Tuesday, October 8, 2024

ON THE ORIGIN OF THE KINDS

For this commentary, I use the eyes of a technician to understand the Way of God. My eyes see things in a different manner than most because of my engineering background. My entire career was about invention and turning the things in my mind to real things. I now use that perception for how the “Tekton” God might have done things. Please stay with me as I seek to understand the high degree of creativity of our awesome God!

Strangely the English word “kind” is used mostly in the creation of the heaven and earth (Gen 1). It is not used in the seeding and growing of the Garden of God in Genesis chapter two. It is not used again until chapter six wherein the different kinds were brought onto the ark of Noah.

First let me explain the creation of the heaven. In chapter one man was created in the Image of God. That “Image” was a “shadow,” or phantom. Then in chapter two, God took that invisible Image and constructed flesh from the ground. Early in chapter two something is revealed: 

Thus, the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them. And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it: because that in it he had rested from all his work which God created and made. (Gen 2:1-3) 

To be honest, I have had it wrong; both the heaven and earth were made during the first event. What was made was the “lofty” and the “firm” things. They were the ingredients that God would grow two different gardens.

Chapter two is about growth. Living things grow. It seems that chapter one was when the cosmos was seeded, and chapter two was when it became a “garden.”

The soul of the male and female of one distinct kind was made in six stages, ending in rest (i.e., the six processes coming to equilibrium).  Part one was God generating the seed and part two, God sowing the seed. The seeds of the kinds were created before the foundation of the world when the Garden was sown.

The different kinds were literally “portioned out” as the Hebrew word min means. Seed is first mentioned (several times) in chapter one, but not in chapter two. The word “seed” is zera’ in the Hebrew, one meaning which is “semen verile” — semen with the properties that would produce an adult male (Merriam-Webster 2024). Of course, semen is the seed of males in a seminal fluid.

God had said, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters” or figuratively, the semen from the semen (ibid).

One of the first things that God did was to divide the types of semen — the heavenly from the earthly, as it turned out. That was perhaps the occasion when two realms were created with the seed for each, respectively. Angels and men were possibly divided at that time, each having the same form but different substances.

Dividing the waters from the waters was perhaps the “election” before the foundation of the world, if that is true. After that, the story of the angels was dropped, and God focused on mankind. Much went on in the heavens while earth was in formation. The angels would have been planted in their own “garden” in heaven while man was planted in a very similar garden of firm material.

The “firmament” is speculative. Some believe it is a cosmic dome. I believe that the firmament was a tool to use to separate the firm things from the unfirm things. (In science that compares to “Young’s Slit Experiment” where a cloud of light is divided into waves and particles.

The firmament was using a process, and the process was dividing the kinds from the kinds. The first division sorted out the man-seed from the angelic seed.

God divided the DNA of both creatures before the foundation of the world. Human beings were the chosen seed to grow in the Garden of God in the ground.

Then later in chapter one, the seed was divided further wherein God made all the other kinds. He used seed in the manner of mankind’s but sorted theme further to make the vegetable and animal kingdoms.

The seed of Adam was glorious. It would have been the Image of God. The phantom description of that Image describes the chromosomes of God very well… God without flesh. Imagine a Creature without flesh but with chromosomes in the image of a body. Chromosomes are colorless and every nuclear cell of the body has male chromosomes. Hence, the paternal aspect of God, the “Father.”

In chapter one, that “apparition” was Adam. God further divided the semen (and the DNA within it) and made the female separate but alike beings. (Mitochondrial DNA would come later as well as bacterial DNA, so be patient.)

In chapter two, God took that phantom-like Image — the genome of Adam — and kneaded it into the clay: “The Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Gen 2:7). God had used His seed, made the seed of man, and then put each seed in a material “shell” of sorts — the totality of the chromosomes of man in bodily form. (Our it could be that God put one of His own seeds in the chromosomal cell.) The latter makes more sense because the next occurrence is this, “The Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there He put the man whom he had formed” (Gen 2:8). Eastward meant before time existed.

It seems that chapter one is more about generating the seed of man and chapter two the planting and growing of the seed of man in the Garden of God. Once Adam was grown, he named all the other creatures, but one remained missing — the female of the kind. It was at this time that God portioned out the female from the male, creating a division of mankind; “And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made He a woman, and brought her unto the man” (Gen 2:22).

It was not a rib! It was literally something from the side of Adam (Strong 2006). What makes sense is that God took a sample of the DNA from Adam and created woman from it — a female from the male, or in the Hebrew an ‘issa from the ‘is. God made two existences from the one. He would have used the male chromosome to create the female. That might be the origin of the XX-female chromosome from the male XY-chromosome. The Y-chromosome defines a male; it is paternal.

In my book, On the Origin of Man and the Universe, I speculated that since it does not appear discretely in humans, that the God-chromosome is YY and that Adam’s phantom, or soul, is the YY-chromosome while the material form of Adam was XX, and when joined in the Garden, Adam was a hybrid being with XY-chromosomes. Since the female was from the male, and not God, then her chromosomal identity was XX. Who knows? but that does make sense!

The kinds were from God. He was all of Existence in the beginning. The “beginning” was not the beginning of time, but literally of “rank one” (ibid). All the seed came from the “side” of God from whose belly flows living waters. The prophet Jeremiah referred to God as, “the fountain of living waters,” meaning that all things are portioned out (the kinds) from Him. It is not that God is in all existence, but that from God came all things in existence.

From God came the kinds. From His side all things were poured out then divided. Mankind came from God who first made the “seed” put it in a shell, planted it, and from that one seed, all of mankind grew.

The other kinds came from a very different seed except the angelic kingdom. They were never planted in the Garden of God on Earth but grew separately in the Garden of God in Paradise. They were surely gardens much alike but in different realms.

By the time of Noah, the angelic kingdom came to this world and things changed drastically. Hence, in chapter six another kind poured out and they were sucked down the “drain,” so to speak.

Note that the male came from God directly and the female came from the male. There was no occasion where God divided the seed of Adam from the seed of animals. Mankind is not of animals but were of God. Later, it shall be shown that the next division was the beasts from Issa, the woman. Genesis chapter three is about the further division of the kinds. It was an improper division not of God. This new kind was not original but mutated. The Garden of God had been encroached upon by an alien creature, not from another planet, but alien to God and the firm things.

The origin of Adam from the seed of God is demonstrated in the graphic below.)

Think now about Neanderthal “man” until we meet again.

Picture credit; "Prop G;" University of Florida.

 

Monday, October 7, 2024

THE GREATEST SIN

All sins are not of equal seriousness; albeit even the tiniest sin without repentance results in eternal death; “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23).

One might ask, “How have I sinned?” especially an innocent child or the purest do-gooder.

Sin is inborn. Because of ancestral sin by repetition, sin is engrained within the nature of mankind; thusly the theological term, “original sin.” Because you are of the humankind makes you a sinner.

That does not seem fair, nor does it seem fair that the most faithful creatures — canines — have no hope of eternal life. Mankind was chosen before the foundation of the world, to wit: 

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: According as He has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love: Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of His will. (Ephes 1:3-5) 

Now ask yourselves some questions: 

·         Who did God choose? Answer: He chose “us” — mankind. He could have chosen one of the other kinds or all the kinds. God made mankind alone in His Image (Gen 1:27), and mankind, both the male and the female, had dominion over the other kinds. (Gen 1:26). Mankind, not the other kinds, were supreme; only we were “children” of God in the beginning. Children in the sense that only mankind had the identity, or genome of God. We were chosen to be like God.

