Tuesday, April 14, 2026

THE LAST WORD

 After reviewing your comments over the years, I want to admit something; I AM NOT the final WORD; Jesus is. I have ideas which I get from scripture, but according to scripture, we are to test all things and hold onto what is good.

Often times, after writing,  I am corrected by more study of the Bible. That is why we have scripture: 

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. (2 Tim 3:16)

Please, if you disagree with my assessment, kindly let me know for I do change my way of thinking, given more evidence. Keep in mind though that we may read the same words but understand them differently.

I AM is God; I AM not nor do I claim to be.  Likewise, neither are you God. Humble yourselves and when I make errors in understanding, I am indeed humbled.  

I try to never let my denomination govern my own understanding or doctrine because denominations of which all churches are, are such because they disagree. 

Generally, I try to ignore differences and focus on Jesus with Him crucified and resurrected. I do have opinions on about all issues, as you do as well, but none of us have absolute truth.

My hope is that God pardons what I fail to understand and blesses me with what I do understand.

My hope is that you will react the same way.


Larry

EATING OF CHRIST AND SHARING HIM

 EVAGELISM:

The apostles saw the hungry multitude and wondered how they could all be fed, so their idea was to dismiss all the others and for them alone to dine with Jesus.

Jesus would be their teacher; He would show them divine mathematics.

Remember in the beginning, God had said to Adam and his woman, “Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it” (Gen 1:28). Well, He was about to show the apostles multiplication as He dispensed and multiplied with fruits of the earth.

 

(Jesus) took the five loaves and the two fishes, and looking up to heaven, he blessed them , and brake, and gave to the disciples (5000; verse 14) to set before the multitude, and they did eat, and were all filled and there was taken up of fragments that remained to them twelve baskets. (Luke 9:16-17)

 

Jesus revealed to the masses that He was God for He took smaller amounts of things and made more things of the same substances.

In science, making articles from particles is called quantum “matter creation” and of course the quantum came from the Power of God in Yeshua (ישוע).  Technically Yeshua is not only “Jesus” in the English (“Ya saves”) but the letters themselves have intrinsic value:

 

·         י the first spark of measurable reality like a capacitor or a jump start.

·         ש synthesis.

·         ו quantum entanglement of in theology, binding forces.

·         ע observable reality.

 

Those four Hebrew letters not only describe the Person of God but the increase in bread and fish. Jesus was revealing the Power of God in Himself. He increased bread and fish from His self-contained Power “El Shaday” just as in the beginning.

Throughout the entire Old Testament the M.O. of God was to increase in numbers; as an example God said:

 

For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in obedience to Him, and to keep His commands, decrees and laws; then you will live and increase, and the Lord your God will bless you in the land you are entering to possess. (Deut 30:16)

 

For instance, God took Adam and increased his numbers, God graced Noah with great numbers, God increased Jacob called “Israel” and increased his numbers, and so it goes with Jesus and The Great Commission:

 

Jesus came and spoke unto them, saying, “All power is given unto Me in heaven and in earth; go you therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost…(Mat 28:18-19)

 

What Jesus did not say:

 

1.      I am powerless.

2.      Stay comfortable and forget My Power of increase.

3.      Stay put and I will do all the multiplication.

4.      Keep your faith to yourselves for it might be offensive to others.

5.      Baptize them in the things of the world like rules, regulations, and even rituals. (Baptism is in the name of God, Yeshua — the vessel for the Power of God (Elohim) in one Person having Eloha, a “fragment” of Elohim.)

 

The Power of increase is really the Power of God in you. You must be in Christ, meaning to have a particle of Christ in you, as with Adam, God saying, “Let us (Elohim) make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion (“to crumble off” a particle from Elohim —  Eloha) over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth” (Gen 1:26).

The Hebrew word translated “dominion” is רָדָה radah.

 

·         ר emergence of order.

·         ד entry into space/time and matter.

·         ה expansion, inflation, or simply increase.

 

When God increased the bread and fish, in the Hebrew that would have been radah. Jesus indeed took of Himself as God and made an increase when a two fish and five loaves of bread; increased enough for the multitude and had more fragments left over than existed in the beginning. Jesus was revealing the Power He had over the world.

The fragments that remained after radah were not there in the beginning. Jesus, as God, had created the increase, and with the Power of God in you, you too can increase.

Jesus took twelve Jewish men and by now there exists in the world these amounts:

 

Global Religious Populations (2025–2026 Estimates)

Below is a table of the largest world religions by estimated number of adherents, based on 2025–2026 global data Statistics and Data+2.

Religion / Sect

Estimated Population

% of World Population

Sunni Islam

1,579,268,274

~30.0%

Roman Catholic

1,268,004,246

~26.7%

Hinduism

1,075,098,000

~15.0%

Protestant Christianity

625,452,306

~11.0%

Eastern Orthodox Christianity

294,957,346

~4.0%

Mahayana Buddhism

341,318,714

~4.1%

Theravada Buddhism

187,979,425

~2.0%

Shinto

122,667,219

~1.3%

Anglican Christianity

75,844,450

~0.8%

Shia Islam

221,790,956

~2.8% (within Islam)

Vaishnavism (Hinduism)

399,526,000

~3.3% (within Hinduism)

Shaivism (Hinduism)

385,423,000

~3.2% (within Hinduism)

Oriental Orthodox Christianity

72,000,000

~0.7%

Mormonism (LDS)

17,200,000

~0.2%

Judaism

14,800,000

~0.1%

Bahāʾī

9,150,000

~0.1%

Zoroastrianism

205,000

~0.002%

Agnosticism / Atheism

~744–147 million

~8–15% (varies by source)

Notes:

  • Percentages are approximate and vary by source; some totals (e.g., agnosticism/atheism) are not always included in religious affiliation counts.
  • “Other religions” and smaller traditions (e.g., Shinto, Daoism, Jainism) are also present globally but have much smaller populations.
  • Christianity as a whole (Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Anglican, Mormon, etc.) is estimated at over 2.5 billion adherents Britannica.
  • Islam’s total (Sunni + Shia + other) is about 1.8–1.9 billion Britannica.

