Wednesday, April 15, 2026

NAKEDNESS

 


This commentary provides much esoteric, or hidden  knowledge, and is important for us to humble ourselves for God to lift us up. Now consider a show that I am ashamed that I watched.

In the sitcom “Seinfeld” (Season 9; episode 9) called “The Apology,” Jerry dated a woman who was comfortable being naked. It disgusted him to see a grown woman sitting casually on the sofa doing nothing but being naked.

Unlike most men, Seinfeld found that disgusting. His male friends did not understand, so he described “good naked” and “bad naked.” Unknown to Jerry, he was describing a biblical concept from the passages which follow:

 

·         “The man and his wife “were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed” (Gen 2:24) ostensibly in the Presence of God.

·         After eating of the “Wisdom Tree, “The eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons, and they heard the Voice of the Lord God walking in the Garden in the cool of the day and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the Presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the Garden.” (Gen 3:7:8)

 

Before sin, the two would have been glorious and full of glory; כָּבוֹד Kabowd. Within them would have been the “Image” of God, Tselem (צֶלֶם), that provided the Glory of God (Elohim) to them. The essence of the Presence of God would be Kabowd in the form of Tselem.

Now to analyze Kabowd first:

 

·         Qof means in a hidden dimension.

·         Bet symbolizes emergence from hidden probabilities.

·         Vav means bound in both heaven and earth.

·         Dalet indicates entry into what we call the world.

 

In summary, the state of Adam was like one emerging from a non-material world into a material one. The “hidden probabilities,” is perhaps Calvin’s doctrine of “election” for only Adam’s kind would have emerged from the heavens unto the world with God, Elohim, in him.

Now you might see that scripture begins to make sense. Adam was before space/time and matter and of Elohim; and after entry into it, Tselem — the very Image of Elohim in bodily shape as with Jesus (Luke 3:22). That Image would have been “full of glory” of which the apostle Paul wrote to Peter in the case of Jesus by then gone:

 

That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perishes, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ; whom having not seen, you love; in whom, though now you see Him not, yet believing, you rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory. (1 Pet 1:7-8)

 

Paul compared to the fullness of glory to the human soul (1 Pet 7:9), “Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls” (1 Pet 1:9).

Jesus was the Glory of God in the shape of a man and as such “the last Adam” (1 Cor 15:45), “The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening Spirit.”

Therefore, Yeshua (the last Adam) was the Spirit in the first Adam that was a living soul. Like Jesus, Adam would have had Elohim in his person from the bodily Presence of God (Yeshua).  John described the creation of Adam eloquently:

 

In the beginning was the Word (Jesus to be made flesh), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; the same was in the beginning with God.

All things (like Adam) were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made, in Him was life; and the life was the Light of men. (John 1:1-3)

 

The substance of God in Adam was His Light as God said it, “Let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give Light upon the earth: and it was so” (Gen 1:15). The lights of heaven (Gen 1:6) would cross the firmament between heaven and earth, and would be the lights of men, most assuredly the immortal souls prepared for only Adam’s kind.

Just as “stars” in Revelation reveal angels, the lights of heaven would surely reveal primordial souls of men.

That action was God’s selection, or “election” as translators called it; “(God) has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love” (Ephes 1:4).

Adam would have been created from the very Light of God. As such, the soul of Adam (Tselem) would be Adam as a “shadow” or “phantom” of God (Strong 2006). God is Light and in Him is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5). Hence, even the shadow of God — the “living soul” of the man, Adam, would have been full of Light as John wrote (John 1:3). [1]

The Light of God within the living soul of the man, Adam, would have been the Glory of God — the Presence of the Light of God within the soul of Adam.

Christians must do the math, so to speak. Since Paul was writing about selection before the foundation of the world, the readers must visit The Book of Genesis to find out how so, when, and why.

John even added where to find that (John 1). Genesis was the beginning of things just as John and Paul revealed. God would not have been a “Particular Baptist” but would baptize all (General Baptists) of Adam’s kind as His people.

Paul wrote:

 

There is one body, and one Spirit, even as you are called in one hope of your calling: one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. (Ephes 5:4-6)

 



Adam was baptized by the Elohim of God and was raised from the waters as a living soul. Baptism of the Spirit (The living waters of God — HaShamayim). The baptism of Jesus was in the same manner as Adam was baptized:

The Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him, and a Voice came from heaven, which said, “You are My beloved Son; in You, I AM well pleased. (Luke 3:22) 

 

Adam was also baptized by the Spirit of God in bodily shape when he was made alive.

God provided for Adam a living soul, then put his soul into a material vessel.

For Jesus, it was somewhat different; God Elohim always existed and onto Himself in the womb of Mary, He added the flesh like a sinful man to become sin for us (2 Cor 5:21). As such, Jesus required baptism first to cleanse the disgust from His flesh in preparation for God Elohim to enter His Vessel.

