UNNOTICED MIRACLES OF CHRIST

There were fifty obvious miracles of Christ but there were many more, not so obvious. Among the fifty obvious miracles were the Resurrection, but after that, the miracles kept on coming!

Miracles are extraordinary acts demonstrating divine authority over disease, nature, evil spirits, and death. The Resurrection of Jesus was indeed Him overcoming the world (John 16:33). The world is not just planet Earth, but in the Greek, “Kosmos,” of which the Cosmos is the English translation.

Science applies to the world, so Jesus would have overcome science. That itself is the ultimate miracle. He was beyond the theory of everything as explained in my recent book.[1]

Of course, Jesus overcame gravity when he ascended into heaven. It is not that he physically arose but would have transcended this world. Hence, the ascension of Jesus (Acts 1) is also miraculous. Jesus would have crossed the “p-branes” between gravity and the absence of gravity wherein 3-D “points” change dimensions, or states of life.

Jesus had not arisen when He was “raised” from the dead, as its written, “He is not here: for He is risen, as He said. Come, see the place where the Lord lay” (Mat 28:6). Jesus was not raised in elevation from then dead, but “risen” (Greek; egeiro); He collected His faculties (Strong 2006).

What were the faculties of Christ? Of course, His Body but also His Holy Ghost, and His Power — God El Shadday, the Power of God to overcome the world for miracles. The three “substances,” or states, of Jesus had reunited (homeostasis) after they were separated at death.

Of the three faculties, one had changed; the Ghost of Jesus was rent from His mortal flesh like the curtain of the temple (Mark 15:38). Mortal flesh is the process in which Jesus became sin for us (2 Cor 5:26). His birth was a miracle because Jesus was not born in iniquity like humans; He was born pure to take on sins for the entire world. That too was a miracle!

Jesus changed states at the Resurrection; He was transfigured (Greek; metamorphoo).

Metamorphosis is a biological process where an animal physically develops and goes through a striking, often abrupt change in its body structure, form, or habits after birth or hatching. The word comes from the Greek roots meta (change) and morphe (form). (Merriam-Webster 2025)

I designed a graphic some time ago which reveals the metamorphosis, or “transfiguration” of Jesus which began on the mountain with witnesses. (•Mat 17:1–13;  Mark 9:2–13; Luke 9:28–36; 2 Peter 1:16–18).

Recalling the meaning of metamorphosis, Jesus had a “striking, often abrupt change in its body structure, form, or habits after birth or hatching” from a mere mortal man into a New Creature.

The tomb would have been the “pupae” from which the New Creature emerged, the abrupt change would have been the transfiguration when Ya struck the Body of Jesus with His Divine Presence; sort of a jolt to get the process off to a good start, the hatching would have been when the changed man just walked through the walls of the womb/tomb into the world, and the “birth” was Jesus in a new substance, or state of existence. He retained His form, but His manly state would have been retained, unlike the form of the butterfly in the photo. However, the glorious state in which Christ emerged into the world was like a butterfly in comparison.

 

Figure 1: The Transfiguration of Jesus

Transfiguration began at God’s overshadowing Jesus on the mountain, but was not completed until the Angel of the Lord became one of His faculties again when Jesus was glorified (John 7:39). 

Satan could have gone into Him while still in the “larvae” stage, but the Spirit of God outperformed the spirit of Satan.

Satan, thinking he had defeated Jesus because of His death, would have been elated, thinking he had won. On the other hand, sin and death were delivered to Hell, so all Satan would have won is nothing but lost the souls if what would be billions of otherwise lost souls.

Note that the mysterious power that changed the worm into a butterfly, compares well to the mystery of God that morphed the mortal flesh of Jesus into the a glorious Creature. In the graphic that would be the special ingredient that the butterfly has — living water.

That uncommon and usually unseen Holy Thing would have been the liquid water from the Power of Angel of the Lord. The greatest miracle ever would have been the glorification of Jesus. [2] God made the new Body of Christ in the same manner as He morphs caterpillars into butterflies!

Just as the world can kill the worm before it becomes the butterfly, Jesus was killed before He became the glorified version of Himself.

Just as the larval stage of a butterfly can be sprayed with chemicals, the infant stage of a Christian is subject to the stain of sin. Just as the world kills larvae, the world kills infant stages of Christians. Just as the world aborts early states of butterflies, then world aborts babes in Christ. Just as only when the butterfly emerges following the death of the larvae, Christian “saints” are only glorified after enduring the world to the end (Mat 10:22).

Paper wasps actively hunt caterpillars, stinging them and carrying them off or feeding pieces to their young. Braconid wasps are parasitoids—they inject eggs inside the caterpillar, and the wasp larvae hatch and consume the host from the inside out.