This table reflects the current global religious landscape, with Christianity and Islam dominating in sheer numbers, followed by Hinduism, Buddhism, and a wide range of smaller traditions. (AI Overview)

 

Jesus took 12 men and now there are 2.5 billion people who identify with Jesus of a total of 8.3 billion. Only 0.014 billion identify with Judaism. While Judaism has stagnated, Christianity has increased. (Of course, many claim to be Christians, but self-acclamation does not make anyone a Christian.)

The comparison is that Jesus increased Himself to twelve, then twelve to many, and many to 2.5 billion. The increase in loaves and fishes revealed the Power in Jesus as the Way to eternal life.

Since there are only 2.5 billion claiming to be in Christ and 6 billion not in Christ, reveals a golden opportunity for the 2.5 billion to increase.

Jesus was a great fisherman of men, catching twelve of the best in just a short time. Those twelve had soon grown to twelve or more churches, and by the first quarter of the third century, the Roman Empire was following Jesus at least in name.

What did Jesus do to provide an increase in numbers? He fed them fish and bread.

Fish in scripture represents evangelism: persuading others to become Christians. Evangelism is much more than gathering one fish at a time that God has trapped for you but going into the world to fish for men.

The Hebrew letter mem represents fish and fishing — making an increase in what God began.

Bread represents potentiality in theology for bread increases when just a lump of yeast makes the loaves rise.

The “bread” of life consists of the Spirit of God as the leavening agent, but there is also another leaven that spoils the loaf, “Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; you are fallen from grace” (Gal 5:4).

The effect of Christ in you is the leavening agent of the Spirit. However, you as the “loaf” can be punched down by the wicked ones with the grace of God removed until your “loaf” falls. If you are not increasing, then the Spirit may not be active in you. You may be the loaf but remain flat without the leavening agent of God in you. With that, the yoke, albeit leavened, may fall.

Grace in the Hebrew is חֵחֵ chen.

 

·         חֵ separation in realms and separated unto God from the world.

·         חֵ sofit meaning eternal life as nun represents life and the fish the multitude that ate.

 

Note that Jesus fed them all but like a probability cloud, all were not engendered by God. In other words, all of them were potentiates, albeit only a fragment would have become candidates. That defies the Calvinistic doctrine of election for all there had received grace, but not all would have become Christians.

 

So, the last shall be first, and the first last: for many be called, but few chosen… for many are called, but few are chosen. (Mat 20:16; 22:14)

 

They all ate of Jesus (the Bread of Life) and His movement (the fish), but there were fragments that went right back into the bread and dish baskets.

There was food for more, but perhaps some were not hungry enough to partake of the body of Christ which the bread represents, and not His Way as the fish represents.

One can surmise that the fragments of fish and bread were not wasted but would feed others, although some that day would not have eaten.

Sometimes Christians feel alone in the world, but there are six-billion opportunities in the world to whom we can feed the bread and fish — the Person of God and the Way of God.

Note that without one or the other, the mission is not accomplished; there must be both bread and fish — there must be Jesus and His Way.

Jesus created and shared the grace, but not all of it was eaten. Grace can be shared but never forcefully fed. Some grace (the fragments) were left over to share, but for Calvinists they have the bread but depend on God to share it.

Saturday, April 11, 2026

IN A FISH, WHALE, OR ELSEWHERE

 Many people argue about whether Jonah was trapped inside a fish or whale for three days. Of course, with God all things are possible and either one may be the case. However, is it? A critical analysis is due.

First off, read the entire scripture about the adventures of Jonah (Jonah 1:17 through 2:10).

(To be honest, I reviewed only chapter one, so I had no recent knowledge of chapter two, albeit I continued my analysis to see if my hypothesis made sense.)


My hypothesis: Perhaps Jonah was in some other thing for three days.

The null of that: Jonah was not in some other thing.


If there is evidence that Jonah was in some other thing, then that decreases the probability that Jonah was in the belly of either a fish or a whale.

If there is any possibility that Jonah was in something else, then I fail to reject the null hypothesis which makes the hypothesis a possibility with some degree of confidence. That is the scientific method of testing for truth.


Consider the evidence from the Bible:

 

·         Now the Lord had prepared a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights. (Jon 1:17)

·         (Jesus said) An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas; for as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. (Mat 12:29-30)

 

Two choices are given: the belly of a great fish and the belly of a whale. However, could there be a third choice? To determine that, we turn to the original languages. An obvious choice is that like Jesus, Jonah/Jonas would be in the heart of the earth for three days.


What does that mean? In the Greek, ho kardia ho ge. Since ho is “that” in English, and kardia the centroid of the soul, then the soul of Jesus would be between that and that. What is “that?” Ge. By extension, Ge is not just earth but any region.


Of course, the body of Jesus was in the ground three days in a sepulcher. However, where would have been the “heart” of the region? In scripture the heart of the earth would be what is called “Hades” in the Greek.


For at least parts of three days, Jesus would have been in Hades, or Hell, whether in bodily form or not is unclear. However, it makes sense that Jesus was in Hell in bodily form but not material substance, just as it was at His baptism… “the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him” (Luke 3:22).


Jesus compared Jonas in the belly of a whale to Himself in the belly of the Earth. That is evidence that might come in handy.


Next, consider the belly of “a great fish” in which Jonah was captured, in the Hebrew dag gadol dag to swallow up (bala’) Jonah.


First off, just as the “Ghost” (kardia) of Jesus is between two ho’s, gadol is between two dag’s.


Gadol is indeed translated a “fish,” but what would have the original pictograph’s have represented? Written גָּדוֹל may provide the answer: 

Gimmel (גָּ) theologically represents energy flow between realms.