Now imagine the Spirit of God (Elohim) in bodily shape (Eloha) entering the man, Adam. Jesus always existed but not in the flesh of a Beast like us. He was glorified (John 7:39) when He received new flesh much different than before the crucifixion.

So, what does all this have to do with “good naked” and “bad naked?”

Tselem was the Image of God and the substance kawbod.

However, the next act of God was a covering for the soul of man. Before that, the substance of Adam would have been the Elohim “Spirit” of God in the shape of a man without a covering. Then “the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Gen 2:7). God then made a vessel and put the Spirit in the shape of a man into the man, Adam.

Adam would have therefore pre-existed as a Spirit-shaped man. In the creation process, that Spirit, shaped like Adam, would have received a covering. Translated “dust” let’s examine the substance. Dust would be the earth, ‘eres in the Hebrew, but Adam was formed from the dust (‘apar) of the ground (adama).

His covering would have been a particle (‘apar) of adama. So, what is the substance adama?

 

Adam is the root word (אֲדָמָה) of “the ground,” thus a material in substance. Let’s examine that material:

 

אֲ represents the Power of God (El) as Light.

דָ symbolizes the Way or process to become matter.

מָ represents the Living Waters, or Holy Spirit Elohim.

ה is symbolized by a man-like figure beholding, or praising, God.

 

Adama would have been Spirit from God in the shape of a man. It would not necessarily have been ground or even clay.

The vessel for the Spirit of God in Adam would have been some divine covering, that Adam was naked and not ashamed tells us much.

Divinely “naked” is symbolized by the Hebrew word ‘arom (עָרוֹם). Without going into all the symbolism, I visulaized naked and not ashamed, as “transparent,” and AI CoPilot® deduced the same thing.

That situation, with adama as the covering of Adam, makes sense since it would cover the Glory of God in the man-like Spirit.

As a covering, adama can either be full of something, or even empty. Adamic man was surely full of the Spirit of God and was not ashamed. Since Glory is the Goodness of God, adama would have been “good naked” as Seinfeld called it.

Adam was not ashamed because he would have been transparent and the Glory of God revealed within him.

Now for “bad naked” (‘erom; עֵירֹם compared to ‘arom (עָרוֹם). They are both modes of nakedness because they share three letters עָרם. The difference is between the letters yod (י) and vav (וֹ).

The letter vav represents, among other things, the Messiah. That agrees with the relationship between the first Adam and the last Adam of which Paul wrote (from earlier). That would be “good naked.”

Bad naked is not all bad but with the letter yod (י) alone, it is God Ya (the sound of His Voice). Bad naked would be without the quickening Spirit of the last Adam, but only the potentiality of Father God, Ya.

Just as with Seinfeld’s concept of bad naked, Adam had new flesh from the old creature making God within himself hidden… and he was indeed ashamed.

After sin, God Ya would have been hidden by flesh that was acquired from some beast — perhaps an organic covering, containing chromosomes from some beast of the field.

Among the beasts of the field that are listed are the “creeping things” — lower states of men as the Hebrew word Remes indicates (Gen 1:26). (See my book, The Creeping Things of the Bible for more.)

Bad naked, to be ashamed of it, would be God hidden from view with organic flesh as a covering. Therefore, the flesh has become the idols of what was once Adam’s kind but are now Enosh kind — common mortal men.

Cain was the first of that kind, “Ish” as the genetics of Isha (the woman). Before, God had been the Creator “Husbandman,” but after sin, the woman would have become the “husbandman” with her as the creator (Gen 4:1), or as John wrote the words of Jesus, “For all that is in the world: the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world (1 John 2:16).

Of what flesh was Adam ashamed? That with sin, and the flesh of the old creature covering his divine body, Yahweh would have been hidden from sight.

Adam was not totally depraved but ashamed of his flesh.

God remedied that by the grace with which he covered the beastly flesh of Adam and his mate: “Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins and clothed them” (Gen 3:21).

God would have covered bad naked but good naked was also still covered. By grace, we must be born again and engendered with a new Spirit (Elohim) of El of which we are never to be ashamed, as it is written, “For whosoever shall be ashamed of Me and of My Words, of him shall the Son of man (Jesus) be ashamed, when He shall come in His own Glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels” (Luke 9:26).

Jesus — God in the flesh — upon death and resurrection was glorified (John 7:39). As “bad naked” creatures, we would be ashamed of a soul covered by the flesh of a beast, but with a particle (Eloha) of God Elohim within us, we should not be ashamed for that one particle (Eloha) of the blood of Jesus would cover the shameful naked flesh of His new creatures. That is the meaning of “born again” (John 3:7).

Somehow God shielded Adam and Eve’s corrupted flesh with grace that He provided out of mercy, for in the beginning, they had been His Creatures.

Satan to Job called that shield a “hedge” and surely it was the Garment of Adam that covered Job, and later even John the Baptist, who wore a coat of camel’s skin. (More about that in a future commentary.)