In like manner, babes in Christ may be like the former, or old caterpillar-like Christians may be stung to death, to wit: “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walks about, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Pet 5:8). Either way, either the from the inside out, or from stings, inattentive Christians can be consumed.

Just as butterfly transition is miraculous, so is the regeneration of Christians and either can be aborted midway.

Glorification would have begun with the ancient Ya of old in the man, Jesus.

The letter yod with the sound Ya is “first spark” of change. Ya is God, Elohim, and at the baptism El, Ya in bodily form (Luke 3:22), would have gotten into Jesus. Then at the transfiguration, the full force of power, Elohim would have been the mysterious thing that made the metamorphosis process dynamic.

 Whereas common, mortal men will die, glorified men and women will never. Glorification was when the faculties of Jesus were reunited, and the same applies to Christians. When the soul is reunited with new flesh at the rapture, glorification is complete and no longer can the “worm” be destroyed because now it is the “butterfly.”

Butterflies compare well with glorification. Worms eat things and digest them.

Butterflies have no external digestive tracts. Because they cannot chew solid food, everything they consume is already in liquid form (living water?), or liquefied by special sponges/saliva on the tip of the proboscis.

Butterflies take in massive amounts of water. They rapidly absorb the necessary salts and minerals while losing excess water almost as fast as they drink it. Jesus seems to have done the same thing. That was perhaps one of the mysterious miracles of Jesus, to wit: They gave the newly glorified Jesus, “a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb; and He took it and did eat before them” (Luke 24:42-43).

Glorification is not beastlike; beasts like us all “come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23). Glorious creatures are not biological. Glorious creatures eat but do not defecate because defecation, like any bodily discharge, is unclean, according to the Law of God.

In Chapters 64 and 65 of The First Book of Adam and Eve, Adam and Eve consume earthly fig fruit after three days of hunger, leading to immediate physical distress as their bodies thicken and experience severe internal pain. After Adam prays for mercy, God provides them with a functional digestive outlet, explaining that they must now rely on regular food and water because their physical form has changed to resemble beasts of the earth.

Glorious Adam’s kind were not biological creatures: with no mucus, no defecation, and no ejaculation of any sort. How then did Jesus eat after His glorification?

He ate real food but would have digested none of it. Like the butterfly, the food would have turned to liquid and been sweated out profusely in the manner of His agony.

Therefore, another undisclosed miracle was Him eating real food and not wasting it to the ground. How could that be done? By the Power of God within transforming solids into living water. That Jesus did not get indigestion like Adam, is evidence that God is in Him!

Whereas Adam and Eve were morphed from glorious to wicked biological creatures, Jesus was morphed, or transfigured, from a biological to a glorious, Holy Thing (Luke 135).

Jesus was born a Holy Thing, and glorified the same Holy Thing, but His form was different; no longer was He biological but angelic as the Angel of the Lord revealed (Mat 28:2).

The Angel of the Lord did not descend from heaven but Jesus was lowering His state to be an Adamic man, and as it turned out, He was the “last Adam” (1 Cor 15:45).

There are many more miracles that are hidden in the Bible, such as how Jesus walked through the walls of His tomb, disappeared on the road to Emaus and immediately reappeared in the locked room with the eleven.

Another miracle, not yet credited to Jesus, is when those dead in Christ are awakened in heaven from no power of their own (1 Thes 4:16). That same thing happened when the saints of old in Christ were resurrected with Him (Mat 27:53).

Now you know more of the story!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

[1] Just out on Amazon The Hellish Voyage Into a Black Hole: Over the Event Horizon.

[2] See my book, The Amazing Shroud of Turin, for more.

MANNA AND THE BREAD OF LIFE

With the apostles, leaving Jesus after He walked on water, He was alone on the other side of the sea near Bethsaida with ordinary people where they all ate bread. The bread fed 5000 as it is written from the original five loaves and two fish.

Jesus multiplied the bread to feed the multitude with twelve loaves remaining after they no longer hungered.

From where did the additional bread come? Not by magic, but a miracle. It is not that the bread multiplied on its own, but that something from heaven increased the amount of bread. That “magic” would have been the good virtue of God — Elohim.

Rather than calling it a “miracle,” it was the ordinary, even extraordinary, way God did things. Jesus reminded them of his feeding of the millions from a time long ago:

 

³¹ Our fathers did eat manna in the desert; as it is written, He gave them bread from heaven to eat. ³² Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread from heaven; but my Father gives you the true bread from heaven. ³³ For the bread of God is He which comes down from heaven and gives life unto the world. ³⁴ Then said they unto him, “Lord, evermore give us this bread.” (John 6:31-34)

 

With that said, Moses gave them substance, but Jesus gave them real sustenance. Bread alone does not give life, but something about Jesus gives life.

