flesh of Jesus with His
own seed. Not said is whether God just created the flesh in the womb of Mary or
whether His seed fertilized an egg in her womb. Mary was a virgin, so there
would have been no sexual activity. Jesus would have been a created man in the manner
of Adam by God breathing Him from no “thing.” Jesus even denied that Mary was
His mother (Mat 12:48).
Jesus as the “last Adam” was made a “quickening Spirit.” Inferred therein
is that Jesus was the living Spirit of God, not the flesh of God, and sort of
like the “first Adam (who) was made a living soul” (1 Cor 15:45). Adam (I)
would not have been made of raw flesh but with the Spirit of God in the shape of
a man. Adam would have been made of flesh because of the sin of his wife.
The man Adam and the woman Adam were paired — alike but opposite. In
science that is “entanglement;” the characteristic of entanglement is that any
time thereafter if one changes, once entangled, the other changes as well.
True to science, Eve was the “mother of all” (Gen 3:20), including her mate.
She became sin with the original and because they were entangled — one flesh
(Gen 2:24) — Adam became flesh as well because his mate had sinned. Neither
would have been created with flesh but were “naked” (Gen 2:25) and surely without
flesh. With sin, they both would have become flesh in a very scientific way; it
is not mythology! Hence, the flesh of man is the epicenter of sin and sin lies
within the flesh as the seed of Satan in the new form of mankind, not “Adam’s
kind” but “Ish’s kind” (Gen 4:1). Ish kind is the Hebrew nomen
for mankind to this day.
Adam’s kind — sons of God — died and Ish kind was Satan’s kind (John 8:44).
All that to point out that Adam was not how he is pictured. Let’s call Adam
“YY-chromosomal” from the “yod yod” of Father God. Adam would have not
had flesh of any beast, as we have been taught, but would have been “inorganic
man” without any worldly flesh.
“Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground” (Gen 2:7). That seems to
say that Adam was made of earthly material, so we need to critically examine those
words through a Hebrew/biological lens.
Dust (עָפָר ʻaphar):
·
Ayin: awareness, or
consciousness.
·
Pev: commutative, or with intelligence
with reason.
·
Resh: mind
That “dust” would not be material but self-awareness and sapience — higher
order intelligence and reasoning. Adam’s kind would have been Paul’s “elect”
over all the other kinds (Gen 3:28). The dust was a “mist” (‘ed) — a “vapor”
— surely the living waters from God.
“Ground:” (אֲדָמָה ʼadamah):
·
Aleph: for the Master to regulate.
·
Dalet: from the Breath of
God, or the “Word.”
·
Mem: genetic encoding
ostensibly from the Master Regulator.
·
Hey: into life-space.
Since YY-chromosomes do not exist alone in nature, and chromosomes are
colorless, I like to think that the chromosomes of the first man were “Yod
Yod” or YY-chromosomal. (Note that there are XX and XY but not YY-chromosomes.)
Adam’s substance was what? Tselem in the Hebrew: a “phantom” (Strong 2006). The “nakedness” of
Adam’s kind would have been that they were not made of flesh but were glorious creatures,
or at best, a flesh not of this world at all — a translucent chromosomal flesh
that would have exposed their living souls (Gen 2:7).
So, the first man and woman were not like we think of them but like the “Word”
and without flesh.
With sin, the two would have taken on the flesh of some lower state of man
which pictographs I have identified to be “creeping things” that creep (Gen
1:26). They would have been created by God without “dominion” or a “crumble” (ibid)
of God in them as Adam had.
Since the “Serpent” (Lucifer) could not couple, a surrogate would have been
necessary. I promote the idea that a beast like a lower state of man without a
soul was used — a “creeping thing.” For that reason, perhaps that is why Satan
is called the “Beast’ by John, the Revelator.
With that background as the “last Adam” Jesus — Adam (II) — pre-existed as
the quickening Spirit of Father God that had made Adam (I) a living soul.
Adam obtained flesh because of sin. God manifested Jesus to the world like
sinful Adam and with raw flesh like some beast, or as David called it, a “worm”
(Psalm 22:6). Jesus knew no sin but had sin like ours in His human DNA. Jesus
would have had the same original sin in His flesh as we have in ours. Jesus
inherited our sins from the “mother” of all, Eve, because although wholly God, He
was fully man as well.
Technically speaking, the “Word” (Jesus) was inorganic of some divine material
(Elohim). The Word was made flesh, and biological Jesus would have been
made organic. The “Word” in
phantom form always existed (John 1:1-3) but was made flesh (John 1:14).
Biological Jesus came eating and drinking as it is written. That raises the
question, Did glorified Jesus eat and drink?
First off, Jesus was the “last Adam” like the first Adam who was a living
soul. Souls do not eat and Adam’s kind died with advent of sin, and replaced
with Eve’s kind — the kind with raw flesh.
Most people believe that Adam (I) ate “herbs” because it was translated
that way through the eyes of ancient people. God communicated His Master
regulation:
I have
given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and
every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall
be for meat. (Gen
1:21)
“Herb” is עֵשֶׂב 'eseb in the
Hebrew. Strong’s translates that as “glossy” and because it was glossy, the
translators supposed it was grass or vegetation of some sort. Was it?