Seinfeld… there does exist both good naked and bad naked. Whereas, good naked is transparency of some sort for God to be seen within, perhaps the very YY-chromosomes of God; bad naked means “exposed” to the sin within mankind, not even covered with the flesh of beasts (John 8:44). Grace covers all sin and it is a from God for us to not be ashamed of Him in our souls, for those who belong to Him.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] Modern quantum mechanics have now found that light is even in the darkness of the vacuum of space, thus verify God’s Words.

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

THE LAST WORD

 After reviewing your comments over the years, I want to admit something; I AM NOT the final WORD; Jesus is. I have ideas which I get from scripture, but according to scripture, we are to test all things and hold onto what is good.

Often times, after writing,  I am corrected by more study of the Bible. That is why we have scripture: 

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. (2 Tim 3:16)

Please, if you disagree with my assessment, kindly let me know for I do change my way of thinking, given more evidence. Keep in mind though that we may read the same words but understand them differently.

I AM is God; I AM not nor do I claim to be.  Likewise, neither are you God. Humble yourselves and when I make errors in understanding, I am indeed humbled.  

I try to never let my denomination govern my own understanding or doctrine because denominations of which all churches are, are such because they disagree. 

Generally, I try to ignore differences and focus on Jesus with Him crucified and resurrected. I do have opinions on about all issues, as you do as well, but none of us have absolute truth.

My hope is that God pardons what I fail to understand and blesses me with what I do understand.

My hope is that you will react the same way.


Larry

EATING OF CHRIST AND SHARING HIM

 EVAGELISM:

The apostles saw the hungry multitude and wondered how they could all be fed, so their idea was to dismiss all the others and for them alone to dine with Jesus.

Jesus would be their teacher; He would show them divine mathematics.

Remember in the beginning, God had said to Adam and his woman, “Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it” (Gen 1:28). Well, He was about to show the apostles multiplication as He dispensed and multiplied with fruits of the earth.

 

(Jesus) took the five loaves and the two fishes, and looking up to heaven, he blessed them , and brake, and gave to the disciples (5000; verse 14) to set before the multitude, and they did eat, and were all filled and there was taken up of fragments that remained to them twelve baskets. (Luke 9:16-17)

 

Jesus revealed to the masses that He was God for He took smaller amounts of things and made more things of the same substances.

In science, making articles from particles is called quantum “matter creation” and of course the quantum came from the Power of God in Yeshua (ישוע).  Technically Yeshua is not only “Jesus” in the English (“Ya saves”) but the letters themselves have intrinsic value:

 

·         י the first spark of measurable reality like a capacitor or a jump start.

·         ש synthesis.

·         ו quantum entanglement of in theology, binding forces.

·         ע observable reality.

 

Those four Hebrew letters not only describe the Person of God but the increase in bread and fish. Jesus was revealing the Power of God in Himself. He increased bread and fish from His self-contained Power “El Shaday” just as in the beginning.

Throughout the entire Old Testament the M.O. of God was to increase in numbers; as an example God said:

 

For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to Him, and to keep His commands, decrees and laws; then you will live and increase, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land you are entering to possess. (Deut 30:16)

 

For instance, God took Adam and increased his numbers, God graced Noah with great numbers, God increased Jacob called “Israel” and increased his numbers, and so it goes with Jesus and The Great Commission:

 

Jesus came and spoke unto them, saying, “All power is given unto Me in heaven and in earth; go you therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost…(Mat 28:18-19)

 

What Jesus did not say:

 

1.      I am powerless.

2.      Stay comfortable and forget My Power of increase.

3.      Stay put and I will do all the multiplication.

4.      Keep your faith to yourselves for it might be offensive to others.

5.      Baptize them in the things of the world like rules, regulations, and even rituals. (Baptism is in the name of God, Yeshua — the vessel for the Power of God (Elohim) in one Person having Eloha, a “fragment” of Elohim.)

 

The Power of increase is really the Power of God in you. You must be in Christ, meaning to have a particle of Christ in you, as with Adam, God saying, “Let us (Elohim) make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion (“to crumble off” a particle from Elohim —  Eloha) over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth” (Gen 1:26).

The Hebrew word translated “dominion” is רָדָה radah.

 

·         ר emergence of order.

·         ד entry into space/time and matter.

·         ה expansion, inflation, or simply increase.

 

When God increased the bread and fish, in the Hebrew that would have been radah. Jesus indeed took of Himself as God and made an increase when a two fish and five loaves of bread; increased enough for the multitude and had more fragments left over than existed in the beginning. Jesus was revealing the Power He had over the world.

The fragments that remained after radah were not there in the beginning. Jesus, as God, had created the increase, and with the Power of God in you, you too can increase.

Jesus took twelve Jewish men and by now there exists in the world these amounts:

 

Global Religious Populations (2025–2026 Estimates)

Below is a table of the largest world religions by estimated number of adherents, based on 2025–2026 global data Statistics and Data+2.