Dalet (ד) represents a change in states into space/time and matter (or back).

Vav (וֹ) symbolizes a connection between heaven and earth, and

Lamed (ל) divine authority of being led from somewhere to elsewhere.

 

Translated “great,” it seems to be a great journey somewhere or somehow. The pictographs indicate it could be a journey from one realm to the other in the manner of Jesus’s trip to Hell, as it is written:

 

When He (Jesus) ascended up on high, He led captivity captive and gave gifts unto men. Now that He ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower parts of the Earth? He that descended is the same also that ascended up far above all heavens, that He might fill all things. (Ephes 4:8-10)

 

Jesus had ascended to Paradise in heaven in bodily form and in like manner he had descended to the lower parts of the earth as well — to the “heart” of the Earth it would seem, or into Hell as most theologians interpret it. How did Jesus do that? Perhaps the Holy Ghost that had left Him went both to Paradise and to Hell while His body rested in the grave.


That is further evidence that Jesus easily translated between the realms of heaven and earth.

 The word “earth” is confusing because we most often think of this planet. But the heart of the earth is much like the soul of all things in the material cosmos, and of course, the “soul” of material things would be the heavens. In other words, like man and his heart, so it is with the cosmos and its heart, or center of existence.


Jonah would have changed states. It could have been from the waters of the sea into the belly of a great fish, or it may also have been from the earth’s estate to the heavens.


“Heaven” is often thought of a place of eternal life, but as it is written, “heaven” consists of both Hell and Paradise with a great gulf between them (Luke 16:26).


It may be that the “great” in “great fish: (gadol) is the same “great” as in “Great Gulf” and with that comparison, the “gulf” might very well be the “fish” of Jonah’s venture.


The great gulf of which Luke wrote was between Hell and Paradise. Perhaps the same applies to heaven and earth, the “firmament” (badal; בָּדַל), dividing the waters from the waters in scripture (Gen 1:6).

 

Bet (בָּ) indicates in space/time and matter

Dalet (ָדַ) symbolizes a change in states of existence.

Lamed (ל) divine authority of being led from somewhere to elsewhere.

 

Just like gadol (great), badal (firmament) is much the same and both represent a change in states from one existence to another. Jonah’s journey would have been a change in states from one existence to another, but it still could have been either a fish or a whale.

Translated “fish” Jonah was swallowed up by a dag (דָּג). The full word is spelled הַדָּג. The letter hey at the beginning would indicate God-breathed. So, wherever it was that Jonah had gone, God did it. Whether a fish or something else, God would have caused it.

 

Dalet (דּ) again symbolizes a change in states of existence. However, this time there is a dot or dagesh within it. The dagesh would indicating a piercing of a hard thing, maybe indicating from a firm place to a non-firm place of existence. 

Gimmel (ג) again represents energy flow between realms.

 

With that analysis dag could either be translated either as “fish” or just a change in physical states from earth to heaven. Remembering that heaven is both Hell and Paradise, then Jonah would have been taken to one or the other by the will of God.


Lastly, it was to the “belly” (meʻeh; מֵעֶה) of the fish (sic). Belly, as with Jesus, represents the source of living waters, mem in the Hebrew. Now examine the pictographs for belly:

 

Mem (מֵ) the living waters.

Ayin (ֵעֶ) the collapse of reality.

Hey (ה) God breathed into existence.

 

The “belly” may represent a transfer from real waters to spiritual waters, and not the belly of a fish at all.


Being a science fiction aficionado, I thought maybe a spacecraft from another world captured him, but not believing in aliens from another planet, I quicky discarded that notion.


Like Mr. Monk, I then said with certainty, “I know what happened,” then ran to my other half and told her! I told my wife that God had translated Jonah to Hell as a warning, not into the belly of a fish at all.

Now, the rest of the story.

 

Then Jonah prayed unto the Lord his God out of the fish's belly, and said, “I cried by reason of mine affliction unto the Lord, and He heard me; out of the belly of Hell cried I, and You heard my voice. (Jon 2:1-2)

 

Jonah had been in Hell, not in the belly of any fish, but the underside of the earth which represents Hades, or Hell.


The null hypothesis was that Jonah was not in some other thing. By his own words, Jonah was in Hell and by the Hebrew pictographs, He was in another realm other than this one. Jonah was in some other thing, so the evidence with near certainty is that Jonah was neither in the belly of a fish nor a whale.

However, there remains a problem; Jesus, who does not lie, said that Jonah spent “three nights in the “whale's belly.” However, that is a translation from the Greek language.


Jesus actually said, “en ketos koila.”


En is of course, “in.”


Ketos means some sea monster: either a big fish, whale, or other creature of the water. The root word of ketos is chasma — “a gaping opening, a chasm, a gulf” (Strong’s Dictionary). The “whale” could have been the “great gulf” between realms, not forgetting that it might also have been the belly of some sea monster.


Consider now the word koila, translated “belly.”


Another possibility is “the innermost part of a man, the soul, heart as the seat of thought, feeling, choice” (ibid). The belly of the chasm would be where? Another realm, perhaps Hell as the underside of the belly.


Therefore, the possibility does exist that Jonah spent three days in Hell in the manner of Jesus, and that fish and whales are either mistranslations or a metaphoric description that Jesus repeated.


However, Jonah was conscious that he had been in Hell. Could Hell be a state of mind and him only in a state of torment? Could Hell be both a mental state and another realm?


Whatever swallowed Jonas is not as important as that he was in Hell in whatever modality it was!

Saturday, March 7, 2026

MORE ABOUT HAWAIIANS

MORE ABOUT HAWAIIANS

 

In my book, The Arks of Tubal-Cain, I compared Hawaii, perhaps one location of the land of Nod, to which Cain wandered. The reason for that was Eve’s name; “Adam called his wife's (Ishah in Hebrew) name ‘Eve’ because she was the mother of all living” (Gen 3:20).  