·         What was the “blessing”? Answer: He gave us a spiritual nature. The Image that God blessed mankind with was spiritual. His “Image” with which He blessed man was a “Shadow’ (Hebrew; Selem) of Himself. That “Shadow” was a phantom being (Strong 2006) which is called the “soul” within the body of our progenitors (Gen 2:7).

  The soul is a living spirit of God with flesh (ibid). Ancients called the souls of man identical to the body of man down to the fingers. Hence, the soul of man with which we were blessed is just like us only of a very different substance. We are three beings in one just like God: body, soul, and life. Like God, mankind is not just an image, but an animated being which can move of its own accord in any direction that it desires. Mankind moved away from God with original sin and their souls went with the bodies.

·         Where did the blessing occur? Answer: “In heavenly places.” Note that “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” The first verses of Genesis 2 indicate that part one was done; the heaven was created and within the heaven, the souls of male and female Adam, respectively were created; “God created man in His own image, in the Image of God created He him; male and female created He them” (Gen 2:7). God did that before He put onto them bodies made of material (Gen 2:7 and Gen 2:22).

  Chapter one was the creation of the souls of the two Adams and chapter two was about the creation of the flesh of the two. If chapter one was about the creation of the heaven, indeed any animals that were in heaven would still be in heaven to this day because they did not sin. It is expected that they are living creatures without souls like man. In fact, there will be creatures in Paradise that were there from the beginning, but they too will be of a different substance. Since, we were the ones chosen (“the elect;” Mat 24:22), only mankind has souls like God’s; and the animals in Paradise would just be of a different substance than they are here.

·         When were we blessed? Answer: “Before the foundation of the world.” Genesis chapter one is about the creation of heaven, if my premise is right, and chapter two is about the creation of the earth, or firm things. Heaven is the non-firm things (lofty).

  The “election” was not an election. Nobody voted. It was a “divine selection” (ibid), not natural selection. The heavenly creatures were just made (Gen 1:25), but man was made in His Image (Gen 1:26). Man was made much different than the beasts and before the foundation of the world, or the firm things in Genesis chapter two when God created the earth; not the planet, but firm things.

·         When did that blessing occur in time? Answer: Before time even began. Like much of the Hebrew, the first mention of time is “in the process of time” (Gen 4:3). Literally, that is “the end of hotness” (ibid). It is a twisting from the cooling, in other words, a “process” just as translated.

  In like manner, the “days” of the creation use the same word, “yom” — a hotness. Darkness or night, God called “layil” — a twisting, obviously from the day. “Evening” is “’ereb” the dusk wherein cooling occurs. Hence, time did not exist during the creation at least in the same increments. Hence, the creation was a “cyclic process” made up not of increments of time but different thermodynamic processes.

  A process requires energy, activity, and cooling to reach equilibrium. The “days’ of creation are not time oriented, but process oriented just as Genesis 4:3 implies. 

  They could have occurred consecutively or simultaneously with each cyclic process becoming part of the whole. In other words, all seven of the processes could have been at once. Indeed, the theory now in vogue since the James Watt Space Telescope reported back, in the creation “time did not exist.” Appended to that, according to Michio Kaku is that “time is a construct of man.” The Bible somewhat confirms that if the Hebrew is taken literally.

·         Who is God in scripture? Answer: He and him are not in scripture. They were added to indicate that God is paternal, albeit “He” is neither male nor female, but was a source of our genetics in both males and females. God would have supplied the nuclear genetics that makes humans, human. “God” is the theos and is the “father” (pater) of the Lord Jesus. Theos is the “Godhead” — the Holy Trinity — Yahweh, the Progenitor, His Image, and His Progeny.” Yahweh is the Creator God, the “Dynamis” aspect of the Godhead. His Dynamic is Virtue, according to the Greek. Hence, “God is Good” (Psalm 73:1). God in all three aspects, or substances.

·         What is “adoption”? Answer: It is necessary because of sin wherein children of God emancipated themselves. Time began for mankind with sin because sin was the advent of death. The two Adams could have lived for eons before sin in an economy wherein time did not exist. The plant and animal kingdom could have come and gone, or even existed all along with mankind.

  The animals of chapter one of Genesis would not have been subject to decay until mankind sinned. Perhaps they went extinct when mankind sinned, and that God carried so many of them through the advent of sin and many were driven out of the Garden of Eden with man (Gen 3:24).

  They would have been expatriated from one economy to another. In other words, they were renounced by God because they were then of the Wicked One like Cain (1 John 3:12). In expatriated, the “ex” means “out of” and “patria” comes from the Latin meaning “father” (Douglas Harper 2001-2023). Hence, God removed His own genetics from the man and the woman. They were not necessarily cast out of anyplace but were emancipated from the good Genes of Father God. Of course, without the Genome of God in them, they would indeed be aliens to Paradise, and God had made a place for them in this world wherein tribulation exists.

Because they were emancipated from the paternity of God, then to be “born again” (John 3:7) means that God would engender them (Strong 2006) from above. Lost sinners would then be adopted sons of God, not biologically, but by regenning. It would be interesting to test whether the genetics of a Christian is any different than before he or she was born again.

·         How did God “predestine” us? Answer: He determined beforehand. He decreed from eternity. Well, that goes back to before time again. When was eternity? Before time began. What happened before time began with the advent of sin? Adam’s kind was selected as the favored kind, having dominion over the other kinds. It was everyone, the “whosoever” in John 3:16, that was predestined; at least everyone who trusted in Him to regenerate; that God had the power, mercy, and genetics as the “Father” to do so. Jesus was the only Person with the Genome of God in Him. Hence, Jesus is the Way. God predestined anyone who would trust Him. Anyone else He would not. He wanted everyone to trust Him, knowing full-well that many would not. The predestination was that all would sin. The choice was that some preferred not to sin. That independence comes from good kings. Their allegiance is not forced but goodwill comes from their own will.    

The commentary is about exhausted, but the point is made that every word in “The Word” must be analyzed. Take nothing for granted. The English versions are not literal, but the Greek and Hebrew are more so. When Jesus spoke, He spoke in the Greek. Some words are not exact between languages, so context and the ingenuity of the translators is important.  

If you are alive, you have sinned. That is the answer to the original question in the first paragraph. You have sinned because you are human. It is in your genetics and has been since the original sin. It is not your fault that you are a sinner, but it is your fault if you remain so!

Death commenced with sin, did it not? We all shall die because we “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23).

How do babies sin? There are types of sin: inbred, accidental, by omission, and by commission. They are not equal sins, but anyone of them is coming short of God’s Will — His “Glory,” or nature.

Accidental sins are those we do without understanding that they are sins. An example may be working on the Sabbath or the Lord’s Day when the exact time may not be known, or another; tripping because we think that we can carry our own load. It is with good intentions but bad performances. Accidental sins are endeavoring to do every Law of God, albeit it is impossible.

Sins of commission are knowingly usurping God. We might know His Will but proceed anyway with things against His Will.