Religion / Sect

Estimated Population

% of World Population

Sunni Islam

1,579,268,274

~30.0%

Roman Catholic

1,268,004,246

~26.7%

Hinduism

1,075,098,000

~15.0%

Protestant Christianity

625,452,306

~11.0%

Eastern Orthodox Christianity

294,957,346

~4.0%

Mahayana Buddhism

341,318,714

~4.1%

Theravada Buddhism

187,979,425

~2.0%

Shinto

122,667,219

~1.3%

Anglican Christianity

75,844,450

~0.8%

Shia Islam

221,790,956

~2.8% (within Islam)

Vaishnavism (Hinduism)

399,526,000

~3.3% (within Hinduism)

Shaivism (Hinduism)

385,423,000

~3.2% (within Hinduism)

Oriental Orthodox Christianity

72,000,000

~0.7%

Mormonism (LDS)

17,200,000

~0.2%

Judaism

14,800,000

~0.1%

Bahāʾī

9,150,000

~0.1%

Zoroastrianism

205,000

~0.002%

Agnosticism / Atheism

~744–147 million

~8–15% (varies by source)

Notes:

  • Percentages are approximate and vary by source; some totals (e.g., agnosticism/atheism) are not always included in religious affiliation counts.
  • “Other religions” and smaller traditions (e.g., Shinto, Daoism, Jainism) are also present globally but have much smaller populations.
  • Christianity as a whole (Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglican, Mormon, etc.) is estimated at over 2.5 billion adherents Britannica.
  • Islam’s total (Sunni + Shia + other) is about 1.8–1.9 billion Britannica.

This table reflects the current global religious landscape, with Christianity and Islam dominating in sheer numbers, followed by Hinduism, Buddhism, and a wide range of smaller traditions. (AI Overview)

 

Jesus took 12 men and now there are 2.5 billion people who identify with Jesus of a total of 8.3 billion. Only 0.014 billion identify with Judaism. While Judaism has stagnated, Christianity has increased. (Of course, many claim to be Christians, but self-acclamation does not make anyone a Christian.)

The comparison is that Jesus increased Himself to twelve, then twelve to many, and many to 2.5 billion. The increase in loaves and fishes revealed the Power in Jesus as the Way to eternal life.

Since there are only 2.5 billion claiming to be in Christ and 6 billion not in Christ, reveals a golden opportunity for the 2.5 billion to increase.

Jesus was a great fisherman of men, catching twelve of the best in just a short time. Those twelve had soon grown to twelve or more churches, and by the first quarter of the third century, the Roman Empire was following Jesus at least in name.

What did Jesus do to provide an increase in numbers? He fed them fish and bread.

Fish in scripture represents evangelism: persuading others to become Christians. Evangelism is much more than gathering one fish at a time that God has trapped for you but going into the world to fish for men.

The Hebrew letter mem represents fish and fishing — making an increase in what God began.

Bread represents potentiality in theology for bread increases when just a lump of yeast makes the loaves rise.

The “bread” of life consists of the Spirit of God as the leavening agent, but there is also another leaven that spoils the loaf, “Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; you are fallen from grace” (Gal 5:4).

The effect of Christ in you is the leavening agent of the Spirit. However, you as the “loaf” can be punched down by the wicked ones with the grace of God removed until your “loaf” falls. If you are not increasing, then the Spirit may not be active in you. You may be the loaf but remain flat without the leavening agent of God in you. With that, the yoke, albeit leavened, may fall.

Grace in the Hebrew is חֵחֵ chen.

 

·         חֵ separation in realms and separated unto God from the world.

·         חֵ sofit meaning eternal life as nun represents life and the fish the multitude that ate.

 

Note that Jesus fed them all but like a probability cloud, all were not engendered by God. In other words, all of them were potentiates, albeit only a fragment would have become candidates. That defies the Calvinistic doctrine of election for all there had received grace, but not all would have become Christians.

 

So, the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen… for many are called, but few are chosen. (Mat 20:16; 22:14)

 

They all ate of Jesus (the Bread of Life) and His movement (the fish), but there were fragments that went right back into the bread and dish baskets.

There was food for more, but perhaps some were not hungry enough to partake of the body of Christ which the bread represents, and not His Way as the fish represents.

One can surmise that the fragments of fish and bread were not wasted but would feed others, although some that day would not have eaten.

Sometimes Christians feel alone in the world, but there are six-billion opportunities in the world to whom we can feed the bread and fish — the Person of God and the Way of God.

Note that without one or the other, the mission is not accomplished; there must be both bread and fish — there must be Jesus and His Way.

Jesus created and shared the grace, but not all of it was eaten. Grace can be shared but never forcefully fed. Some grace (the fragments) were left over to share, but for Calvinists they have the bread but depend on God to share it.

Saturday, April 11, 2026

IN A FISH, WHALE, OR ELSEWHERE

 Many people argue about whether Jonah was trapped inside a fish or whale for three days. Of course, with God all things are possible and either one may be the case. However, is it? A critical analysis is due.

First off, read the entire scripture about the adventures of Jonah (Jonah 1:17 through 2:10).

