Friday, December 12, 2025

ON THE HERESY OF CALVINISM

Calvinism is the doctrine of reformed churches that came about because of the reformation of the Roman Catholic Doctrine which was believed to have been smothered by the law. Sin was easily forgiven in the Catholic Church, not by grace, but by indulgence wherein sinners could pay for their sins. Note that was not the problem of Christianity, but a Catholic doctrine.

Pardon, for the reformers, was “by grace alone,” called by theologians the Latin sola gratia. The concept of sovereignty is paramount in Calvinism as it should be, for only God is Lord and King.

Soon, the Pope of the Catholic Church became both lord and king, as the “king of kings” and Pontifex Maximus of the house of Roman lords. Hence, the Pope is to them the sovereign and was called “Pontiff” or the “bridge” to somewhere; apparently the mediator to God instead of Jesus as is written,  “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus” (1 Tim 2:5).

Hence, the doctrine that God is sovereign and His Person, Jesus is Mediator, is of extreme importance to Catholics and Christianity.

“Sovereignty” means that Jesus is King and Lord; in fact he is even “King of kings, and Lord of lords” (Rev 19:16), not the Pope as his title and status among kings of the Holy Roman Empire implied. In other words, the Pope is just a common man with no more authority than any Christian (1 Pet 2:9). However, this commentary is not to attack the flaws of Catholicism, but the doctrines of Calvinism which doctrine is described by the acronym “TULIP”:

 

·         “T” — Total depravity (all are spiritually dead since original sin)

·         “U” — Unconditional election (God selects people based on His own sovereignty and people have no merit to determine their own fates.)

·         “L” — Limited atonement (The atoning death of Jesus was not to secure salvation for just anyone, but only a limited number, the “elect”.)

·         “I” — Irresistible grace (The elect only receive grace and only they can be saved to the extent that that grace is irresistible.)

·         “P” — Preservation of the saints (Those truly chosen will be preserved to the end regardless of their faith or anything else and it is impossible for them to fall away (apostasia in the Greek.)

 

Without going into every point, the “election” is not truly election but control. God controls who counts, and whatever is His decision goes, regardless of the plea.

Only God is good. We can agree on that; can we not? However, is it good to condemn someone to Hell just because he or she exists?

Under Calvinistic doctrine, God needs no evidence and would sentence some to Hell and demand others obtain heaven without regard to anything. The doctrine of “election” would make God a tyrant on the order of Hitler; He would holocaust the innocent along with the criminals as mere casualties.

“Limited atonement” would imply that Paradise has only so much room and without a “room at the inn,” the Christian is not welcome and would not have a room reserved for him, in contrast to the good God. Speaking to His disciples, Jesus said:

Let not your heart be troubled: you believe in God, believe also in Me. In my Father's house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you; I go to prepare a place for you, and if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself that where I am, there you may be also” (John 14:1-3)

His disciples were those who chose to follow Jesus. He was telling them that there was room for them in His Father’s House.

Theologians think of that as a room in Paradise; but remembering that Jesus is the “House” (Bet) of God, then Jesus was promising that they be “sons of God” in like manner. That “House” would not be material but the genesis of the Lord God, meaning those who are “born again” (John 3:7; literally “engendered from above”); (Strong 2006). In other words, all who follow Jesus to their deaths will inherit Paradise. God calls everyone, but whether to follow or not is a crucial decision. Paul wrote about the fairest “election” of all:

I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; for kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty; for this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior; Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. (1 Tim 2:1-4)

First off, Paul exhorts “all men” to be godly. Secondly, God accepts all men who follow Him to be saved. God is not a dictator at all, but the concept of irresistibility makes Him one.

Those who follow Jesus, in the Calvinistic lexicon, are merely robots going where Jesus goes. They are no more than modern drones programmed to follow Jesus without any thoughts of their destination. Why would they need to know since they were merely mindlessly following like an instinct that God programmed into them. As such, irresistible grace makes disciples no more than “Stepford Wives” rather than consciously choosing their grooms.

Many Christians are now turning to Calvinism because it removes all critical thinking on their own part; it is just that wherever Jesus went, they would follow. Jesus went into dens of thieves and inns of sin. Mindless Calvinists would follow Him there as well, but apparently, they forget that they are not God.

God provided only mankind with a fragment from Himself as the word “dominion” implies (Gen 1:26), according to Strong’s (ibid). The “election” was in the beginning before the foundation of the world as it is written: “According, as He has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world; that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love…” (Ephes 1:4).

So, where should anyone look to see who was elected? To Genesis before the foundation of the world was finished. Before the foundation of the world was finished, God selected Adam’s kind, to wit: 

God said, “Let us make man in our Image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth” (Gen 1:26) 

God chose man, Adam, to be like Him. Dominion means a part of Him. Adam (mankind) was part God and part man, so after sin he was partly depraved, not totally so.

Gone unnoticed because of translations are the “creeping things.” Those would not have been animals that crawled at all, but a lower state of anthropoids. (I submit they may have been Neanderthal and Denisovan men — manlike animals.) [1]

The “creeping thing” in the Hebrew is remes (רֶמֶשׂ). The letter resh implies a man; the mem blood, waters, or semen; and the shin fusion. Mem also represents genetics in the blood. What did God miss in creating creeping things? Nothing; He chose not to put His Image in them and hence, they were surely lower states of men. The Sovereign God chose Adam and his kind, not any earlier forms that looked like men. That was surely the “election” of which Paul wrote, and it was found before time even began with the advent of sin. Does that not make sense?

Early man was instinctual like the animals; and it was them who were the robots, not Adam’s kind. Animal behavior can be predicted because it is in their nature. Mankind cannot be predicted unless they follow Satan; hence, the mindless people of modern times who go wherever the mob goes!