Sins of omission are knowing His Will but having apathy for His Will, or just being too lazy to perform as expected. The most common sin of omission is the failure to commune with God, especially the failure to pray, or to pray with vanity, as if it has no effect.

Which is the greater category of sin? Accidental ones? No. Sins of commission; things we do knowing they are wrong.

Now examine the crucifixion? The accidental sin was, believe it or not, the ones who nailed and the one who pierced the side of Jesus. To them, He was just another malefactor, and they were only doing their job. They had no hatred for Jesus; They were only doing mechanical things like hammering and piercing. Jesus said, “They know not what they do” (Luke 23:34).

Others knew what they were doing. Pilate understood that Jesus was who He said He was and washed his own hands of the activity. He was not a religious man, but seemed to be a student of philosophism with his question, “What is truth?”  However, he knew that he was doing wrong because he was a sensitive man. He committed the act by his orders. His was an act of commission. However, Jesus understood his situation and expressed it: “You could have no power at all against Me, except it were given thee from above: therefore, he that delivered me unto you has the greater sin” (John 9:11).

Of whom was Jesus speaking? At first glance, it seems to be the chief priest Caiaphas. Caiphas did in fact deliver Jesus to His death, and indeed, Caiphas did not have good will for the Person of God. However, Caiaphas did not know that Jesus is God! He thought Jesus was only a pretender to the throne of Judea which was empty. He may have wanted the regime of Annas to continue with himself as king in the manner of John Hyrcanus who was priest and king before. If Caiphas had known that Jesus was God, then would he have killed God? It was incumbent on himself to learn the truth. He failed that. Neither did he know what he was doing! His was a sin of omission.

Who killed Jesus, then if not Pilate, the executioners, nor the chief priests? The Jews did not kill Jesus, either. The Jewish leaders were not the guiltiest just as Jesus said.

Well, the One who killed Jesus was Father God. Jesus implied that when he answered Pilate. It was God who sacrificed His only Son. Of course, Jesus was no more the literal “Son of God” than He was the literal “son of  David,” although He was called both.

Peter had said, “You are the Christ, the Son (huios) of the living God” (Mat 16:16). Jesus was not born of God; He always existed (John 1:1-14). Jesus was the posterity of God. He was God in the flesh. He was not a born Being, but God borne there from above, as in “transported” or “translated.” In a sense, Mary was just the “Ark” wherein Yahweh was transported from another realm to this one and given flesh so that He could be seen.

The best guess is that the Spirit in Jesus was the very Image of God. As the “Son” that would have been the genetics of Yahweh and the “Glory of God” would have been the Genome of God. When we are glorified, then we are engendered somehow with the genetics of God to become in Christ, or actually, Yahweh in us.

I have written before that the Yahweh in Jesus is the very Genome of God within Him — that the genetics of Jesus was God’s, possibly the YY-chromosome.

The greater sin was that God took on the sins of mankind, as Paul wrote, “For He has made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him” (2 Cor 5:21). For the first time ever, God sinned. He had to know our sin to comprehend sin.

To be blunt, Yahweh suicided Himself just as Satan did himself with Judas. Judas endeavored to propitiate his own blood to rid himself of Satan. He became “god” for a few moments. He was the Antichrist of that day who had Satan in himself. He tried to sacrifice himself for his own sin, but that was not efficacious. Judas was under control of Satan. Satan was guilty of killing Judas.

On the other hand, God (Yahweh) killed Jesus as He sacrificed His only “Son;” not His offspring, but His own Identity for the Ghost within the man, Jesus, was God Himself. God was in every nuclear cell of the flesh of the man, Jesus. His Genome might very well be the Holy Ghost that left the Body of God upon dying.

The greatest sin was God’s suicide of Himself. It was a sin of commission that He did, but for right reasons; Jesus had to die so that we could live forever. He did what any good king would do!

What about the apostles? They too killed Jesus. What was their sins? They stood silently by while Jesus was dying. They could have picked up their own crosses and die instead of Him, but they did not. Their sins were sins of omission. When we stand idly by while God is diminished, we too are silent killers.

Sins of commission kill God even more effectively. Each sin is as if hammering a nail into the appendages of God.

It is easy for us to sacrifice ourselves for Jesus. Picking up our own crosses and following Him is just a matter of dying to the will of our fleshes. It is not even painful; we need not even sacrifice our foreskins but only the hardness of our hearts. The greatest sin for us is that so many fail to sacrifice our flesh, even Christians, who still continually subject themselves to the ways of the world. Maybe it is doing things contrary to God, but worse yet, it is omitting God from our lives. Do that often enough and we have again emancipated ourselves from God. That is apostasy — once having affection for God, some  Christians defecting.

You may not be as secure as you think, or it would not be written, “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the Devil, as a roaring lion, walks about, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Pet 5:8).

So, who killed Jesus? We all did! Even His disciples who stood idly by. Yahweh God did the “bloody deed,” as Moses wife would say, but He did it because us all, for all have sinned.



 

 

 

 

Friday, October 4, 2024

ABOUT THE RESURRECTION

Belief in resurrection is imperative; without the understanding that you can live forever, Christianity is meaningless.

Trusting Jesus is part-one in a two-part event. To be born again there are two things in which a sinner must believe: (1) That Jesus is God in the flesh and has the Power of God, and (2) belief in the Resurrection.

The philosophers of Athens thought Paul and unusual fellow because “he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection” (Acts 17:18) That was indeed a strange teaching because they obviously believed in the man, Jesus, but not His Resurrection.

While many of the Greek gods were believed to be resurrected figures, the Greek philosophers did not believe in the Resurrection. They were the strange people of Athens. (MrMacSon 2018).

Paul was an odd fellow to them because he seemed to believe in the Greek gods, unlike the philosophers who trusted the philosophers. Even if Paul had believed in a god that was usual, but he believed in the resurrection.

Now examine the implications of that strange belief that even the Sadducees did not believe, to wit: testing Jesus, “the Sadducees, (which) say that there is no resurrection….” (Mat 22:23). The Sadducees believed in God but that’s it: 

  The Sadducees believed that God determined what was good and bad, and communicated this through the Torah. They believed that God was inactive in history and didn't care about people. (Cataliotti 2024)

 

What is a “god”? 

The being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped (as in Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism) as creator and ruler of the universe

Throughout the patristic and medieval periods, Christian theologians taught that God created the universe … (Merriam-Webster 2024) 

Note that through the Dark Ages, God was believed to have created the universe. Implied therein is that many in those religions deny that God created anything. Thus, by definition, the God of contemporary religions had no power, wisdom, nor goodness.

Many liberal Christians believe in God but do not believe that the cosmos was created. They believe in the fellow Jesus and even that He was good, but do not believe that He still lives. The popular notion in liberal Christianity is that there was no creator God and that even Jesus is dead. “Progressive” church denominations of this era trust philosophers and not God.

The Sadducees were not so unusual to the Greek philosophers; they could live with their belief. However, Paul was called a “babbler” whose religion was strange because he taught Jesus and the Resurrection.

Christians are still shunned by so many in society because we too are considered babblers of a strange religion.

To many, the idea of a creation is now strange. Are you aware that even the world’s leading scientists now refer to ontology of the universe as “creation”?  The word creation implies intelligence and power.