Therein exists equality; she was called “Eve” because she was the mother of all living. Hence Eve is equivalent to “mother”, and hers the land of the living. Cain’s seed might be called the “Motherland”.

In Hebrew, Eve is spelled חַוָּה (right to left chet-vav-hey) which is transliterated “Haua” in the Hebrew. The first letter (חַ), I mistook for the letter hey (ה), and while realizing that the “u” has the waw sound, I thought That spells Hawaw’a which it does not. Strong’s Dictionary misled me as well sounding Haua khav-vaw'. However, the “k” is not sounded; it is merely a guttural “h” sound like a hard “h” compared to the letter hey as a soft, airy “h” sound.

By getting it wrong, I nearly got it right; Hav-VAW with the hey silent therein.

How would natives pronounce Hawaii?

Hawaiʻi is generally huh-VAH-ee (or ha-vai-ʻi), with a soft 'v' sound for the 'w' and a distinct pause (glottal stop) represented by the ʻokina (ʻ). While many locals use the 'w' sound, using a soft 'v' is considered authentic to the native language. (YouTube)

Now compare Haua (Eve) to Hawai’i. Note that the pause of the ʻokina replaces the silent hey in חַוָּה (Haua) and that the “u” has the sound of the VAH in huh-VAH-ee. Hence, it is hav-vaw for one and hav-Vah for the other with an extra ee sound.

In Hebrew, Hawai’i is pronounced Ha-VAH-ee, very much like Hawaiians pronounce it. In early times, generally the WAW sound for the letter vav was used rather than the VAH sound. If that is the case, then Eve’s name would be pronounced in ancient times as Haw-WAW-uh (the uh replacing the letter hey. Although not exact, the reader must admit that there are just too many similarities for them not to be common. With that, I submit that the island of Hawaii may have been named for Eve and like Eve it is the motherland.

That means that I may have stumbled upon something by accident; The island of Hawaii has something to do with Eve. Indeed, Hawaii is a “paradise” like Eden, so it made sense that the seed of Cain had found their own version of Paradise.

The next thought that came to me is What is notable about Hawaii? The hula dance, and as it turned out, hula means “wandering” in the same vein as the land of Nod.

Next, I wondered about their god(s). Who did they worship? Several sea creatures. I thought that perhaps friendly sea creatures guided them to a safe mountain during the flood of Noah.

Mount Kea is their holy mountain. and it is much higher than any of the mountains of Ararat. Mount Kea was created from a volcano, last active 4,500–6,000 years ago. Could it be that God provided a place because of His mercy and the “lighthouse” to guide them there?

The full name is Mauna a Wakea in their language. Wakea means “sky father” and represents space and the heavens. In Hebrew Wakea would be the same as the Hebrew Shamayim (the heavens). Mauna a Wakea would mean “mountain to the heavens”. Indeed, Mauna Kea is their most holy mountain.

Also, Raki'a (רָקִיעַ) refers to the "Firmament" or the "expanse" created to separate the waters from the heavens in Genesis. This closely mirrors Wakea's role as the expansive space above the earth.

In some contexts, Wakea (or Awakea) means "noon" or "light of day," symbolizing the vivifying influence of the Sun, or either the Light of God.

Wakea would be the progenitor of the Hawaiian people and the "Sky Father" — Father God. Could it be that they worshipped the same father God as Judeo-Christianity, but the wrong son? Who is their major God? Kane.

Representing the god of creation, procreation, and the Progenitor of chiefs and commoners. As a giver of life, he is associated with sunlight, fresh water, and the sky. He is revered as a creator who formed the earth and fashioned the first man. (Beckwith 1940)

Cain was the first mortal man — “Ish”— who like God existed within himself.

Now consider my young granddaughter; I asked of her, “Who taught you to speak?

Her short reply was, “I taught myself.” Compare that to Eve, “I created Ish-man, Cain” (Gen 4:1). Like the mother, like the son; Cain may have been thinking, I created myself!

Modern people think the same way; God did not create me, I just happened.

As such, Kane would parallel Jesus as the “Word” (John 1:1-14). Not Yeshua, but Kane, would be the Creator as God. The biblical Cain would be “the sky father” rather than either Adam or Yeshua. Hawaii would be the motherland of Eve.

The Serpent warned, “God knows that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil” (Gen 3:5). If Kane/Cain was the “father of all living,” compared to Eve as the “mother of all living”, then Kane and Haua would be the Hawaiian version of the father and mother, respectively.

If so, then would expect incest to be part of the native religion. Was it? In ancient Hawaii, there were documented instances of incestuous, cross-generational, and sibling marriages within the Aliʻi — the noble and royal classes — which included some cases of a mother and son or father and daughter marrying.

 

The primary motivation for such marriages was to preserve the highest possible bloodline (mana) and keep it pure, as royal incest was considered a way to ensure the children had the highest possible status.

Aliʻi Pio (Highest Class): The highest-ranking chiefs were often the product of full-sibling unions. The practice was not considered a sin or social wrong within this exclusive, elite group. (AI Overview)

 

Now consider even the bloodline of the Hawaiians — mana. Even mana has Hebrew meaning; the mem-nun, the same as manna from heaven in the Bible. The letter mem means either blood or water, or even both, as Jesus described the prescription for salvation (1 John 5:6).

For the Hawaiians, their bloodline, true to the Bible, came both by water (the flood) and the blood (their genetics) just as with Noah’s seed.

What came by the water? The letter nun, representing both fish and semen. Could that be their mistaken doctrine of mana, crediting the ocean bearing creatures for their salvation, and making them the various gods in their pantheon?

What evolved in Hawaii would be a type of Judeo-Christianity as to be expected, so when Christian missionaries came to the island, it was difficult to alter their form of religion in favor of the religion of the white man; albeit similar, theirs included both good and evil.