(To be honest, I reviewed only chapter one, so I had no recent knowledge of chapter two, albeit I continued my analysis to see if my hypothesis made sense.)


My hypothesis: Perhaps Jonah was in some other thing for three days.

The null of that: Jonah was not in some other thing.


If there is evidence that Jonah was in some other thing, then that decreases the probability that Jonah was in the belly of either a fish or a whale.

If there is any possibility that Jonah was in something else, then I fail to reject the null hypothesis which makes the hypothesis a possibility with some degree of confidence. That is the scientific method of testing for truth.


Consider the evidence from the Bible:

 

·         Now the Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights. (Jon 1:17)

·         (Jesus said) An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas; for as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. (Mat 12:29-30)

 

Two choices are given: the belly of a great fish and the belly of a whale. However, could there be a third choice? To determine that, we turn to the original languages. An obvious choice is that like Jesus, Jonah/Jonas would be in the heart of the earth for three days.


What does that mean? In the Greek, ho kardia ho ge. Since ho is “that” in English, and kardia the centroid of the soul, then the soul of Jesus would be between that and that. What is “that?” Ge. By extension, Ge is not just earth but any region.


Of course, the body of Jesus was in the ground three days in a sepulcher. However, where would have been the “heart” of the region? In scripture the heart of the earth would be what is called “Hades” in the Greek.


For at least parts of three days, Jesus would have been in Hades, or Hell, whether in bodily form or not is unclear. However, it makes sense that Jesus was in Hell in bodily form but not material substance, just as it was at His baptism… “the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him” (Luke 3:22).


Jesus compared Jonas in the belly of a whale to Himself in the belly of the Earth. That is evidence that might come in handy.


Next, consider the belly of “a great fish” in which Jonah was captured, in the Hebrew dag gadol dag to swallow up (bala’) Jonah.


First off, just as the “Ghost” (kardia) of Jesus is between two ho’s, gadol is between two dag’s.


Gadol is indeed translated a “fish,” but what would have the original pictograph’s have represented? Written גָּדוֹל may provide the answer: 

Gimmel (גָּ) theologically represents energy flow between realms.

Dalet (ד) represents a change in states into space/time and matter (or back).

Vav (וֹ) symbolizes a connection between heaven and earth, and

Lamed (ל) divine authority of being led from somewhere to elsewhere.

 

Translated “great,” it seems to be a great journey somewhere or somehow. The pictographs indicate it could be a journey from one realm to the other in the manner of Jesus’s trip to Hell, as it is written:

 

When He (Jesus) ascended up on high, He led captivity captive and gave gifts unto men. Now that He ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the Earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that He might fill all things. (Ephes 4:8-10)

 

Jesus had ascended to Paradise in heaven in bodily form and in like manner he had descended to the lower parts of the earth as well — to the “heart” of the Earth it would seem, or into Hell as most theologians interpret it. How did Jesus do that? Perhaps the Holy Ghost that had left Him went both to Paradise and to Hell while His body rested in the grave.


That is further evidence that Jesus easily translated between the realms of heaven and earth.

 The word “earth” is confusing because we most often think of this planet. But the heart of the earth is much like the soul of all things in the material cosmos, and of course, the “soul” of material things would be the heavens. In other words, like man and his heart, so it is with the cosmos and its heart, or center of existence.


Jonah would have changed states. It could have been from the waters of the sea into the belly of a great fish, or it may also have been from the earth’s estate to the heavens.


“Heaven” is often thought of a place of eternal life, but as it is written, “heaven” consists of both Hell and Paradise with a great gulf between them (Luke 16:26).


It may be that the “great” in “great fish: (gadol) is the same “great” as in “Great Gulf” and with that comparison, the “gulf” might very well be the “fish” of Jonah’s venture.


The great gulf of which Luke wrote was between Hell and Paradise. Perhaps the same applies to heaven and earth, the “firmament” (badal; בָּדַל), dividing the waters from the waters in scripture (Gen 1:6).

 

Bet (בָּ) indicates in space/time and matter

Dalet (ָדַ) symbolizes a change in states of existence.

Lamed (ל) divine authority of being led from somewhere to elsewhere.

 

Just like gadol (great), badal (firmament) is much the same and both represent a change in states from one existence to another. Jonah’s journey would have been a change in states from one existence to another, but it still could have been either a fish or a whale.

Translated “fish” Jonah was swallowed up by a dag (דָּג). The full word is spelled הַדָּג. The letter hey at the beginning would indicate God-breathed. So, wherever it was that Jonah had gone, God did it. Whether a fish or something else, God would have caused it.

 

Dalet (דּ) again symbolizes a change in states of existence. However, this time there is a dot or dagesh within it. The dagesh would indicating a piercing of a hard thing, maybe indicating from a firm place to a non-firm place of existence. 

Gimmel (ג) again represents energy flow between realms.

 

With that analysis dag could either be translated either as “fish” or just a change in physical states from earth to heaven. Remembering that heaven is both Hell and Paradise, then Jonah would have been taken to one or the other by the will of God.