The cosmos does exist; does it not? It was erected by some Thing that we call “God” and who has power, wisdom, and goodness if we define goodness as the glorious, intrinsic design of the universe for the habitation of mankind!

Any fool can look out the window and see that there must be a god. That is the premise of about all religions. Paul spoke about that observation: “The invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead” (Rom 1:20).

The “Godhead” is the Person, Spirit, and Power of God. God is indeed a Supreme Being beyond our understanding, but some THING created that was omniscient. We call that Divine Being “God.” The ultimate ignorance is that some naïve people still believe, not in science, but alchemy wherein things come from nothing.

To be a theist, requires that things came from something. That is scientific as well; there must be a cause for every effect. To believe what you can clearly detect with your own senses came about without a cause is pure idiocy. The atheist may not be stupid, but naïve enough, to accept repetition as the truth. It has been said trillions of times that the universe is without a cause, and that for many, has become the truth.

That God is Truth implies that He is the science, and now the smartest scientists in the world believe in the creation.

That God is Light is evidence of that because light is truly a cloud that when divided into its parts, and when stopped, can be seen as either photon particles or waves of light that each reveal order by light’s frequency and wavelength. Light is evidence of intelligent design because when it is divided into its components, the cloud of light reveals order.

That is evidence of a God, and it does coincide with the science. I know very naïve people that still do not accept that as science because they have been taught that order happened by random chance.

Every wise person should believe in creation. That is now the science, and it was from the beginning. Even I, while in high school and college, was taught that was foolishness, but now it is the accepted science. Repetition did not make the deception the truth. Only really brainwashed people now think that all things just happened without a cause!

Creation is building things. From the Power of God came all things (John 1:1-3). God erected the universe. However, Paul taught Jesus and the Resurrection.

Jesus, laid in the tomb, and was re-erected. That He lay dead-still on a stone would not be proof that He is God. God did the erection, as I have shown. Jesus experienced the Power of God when He was re-erected, having once walked erect. The word, “resurrection” in the Greek is “anastasis.”

The root words for that, Ana means “up again” and histanai “to cause to be upright, or firm” (Harper 2001-2023).  It was not just a mechanical thing wherein Jesus was raised up but that He was made firm again. He was re-erected because He was indeed God. His death and resurrection proved that Jesus is God!

Many miss an important point about the Resurrection of Jesus. He was raised from the dead (Acts 3:15). That was what Paul was talking about as well. The Greek word for “raised” is literally “assembled.” He was assembled from a non-firm spirit and a firm person.

God not only created all things; He assembled them to working order. He gave life even to the planetary objects and even black holes where objects are turned into energy and then re-erected as masses. The cosmos reveals the resurrection in black holes and the James Watt Space Telescope saw them in 2021.

Jesus was re-assembled in the tomb. He was not strictly made erect, but firm again as well. The Godhead includes God in different stasis (states): Spirit, Mass, and Power (Dynamics), all together as one God in homeostasis.

The point to the crucifixion of Jesus was to reveal the truth; that Jesus is God in the flesh. In a very Platonian manner, God made the “Shadow” (Image; Selem in the Hebrew) move independently of the object. The death of Jesus overcame the science that the shadow is a fragment of the object, not the object itself! Jesus cried out and “he gave up the ghost” (Luke 23:46). That was God’s proof that Jesus was who He said He was — God in the flesh.

The crucifixion dis-assembled God. The tomb re-assembled Him. How so? 

Behold, there was a great earthquake: for the Angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. His countenance was like lightning, and His raiment white as snow. (Mat 28:2-3) 

The “angelos” of the Lord was an “heavenly spirit.” However, that specific Spirit was of it’s “kyrios” — its Owner.  That heavenly Spirit was the Holy Ghost that was gone from Jesus, returning to be re-assembled.

In science, there is a thermodynamic characteristic that is true for all things in the world — entropy. It is the science that any thermodynamic process once completed, cannot be reversed without the loss of energy.

The Holy Ghost had lost great Power (Virtue) to save mankind. The Godhead was re-assembled, and the Godhead afterward was identical to the Godhead before. There was no loss of entropy, again proving that Jesus overcame the world. He even said so, “Be of good cheer; I have overcome the world” (John 16:33).

God, in the beginning, created the world. He, in a sense, “cut the atom” (‘bara in the Hebrew means to cut) into sub-atomic particles that He re-assembled to make all things. Ironically, His project was named “Adam.”

God assembled the universe in the beginning after cutting the particles with great energy, or as the Bible says it, “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters” (Gen 1:6). Then He did just that; He divided the “seminal fluids” containing “seminal particles”! Then God re-assembled them again, and said it was “good” (Gen 1:31).

The point with that background is that God did with Jesus what He had done with the Creation. He made all things from Himself in a sense, from His Power, and the death and Resurrection of Jesus is the repeat of that.

First God separated the waters from the waters, the blood of Jesus from the waters of Jesus, then God, at the Resurrection, returned the “Waters” (Living Water) to the belly of Jesus (the firm things).

Is it merely a coincidence that God proved that Jesus was God by a re-creation?

The Bible is a book of miracles. You may see them as coincidences but unlike repetitions, many “coincidences” is evidence of truth — that Jesus is who He said He was, and that He is God!

Paul taught on Jesus and the Resurrection because the Person of Jesus already re-erected was the evidence that Jesus was the “Unknown God” (Acts 17:23) to which they attributed all things.

Paul was preaching to them that Jesus is their unknown god, “and Him I declare to you.” His declaration was that mysterious Power that created all things were The Word, Jesus (John 1:1-14).

Even the demons believe in God. (Jas 2:19). Since atheists are even worse than demons, they should expect as bad an outcome — the total destruction of their souls.

Jesus went to Athens to make a point to the most intelligent of the time; that Jesus is the god who they were unwittingly teaching. That was of first importance. Of equal importance was the Resurrection wherein Jesus’s re-assembly without any losses did overcome the world; and that was enough evidence that He was their unknown god.

Jesus died, not only to save mankind, but to convince them that God is greater than the science. Paul was able to persuade the Greeks to accept Jesus as God because the evidence of the creation and re-creation overwhelmed any other idea. The Greeks understood that Jesus is God because although once dead, even taken apart, He was put back together again and was still the God of Creation.

People followed Moses, but always refused to follow God. The blood of Moses never changed anybody, but God changed Abram to Abraham, Sarai to Sarah, and Jacob to Israel.

Jesus changed the murderer Saul into the apostle Paul. God changed their countenances just as Yahweh had changed the countenances of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and even King David.

Paul taught two points to change philosophers into Christians; that Jesus was the unknown Creator God that they professed and not once dead; always dead.  

Jesus is the material Image of God, and the Resurrection proved that His “Shadow” was Yahweh Himself. That coincided with Plato’s Allegory of the Cave in pursuit of the truth. They should have accepted Jesus and the Resurrection as adequate proof that the Object and its Shadow were one Divine Being.

So, you believe in God? Most do not! You must believe that Jesus is God; and that His Body was evidence of the Ghost within Him, as Paul said to the Romans.

Jesus was not just a man; He is the Immortal God and He proved that by re-assembling Himself in the same manner that Yahweh assembled the universe.  