Before the true bread is examined, first look at manna from heaven.

From Exodus chapter 16, manna had certain characteristics:

1.      It was not ordinary bread like they had eaten while in Egypt. (verse 3)

2.      The bread of God rained like water from Heaven. (verse 4)

3.      It provided all the Israelites enough to sustain them, even doubling the amount of the sixth day to provide enough for the Sabbath day. (verse 5)

4.      It was supplied that they should know that it was from God. (verse 6)

5.      Each morning, they would see the glory of the Lord from where the bread came. (verse 7)

6.      They would be filled with bread each day. (verse 12)

7.      In the morning dew, the host — the manna — laid on the ground. (verse 13)

8.      When the dew (like the mist of the Garden) that lay was gone up (disappeared), behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground. (verse 14).

9.      The Israelites didn’t know what it was so they called it “manna” but Moses called it “bread” which the Lord had given for food. (verse 15)

10.  It was just enough to feed each person. (verse 16)

11.  Each gathered only what they needed to live. (verse 17)

12.  There would be none left over. (verse 19)

13.  What some carelessly left over rotted and attracted worms. (verse 20)

14.  What was not gathered simply evaporated, like water, and returned to heaven from which it came. (verse 21)

15.  For the Sabbath day, they would bake it on the previous day and it would not stink on the Sabbath. It was incorruptible food. (verses 23 and 24)

16.  On the Sabbath, they would find none in the field. (verse 25)

17.  Lastly, those who went to gather on the Sabbath found none (verse 27). It just disappeared before the sun came up.

18.  It is described as tasting like wafers made with honey. (verse 31); in Numbers 11:8, it was said to taste like cakes baked with fresh oil. The taste may have been different for different people.

19.  Moses said unto Aaron, “Take a pot, and put an omer full of manna therein, and lay it up before the Lord, to be kept for your generations.” (verse 33). A vessel could contain it for some unlimited amount of time.

20.  The Israelites ate manna from heaven for forty years until they arrived in the land of milk and honey. (verse 35), then stopped (Josh 5:12)

21.  The golden jar of manna was then placed inside the Ark of the Covenant. (Exodus 16:33-34)

 

It was called “manna” because the Israelites had never seen it before. It was not coriander seed but like it. What then was manna? It was in Hebrew “mawn” (מָן): mem waw nun sofit.

 

Mem (מ) = water, flow, womb, source, emergence from the deep, or another realm.

Waw (ו) = hook, connection, joining, transmission, continuity.

Nun Sofit (ן) = seed extended to completion, perpetuation, continuance through generations, mature offspring, enduring life.

 

With that said, manna meant something: From (waw), emerging from some source (mem), to sustain life, and lasting for perpetuity (nun sofit).

Mem is most noted for providing the “living waters” for eternal life (John 7:38). It is not that manna was liquid at all, but although solid, within it would have been hidden the Spirit of God.

Jesus said, “I AM the Bread of Life: he that comes to Me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst” (John 6:35). Manna would have been the “bread” which the Israelites ate to sustain them.

Jesus reminded them: “Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and are dead... I am the living bread which came down from heaven” (John 6:49-51). Implied is that Jesus as the true “Bread” caused life for eternity whereas manna, albeit even though for perpetuity, the Israelites still died. Manna therefore was substitutional until the True Bread was delivered by God, “magically” from the womb of Mary.

The bread in the golden pot was placed in the Ark of the Covenant to suffice until the True Bread was delivered. Hence, the manna was a token for the Body of God, much like the bread of the Last Supper.

Have you wondered about the “golden bowl” of Solomon’s sayings? Solomon, writing about death, said, “Or ever the silver cord be loosed, or the golden bowl be broken, or the pitcher be broken at the fountain, or the wheel broken at the cistern” (Ecc 12:6). Perhaps that “golden bowl” was the golden pot of manna.

If the golden bowl was broken, then the manna would decay. The “silver cord” is literally a “pale twisted thread” (Strong 2006), surely representing human DNA that would be loosed into the soil.

The golden bowl, or pot, would release the Spirit of God in the preserved manna, and the Spirit would return to heaven from which it came. That it would do, according to the Revelation of John.

Manna was glorious because it would never decay; it was everlasting like the immortal soul of mankind.

Jesus also said, “I AM the living bread which came down from heaven; if any man eat of this bread, he shall live forever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world” (John 6:51)

The “Bread of Life” is the flesh of Christ Jesus. Before, the bread of life had been manna, but the last of it was placed into the golden bowl within the Ark of the Covenant. What happened to the Ark? With the defeat of Judea it disappeared. Where it is has always been a mystery.