Lastly, it was to the “belly” (meʻeh; מֵעֶה) of the fish (sic). Belly, as with Jesus, represents the source of living waters, mem in the Hebrew. Now examine the pictographs for belly:

 

Mem (מֵ) the living waters.

Ayin (ֵעֶ) the collapse of reality.

Hey (ה) God breathed into existence.

 

The “belly” may represent a transfer from real waters to spiritual waters, and not the belly of a fish at all.


Being a science fiction aficionado, I thought maybe a spacecraft from another world captured him, but not believing in aliens from another planet, I quicky discarded that notion.


Like Mr. Monk, I then said with certainty, “I know what happened,” then ran to my other half and told her! I told my wife that God had translated Jonah to Hell as a warning, not into the belly of a fish at all.

Now, the rest of the story.

 

Then Jonah prayed unto the Lord his God out of the fish's belly, and said, “I cried by reason of mine affliction unto the Lord, and He heard me; out of the belly of Hell cried I, and You heard my voice. (Jon 2:1-2)

 

Jonah had been in Hell, not in the belly of any fish, but the underside of the earth which represents Hades, or Hell.


The null hypothesis was that Jonah was not in some other thing. By his own words, Jonah was in Hell and by the Hebrew pictographs, He was in another realm other than this one. Jonah was in some other thing, so the evidence with near certainty is that Jonah was neither in the belly of a fish nor a whale.

However, there remains a problem; Jesus, who does not lie, said that Jonah spent “three nights in the “whale's belly.” However, that is a translation from the Greek language.


Jesus actually said, “en ketos koila.”


En is of course, “in.”


Ketos means some sea monster: either a big fish, whale, or other creature of the water. The root word of ketos is chasma — “a gaping opening, a chasm, a gulf” (Strong’s Dictionary). The “whale” could have been the “great gulf” between realms, not forgetting that it might also have been the belly of some sea monster.


Consider now the word koila, translated “belly.”


Another possibility is “the innermost part of a man, the soul, heart as the seat of thought, feeling, choice” (ibid). The belly of the chasm would be where? Another realm, perhaps Hell as the underside of the belly.


Therefore, the possibility does exist that Jonah spent three days in Hell in the manner of Jesus, and that fish and whales are either mistranslations or a metaphoric description that Jesus repeated.


However, Jonah was conscious that he had been in Hell. Could Hell be a state of mind and him only in a state of torment? Could Hell be both a mental state and another realm?


Whatever swallowed Jonas is not as important as that he was in Hell in whatever modality it was!

Saturday, March 7, 2026

MORE ABOUT HAWAIIANS

MORE ABOUT HAWAIIANS

 

In my book, The Arks of Tubal-Cain, I compared Hawaii, perhaps one location of the land of Nod, to which Cain wandered. The reason for that was Eve’s name; “Adam called his wife's (Ishah in Hebrew) name ‘Eve’ because she was the mother of all living” (Gen 3:20).  

Therein exists equality; she was called “Eve” because she was the mother of all living. Hence Eve is equivalent to “mother”, and hers the land of the living. Cain’s seed might be called the “Motherland”.

In Hebrew, Eve is spelled חַוָּה (right to left chet-vav-hey) which is transliterated “Haua” in the Hebrew. The first letter (חַ), I mistook for the letter hey (ה), and while realizing that the “u” has the waw sound, I thought That spells Hawaw’a which it does not. Strong’s Dictionary misled me as well sounding Haua khav-vaw'. However, the “k” is not sounded; it is merely a guttural “h” sound like a hard “h” compared to the letter hey as a soft, airy “h” sound.

By getting it wrong, I nearly got it right; Hav-VAW with the hey silent therein.

How would natives pronounce Hawaii?

Hawaiʻi is generally huh-VAH-ee (or ha-vai-ʻi), with a soft 'v' sound for the 'w' and a distinct pause (glottal stop) represented by the ʻokina (ʻ). While many locals use the 'w' sound, using a soft 'v' is considered authentic to the native language. (YouTube)

Now compare Haua (Eve) to Hawai’i. Note that the pause of the ʻokina replaces the silent hey in חַוָּה (Haua) and that the “u” has the sound of the VAH in huh-VAH-ee. Hence, it is hav-vaw for one and hav-Vah for the other with an extra ee sound.

In Hebrew, Hawai’i is pronounced Ha-VAH-ee, very much like Hawaiians pronounce it. In early times, generally the WAW sound for the letter vav was used rather than the VAH sound. If that is the case, then Eve’s name would be pronounced in ancient times as Haw-WAW-uh (the uh replacing the letter hey. Although not exact, the reader must admit that there are just too many similarities for them not to be common. With that, I submit that the island of Hawaii may have been named for Eve and like Eve it is the motherland.

That means that I may have stumbled upon something by accident; The island of Hawaii has something to do with Eve. Indeed, Hawaii is a “paradise” like Eden, so it made sense that the seed of Cain had found their own version of Paradise.