Don’t call yourselves “Christians” unless you believe that God created all things, that Jesus was Him who created (John 1), and that it is God who can re-erect you in the end by re-assembling your body with your soul (1 Thes 4:16).



 

 

 

Thursday, October 3, 2024

WHERE IS THE GARDEN OF EDEN?

Some are in search of the Holy Grail. I have found it! The “cup” or body of Jesus itself is the Holy Grail for which mankind still searches. It is still here on Earth in phantom; the contents of the Grail remain here in this world in the bodily shape of the Person, Jesus but its material is not of this world.

My point is that we look for real solid material things but should search for esoteric things.

I have searched for the Garden of Eden for years by not going anywhere further than my recliner. The Bible, I believe tells of its location; albeit it requires an intensive search in the annals of time and even before time even began.  Ezekiel provided some clues: 

13 You have been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was your covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of your tabrets and of your pipes was prepared in you in the day that you were created.

14 You are the anointed cherub that covers; and I have set you so: you were upon the holy mountain of God; you have walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.

15 You were perfect in your ways from the day that you were created, till iniquity was found in you.

16 By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of you with violence, and you have sinned: therefore, I will cast you as profane out of the mountain of God: and I will destroy you, O covering cherub, from the midst of the stones of fire.

17 Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty, you have corrupted your wisdom by reason of your brightness: I will cast you to the ground, I will lay you before kings, that they may behold you. (Ezek 27:13-17)

 

Almost everyone focuses on either one of two things: (1) Tyrus as Lucifer, or (2) the destruction of the city of Tyre.

Nebuchadnezzar, as I wrote in the previous commentary, did not destroy the “citadel” city of Tyre; Alexander the Great did enter it. However, Tyre may represent the final destruction of the world as we know it. While we have riches and safety because of the grace of God, His patience will run out. Just as Tyre ended up an unsafe place, so will the world.

However, my focus is on that area as “the garden of God.” Tyre was the trade-route for that area and time and Ezekiel spent much time writing about its commerce and riches. It would be no longer a “garden” but a great city of God; perhaps the one that John called “Babylon” (Rev 20:18).

Tyre is Tyre, but it may represent Jerusalem as well. The real city of Babylon was destroyed by Persian king Cyrus in 539 BC. The Book of Ezekiel was written between 593 and 571 BC. Tyre could have represented the fall of the city of Babylon, or any great city, even the fall of Jerusalem or even the world.

It could be that Ezekiel was speaking of the fall of Jerusalem, the “harlot” that killed Christ. It did fall in 70 A.D. when three Jewish malefactors, allied together for the “good” of the Jews, destroyed Jerusalem.

Just as Ezekiel was speaking of Lucifer when he wrote about Tyrus (the city), he could have been speaking of Tyre as a representation of the “Babylon” Jerusalem as well.

About Tyre, Ezekiel wrote, “You have been in Eden the garden of God.”

Where is Eden? “Eden is where wealth comes from” (Abarim Publications 2024). It implies delight and luxury. The city of Tyre, before it fell, represented Eden but it was not the epicenter of Eden.

There is evidence of Eden (Aden) to this day. The city of Aden in Yemen and the Gulf of Aden whereon Yemen lies southward on the Arabian peninsula.

The land of Dan westward of Jerusalem was once known as “Eden.” Eden, if it was real estate, was surely the entire Kingdom of David with the bounds that God delegated to Abraham: “The Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, ‘Unto your seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates” (Gen 15:18). That real estate is now part of the “fertile crescent” that runs through Jerusalem, Tyre, and Sidon, even to the Euphrates River in what once was the border of Babylon. Central to the land given to Abraham is Jerusalem and Mount Calvary is the celestial axis and “naval of the world.”

I submit, not Babylon, but the land promised to Abraham was “Eden” and that before time, that area was like the pleasantries of the city of Tyre.

Like the king of Tyre, Nebuchadnezzar was also an antitype of Lucifer. Nebuchadnezzar failed in capturing Tyre whereas Alexander succeeded. If Tyre represents Eden, then Alexander was not the destroyer but perhaps Lucifer himself. As such, Tyre may represent the world and its destruction. As it gets more prosperous, even Utopian, it is closer to destruction. Tyre is how the world is at the present time. We may be marked for destruction, but destruction will come at the end of time sometime in the future. No longer will time be utilitarian because mankind will be gone, replaced by God’s kind — those who are in Christ.

However, continue to focus on the Garden of God. There is a marker for the Garden of God — the Jordan River, in the Hebrew, “Naral ha Yarden,” the “River of the Garden.”

When Lot and Abraham stood south of the Dead Sea, they looked northward and saw the Garden of Eden; “Lot lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered everywhere, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord…” (Gen 13:10) “Even as” is not even in the Hebrew. “Garden” is. They were not looking north to a plain that looked like the Garden of the Lord, but along the Jordan River is the Garden of the Lord where it existed before time began.

When we think of Adam and Eve being cast out of the Garden of Eden, we think of them being cast out of real estate here on Earth. I suggest that their Garden was Paradise in the realm of heaven and that they were cast out to a garden in the world that was harder to till as Genesis chapter three indicates.

That is not to say that heaven is on Earth but that there is another unseen realm that can be entered only by translation there. Adam and Eve did not die per se, but they were translated from a realm where time does not exist to one where time does exist. In a sense, time killed them gradually.

So where is Paradise? It is in another realm with a “gate” between the two; one guarded by cherubim (Gen 3:24).

Ezekiel referred to Tyrus as “the anointed cherub.” He would be the chosen one among the cherubim that guarded access to Paradise in heaven. In a manner, Lucifer does guard the way to Paradise for he stands in the way to the Tree of Life, just as God said about the Garden of Eden.

With that said, the Garden of Eden was before time, surely in another realm of which the Kingdom of David is a reasonable facsimile. The real estate here on Earth will remain, but be destroyed entirely by Lucifer someday and then Paradise in heaven will come to its foundation — its firm place here on Earth, to wit: 

And I (John) saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. (Rev 21:1-3) 

The destruction of “Tyrus” is the world in the “sea” of the cosmos. It will not be accomplished by any king, but Lucifer whose sole existence is to tear down things so that God can build back better.

The destruction of Tyrus represents God preparing the world for the Garden of Eden to return to its firm place.

The Book of Enoch points toward Paradise here on Earth being the same as Paradise in heaven but in another realm. I believe Enoch knew that!



 The Garden of Eden as I see it; Coeur d' Alene Press; The Promise Land

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, October 2, 2024

THE EMANATION CONTROVERSY

I laid awake early this morning debating an age-old question in my mind; to whom does light emanate, or does it? Not only have I debated that, but so did the middle age ecclesia.

“Emanation” is “act of flowing or issuing from an origin; emission; radiation; what issues, flows, or is given out from any substance or body.”

In cosmology all things flow from God; He emanates matter and what is not matter; notably the heaven and the earth (Gen 1:1) “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” God emanated both of those substances.

“Cosmology” is the science of things; both the visible and the invisible. Genesis 1:1 is the origin of the cosmos, translated in the English as “world.” All the Book of Genesis is cosmology and so is the Book of John chapter one. Genesis chapters one and two are about the origin of the cosmos.