Although I was mistaken in my reasoning, I accidentally found my hypothesis plausible. There is much evidence that the arks of Tubal-Cain made it far, far eastward of Eden.

Genetic studies indicate that Polynesian ancestors likely originated from, or passed through, East Asia, with significant mixing with Melanesian populations later. Their genetics are said to be around 80% Japanese because of migration from eastern Asia. They would have been from the land of Nod and from the land of the rising sun (Japan).

“Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden” (Gen 4:16). If Eden is the Holy Land, then Japan is eastward of Eden, and Hawaiians are the seed of the Japanese. That also points to water travel to escape the waters of the flood, and like their ancestors, high mountains would be the safe space and the place to worship their sky god.

Now back to phonetics. The Hebrew letters chet and hey are different but more common to the extent that some modern Hebrew words can either be written as “ch” as in chet or “h” as in hey.

Both chet and hey share the same form: חַ and ה, respectively. They are connected by the letter vav (וָּ) which means “connected”. Although spelled חַוָּה, the word Haua (Eve) is pronounced Khav-vaw’. Haua therefor means “life-giver” as the “mother of all living.”

In the original language of Hawaii, it contains a glottal stop as in Hawai’i, making the pronunciation ha-VAI-ee. Remembering that the “u” in Haua is pronounced as a double “v” sound, you may by now understand my misunderstanding in the beginning.

The word “Hawaii” is often interpreted as a combination of ha (breath), wai (lifeforce), and ‘i (supreme/God), translating to “the breath of life” or “the breath of the supreme (deity).

In the same manner, the letter vav in Haua also represents the binding life force of God. Can you now see the similarities?

Now compare Hawai’i to Haua (חַוָּה); read from right to left: chet, vav, and hey.

The Hawaiian people had no written language when the English came in the early 1800s. English-speaking people created their language using the left to right western convention. If they had developed their own language, like other Orientals, it might have been from right to left, so for the purpose of this commentary, ignore the difference in the flow of the letters.

So, let’s rewrite חַוָּה in western directions: hey-waw-chet. Linguists believe that Polynesian Hawaiki refers to Hawai’i. Hence the glottal stop might have once been the letter “k”. The letter chet sounds like “ch” or the letter “k”. Now compare phonetic ha-waw-kee to Polynesian, Hawaiki.

Not stopping there, consider the meaning of חַוָּה — “the mother of all living.” Literally, chet-waw-hey means wall, connection, and beheld (or breath), respectively.

Now work the magic of understanding Hebrew pictographs; in the manner of paleontologists, you must use the imagination.

Chet means fence, barrier, wall and similar things. After much thought, the idea of a “womb” occurred to me as a protective barrier within women to keep their unborn child safe from the world. Hence, Eve would have a womb by the time Adam classified her new kind.

The last letter hey is of a mortal man with arm’s raised, as if in praise or breathing. The pictograph may not have been a glorious man like Adam but a lower state of man raising arms to receive the glory of God. (True that is imaginative, but original man would not have looked like a common man.)

It could be that the letter hey represented Cain with arms raised to receive his mark (Gen 4:15). I have concluded that common men, coming short of the glory of God (Rom 3:23) looked more like the beasts of the field, specifically the “creeping thing” (Gen 1:26). [1]

Coming short of the glory of God, the letter hey might have represented a man/beast (Ish, Gen 4:1) in the womb of Ishah — the woman/wife. Whatever the case, the letter hey means either to behold or breathed into.

In the case of Eve, she was beguiled (Gen 3:13). Her “lord”, surely after sin, Satan would have “breathed” life unto her newly acquired womb. To validate that, we must turn to the Bible. It is there in several places; “Cain, who was of the Wicked One” (1 John 3:12) and that he was a new kind of man, not “Adam” but “Ish” of Ishah (Gen 4:1).

Because sin was genetic, then all the seed was of both Eve (the mother of all living) and Cain (Ish) — the father of all living — and because of Satan in him, all common men are of the wicked ones; “You are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father you will do” (John 8:44).

That situation compares well with the Hawaiian idea of Hawai’i as the supreme mother God of Hawaii and her son, Kane the father of them all.

Hawai’i, or Polynesian Hawaiki, refers to the ancestral home or the place from which people migrated. If they migrated from Ha-Waw-kee (Eve), then Hawai’i would be the mother land and Moana Wakea the mountain of the mother — “the mother land” of Eve.

If this seems contrived, so be it. However, the thoughts just occurred to me and the elements presented herein is evidence of my hypothesis; that Hawaiians descended from mother Eve, and from father Cain.

Several names have been passed around as wives of Cain. The Bible speaks only of one ‘Issa, or Ishah.

In Biblical Hebrew, issa (אִשָּׁה - ishah) primarily means "woman" or "wife". It is the feminine counterpart to ish (man/husband), appearing frequently in The Old Testament to denote a female person, or a married woman.

Since Ish means man and Ishah woman/wife, then Isha could have been the wife of Cain. Since Eve was woman/wife Isha, could it be that Cain husbanded with his own mother? Many religions, including native Hawaiians, did not condemn such things.

An aberration of Judaism is that Lot fathered the children of his daughters, meaning well, but creating a new kind of people — the Moabites. Were his daughters just repeating the sins of their genetic mother Eve, having incest with their own father? Hence, the god of Moabites were their father/mother pairs, such as El and Asherah of the Canaanites.

Like the Canaanite God, Chemosh and Ashtar were the one God pair of the Moabites as some believe. Is it possible that Eve and Cain were paired Hawaiian gods? It seems so; perhaps they brought a form of God to the islands but a misinformed pair, or even a pantheon of creature gods.

The Ish man, Cain, was a god unto himself, not glorious but cunning and arrogant like his father the Devil. True to the Serpent, in their wanderings, the seed of Cain became the gods and that was especially true in Hawaiian mythology where even the lower states of beasts became the gods as they were more like Cain than Yahweh.