The next thought that came to me is What is notable about Hawaii? The hula dance, and as it turned out, hula means “wandering” in the same vein as the land of Nod.

Next, I wondered about their god(s). Who did they worship? Several sea creatures. I thought that perhaps friendly sea creatures guided them to a safe mountain during the flood of Noah.

Mount Kea is their holy mountain. and it is much higher than any of the mountains of Ararat. Mount Kea was created from a volcano, last active 4,500–6,000 years ago. Could it be that God provided a place because of His mercy and the “lighthouse” to guide them there?

The full name is Mauna a Wakea in their language. Wakea means “sky father” and represents space and the heavens. In Hebrew Wakea would be the same as the Hebrew Shamayim (the heavens). Mauna a Wakea would mean “mountain to the heavens”. Indeed, Mauna Kea is their most holy mountain.

Also, Raki'a (רָקִיעַ) refers to the "Firmament" or the "expanse" created to separate the waters from the heavens in Genesis. This closely mirrors Wakea's role as the expansive space above the earth.

In some contexts, Wakea (or Awakea) means "noon" or "light of day," symbolizing the vivifying influence of the Sun, or either the Light of God.

Wakea would be the progenitor of the Hawaiian people and the "Sky Father" — Father God. Could it be that they worshipped the same father God as Judeo-Christianity, but the wrong son? Who is their major God? Kane.

Representing the god of creation, procreation, and the Progenitor of chiefs and commoners. As a giver of life, he is associated with sunlight, fresh water, and the sky. He is revered as a creator who formed the earth and fashioned the first man. (Beckwith 1940)

Cain was the first mortal man — “Ish”— who like God existed within himself.

Now consider my young granddaughter; I asked of her, “Who taught you to speak?

Her short reply was, “I taught myself.” Compare that to Eve, “I created Ish-man, Cain” (Gen 4:1). Like the mother, like the son; Cain may have been thinking, I created myself!

Modern people think the same way; God did not create me, I just happened.

As such, Kane would parallel Jesus as the “Word” (John 1:1-14). Not Yeshua, but Kane, would be the Creator as God. The biblical Cain would be “the sky father” rather than either Adam or Yeshua. Hawaii would be the motherland of Eve.

The Serpent warned, “God knows that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Gen 3:5). If Kane/Cain was the “father of all living,” compared to Eve as the “mother of all living”, then Kane and Haua would be the Hawaiian version of the father and mother, respectively.

If so, then would expect incest to be part of the native religion. Was it? In ancient Hawaii, there were documented instances of incestuous, cross-generational, and sibling marriages within the Aliʻi — the noble and royal classes — which included some cases of a mother and son or father and daughter marrying.

 

The primary motivation for such marriages was to preserve the highest possible bloodline (mana) and keep it pure, as royal incest was considered a way to ensure the children had the highest possible status.

Aliʻi Pio (Highest Class): The highest-ranking chiefs were often the product of full-sibling unions. The practice was not considered a sin or social wrong within this exclusive, elite group. (AI Overview)

 

Now consider even the bloodline of the Hawaiians — mana. Even mana has Hebrew meaning; the mem-nun, the same as manna from heaven in the Bible. The letter mem means either blood or water, or even both, as Jesus described the prescription for salvation (1 John 5:6).

For the Hawaiians, their bloodline, true to the Bible, came both by water (the flood) and the blood (their genetics) just as with Noah’s seed.

What came by the water? The letter nun, representing both fish and semen. Could that be their mistaken doctrine of mana, crediting the ocean bearing creatures for their salvation, and making them the various gods in their pantheon?

What evolved in Hawaii would be a type of Judeo-Christianity as to be expected, so when Christian missionaries came to the island, it was difficult to alter their form of religion in favor of the religion of the white man; albeit similar, theirs included both good and evil.

Although I was mistaken in my reasoning, I accidentally found my hypothesis plausible. There is much evidence that the arks of Tubal-Cain made it far, far eastward of Eden.

Genetic studies indicate that Polynesian ancestors likely originated from, or passed through, East Asia, with significant mixing with Melanesian populations later. Their genetics are said to be around 80% Japanese because of migration from eastern Asia. They would have been from the land of Nod and from the land of the rising sun (Japan).

“Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden” (Gen 4:16). If Eden is the Holy Land, then Japan is eastward of Eden, and Hawaiians are the seed of the Japanese. That also points to water travel to escape the waters of the flood, and like their ancestors, high mountains would be the safe space and the place to worship their sky god.

Now back to phonetics. The Hebrew letters chet and hey are different but more common to the extent that some modern Hebrew words can either be written as “ch” as in chet or “h” as in hey.

Both chet and hey share the same form: חַ and ה, respectively. They are connected by the letter vav (וָּ) which means “connected”. Although spelled חַוָּה, the word Haua (Eve) is pronounced Khav-vaw’. Haua therefor means “life-giver” as the “mother of all living.”