The archeologist Ron Wyatt said he saw it in Jeremiah’s Grotto (aka, “Gordon’s Calvary”) with the dried blood of Jesus on its seat.

However, John saw it in the apocalypse: “The temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail” (Rev 11:19). Perhaps the lightening was the “glistening” from the manna.

What John saw in the Ark of the Covenant is not said, but among them would be the golden pot since three things were placed into the Ark for posterity.

“Posterity” would be the end of time and the apocalypse, so within the Ark in heaven sometime in the future after the temple is rebuilt, the golden pot of manna would last its name.

With that said, manna would be a token for the Body of Christ. When the Israelites ate manna on the way to death in the wilderness, they would have been nourished by the elements of the Body of Christ. Each day would have been Holy Communion (Eucharist) for them. Manna from heaven would have been the blessed sacrament for they were essentially eating a token of the Body of Christ.

Viewed through the symbolic framework of the Hebrew alphabet, the relationship is far deeper than simple nourishment:

 

Manna from Heaven	Jesus, Bread of Life
Descended from heaven each morning	Descended from heaven once for all
Sustained physical life in the wilderness	Sustains spiritual and eternal life
Gathered daily	Received continually through faith
Temporary provision	Eternal provision
Fed Israel	Offered to all humanity
A sign	The reality signified by the sign

 

The manna they ate was the very structure of Jesus as the Bread of Life. The big difference is that they physically ate manna, but for Jesus as the Bread of Life, they would have eaten His Spiritual Presence — the Remembrance of Him, as it is written, “He took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave unto them, saying, ‘This is My Body which is given for you; this do in remembrance of Me” (Luke 22:19). Then those that hungered for Jesus ate the bread-like wafer. Like the Israelites, Christians symbolically eat Manna from heaven since the Body of Christ is in heaven.

Within the unleavened bread would be the “remembrance” of Jesus — the Holy Ghost who remains within true Christians. As such, the communion table is remembering the Exodus and their escape from Egyptian “Hell” and the Pharaoh — the “Devil.”

Jesus would have been with the Israelites, not in their stomachs, but within their souls. Eating would have merely been the process of consuming the Spirit of God.

Neither is the communion sacrament actually imbuing the Spirit but staying one with God.

Now consider the concept of “quantum entanglement.”

If two particles are from the same source at the same place, from wherever it is removed, they remain entangled unless some sort of decoherance, such as sin, interferes.

If one of those particles might remain here, and the other is moved any distance, then they remain entangled if there is no decoherence to intrude. If one particle is in heaven and the other here, then regardless of the distance and even the time, they can remain entangled.

So once in Christ always in Christ unless iniquity intervenes and the particle here serves another master (Mat 6:24) and as such, being entangled with two masters simultaneously is the ultimate decoherence. That is true with both scripture and science.

Hence, partaking of the elements: bread and wine (the Body and Blood of Jesus) entanglement would be kept and strengthened just as with the Israelites who never endured to the end, but were separated from the Promise Land before arriving in Canaanland.

Taking the elements unworthily would be for wrong reasons. It is to remember with whom a Christian is entangled; what we call “in Christ.” To stay in entangled, we must eat the Substance of Christ. It is not bread alone, but the Spirit, as suggested by Jesus, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every Word that proceeds out of the mouth of God” (Mat 4:4).

The communion table would be like eating the “Word” (Jesus) Himself. He is the Bread of Life and Jesus the Word as well.

The word was made flesh (John 1:14), so rather than eating the flesh of Jesus as our “Bread,” we are to eat the Word of God.

Returning now to manna (mawm):

 

Mem: Jesus comes from the Father's source (Elohim).

Jesus said, "I proceeded forth and came from God."

He is the originating life, the divine wellspring.

Waw: Jesus becomes the connector. Waw is the number six in gematria, the number of man, pointing to the Messiah. Jesus would have been the Supplier of the Bread of Life.

The pictographic waw is literally the hook that joins two things together such as God ↔ Humanity. Christ functions as the living Waw, reconciling heaven and earth.

Nun Sofit: Jesus imparts enduring life; "Whoever eats this bread shall live forever."

 

What the final Nun symbolizes is perpetual continuation of life that Christ actually accomplishes.

Therefore, manna as Mem-Waw-Nun Sofit means that Jesus, as the “Bread of Life,” becomes the Source Himself, becoming the Connection that grants eternal Continuance. Therein is the connection between manna and the Bread of Life.

The key ingredient in both is “Elohim” — the flow of living water — the Spirit (Elohim) of God (El) — into both the manna and the man, Jesus. Hence, the unleavened bread without yeast to modify it becomes symbolic of the True Bread of Life and the practice of it as much eating the Word which has what in it? God Elohim.