I am not the last word, but there is so much evidence that there were indeed arks of Tubal-Cain.



[1] For more about that see my book, The Creeping Thing of the Bible.


My first glance of Hawaii from the airplane:




 

 

 

 

 

 



[1] For more about that see my book, The Creeping Thing of the Bible.

Thursday, February 19, 2026

PREPARATION FOR PRESERVATION


SALVATION REVEALED IN PICTURES:

Consecration and sanctification are not the same things, according to the consecration and sanctification of Aaron as priest:

 

You (Moses) shall put them (the garments prepared) upon Aaron your brother, and his sons with him; and shall anoint them, and consecrate them, and sanctify them, that they may minister unto me in the priest's office. (Exod 28:41)

 

Moses, as an antitype of Jesus would anoint, consecrate, and sanctify Aaron and his sons. To anoint is to literally rub them, coming from the Hebrew word masah. Masah could be rubbing with oil or about anything, spelled מָשַׁח.

The first letter mem (right to left) is living water in theology; it represents the Spirit of God.

The middle letter, shin, represents a synthesis; what to what? Mem to chet; the latter a covenant with God — a “covenant”. Aaron would have a little of what Moses had obtained from God just by contact wherein the Spirit of God in Moses would be absorbed into Aaron.

What did Moses have that Aaron did not? Nothing yet but the willingness to meet God in person. Later, Moses face shined (Exod 34:29–35. God shined onto him, but Moses climbed the mountain. It seems that anointment was preparation for the journey ahead to find God.

Moses would then consecrate (mala'; מָלָא)Aaron.

The first letter mem is living water and the letter lamed, teaching, a divine programming. About what? Aleph, the Power of God. So, far, Aaron was made ready, and now taught the things of God. Perhaps Moses was the teacher who would program Aaron with the knowledge of God that he had about the fire of God in the burning bush.

Upon encountering the Spirit of God in the burning bush, Moses asked God, “Who am I?” (Exod 3:11). Not “I AM” but “am I” (hinne; Exod 3:4) for God is “I AM” (haya; Exod 3:14); to which God answered, “I will be with you; and this shall be a token unto you, that I have sent you” (Exod 3:12).

Hence, Moses was not the great I AM Himself but a token (אוֹת). The letter vav represents a connector of some sort. The letter aleph is the Power of God, and the letter chet at the end, Moses in a state like God. Moses was not God but a placeholder for the Power of God, in the manner of Abraham who was a token for Almighty God as well. Moses was a “proxy” for God, a figure for the authority of God… “that I have sent (salah; שָׁלַח) you” (Exod 3:12).

Of course, the lamed means teach. The shin the consuming Presence of God from the burning bush. Lastly the letter chet about the other invisible realm, the covenant, and the states of God.

God had rubbed Moses with fire. That was the anointing of Moses, and Moses would then rub the Presence of God — living water — onto Aaron.

Moses was beheld (hinne; הִנֵּה) but God haya (הָיָה) — the Existence, or literally the breath from which Existence is beheld. God was indicating that Moses was part of the Creation that He had created. Moses had some God likeness in his person, so he was a suitable token for the authority of God.

Just as the Power of God (El) had gone (Elohim) into Adam, the fire of God (El) had gone into Mose (מֹשֶׁה). Recall the rubbing, Masah (מָשַׁח) from earlier?

The literal rule in Hebrew is that common letters between words means that there is an affinity between the two, or that the root of one is the root of the other. The difference between Mose and masah are the ending letters, hey in Mose and chet in masah. Whereas chet means covenant, hey means expansion. Masah was the Mosaic Covenant and Moses the missionary of that covenant. Mose was to spread the living waters from God. He would have been the “fount” of living water as a proxy for Father God (Elohim).

Now back to Aaron, just as Adam shared Elohim of El, Moses would have shared the living waters to Aaron, his brother. Not only would they be biological brothers but Spiritual brothers as well with living water existing in them both. Aaron would be the seed of God as well as a prophet, sharing the living water to all who would come to him. Aaron and Moses would be one covenant in God.

Aaron (‘Aharon; אַהֲרוֹן or אַהֲרֹן) has two spellings. Note the difference between the letter resh (ר) in the spellings. The point over the ר has esoteric meaning. Note that in the first spelling the point is above the letter vav (וֹ). The point about Aaron would have been the man in vav, (וֹֹ) compared to the leadership (רֹ) in the resh. Those points are special markers typically signaling a deeper mystical, exegetical, or scribal meaning, rather than a standard phonetic change.

Mystical characters represent the metaphysical. As such, the man, Aaron, upon consecration would have become metaphysical, beyond physical attributes; once a mere man, Aaron with consecration was beyond just a mere man.

So far, both anointment and consecration have been analyzed for deeper meanings. Not only that, but finally after anointment and consecration, Aaron was sanctified.

Sanctification was thoroughly discussed yesterday, but in summary, sanctified would mean “preserved”. Just as in cold-pack canning, Aaron was cleansed (anointed), dosed with “preservatives” from Moses (consecrated), and then preserved… until when? The opening of the vessel in the Presence of God. Perhaps Aaron was among the saints that was resurrected with Jesus, as it is written:

The graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, and came out of the graves after His resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. (Mat 27:52-53)

Aaron would have been prepared by Moses as the token of God for the resurrection wherein His flesh was saved in bodily form. Hence the reason for anointment, consecration, and preservation was to witness God in person and Moses as only a temporary proxy. It was Aaron in the state of preservation awaiting the time of salvation. (That should help Jews understand that their own religion points toward the coming of Jesus.)

The concept of a Messiah is important as well — Mashiach (מָשִׁיחַ) in the Hebrew. Recall now the Hebrew rule pertaining to Mose and Masah? Well it is in Mashiach as well the מָשִ — the living water of released from Ya, the sound of the letter yod (י), and just as in Masah, the letter chet means a covenant — all together the dispersion of living water from the belly of Jesus (John 7:38).