Most people think of the “world” as planet Earth. We are just one visible speck in a visible and invisible universe. The cosmos is the entirety of all things, both visible and invisible. As it turns out the heaven may be real but invisible. Invisibility is more than things of a different substance, but substances that emanate and reflect light at higher frequencies that remain unseen.

The James Watt Space Telescope (JWST) is currently sending back images of both the seen and the unseen because infrared light is filtered from darkness. Darkness is not the absence of light but light at higher frequencies such as gamma, or X-rays. You cannot see them, but they can “see” through you.

The ancient Christians wondered about emanation. The Fourth Lateran Council of the Catholic Church in 1215 A.D. ruled on emanation. That was ironic since it was during the “Dark Ages” which some consider to be between the fifth and fifteen centuries. Their ruling was truly dark! The Vatican “expressly condemns emanationism (I. De Deo rerum omnium creatore, can. iv), and anathematizes those "asserting that finite things, both corporeal and spiritual, or at least spiritual, have ‘emanated’ from the Divine substance” (From Catholic Encyclopedia 2024)

About creation, the Vatican decided (ibid): 

·         creation is not a change or transformation, since the latter process includes an actual underlying pre-existent subject that passes from one real state to another real state, which subject creation positively excludes;

·         it is not a procession within the Deity, like the inward emission of the Divine Persons, since its term is extrinsic to God;

·         it is not an emanation from the Divine Substance, since the latter is utterly indivisible;

·         it is an act which, while it abides within its cause (God), has its term or effect distinct therefrom; formally immanent, it is virtually transitive;

·         including, as it does, no motion, and hence no successiveness, it is an instantaneous operation;

·         its immediate term is the substance of the effect, the "accidents" (q.v.) being "con-created";

·         since the word creation in its passive sense expresses the term or object of the creative act, or, more strictly, the object in its entitative dependence on the Creator, it follows that, as this dependence is essential, and hence inamissible, (sic) the creative act once placed is coextensive in duration with the creature's existence.

 

The creation — the cosmos — “is not an emanation from a Divine Substance.” Hence, nothing emanated from God and since Jesus is an objective substance, Jesus would not have emanated from God.

Of particular interest is that “it is not a procession within the Deity, like the inward emission of the Divine Persons.” It is true that all things must have come from God since God created and there was only God (Gen 1:1) and also, “All things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made” (John 1:3)

In the English, that would indicate that God made things. That infers that He was not the divine Ingredient, or Material, from which all things were made. “Made” in that passage is ginomai in the Greek. That means “come to pass” or “assembled” (Strong 2006). Come to pass means “emanates” as the definition reveals. However, “assembled” means putting things together. Therefore, emanation is ambiguous from what John wrote since assembling is not coming to pass from something before.

That fails, so let’s check the Book of Genesis. “Created” in the English is bara’ in the Hebrew. That means “to form by cutting” (ibid).  Forming is not assembling. It is molding. Molding is indeed done by removing material and shaping what remains. God did cut all things from something. What was before any thing? The “Holy Thing” that we call God. God is not the Creator’s name, but Existence itself. He was “It” alone and no thing other.

God did more than form all things but divided some things from other things. The smallest thing was once thought to be the “atom” and indeed both the ground (adam) and the man (Adam) have the same atomic composition in identical proportions.

God cut something? He cut the atoms to make sub-atomic particles which he assembled to form things. Adam was made from both visible and invisible particles. Genesis chapter one is the invisible “Image” (Selem) or the phantom, and in Genesis chapter two God made the visible Image from the dust of the ground which He molded into the shape of a man. The phantom was the same shape but of some invisible substance.

Only God existed in the beginning (Gen 1:1). The beginning was the first rank of things, not time as the Hebrew word indicates. Hence, all things emanated from God since all subsequent ranks came from Him.

We turn to John again who knew cosmology, “This then is the message which we have heard of Him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in Him is no darkness at all.” (1 John 1:5).

Since God is Light, then all things emanated from God. In other words, God is in all existence, and everything that He made was good. That seems to be New Age thought but it is not. Things emanated from God but just like Adam, that did not make them gods.

In quantum mechanics, light emits both photons and light waves. They are neither, only a “cloud” until they are divided in some sort of divine splitter. (Refer to Young’s Slit Experiment.) Well, God divided the waters from the waters (Gen 1:6) “Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters.” Whatever that firm thing was that was divided, it was much like Young’s barrier with two slits.

What was before? God alone.

“Waters” is figuratively “semen” according to the Hebrew. The “Semen” of God was His Genome — the Identity of God, or His Image. One Image was “Selem” — a Phantom, or Spirit. The other Image was the material from which Adam was molded. Hence, Adam emanated from God both spiritually and materially. Since Jesus was the “last Adam” (1 Cor 15:45), then Jesus could have emanated from God. However, He is God, so He did not emanate from anything.

“No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he has declared Him” (John 1:8). God is in the bosom of Jesus. He is in what was called the “loins” of the man. The Ghost of Jesus was the Image (Hebrew, Selem) of the Father. So, the Holy Ghost of Jesus did not emanate from the Father but was the “Father” in the loins of Jesus who was His “Son,” or progeny. The Father was in the Son genetically. Jesus did not emanate from the Father like Adam, but He is the Father within.

Jesus was the “only begotten.” However, that too is ambiguous for Jesus was not begotten (emanated from) but “monogenes” in the Greek. Monos means “one” or “alone” and genes from ginomai, means “cause.” Jesus was the “First Cause,” or the “I AM THAT I AM” (YHWH: Yahweh) (Exod 3:14) that existed alone as the rank one.

Jesus was not from God… emanating from Him, but is God with the Genome of Yahweh in His flesh. It is not “Jesus AND God” but “Jesus IS GOD” for God is within the vessel, or “cup” of the man, Jesus (Mat 26:39).

Therefore Jesus, unlike Adam, did not emanate from God but IS God. Hence, the Vatican was right about Jesus, but other things, such as man, emanated from God. We are not gods but at one time were from Him. Sin de-emanated the Light of God from mankind, and to emanate from God again, we must be “born again” or “gennao” (engendered from above). God must imbue us old creatures with His Identify, or Genome, to make us new creatures. Hence, Christians emanate from God, and since Jesus is God, then Christians are “in Christ” (2 Cor 15:7), not Christ, but emanated from Him.

On the other hand, the “lost” — those not in Christ — emanated from the Wicked One as was Cain (1 John 3:12). “Born again” is basically a change of whom is our master — from the one from whom our genome comes.

Jesus did not emanate from Yahweh but is Yahweh. As such, Jesus is God in the flesh of a man. However, the flesh of Jesus did emanate from the Father (The Progenitor) to the “Son” (The Progeny). “Father” and “Son” do not indicate that the Son emanates from the semen of the Parent but that the Son has the Identity of the Father within. Hence, the Genome of the Son is the exact Image of the Father.

What is that “Image” (Selem)? A “Shadow” or “Phantom” (Strong 2006). Therefore, the Holy Ghost that left Jesus was Yahweh Himself. When Jesus gave up the Ghost at His death, many saw Yahweh leave Him; no wonder Jesus cried, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” (Mat 27:46).

That leads to the concept of the “godhead” (Acts 17:29), or the “Father, Son, and Holy Ghost” (Mat 28:9). The Father is the Dynamic (Virtue; Greek Dynamis). The Father is the “Emanator” — the “Light” that appears as a cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night (Exod 13:21).