One last connection just to clarify: Adam had “dominion” over the other beasts of the field and even lower states of men — Remes (Gen 1:28; creeping things). The word “dominion” is also translated as a “crumbling.”

God created all the beasts of the field but more so with Adam, God put Himself into Adam. Himself was the Image (Hebrew; Elohim.) Elohim essentially implies living water from the belly of God. Adam would have drunk from the fountain of God, translated as a mere “mist” (Gen 2:6).

Now for an analogy: If God is represented as a huge cookie, or even a large loaf of bread, then Adam would have crumbled from the cookie/bread. If the bread was yeast, that would represent the Spirit of God.

That particle of bread that crumbled would have given Adam eternal life like the manna from heaven was meant to do, for in the Garden, there should have been no decoherence.

The God-Cookie, or Bread, if you like bread better, always existed, but then the Cookie crumbled.

Adam would have been the first to crumble from the God-Cookie. The others were just made by the Great Baker to look like man in some manner but without the essential ingredient — Elohim.

The crumble from Elohim would have been one Eloha for man and one Eloha for the woman, and because they were both crumbled from God, then they would have been entangled as one (Gen 2:21) of the same structure, not just a “rib.”

Think now about entanglement: If one changes even later in time, the other changes as well because they are one flesh. When the woman sinned, sin was accounted to the man as well, two wit: Paul wrote, "Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned" (Rom 5:12).

If the woman had not sinned, then the man would have not known sin and would have continued in God’s Elohim. Adam and Isha (the woman) are a classic case of quantum entanglement from which they fell due to the flesh of some Beast whom she sought to bond with.

Only Adam’s kind were parts of the Cookie/Bread. The others resembled the cookie/bread but had not yeast, or Spirit; the critical divine Substance was missing.

Perhaps, Lucifer got into the man-like Beast to share a part of the crumbs from the Cookie. Isaiah implied that: “I (Lucifer) will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High” (Isa 14:14). Not satisfied with his low state, with no estate, Lucifer got into the Beast to be sort of like the Bread-Man from above.

Lastly, consider the “herbs” that Adam’s kind allegedly ate: “Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the Earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat” (Gen 1:29). While the beasts of the field ate greenery, Adam’s kind ate so-called “herbs.” That is the English translation. The exact translation from which “herb” was extrapolated is “glisten” (Strong 2006).

The only food that I could find in scripture that glistening might apply is manna which was like hoar frost on the ground. With that said, if so, then the food in the Garden would need no digestion, and hence, there would have been no need for a digestive system, which by the way, also includes the pudenda… no need for aprons in the Garden before sin!

Adam and Isha would have multiplied by Spirit from the Bread of Life, not by sexual reproduction; the latter came from the biology of some beast.

God is the special Ingredient in the Bread of Life and “bread” would be the euphemism for the Body of Christ, according to Holy Communion.

 Holy communion to remain entangled with God by remembering His Body by the Spirit in the Bread of His Body.

The last premise needs testing; what is “herb” in the original Hebrew? Ehseb (עֵשֶׂב)… from the pictographs, that which is received, consumed, and becomes life within the house.

What was received in the Garden was the Light of God. The man and the woman received the Light of God. It would be their “food” because God emanated it and they imbued it. The outcome was life within their “house” or glorious bodies. They were not consuming normal food, not even meat or bread; the Majestic Cookie was shedding Light on the two and they were nourished.

The beasts may have eaten green herbs, but mankind needed not eat because they were glorious since God was in their incorruptible flesh.

Their food compares well to plant food like the animals would eat; they ate green herbs, meaning that the things that glistened which passed on life by photosynthesis; hence they physically ate light, but mankind “ate” nothing but Spirit in a sense.

The two were surely nourished by God in the manner of the “magic” in the loaves of bread from earlier. It is not that glorious man lived by photosynthesis like the plants, but that the Light of God was the Spirit of God — Elohim — that kept them going. That Adam’s Image was “Elohim”— living water, rather than Eloha, one particle, reveals that God nourished him all the time, not just one time.

What changed? They “ate” deception from the spirit of Satan and were lost to the world (Gen 3:24). Jesus returned to feed the elect — Adam’s kind — with glorious food again… the Spirit of God in the Body of Christ. Hence, communion is to be continual, not just a one-time event in the same manner as the manna was to last forever.

Jesus would be like manna but flesh rather than gloriousness, until He was glorified at death. The Yeast (the Holy Spirit) separated from the Bread and even with that the “Bread” of Jesus never decayed, nor stunk like uneaten manna.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A BEAUTIFUL MIND

 A chapter from my latest book (Theontology: The Theory of Everything) to be published in November on Amazon Books. My thoughts on the structure of our God-given minds and how the brain compares well with quantum entanglement.