Hence, Moses was a proxy for Jesus from whom his belly flowed living waters as a token Messiah only until the real Messiah would come. Not only that but Aaron would have been a proxy for Christians to come from the Mosaic Covenant.

So, just as words mean things in scripture, so do pictures. God seemed to have drawn pictures for Moses to convey esoteric messages so that someday that His Word could be understood regardless of the language barrier. The Word in scripture is merely pictures (pictographs) that anyone might understand.

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

SANCTIFICATION: SAFETY UNTIL SALVATION

 

God blessed mankind:

 

·         God provided for His creatures an existence (Gen 1:1)

·         God lighted that world. (Gen 1:3)

·         God provided a heaven for man to rest. (Gen 1:8)

·         God provided land for habitation. (Gen 1:9)

·         God provided water for life to exist. (Gen 1:10)

·         God provided nourishment for His creatures. (Gen 1:12)

·         Do provided for life “clocks” to measure life. (Gen 1:14-18)

·         All moving creatures were placed on land and seas (Gen 1:20-21)

·         God provided for the lesser creatures a means of reproduction (Gen 1:22-25).

 

To this point, God made all the things for lesser creatures — those of a lower state of existence. To this point all things were “good” (Gen 1:25).

 Then God made the greater creature:

 

·         God then made man after His own image and likeness. (Gen 1:26).

·         Man was a creature of a higher state of existence, having dominion over the lesser creatures (Gen 1:26). Dominion would be a fragment, El. of Elohim in man alone.

·                       God made man in two distinct forms: male and female (Gen 1:27): זָכָר and נְקֵבָה. Note that the male form had dominion and the female form lesser — the male’s help-mate (Gen 2:18). The male was to be the dominant of the species, not the female. The male (zakar; זָכָר) would be the virile of the two (neqiba; נְקֵבָה) “the pierce” from the root verb “naqab” (נָקַב). Hence, the male Adam had dominion over the female Adam in addition to the lower state of the other creatures.

  Literally, the male was cut (zayin) from the Godhead (resh) before time began (qof). Note that the male was perceived before the foundation of the world. Like Jesus as well, “(God) has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love, having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of his will…
  Adam’s kind was predetermined from the beginning as the chosen kind and also that man over woman would be the dominant kind. However, when time began outside the Garden, the woman because of sin held the dominant role (Gen 4:1), her saying, “I have gotten a man…” She had become the male figure. She chose herself to be a higher state of creature, albeit she was of a lower state than the male. So, like the first Adam, the “last Adam” (Jesus) was born male and the Chosen One who would reproduce man with His quickening (life giving) Spirit (1 Cor 15:45).

  Given that background, mankind, and the male of that kind, would have been the chosen “elect” predestined to be in Christ. The predestination is rightfully before the foundation of the world (Gen 1:1); hence the world was made for Adam’s kind.
  Adam was the man made in the Image of God, but the woman (Isha), Eve, made man (Ish) in her image. To be one of the elect, therefore God would transform (provide genes from above) the common mortal man, Ish-kind, into Adam’s kind (John 3:7).
  The concept of election is found in Genesis 1:26-27 wherein the male Adam is chosen above the female as well as all the other creatures, and that was God’s Plan from the beginning.

·         God stated that their kind was chosen, and that mankind would multiply God’s type via the prototype male, Adam. (Gen 1:28)

·         Until the creation of man, all things were “good” but with Adamic man “it was very good” (Gen 1:31). God had created His seed in the form of firm things. Next, God would place His divine seed in His Garden to grow (Gen 2:7). His kind were the “elect”, not any of the others.

·         God put the man whom he had formed in the eastward of Eden in the Garden (Gen 2:8). “Eastward” is an ancient way of saying “before time began.” So, the Creation, although the clocks had been created, time was for mankind and the creatures.

·         God made the Tree of Life for man in the middle of the Garden before time ever began (Gen 2:9). The Garden of Eden would have pre-existed time, and then time began with sin (Gen 4:3).

 

God made mankind and put him and his mate in a sanctuary with Himself as the Tree of Life as the focus of attention. Because Adamic man was non-vigilant and not sober, Adam’s kind became a lower state — common mortal man, Ish (Gen 4:1).

Before, glorious man had been safe in the sanctuary of the Lord God, and after sin very unsafe as The Books of Adam and Eve portray their existence after being cast out of their sanctuary (Gen 4:26).

With that background, while in the Garden sanctuary of the Lord God, Jesus stood right there in the middle as the source of life in the Tree of Life. Afterward, they would provide for themselves after sin and removed from their sanctuary.

The exodus of the Israelites was not directed to the real estate of the promise land but beyond that land, “You shall bring them in, and plant them in the mountain of your inheritance, in the place, O Lord, which You have made for You to dwell in, in the Sanctuary, O Lord, which Your hands have established” (Exod 15:17).

Moses’s destination was not Canaan land but for sanctuary in the Garden of the Lord where Moses would go, not where they would go. Moses died and found the true promised land and there he rested in the bosom of Abraham who had gone there previously as lord, according to The Book of Jasher.

 

And afterward Moses went into the garden of Reuel which was behind the house, and he there prayed to the Lord his God, who had done mighty wonders for him. And it was that whilst he prayed he looked opposite to him, and behold a sapphire stick was placed in the ground, which was planted in the midst of the garden.

And he approached the stick and he looked, and behold the name of the Lord God of hosts was engraved thereon, written and developed upon the stick.

And he read it and stretched forth his hand and he plucked it like a forest tree from the thicket, and the stick was in his hand.

And this is the stick with which all the works of our God were performed, after he had created heaven and earth, and all the host of them, seas, rivers and all their fishes.

And when God had driven Adam from the garden of Eden, he took the stick in his hand and went and tilled the ground from which he was taken.