The “Holy Ghost” is the specific pneuma that reveals the Father in the Son, or the Progenitor to His Progeny.

The man Jesus has the Phantom Yahweh in the shape of the Person of Jesus (Luke 3:22). Hence, the Holy Ghost looks like Jesus but is of a different divine Substance.

I imagine the Holy Ghost to be like chromosomes suspended in the shape or a body which they are. Chromosomes are practically invisible, requiring stain to reveal them. They are in every nuclear cell of the body, so in your mind’s eyes, just remove the flesh from the body, leaving the chromosomes in place and there you have the “ghost” of a person!

The Holy Ghost of Jesus did not emanate from the Virtue but Is the Virtue of God. His divine “Semen” is His Genome.

A “genome” is the composite of all the chromosomes in every cell of the creature. God, although not an organic Creature, has a Genome because he is able to imbue it to His creatures. He emanates His own substance to mankind to “fill” His people with the Holy Spirit. The filled person contains the spirit of God in the shape of a human, hence the “Holy Ghost” within the Christian.

Since God is Light and He is the first rank in the genomes to come, then all things, including mankind, emanated from God. That is “glorification.” Essentially, the Serpent de-glorified Adam and the woman. The resurrection is a re-glorification.

As for the “Son,” that is the vessel, or cup, that contains the Spirit of God — His Genome — in the Person of Jesus.

Those explanations should clarify the substances of the Holy Trinity, or “Godhead.” To summarize, the godhead is the Action of God, the Body of God, and the Genome, or Spirit, of God.

Therefore, all things do emanate from God except Jesus who IS God.

Indeed, God did divide Himself to make almost all things, with the firmament doing the splitting, but Jesus Himself did not emanate from anyone or anything. He was the One Thing that pre-existed all other things! (John 1).

The Vatican got it right about Jesus who did not emanate from the Father but apparently all else did. That is the science as well!




 

 

 

Tuesday, October 1, 2024

A BEAUTIFUL MIND

 Many wonder how we are controlled by invisible forces. No, I’m not talking about corrupt governments or others using remote controls, but how thoughts from another, maybe the invisible realm, influence us human beings.

The mind has the capacity to interpolate; that is to take minimal information and expand upon it. For instance, the phrase “God is love” is mind expanding. Somehow our minds take that one phrase and add to it other things from the body of knowledge already stored in the brain.

The Words of Jesus did that for me: “…about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, ‘Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?’ that is to say, ‘My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?’” (Mat 27:46). The Aramaic in that cry is confusing. It did nothing to stimulate my brain because Aramaic is just gibberish to me that is confusing. My brain does very little with that information; it is only perplexing. If I had heard the cry in my own ears, information would be added to that. My mind could have filled in the missing pieces.

What was missing? Agony, a feeling of aloneness, pain. If we had heard that cry, then our minds would have interpolated the meaning of those words, expanded upon them, and provided to us many details of what those words meant.

For the convenience of the Greek-speaking world, Matthew translated the Aramaic to the Greek so that the Greeks understood the agony of Jesus. Then translators, took the Greek and put those words in English, so that the English-speaking people would interpolate less strenuously.

My point is that people, hearing or reading a few words, fill in the blank. Their minds expand on just a little information and make conclusions about it. That is “cognition.”

A recent study has found that to be true. The better we listen, the more efficient our brain becomes in understanding. The study showed that just a few words, when expanded upon by the mind, can tell a whole story from information already stored within the brain.

The Jews would have taken the Aramaic and did something with it. Their minds, knowing scripture, would have filled-in much missing information. What was missing to “My God, my God, why has thou forsaken me?” They would have recalled Psalm 22: “My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? why art thou so far from helping me, and from the words of my roaring?” (Psalm 22:1). They would have understood that God did not seem to be helping Jesus and that He ignored the loud cry. You see, much information is gleaned from just a few words, but that is just the first line of the psalm.

Books could be written about the first few verses of that psalm. However, examine this one passage, “But I am a worm, and no man; a reproach of men, and despised of the people” (Psalm 22:6).

Your mind should be asking, if you are focused on reading, Why did Jesus see Himself as a worm? Then your mind, subject to your sub-conscience, would begin to wonder why Jesus might see Himself as a worm! In your mind, you would see a worm and perhaps it even crawling. If you thought even more, you might see a snake, or even the Serpent of old.

Of course, based on things stored in your mind, it should reject the notion that Jesus was inferring that He was the Serpent that beguiled Adam’s kind. Your mind wanders around searching for more meaning and it happens so fast that you are unaware of it. If you had to tell your thoughts where to lead you, then your thought processes would be so slow that you would have very little intelligence. Hence, the speed and expansion of thoughts must have something to do with intelligence; and wisdom is the process of using thoughts for good. There is so much going on in your mind of which you are not even aware. From where do those thoughts come?

How the brain functions is a mystery, but science studies it with modern instrumentation. They can measure what is going on in the brain using new technology to wire, scan, and measure brain activity. A new study was just published; below is an excerpt: 

The researchers uncovered two key findings. First, brain activity was more informative and compressible when participants engaged in the more demanding task of listening to a coherent story compared to the scrambled story or resting conditions. This suggests that during higher-level cognitive tasks, the brain produces detailed, information-rich activity that is also organized efficiently. In simpler tasks, or during rest, the brain’s activity is less organized and contains less specific information. (PsyPost 2024) 

The two points are: effective listening and well-organized presentation. To understand God requires effective presentation and attention to the presentation.

That Jesus is the “Word” of God is significant; every Word in the Bible is God-breathed in that it is inspired within you from God. If you read the Word from the Bible, it is as if it came from the mouth of God. Once read, then your responsibility is to interpolate it; you are to consider God and come to conclusions. It is your responsibility to remain sober — both seeking the truth and without narcotic interference.

Information not only comes from reading but actions. Pilate asked Jesus, “What is truth?” (John 18:38). Jesus did not answer directly. He demonstrated what is truth!

Pilate seems to have been a student of Plato, the philosopher, who wrote many things to answer What is truth?

Jesus was “chained” (nailed still) in the manner of Plato’s Allegory of the Cave. In that allegory, the men were chained in a cave so that they could not see the objects (people and all types of movement behind them). However, they could see the shadows, and their minds would fill in the blanks — that there must be objects (people) in motion behind them who cast the shadows. For them, the shadows became a fragment of the object. They saw the motion and shadow and their minds filled in the blank that there were dynamic objects that cast them. [1]

Their minds took whatever little information that was available and created a more complete reality. Our minds do that all the time.

For instance, when I see a silhouette of Alfred Hitchcock many, many things run through my mind. I take that one piece of information and expand upon it. I could write pages of memories from that one bit of information. My mind, with no effort on my part, takes that one thing and creates many pictures in my mind… and in just a nano-second. (In the Greek, “thought-work” is katergomai — working out by thoughts, your salvation.)

The better and faster we can do that the higher the intelligence and wisdom.

Memory comes into play. I have read the 22nd Psalm many times, so the more I read it, the easier it is for my mind to find it. Under the right conditions, the mind can dig up information that was stored in the now dusty files of the mind. Sometimes stroke patients, it is said, can recall those long-gone memories easier than the present. The mind, indeed, is a beautiful thing. What if we had to keep track of where and when that information lies?