I meditated on God as I wondered about the beautiful mind of human beings —the dominance that we have over each of the other beasts of the field (Gen 1:28).

There does seem to exist a parallel between human cognition, Genesis cosmology, and Quantum Reality, as it occurred to me.

I compared the human brain and the operation of the mind to the Creation structure and in parallel with quantum theory and Young's Double-Slit Experiment (See figure #12). What sought was whether the faculties of the left and right sides of the brain and the corpus collosum in between are comparative to both the "firmament" and the barrier with slits.

Of course, the model of which I was thinking is that the brain is somehow “male” and “female” in the processes of each half and that the corpus callosum is the union between the two. I also wondered about how the neural system and the synapsis would fit in. I was seeking a comprehensive comparison between the brain and its function in both theology and quantum theory, if any exists. Is there a parallel and if so, how?

Since the human brain is not merely an organ, but is a micro‑cosmos, appearing to be a living parable of the Creation structure. When Genesis speaks of the waters above and waters below, separated by the firmament, it is describing a division that is perhaps both cosmological and psychological. The brain mirrors this division with astonishing fidelity.

The left and right hemispheres are not simply two halves of a biological machine; they seem to be both male and female principles:  two modes of perception, two worlds of meaning.

The left hemisphere is analytic, linear, linguistic, and structural—an Adamic mode of naming, ordering, and defining. The right hemisphere is holistic, intuitive, imagistic, and relational—an Eve‑like (Isha-like before Eve sinned) mode of perceiving patterns, emotions, and the living unity of things.

Between them lies the corpus callosum, the shimmering bridge of neural fibers that allows the two worlds to speak to one another which corresponds well with both fiber optics and quantum thought.

Quantum thought in simple terms is when two of anything share the same characteristics, whether in another time or even a great distance, they are inexplicably linked; it is spooky action at a distance that prevails until and decoherence breaks the bond. That is the case of sin that disrupted the bonds between Adam’s kind and God and emancipated them from Him.

The corpus callosum acts like a firmament inside the skull, the dividing expanse that both separates and unites. Without it, the hemispheres become isolated realms; with it, they become a single creation. That is where quantum theory enters the picture.

Young’s Double‑Slit Experiment reveals that reality behaves differently depending on whether it is observed:  light becomes a particle when watched, or a wave when unobserved. Consciousness collapses possibility into actuality.

The brain, with its divided hemispheres, performs a similar miracle. The right hemisphere perceives the world as wave—a field of possibilities, impressions, intuitions, and holistic patterns. The left hemisphere collapses that wave into particle—a defined object, a named thing, a discrete unit of meaning.

The corpus callosum is the “slit” — the threshold through which raw perception becomes structured reality. It is the place where the wave of experience passes through the narrow gate of cognition and emerges as the particle of thought. The brain is performing the double‑slit experiment continuously, moment by moment, turning the quantum haze of sensory input into the crisp world of conscious experience. It’s speed — the speed of thought — is quantum speed perhaps for the greatest minds, faster than the speed of light. That “Great Mind” would be Father God — the Aleph in the Hebrew alphabet.

In Genesis terms, the right hemisphere is the “waters above” the realm of archetype, imagination, and unbounded potential. The left hemisphere is the “waters below,” the realm of form, definition, and earthly manifestation. The corpus callosum is the firmament, the boundary that both divides and connects, allowing the two realms to interact without collapsing into chaos.

Even the neural system fits this cosmology. Neurons fire in quantum‑sensitive ways; synapses behave like thresholds as tiny “gates” where electrical potential becomes chemical reality. Every synapse is a miniature “slit,” a place where possibility becomes action. The entire neural network is a living tapestry of quantum collapses, each one shaping the next moment of consciousness.

The mind, therefore, is not merely housed in the brain—it is generated by the interplay between these divided realms.

Consciousness arises from the tension between the hemispheres, just as creation arises from the tension between the waters. The male and female principles of the brain are not metaphors; they are structural realities. The corpus callosum is the marriage bond, the covenant between the two.

When the hemispheres communicate harmoniously, the mind becomes a unified creation: ordered, imaginative, relational, and capable of perceiving both the world as it is and the world as it might be. When they fall out of balance, the mind becomes fragmented, either trapped in rigid analysis or lost in unbounded intuition. That would be psychosis. In a manner of speaking atheists would have psychosis, inventing in their minds an alternate reality which they would live as if it is true!

In that sense, the human brain is a Genesis engine, a living model of the creation narrative; it divides, separates, names, orders, and unites. It collapses waves into particles and bridges heaven and earth. It is the place where the quantum realm becomes the human story.