‘Eseb (עֵשֶׂב):
·
Ayin: consciousness
·
Shin: genetic integrity
·
Bet: fusion
In addition, “fruit” (פְּרִי periy):
·
Pey: communication
·
Resh: Mind
·
Yod: Micro-regulation
In other words, their “meat” or “food” would be sapience, indicating
reliance on God. God sustained them like He did in the wilderness during the exodus
where they ate the “glossy thing” — manna from heaven like hoar frost on the
ground.
Manna was divine food that just disappeared when the Jews had their fill.
It did not decay, so manna from heaven would have been the Bread of Life
wherein the Israelites were sustained by God. Adam’s kind would not have eaten
ordinary food until they sinned, and then they ate real meat like the
other beasts (Gen 9:3). Meat would be their “herb” or real meat rather than
just divine sustenance.
Therefore, sin is in the flesh genetically. About Jesus, Paul wrote the
following, He was:
Whom
God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in His blood, to declare
his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the
forbearance of God… (Rom
3:25)
“Sins that are past” are all the sins of the world since Eve sinned. As the
“mother of all living” everyone has sinned and everyone of all the nations
since Eve has sin in their genetics. Jesus indeed came in human flesh to be sin
for us. Albeit sin was in His flesh, Jesus still not did not sin when tempted
by the Devil; in contrast to the woman of Adam, by the way.
Jesus indeed was the “worm” (Psalm 22:6), not that He was a worm but
had flesh like a worm before the worm morphed into a “butterfly” — into a glorious
being not of the flesh of the worm, but still with the butterfly that was in
the worm all the time.
God has set forth Jesus “to be a propitiation through faith in His blood.”
Jesus may have looked like a common man, but His blood would be quite different
with no decadence in it at all! The flesh of Jesus during His life would have
been like ours — very “uncomely”
Isaiah wrote about the Lord God to be revealed, “He has no form nor
comeliness; and when we shall see Him, there is no beauty that we should desire
Him” (Isa 53:2). Jesus was born brutish looking like us, and to be honest, we
do look more like gorillas than glorious creatures!
When most people consider beasts, they usually think of carnivores — predators
that use ambush tactics or hunting like wolves might do; using endurance to run
down prey. That is essentially us, as Cain was that kind of “beast,” and
we all are of Cain. Even Jesus through many females over the generations was
the seed of Cain; the difference being is that Jesus was divine.
If my theory is true, then Jesus would have a very different blood type
than the rest of us. As it turns out, the supposed blood of Jesus that Ron Wyatt
collected from the Ark of the Covenant, and the blood on the Shroud of Turin
seems to have divine blood: the mitochondrial-DNA from Eve having all 22
autosomes and only one paternal chromosome. That blood type is what can save
us, not by any manner of transfusion, but trusting it over the duration of our
lives.
It is reported in ancient documents from Pontious Pilate to Caesar that
Jesus was comely. What happened? Was Isaiah wrong? Whether that is
actual documentation or not, glorified Jesus would have been more than comely,
even glorious!
Since Adam was created in the Image of God, God does not eat, so Adam would
not have eaten. That Image was Tselim בְּצַלְמוֹ — a shadow or phantom. The root word is צֶלֶם within some thing — bet בְּ.
The bet with the dot within it shows possession. It was Adam himself with
the inner Image of God, Tselim, which would be the contents of the
living soul. Adam would not have been brutish as created, but more of a Holy
Ghost of a man in shape, akin to the inner Image of Jesus which Luke saw at the
baptism of Jesus:
The
Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him, and a Voice came
from heaven, which said, “You are my beloved Son; in you I am well pleased” (Luke 3:22)
Now let’s consider the Substances of Jesus.
God overshadowed Mary and created a “worm” in her womb that grew into a
viable baby. That embryo would have been the “worm” of which David wrote.
Mary would have been a surrogate for the Garden of the Lord where the flesh
of Adam was planted (Gen 2:8). The substance would not have been divine but raw
flesh. When the “crop” was harvested with birth, then it was put away until the
time was ripe; then Jesus would reveal Himself, no longer as a “worm” but a
full-grown “caterpillar” into which God came into as Elohim in the shape
of a man, or “Eloha” — the Holy Ghost.
Before His baptism, Jesus would have been the “son of Man” or of the gens
of Eve. The flesh of Jesus would have been Ish-type (Gen 4:1) rather
than Adamic for He was born a common, mortal man. With baptism, He was equipped
with the Power of God and soon defeated the Devil who was endeavoring to get Him
to sin because of His brutish human flesh where sin lay dormant.
Temptation is the spark of Lucifer — the fiery darts of the Wicked One — to
convert temptation into actual sin.