And the stick came down to Noah and was given to Shem and his descendants, until it came into the hand of Abraham the Hebrew.

And when Abraham had given all he had to his son Isaac, he also gave to him this stick. (Jasher 77:38-45)

 

That sapphire stick was Adam’s and represented him as “king” of the Garden of Eden. It became like a baton that was passed down. Abraham became the token lord and king of the Garden of the Lord, not in the land of Canaan, but the Garden of the Lord; then that stick was passed down to Moses, which is symbolic of the Tree of Life as revealed to John as Jesus.

The stick of Jasher passes along the right of inheritance— to whom the stick should go. It was finished when Jesus was glorified. The big stick stopped with Jesus and now the dead rest, not in Abraham’s bosom, but the bosom of Jesus.

Passing the stick meant to be for Adam seems to be the concept of “election” wherein He is to be our king and us his people.

All the bullet items in the list previously are by the grace of God. Adam’s kind were pre-decided before the foundation of the world, but when Adam failed, the baton was passed along.

The New Testament would be when the stick of Adam is passed to one new kind — those in Christ Jesus. Those holding the sapphire stick at the end shall become members of the royal priesthood in the kingdom of heaven, as Paul wrote to Peter, “You are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that you should show forth the praises of Him who has called you out of darkness into his marvelous light” (1 Pet 2:9).

Darkness was separated from the light of God in the beginning, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters” of light and darkness. Hence, the firmament would be a distinction between light and darkness, or truth.

A “sanctuary” in the Hebrew from Exodus 15:17 is the mountain of God’s inheritance — the world. It would be calvary — the place of Adam’s skull. [1]

Sanctuary in the Old Testament points to Calvary. God said, “Let them make Me a sanctuary; that I may dwell among them” (Exod 25:8). Hence, the tabernacle was to be a sanctuary, until Jesus was manifested as the sanctuary of God.

Hence, in Christ is the sanctuary. To be in Christ, a Christian to remain a Christian, must abode in Christ (John 14:33); that is to abode in Jesus for sanctuary. The Garden of Eden was once the sanctuary wherein Adam’s kind abode with the Lord God — as “The Tree of Life”.

“Sanctuary” in the Hebrew is miqdas — asylum away from the things of the world; set apart from it.

Sanctuary is an asylum providing safety from threatening elements wherein a person is safe, as in the Garden of the Lord.

Abraham wasn’t seeking Canaan’s land but the true promised land, “even the Garden of the Lord” (Gen 1:10) wherein the Hebrews would have a sanctuary to live in safety. With that said, “Abraham’s bosom” (Luke 16) is a sanctuary wherein mankind was safe until Jesus would get the sapphire stick.

The fire of Ur sanctified Abram and made him “Abraham”. God breathed life (hey — the letter “H”) into him to set him apart, and then God granted the seed of Abraham asylum in the land of Canaan.

“Aliens” are persons out of their own places. As Christians, we are not of this world but are aliens from another world; “This world is not our home; we are looking forward to our everlasting home in heaven” (Heb 13:14-16 ESV). The same applies to sinners in the world of Christians:

 

That at that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: But now in Christ Jesus you who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. (Ephes 2:11-12)

 

Christians are brought close to Jesus by the blood of Christ. As such, Christians are yoked with Jesus just as a new calf is yoked with a mighty and learned ox to become an ox as well. One ox is brought nigh (close) to an ox of a higher state. All oxen are born calves of bovine creatures and become oxen as they are taught by another ox in a higher state.

In Christ is yoked with Jesus in the same manner, and the yoke is the Word of God.

Sanctuary is an inalienable right to be nigh to God just as a servant should not be an alien to any king.

Sanctification is what? Paul wrote about it:

 

You, brethren — beloved of the Lord — because God has from the beginning chosen you to salvation through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth. (2 Thes 2:13)

 

In that passage “salvation” is the in the Greek “soteria” — a state of preservation, or in safety. How to be saved? Through sanctification, “hagiasmos”— set apart, ostensibly for and by God. A sanctuary is a state of being set apart in the safety of a sanctuary.

A sanctuary can be some type of an asylum or a safe space wherein no threat can penetrate. Hence, sanctuary is to be set apart in the Word of God. It is a state of safety until the time of salvation arrives.

If it was a ship, so long as the ship is in the harbor, there is safety, but salvation is not until the ship has reached sure ground.

That sure ground, is Paradise — the Garden of the Lord — where thing alien to God can no  longer get in (Gen 3:24) because Jesus is the Way back to the Tree of Life.

With that said, salvation would not come before sanctification, but sanctification until salvation. The doctrine of Nazarenes is saved and sanctified. Better said is sanctified until salvation.

God sets the Christian apart (sanctifies) until the time of salvation in a sanctuary where like in the Garden, with Him as the “Husbandman” who provides all things to nourish, feed, and keep you safe from the Wicked One. Like the woman of Adam, although safe, because of insobriety and non-vigilance, even glorious woman could still be beguiled. With that said, even in a sanctuary, “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Pet 5:8).

The background from the Book of Genesis reveals the grace of God and who carries the big stick. It is never you, but God who places the stick in the hands of the elect. Going to a church of some doctrinal theory is not the stick, but the sapphire stick is from God. In the hands of the elect, it is a stick of safety until the coming of Christ. Now, it is Christ’s way, not Adam’s, Noah’s, Abraham’s, nor even Moses’s way, but Jesus’s.

Having the stick of God is for those set apart. Adam’s kind began the good race, and certain patriarchs and their seed were set apart in a sanctuary of sorts, but each failed. Only Jesus is the Way and still carries the baton.

Being finished, the only Way to the original sanctuary of God is by Jesus who alone carries the only stick for a way in — the Holy Cross.

 

 

 

 



[1] For more on that see my book, The Skull of Adam as the mount Calvary.