Perhaps this is why the Bible speaks of humanity before sin as made in the image of God; not because of physical form, but because the structure of the mind mirrors the structure of creation itself. The beautiful mind is a microcosm of the beautiful cosmos. It seems to have the same structure as the Hebrew alphabet as so many processes in the Bible, with the ability to map the hemispheres into my “Genesis Quantum Alphabet,” structure, aligning each letter with a cognitive faculty, or with the possibility of integrating neuroscience, quantum theory, and “Tektonic” cosmology, since the “poor carpenter,” Jesus, was not just a carpenter but tectonic!

Indeed, we do have beautiful minds providing they are used. Satan disrupts our minds as “Prince of the Power of the Air” by occupying us with the things of the world. What separates people from God?  Our pattern of thoughts. The “Word” must be our pattern for the things of God are structured after that same alphabet as the table on “Christology” (page X) in the Appendix portrays.

God said, “My Thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways… (Isa 55:8). They can be, in fact, that is in Christ — when our thoughts are aligned with the Thoughts of God such as on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2:1). Our beautiful minds have been despoiled by sin. Our minds are mostly darkness… about 10% of its capacity used. Time wastes our beautiful minds with thoughts about everything but God. Even our minds fail to comprehend God.

Read some of God’s word and then mediate on it and God will expand your minds. That is my story about so much of the esoteric understanding of scripture within the pages of this book.

Transcendental meditation is all about you repeating sounds such as “om” which is considered the foundational vibration of the entire universe. It is believed that by repeating it aligns one’s personal frequency with the universal frequency of creation. In other words, meditation in that vein is becoming one with the cosmos whereas Christian meditation is becoming one with the Creator of the Cosmos.

With that background, my theory is that Vedic philosophy is blessing, or literally “kneeling” to the Creation rather than the Creator, to wit:

 

When they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, neither were thankful, but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened; professing themselves to be wise, they became fools and changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things.

Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves; who changed the truth of God into a lie and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. (Rom 1:21-25)

 

Therefore, mediate on the Creator, Jesus Christ (John 1:1-14) — the “Word” of God and the structure defined in the Hebrew alphabet.

The Vedic religion, like most pagan religions, are nothing more than misunderstandings of the Will of God; sort of worshipping, but coming far short of understanding both the glory of God and our own beautiful minds.

ABC’S: THE ORDER OF CREATION

 

What follows is a chapter about creation from my latest book. That the Hebrew alphabet seems to be the "Word" was heavily on my mind.

 

Since there was nobody to write down Genesis then how did it come into existence? [1]

In Eden, speech would have been nothing more than secondary since those connected (vav; quantum entanglement) would known the thoughts of God. That ability is spooky action allowed communication by what is now called “telepathy.

Adam and his mate were in union with God with the Spirit of God (ruah) given to them by Elohim from El.

Think of El as the source of Light, Ya as the switch that lights, and Elohim as the emanation of the Light of God itself. Elohim provide the substance of El for Adam. (For greater understanding, see the countenance of God symbolized in the electrical circuit in the following figure):

 

Figure 7: The Power of God and the trans-resistance of Satan

Many people in search of hidden knowledge describe the Creation in terms of wave theory; for each action there is a corresponding wave associated with it. That the Light of God is the most elementary of all the waves adds credence to that. The Hebrew letter mem ascribes to living waters and was first written as a picture of waves.

 

Figure 8: Hebrew letter mem (agapegeek)

The pictograph of mem represented turbulent standing waves with power, not just smooth capillary waves of water at rest. Mem implied dynamics, or activity. From that came the idea of the creation of spacetime and matter. In fact, the “waters below” of the genesis would be that material.

Even today, wave theory is common and descriptive. Various sounds create waves of different amplitudes and frequencies as well as wave forms. Each sound of each letter of the Hebrew alphabet has its own distinctive waveform.

From table X in the Appendix, the letter tav is revealed by a collapse waveform. Say “tav” and listen to the sound level, first at a high threshold, then suddenly drop to almost nothing with the vuh sound, as shown in the graphic that follows.

 

Figure 9: The Sound of Tav

“Created” in the beginning is bara (בָּרָא), as always, read from right to left. The beth sound therein is primordial space (something from nothingness).

The sound resh would be the first order of things, and the aleph the field of the Light of God. The latter, the aleph sound is a carrier wave — an unmodulated wave that is silent because it is a steady, constant signal that contains no audio or data. It is just transmission of silent Power, so the sound of aleph would be silence, as if a gentle but powerful wind about to blow.

