SIN: A HIDDEN THING

 A chapter from a new manuscript of mine about the hidden things of God:

SIN

 

The most offensive thing to a person, even Christians is that he is a sinner. Suggest that to about anyone and that person will put a barrier between you and him. Telling someone that he is a sinner is like saying, “You are a deviate” and indeed sinners are deviates.

About Jesus, it is said to anyone who might hear:

 

He (Jesus) is the Rock, His work is perfect for all His ways are judgment… a God of truth and without iniquity, just and right is He.

They have corrupted themselves; their spot is not the spot of His children, they are a perverse and crooked generation. (Deut 32:4-5)

“Spot” therein would not mean just spotted but would be blemished, and of course not perfect but with defects.

In like manner “generation” would not be this generation, but the degeneration from Adamic man to common, mortal men and women. By then mankind of Adam had become degenerates and that was 3500 years ago. By now what was once a glorious man has drifted to animalistic behavior.

I’m not proud of the times that I have been tempted, but nowadays because of technology, people are drawn to look at degenerate things:

 

·         Drag shows

·         Nudity

·         Murder

·         Pornography

·         Blasphemy, and such.

 

Compare human beings to the animal kingdom, and ask, “Which is worst, the beasts or mankind?

Some say, “I have not sinned.” Sin even includes thinking on those things:

 

You have heard that it was said by them of old time, “You shall not commit adultery;” but I say unto you, “That whosoever looks on a woman (or man) to lust after her has committed adultery with her already in his heart. (Mat 5:27-28)

 

God is not hard of hearing; even in secret places, God knows your thoughts. Even contemplating sexual activity is adultery, “You shalt not commit adultery” (Exod 20:14) — a command of God for your well-being.

Adultery seems to bewilder people. In the Hebrew, it is נָאַף naʼaph:

 

·         Nun (נָ): pictographs of a seed,

·         Aleph (אַַ): an ox,

·         Pev closed (ף): the mouth

 

Literally, that can bring up many awful ideas. However, a seed would include semen, the ox like a beast, and the latter emissions, since the mouth emits thoughts.

Even nocturnal emissions are unclean in the Law of God; specifically in Deuteronomy 23:10–11 and Leviticus 15:16. A nocturnal emission renders a man ceremonially unclean until evening, requiring him to wash and remain outside the camp.

Even wet dreams make a man unclean like swine, so any manner of ejaculations intimate that humans are unclean animals.

Saying you are without sin is like claiming to be perfectly clean; defecation is even sinful as humans, unlike animals, must clean themselves.

All biological processes are unclean because without Jesus, human beings come short of the glory of God. Mosaic Law existed so the Israelites would know they are genetically unclean and biologically like the beasts of the field.

We sin because we exist in the world. If you say you are without sin, to God you would not exist to Him. For over 400 years sin was so rampant in the world, that God remained silent. God was still with them but remained in silence because of their offenses.

We all have sinned and come short of the glory of God because we are not the sons of God like Adam, but offspring of the Devil into us by degeneration.

Think rationally as you consider your own biology: You are more like a beast than like God. With that said, or even thought, “Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and He shall lift you up” (Jas 4:10).

It is not that God will raise you to a higher elevation, or even status, but that He will change your state of brutishness to one of righteousness. He will rebirth you to make you whole again.

How is that? Sin robbed Adam’s kind of God, and after the original sin, common man’s kind are just like the other beasts; more intelligent but blinded to uprightness.

We all may walk upright but spiritually and morally, we are degenerates.

John Calvin saw mankind without God in him as totally depraved. That should be questioned because rebirth (“born again”) ignites a long past cold ember that begins to build a fire within lost souls.

Pev in the word for adultery has much meaning. It is not just sexual, but spewing hatred, as James the brother of Jesus expressed it:

 

Even so the tongue is a little member and boasts great things. Behold, how great a matter a little fire kindles!

And the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity: so is the tongue among our members, that it defiles the whole body, and sets on fire the course of nature; and it is set on fire of Hell, for every kind of beasts, and of birds, and of serpents, and of things in the sea, is tamed, and has been tamed of mankind, but the tongue can no man tame; it is an unruly evil, full of deadly poison. (Jas 3:5-8)

 

The tongue can’t be tamed by any man because it only enunciates the things going on in the mind. James saw that the tongues of men will spew things even the beasts would not do. Man has tamed even some serpents, but no man can tame the tongue for it expresses the will of the Serpent (John 8:44). Only One can tame the tongue and that is God! Man is both a little lower than the angels, and by now, a little lower than the other beasts.

Mankind often do so many things sexually that even animals will not do! It is common, mortal men that are the beasts and like their genetic “father” — the Beast.

So, to say that any of us is without sin diminishes God to a liar. Even Christians who still sin are liars “If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His Word is not in us” (1 John 1:10). Christians still sin and must repent of each one.

There are various kinds of sins: of commission, of omission, accidental (as with nocturnal emissions), common sins, great sins, and so forth, but anyone of them that goes unrepented will subject a person to judgment by God.

Not mentioned in that list is genetic sin: “For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23).

How have even the unborn sinned? Like King David said about himself, “I was formed in iniquity” (Psalm 51:5). David was a sinner at conception because his DNA had wickedness (iniquity) within his little starter cell. We have sinned because we do not belong to God even in the womb. A gracious God, however, accounts for the fact that we cannot help who we are until we know about Him.