The Devil failed with Jesus whereas with all others, he obtained a
stronghold within all of them, us all “coming short of the Glory of God” (Rom
3:23). Jesus, before He was crucified and resurrected, although He still had
not sinned, proving it was possible, still came short of the Glory of God
because He retained brutish flesh. He would have to give up worm-like flesh to
become the “butterfly” — the Angel of the Lord:
Behold,
there was a great earthquake for the Angel of the Lord descended from heaven
and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. (Mat 28:2)
The Angel of the Lord had a purpose. That “Angel” would have been within pre-incarnate
Jesus who lived through the crucifixion until He gave up the Holy Ghost. Jesus,
when He was raised from the dead, literally regained His faculties (from
the Greek “eguiro”). That “faculty” would have been the Angel of the
Lord overshadowing and entering Jesus while He was dead in the tomb.
The death and resurrection of Jesus glorified Him just as He had said beforehand
(John 7:39).
The “worm” during His lifetime had changed from a worm to a butterfly in a
transfiguration, or metamorphosis. “(He) was transfigured before them: and His
face did shine as the sun, and His raiment was white as the light” (Mat 17:2).
The glorification process had begun, and like a caterpillar’s internal struggle,
Jesus was in agony before He would be glorified. The metamorphosis of worm into
a butterfly very well describes the birth, life, death, and resurrection of Jesus.
Who would Jesus have been like after glorification? Paul revealed that to
the church at Corinth, “The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last
Adam was made a quickening Spirit” (1 Cor 15:45). Jesus would have been born a
common, mortal man — an Ish man — but was glorified — made a quickening,
or life-giving Spirit — because He sacrificed His own common flesh as He was undergoing
glorification like a butterfly.
Paul compared Jesus, not to sinful Adam with human flesh. But with pre-sin
Adam with glorious flesh.
Remember what was previously written; that righteous Adam never ate herbs nor
any manner of fruit while in Paradise?
Jesus proved that He was who He said He was by eating:
They (the apostles) were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that
they had seen a Spirit; and He said unto them, “Why are ye troubled? and why do
thoughts arise in your hearts?”
“Behold
My hands and My feet, that it is I Myself: handle Me, and see; for a Spirit have
not flesh and bones, as you see Me have.”
And
when He had thus spoken, He showed them His hands and His feet.
And
while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, He said unto them, “Have you
here any meat?”
And
they gave Him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb and He took it,
and did eat before them” (Luke 24:37:43)
First off, the Substance of Jesus was not flesh but Spirit as the apostles
saw Him. Let’s say they were correct in their appraisal. Jesus would have been
Spirit with some form like He was before with scars and all. He would look like
Adam before the original sin morphed him from Spirit into flesh.
He asked that they handle Him. None did that. The reason for that is to
reveal that He was not just Spirit but was of some divine Substance wherein His
“Angel” was exposed — the Elohim of God, El.
Jesus would have been naked of any flesh just like Adam (I), but he had some
material substance that covered the Spirit within, and apparently a transparent
covering at that, for they could see His quickening Spirit within and behind
the scars that He had suffered.
Within his new flesh, Jesus pointed out to them that He still had flesh and
bones. He was real! His flesh was (sarx) a body as opposed to Spirit
(Strong 2006). His flesh remained
His covering, but it had morphed from corruptibility to incorruptibility (Acts
2:31). In scientific terms, Jesus would no longer have been organic but of some
divine Substance.
It was really Him as His scars showed, but He had suffered the agony of “caspases”
wherein the worm digests its own tissue. (Keep that in mind for a moment.)
Physically,
a caterpillar breaks down its old body using digestive enzymes before building
its new form. This is an incredibly taxing biological process. Interestingly,
there are scientific indications that while caterpillars lose their brains
during this stage, they can retain learned memories once they transform into
adult butterflies. (AI
Overview)
Perhaps like a butterfly in transition from a caterpillar, the mind goes
with the new creature. not remain within the dead brain of the old creature. That
is exactly the case with the mind of the soul in Paradise as Lazarus revealed (Luke
15).
Jesus asked, “Have you here any meat?”
“And they gave Him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb and He
took it, and did eat before them.”
Theologians fail to understand how a man glorified with no death nor
defecation could eat. Note that Jesus ate to show that He was still a man, but
did He digest what He ate? That is another story.
A moment earlier, I had you hang onto the concept of caspases
wherein the creature digests its own flesh. In that process, the substance does
not decay as with defecation but just disappears like manna from heaven. Like a
worm to a butterfly, Jesus would have had the power of caspases. He ate, then
it may have just changed form like the Catholic concept of transubstantiation
wherein the bread and wine turn into the body and blood of Jesus.
Although that is just mysticism, for Jesus and Him alone, that would have
been by the process of caspases wherein the honey and fish nourished Him without
corrupting what He had eaten. The honey and fish would have become virtue
within His glorious body.
With that said, if we do eat in Paradise, it would not be for gluttony but for
the Lord to strengthen us.
There are several theological theories about Jesus eating and what
processed the food, and caspases (from my thoughts) are among them.
For we know that if our earthly house of this tabernacle were dissolved, we
have a building of God, an house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For
in this we groan, earnestly desiring to be clothed upon with our house which is
from heaven; if so be that being clothed we shall not be found naked. (1 Cor
5:1-3)