In the original language of Hawaii, it contains a glottal stop as in Hawai’i, making the pronunciation ha-VAI-ee. Remembering that the “u” in Haua is pronounced as a double “v” sound, you may by now understand my misunderstanding in the beginning.

The word “Hawaii” is often interpreted as a combination of ha (breath), wai (lifeforce), and ‘i (supreme/God), translating to “the breath of life” or “the breath of the supreme (deity).

In the same manner, the letter vav in Haua also represents the binding life force of God. Can you now see the similarities?

Now compare Hawai’i to Haua (חַוָּה); read from right to left: chet, vav, and hey.

The Hawaiian people had no written language when the English came in the early 1800s. English-speaking people created their language using the left to right western convention. If they had developed their own language, like other Orientals, it might have been from right to left, so for the purpose of this commentary, ignore the difference in the flow of the letters.

So, let’s rewrite חַוָּה in western directions: hey-waw-chet. Linguists believe that Polynesian Hawaiki refers to Hawai’i. Hence the glottal stop might have once been the letter “k”. The letter chet sounds like “ch” or the letter “k”. Now compare phonetic ha-waw-kee to Polynesian, Hawaiki.

Not stopping there, consider the meaning of חַוָּה — “the mother of all living.” Literally, chet-waw-hey means wall, connection, and beheld (or breath), respectively.

Now work the magic of understanding Hebrew pictographs; in the manner of paleontologists, you must use the imagination.

Chet means fence, barrier, wall and similar things. After much thought, the idea of a “womb” occurred to me as a protective barrier within women to keep their unborn child safe from the world. Hence, Eve would have a womb by the time Adam classified her new kind.

The last letter hey is of a mortal man with arm’s raised, as if in praise or breathing. The pictograph may not have been a glorious man like Adam but a lower state of man raising arms to receive the glory of God. (True that is imaginative, but original man would not have looked like a common man.)

It could be that the letter hey represented Cain with arms raised to receive his mark (Gen 4:15). I have concluded that common men, coming short of the glory of God (Rom 3:23) looked more like the beasts of the field, specifically the “creeping thing” (Gen 1:26). [1]

Coming short of the glory of God, the letter hey might have represented a man/beast (Ish, Gen 4:1) in the womb of Ishah — the woman/wife. Whatever the case, the letter hey means either to behold or breathed into.

In the case of Eve, she was beguiled (Gen 3:13). Her “lord”, surely after sin, Satan would have “breathed” life unto her newly acquired womb. To validate that, we must turn to the Bible. It is there in several places; “Cain, who was of the Wicked One” (1 John 3:12) and that he was a new kind of man, not “Adam” but “Ish” of Ishah (Gen 4:1).

Because sin was genetic, then all the seed was of both Eve (the mother of all living) and Cain (Ish) — the father of all living — and because of Satan in him, all common men are of the wicked ones; “You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do” (John 8:44).

That situation compares well with the Hawaiian idea of Hawai’i as the supreme mother God of Hawaii and her son, Kane the father of them all.

Hawai’i, or Polynesian Hawaiki, refers to the ancestral home or the place from which people migrated. If they migrated from Ha-Waw-kee (Eve), then Hawai’i would be the mother land and Moana Wakea the mountain of the mother — “the mother land” of Eve.

If this seems contrived, so be it. However, the thoughts just occurred to me and the elements presented herein is evidence of my hypothesis; that Hawaiians descended from mother Eve, and from father Cain.

Several names have been passed around as wives of Cain. The Bible speaks only of one ‘Issa, or Ishah.

In Biblical Hebrew, issa (אִשָּׁה - ishah) primarily means "woman" or "wife". It is the feminine counterpart to ish (man/husband), appearing frequently in The Old Testament to denote a female person, or a married woman.

Since Ish means man and Ishah woman/wife, then Isha could have been the wife of Cain. Since Eve was woman/wife Isha, could it be that Cain husbanded with his own mother? Many religions, including native Hawaiians, did not condemn such things.

An aberration of Judaism is that Lot fathered the children of his daughters, meaning well, but creating a new kind of people — the Moabites. Were his daughters just repeating the sins of their genetic mother Eve, having incest with their own father? Hence, the god of Moabites were their father/mother pairs, such as El and Asherah of the Canaanites.

Like the Canaanite God, Chemosh and Ashtar were the one God pair of the Moabites as some believe. Is it possible that Eve and Cain were paired Hawaiian gods? It seems so; perhaps they brought a form of God to the islands but a misinformed pair, or even a pantheon of creature gods.

The Ish man, Cain, was a god unto himself, not glorious but cunning and arrogant like his father the Devil. True to the Serpent, in their wanderings, the seed of Cain became the gods and that was especially true in Hawaiian mythology where even the lower states of beasts became the gods as they were more like Cain than Yahweh.

I am not the last word, but there is so much evidence that there were indeed arks of Tubal-Cain.



[1] For more about that see my book, The Creeping Thing of the Bible.


My first glance of Hawaii from the airplane:




 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] For more about that see my book, The Creeping Thing of the Bible.