That should bring to your mind the Holy Ghost, to wit:

 

When the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place, and suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. (Acts 2:1-2)

 

There was peace in preparation of something, like a calmness before the storm. God was with them but silent.

That silent, but always Present Power, would be God “El” (the letter aleph). He made no sound, but they were quite aware of His Presence, and then a sound came from heaven like a mighty rushing wind. That is the sound of the letter resh, the second letter of bara. The mighty comes from the Aleph/El.

Then the resh sound filled the house (bet) in which they sat. The sound resh introduced the bet (buh). They heard the word “bara” with God creating His Church, just like the heaven/earth in the beginning!

The wave form of the sound resh is called “integrative” — a wave of a disturbance that travels through space or matter to transfer energy from one place to another without transporting the actual matter itself. God was there in Jerusalem and was integrating the multitude as one body in Christ.

Not by coincidence, God was building His “House,” not of material, but like heaven in the beginning. The sound of beth is a standing wave.

A standing wave, or stationary wave, is an interference pattern created when two identical waves travel through a medium in opposite directions and superimpose upon each other.

In this case, they were all of one accord and with God; so, the accordance and the Presence of God collided (resh) in a sense, and God superimposed Himself on all on whom the Holy Ghost was received. The sound of that standing wave still exists as the Church. In Matthew 16:13-20, it is written that Jesus declares that He will build His church, and "the gates of Hades will not overcome it.”

The day of Pentecost was barah, creating a new thing, and the sounds of that word describe the events in Jerusalem when God silently spoke His Hebrew language, and in turn, all of them that heard understood!

After God made His grand entry from “backstage,” He spoke to them, I believe, in Hebrew sounds that many understood and spoke back. God spoke silently in His Thoughts.

Now say “bara” out loud buh-rrrrr-uh. Now go ahead and think those same sounds; you can “hear” them spoken in your mind.

What goes on inside your head? It translates sound waves from thought waves, even when there are no sounds from God. Those in good standing with God “hear” His divine Thoughts. We hear God with brain waves such as shown in the next figure (Pearce 2025):

 

Figure 10: Alpha, Theta, Delta + Gamma

Those same waves coincide with the sounds of the Hebrew pictographs. You hear God as the Voice of God, silent as it may be!

 Although brain waves and sounds of Hebrew letters are not the same thing, functional correspondence is based on how each class of Hebrew phoneme is produced in the mouth (Sefer Yetzirah’s five articulation zones), and what brain‑wave bands are known to dominate during those cognitive/motor acts. That gives you a best‑fit mapping, not a literal frequency match, as follows:

 

1.      The guttural letters (א ה ח ע), articulated in the throat have a neural profile and as such:

 

·         Strong theta (phonological retrieval)

·         Alpha (internal attention)

·         Occasional gamma (semantic integration)

 

The closest EEG correspondence would be theta–alpha dominant.

 

2.      The palatal letters (ג י כ ק) articulated at the palate would have a neural profile:

 

·         Alpha (imagery, internal visualization)

·         Beta (motor‑speech planning)

·         Gamma bursts (symbol recognition)

 

The best EEG correspondence would be alpha–beta with gamma spikes.

 

3.      The lingual letters (ד ט ל נ ת), articulated with the tongue would have a neural profile:

 

·         Strong beta (tongue‑motor planning)

·         Theta (sequencing inner speech)

·         Light gamma (semantic binding)

 

The best EEG correspondence would be Beta–Theta dominant.

 

4.      The dental letters (ז ס ש צ), articulated with the teeth would have a neural profile:

 

·         Beta (fine motor control)

·         Alpha (internal attention)

·         Gamma (symbolic recognition)

 

Best EEG correspondence would be beta–alpha with gamma flicker.

 

5.      Labial letters (ב ו מ פ), articulated with the lips would have a neural profile:

 

·         Strong beta (lip‑motor planning)

·         Alpha (imagery, internal focus)

·         Occasional theta (phonological recall)

 

The best EEG correspondence would be beta-alpha dominant; therefore speech is just audible ways of thinking. God know what you think as you pray. Audibility is for the conversion of others.

Consider the guttural letters aleph, hey, chet, and ayin which would lean more toward theta brain waves with mostly visualization.

That agrees very well with the Hebrew letters which are generally those the most silent and unpronounced.  That is why the thoughts of humans compare well with the sounds of the Hebrew letters, and their sounds are as much thoughts that are expressed vocally.

The point is that the sounds from the throat (guttural) are mere deep breaths rather than audible sounds. Note that hey and chet are both silent, but chet releases a bit of palatial sounds or gamma waves.

 Indeed, there is a connection between what we think and speak and perhaps countenance influences the sound waves of speech.

---

[1] In my book, The Skull of Adam, I contended that God thought and things happened.