Now enter confusion. “When we stop being engaged, or when we think more ‘shallowly’ about what we are doing, our brains switch into a much less efficient mode, where the activity patterns become less structured, less informative, and more idiosyncratic” (ibid).

Christians as well as anybody must stay engaged with the Word of God and everybody must think less shallowly. It has come to the point that even Christians take sayings like “God is good,” and “God is light” and it ends there. They become passive and apathetic. Their minds do not ask any questions; it is as if some thing out there shuts off their neurological processes.

For those without inquiring minds, they don’t care how God is light, or that God is good. They do not even consider what is truth, nor from whom their thoughts come! Their minds are right where Satan wants them to be — dead!

Paul wrote to Peter, “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Pet 5:8). Sobriety is the ability to process information, and vigilance is evaluating what information you are either consuming or glossing over. The outcome of inefficient cognition (mental processes) is that some entity that you cannot see, nor even believe in, might devour you. That is not a physical process but to outwit, outplay, and outlast you. How can that be done? By limiting the good things that you take in and confusing your minds by scrambling your cognition.

Paul wrote to the Thessalonians, “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good” (1 Thes 5:21). All things must be considered. Information must be available and enter the minds of the people. The best way to short-circuit good things is for frivolous things to enter your mind.

Entertainment does just that. All entertainment from all media sources contains messages, albeit your conscience mind may not comprehend the messages, your subconscious understands. Unaware to you, you are considering (cognition) all that enters your minds and hanging on to whatever messages that are sent. Whatever it is that you take in becomes “you.” Lucifer — the Devil Satan — is “Prince of the Power of the Air” (Ephes 2:2). He is the source of the things of the world that occupy your minds. You are under control; you are mastered whether you know it or not!

Because Satan is not omnipresent nor omniscient, he gets into you by other devices to control on whom and what we think, to wit: “My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord” (Isa 55:8). Most people do not think and behave in the manner of God (Jesus — “The Word”) because their minds are occupied on other things.

I do a Bible study most days. I take in some small degree of information, but all day long I consider the Word of God. With even a small amount of the Word, I am safe from the distractions of the Wicked One all day long. I take that small amount of information, consider it, and it grows in my mind. While the Word of God is growing, the distractions of the Devil are filed deeply in the recesses of my mind. That is both theology and the science!

When I see the cross, that one piece of information enters my mind. Within my mind, I see Jesus, I see His agony, and I see that He propitiated His own blood for mine. Sometimes in my mind’s eye, when I see only the cross, I see just truth. I see that Jesus is nailed still yet His Shadow moves and even leaves Him. I see Him overcoming the science — reality in the world wherein shadows are stuck permanently to their objects.  While I am thinking of those things, the thoughts of the Devil may still be in there but are now forgotten until Satan incites me to recall them. He did that to Lot’s wife who looked back at the pleasure of sin (Gen 19:26) and he can do it to me.

When I see people plugged into their smartphones or wearing earbuds, it worries me. Not when they do so occasionally, but when they shut the thoughts of God out and allow the world in continually. Unless they are listening to Christian things, they are shutting God out. When I say anything to such a person, all that I receive is generally only a blank stare. Their minds are occupied on what they are hearing from some tower, maybe from the mind of the Prince of the Power of the Air. They are mastered because they are doing so many things that he desires for them to do!

In the PsyPost study (mentioned above) the cognitive dynamics of the mind are less efficient when the message is scrambled. Narratives are the scrambling process. A “narrative” is spreading information most often to the benefit of the people speaking. It may not be the truth, or it could be.

As Aldous Huxley wrote in the book, Brave New World, “sixty-four thousand four-hundred repetitions make one truth.” If it is repeated often enough, people come to believe it. That is what Jonathan Gruber meant about the acceptance of Obamacare, “We depended on the stupidity of the American voter.” It is not that voters are stupid, but they are shallow thinkers. They fail to understand that free things for others means much sacrifice from themselves. The promise of free things scrambles their thoughts, and they accept them as good, not because of stupidity, but they are inefficient thinkers!

So many Christians think inefficiently. They have been conditioned to take the information without questioning. I get mostly blank stares when I ask people what Christian sayings mean. People say they are “saved.” When I question how so, it is usually blank stares or avoidance that is returned. About any hard question that I ask just confuses people!

I asked one minister with a doctorate in theology from Chicago Theological Seminary, “What is glorification?” His puzzled and only response was “Well, glorification!? He had apparently had never even thought about it before.

Words mean things. That is my mantra. The Word of God means awesome things, both scary and magnificent. I mentioned the other day at church how awesome God is. So, awesome that I wrote an entire book about His awesomeness. No interest… only blank stares as if nobody cares.

They can sing about “My God is an Awesome God” but are very limited in their knowledge about how awesome God is. They care that God is awesome, but how so is too much for them to think about. Many are too busy with the performance to worry about the substance of the message.

Satan himself is lazy but not apathetic. He sincerely wants to undermine God, and he does that by your thoughts; the reason that your thoughts are not the thoughts of God. He occupies your mind, not necessarily by criticizing God, but for you to be apathetic to the things of God; for you to shut off that inquiring mind. Temptation does just that. It is not that we have to sin to undermine God, but to be distracted from Him with sins of omission — all those times that we neglect God.

How to have us neglect God (apathy… blank stares)? By staying occupied with distractions. Many times, I head toward my recliner to study my Bible, but on the way even to the other room, he will direct my attention to some “shiny object” as he did to Eve. This morning, the “shiny object” was reading recent scientific discoveries about the mind that interested me.

Well, God does shield me. I read the article about critical thinking and that sparked a reaction just as they wrote. I was supposed to think about their discovery and my own mind, but then God stepped into my thoughts. He revealed to me; That is how I work in you.” With that one thought, what I have written today is how God expanded on that in my mind, just as the author wrote in his article.

The points I made were an expansion of what they wrote. My mind turned from their discovery to God’s application: to “take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the Word of God” (Ephes 6:17).

The helmet shields the brain from penetration by malevolent sources. The mind resides, at least in this world, in the brain. The Word does not shield the brain in this case, but the mind. They are words inspired by God — His Thoughts that are not our thoughts. Our thoughts are not even our thoughts! We take information from the world that is meant to persuade us of something that may be true or not. The mind, if it has not been subject to tampering, sorts out all the things and retains what is good. All those external things are to scramble our thoughts not to do good.

Adam’s woman did that. She took in both good and evil, and was beguiled, heeding only the evil things to do. The serpent beguiled her. He interfered with her rational way of thinking that was designed to be “very good” (Gen 1:31).

In a manner, once exposed to evil; always exposed to evil… unless the Word in Person or Thoughts shield your minds.

I did test all things this morning and hung onto what is good; I should beware of what and whom control my thoughts.


"A Beautiful Mind;" Variety Magazine

 

 

 



[1] The action, or Dynamics, of God was Him departing the body of the Person, Jesus. Jesus was giving up Virtue to engender mankind with His Genome.  Jesus is the objective Image of God, and the Holy Ghost that went out from Him, His “Shadow,” Phantom, or Holy Ghost. (That is how my mind interpolates the crucifixion and the cross.)