The Image of God seems to have conveyed to Adam the Will of God. Adam’s kind, as was demonstrated by original sin, went wherever they wanted to go despite the Presence of God. God had not made robots who mindlessly followed. However, Satan was surely in some early form in a lower state than man, who would have been mindless animals going wherever nature would take them, just as Cain demonstrated in his wandering to the Land of Nod.

God did not make automatons; He made humans!

The last commentary was about “quantum entanglement” wherein it was explained to be “in Christ.”

“Entanglement,” it was said, was following Christ and being like Him.

Now consider the Calvinistic doctrine of Preservation of the Saints.

First off, what might a “saint” be?

David wrote, “The Lord loves judgment, and forsakes not His saints; they are preserved for ever but the seed of the wicked shall be cut off” (Psalm 37:28).

The English word “saint” is in Hebrew hasid (חָסִי). Catholics make saints of men, so consider the “saints” of God. “Saints,” in general, are kind people of God (ibid). Examine the letters of hasid for the literal meaning; the first letter chet means separation. The letter samekh coming next means protected, or preserved, and lastly, the letter yod means work by the hand of God. Hence a “saint” is a person preserved (made safe) by God. However, safety and saved are two very different concepts; Christians are kept safe (preserved) unto the time of salvation.

According to David, wickedness would cut them off (Psalm 37:28). Wickedness is a gradual thing; a cutting off or falling away (apostasia). That the wicked shall be cut off implies that before, they had been preserved. Paul wrote about apostasy:

If they shall fall away (cut off; apostasy), to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh and put Him to an open shame. (Heb 6:6)

Apostasy means “to defect.” To defect from requires affection before. That affection is for both the love of God and man.

Affection for God is love, and hence, the Image of God is the love of God. Cain seems to have had affection for God because he prepared an offering to Him. Because he was jealous of Adam and quite unkind, he not only cut Abel off, but himself as well. Cain defected from God and became a free-range beast like the early creeping things; becoming an instinctual, half-depraved man on whom God had mercy and marked him (Gen 4).

Cain had fallen away, but not all the way away, albeit part of him was depraved and part not.

There is much evidence that God does preserve the saints — those who have affection for Him. However, preservation is not salvation, and saints are those who remain kind to God; not the wicked who have turned away.

According to the Psalm, saints are those who remain righteous to the end. That is for whom there is salvation: “He that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved” (Mat 24:13) and the wicked shall be cutoff because they are required to follow Jesus all the way to the end.

Those who are dead in Christ are saved first when Jesus comes again (1 Thes 4:16). That is not dead to Christ but those who have not turned wicked and retain Christ in them. They are quantumly “entangled” but that state can be dissolved.

So far, the argument has been purely biblical but does Bible match reality; said to be exposed by science?

An earlier commentary discussed both quantum entanglement and decoherence. Below it is repeated for your convenience: 

Quantum entanglement breaks primarily through “decoherence,” which happens when entangled particles interact with their environment (heat, light, other particles, magnetic fields), causing their fragile quantum link to collapse into classical states. The most direct way to force it to "break" is through measurement, which collapses the shared wavefunction, projecting the system into a definite, but now classical, state, destroying the entanglement between them. (Physics Frontier 2025) 

That very well describes wickedness; it too is the influence of the world on Christians. Like particles of the cosmos, Christians are “fragments of God: as explained earlier — God is in Christians just as He was all Adam’s glorious kind were meant to be until sin interrupted.

The use of science does not make science pre-eminent to God who is sovereign, but that God seemed to have used science to do all things. Would He not for Re-creation if He did so for the Creation?

The world interfered with the female of Adam’s kind. That was a case of “quantum decoherence.” Albeit Adam was preserved until the Redeemer came, Cain went his own way away from God. God branded him like the “animal” he was (Gen 4:15), so that he would not be killed for meat like any other animal.

He was marked, surely because he was a lower state of man, but still a man. He was a man with just a particle of God in him but with a particle of Satan as well. He was not totally depraved but had enough “God” remaining in him that God preserved him, but after the foundation of the world; although preserved, Cain vanished to Hell with the flood. Why? Because Cain became the Wicked One (1 John 3:12).

He had been of God but turned on the part of himself that still had a fragment of God in him. Within the world, he had lost his affection for God and did as he willed. Cain was cut off because he fell away from God. That perfectly describes “decoherence.” Apostasy therefore is decoherence! Apostasy is a quantum change in states from righteous to wicked.

Much evidence of that exists even in modern times as young children are preserved by God according to His divine purpose, but then the actions of the world surround them, makes them incoherent to the Voice of God.

The evidence is that quantum decoherence reinforces the concept of apostasy.

Christians should belief that once saved; always saved, according to the Bible, but the point of contention is, When are disciples of Christ actually saved?

Paul elaborated on that as well: “Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls” (1 Pet 1:9). “Safety,” or preservation, is until salvation, and the souls of Christian saints are saved when faith ends with either the death or the rapture of Christian saints.

Thereafter, eternal security is promised. When still alive, saints must watch and pray, “Be sober, be vigilant, because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walks about, seeking whom he may devour” (1 Pet 5:8). How could you be cut off by the Devil, if you are alive but already saved? That is irrational and the belief of mindless people. If you are a Christian, you are in jeopardy of the machinations of the evil one. God will keep you in a state of safety, but the Devil may cut you off!



[1] With that hypothesis, Adam’s woman surely had carnal knowledge with some “thing” that was not part God, but part Lucifer — a Neanderthal perhaps with Satan in it.

No comments:

Post a Comment