Babies are born lost as members of the economy of the world. If you reside in the cosmos, you are born a sinner and are lost to heaven. We are aliens to the world of God until God adopts each of us as legal heirs (Ephes 1:5); “(God) having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will” (Ephes 1:5).

Just when was that “election”? Rather than natural selection among the kinds, God designated Adam’s kind as the elect, him having dominion over the other kinds” (Gen 1:26).

In my past writings, I may have correctly identified our competition in that passage:

 

·         The “fish of the sea:” realm crossing beings like the giants from the fifth heaven — Grigori angels.

·         The “fowl of the air:” Anunnaki, Watcher Angels, Malikim messengers, and even hybrid sky creatures, the latter as described by the prophet Ezekiel.

·         The “cattle:” other animals.

·         The “creeping things:” lower states of man.

 

God would have selected Adamic man, not any lower state of beast to have Himself in them.

Sin is all encompassing. Anything God would not do or even think is sin, or as God said about it, “Your thoughts our not My thoughts, nor your ways My ways” (Isa 55:8).

We are not only to walk like God but think like Him. If not, then we sin. Can you even imagine God watching television or engrossed in social media?

Sin in the Hebrew is חַטָּאָה chaṭṭaʼah. Now let’s examine that “letterly” (sic):

 

·         Chet (חַ): a pictograph of a fence,

·         Tet (טּ): of serpent coiled in a basket,

·         Aleph (אָ): of the head of an ox. and

·         Hey (ה): a manlike being with hands raised as if in praise.

 

In the Hebrew language, that does mean missing the mark of God, or the Glory of God. However, from an esoteric (hidden) viewpoint, chatta’ah has the definition of severing the connection with the Creator, or the state of separating oneself from the ultimate, essential reality. Atheism, heresy, hedonism, blasphemy, and apostasy all fit that idea. Even vain thoughts that God is of no consequence would be the sin of apathy.

Things that would either diminish God or remove Him from minds would be sin. For instance, I focused so much on work and genealogical research for years that God was far from me in my mind. Too much of anything: entertainment, gaming, sports, and even reading secular stuff will make the person apathetic because those things sever the connection between the Creator and His creatures. Whether, or not, we are still in God, God remains our Archetype from whose “fabric” we were cut, although it was ripped and patched so many times. (There I’m speaking of defiled genetics and still having God’s grace.)

As such, even precious babies are born beasts like animals crawling from animals, rather than upright beings standing from God. As parents of teenagers know, those tots will eventually turn on you if God is not part of them.

That common man comes short of the glory of God contrasts with Adamic man who was created with the Glory of God (Elohim) within him. We are not children of God like Adam but are of the Wicked One (1 John 3:12) like Cain.

In that sin separates us from the mark of God, just what is the gracious mark of God?

Cain was guilty, knew he was guilty, and did not contest God’s curse. He never made any excuses because he was born “the beast” and did the things beasts will do.

Cain did so instinctively. Knowing no sin, he still naturally sinned, by murdering his brother — his keeper — just as any animal might do.

Cain couldn’t help himself, so God branded him like the animal he was with the following brand:

 

אוֹת

 

Pronounced ‘owth there is much meaning in the brand:

 

·         Aleph (א): the ox but also God “El”.

·         Vav (וֹ): a peg or nail, also representing an Adamic man and especially the Messiah

·         Tav (ת): simply the cross of wood. Finished.

 

Literally the mark of Cain was God nailed to the cross. That would be the mark of grace and the only manner that Cain could return from wandering the Way back to the Tree of Life. There it is — The crucifixion of Jesus as the hidden mark of Cain. He missed the mark then, but God’s mark would make him and his seed among the elect despite his sin. That is “grace” for Cain deserved death but received the same promise as Abel and Seth. [1]

What is sin? Doing nothing in the manner of God. Sitting there on your posterior watching football is sinful if your children, family members, and neighbors are not Christians.

To be a football fan is not bad but not being a fan of God is sinful.

The mind of a Christian must be clear of sin, but inebriants of all sorts make minds clear of about everything. Being sober and vigilant (1 Pet 5:8) is an awareness of God in doing all things, and vigilance that the unchosen may outsmart you and you may become one of them.

You are not saved! Satan wants you to believe that your state of being is so profound that sin will not get you. Salvation is of the soul in eternity wherein the soul never dies. Why be vigilant if you cannot be harmed? Use some commons sense; the world and your flesh are your enemies and until you rid yourselves of them, you are always in jeopardy.

---

[1] That Cain had the mark of Christ on him was one of the many pieces of evidence that Cain’s seed would have made it to safety in my book, The Arks of Tubal-Cain.

NAKEDNESS

 

This commentary provides much esoteric, or hidden  knowledge, and is important for us to humble ourselves for God to lift us up. Now consider a show that I am ashamed that I watched.

In the sitcom “Seinfeld” (Season 9; episode 9) called “The Apology,” Jerry dated a woman who was comfortable being naked. It disgusted him to see a grown woman sitting casually on the sofa doing nothing but being naked.

Unlike most men, Seinfeld found that disgusting. His male friends did not understand, so he described “good naked” and “bad naked.” Unknown to Jerry, he was describing a biblical concept from the passages which follow:

 

·         “The man and his wife “were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed” (Gen 2:24) ostensibly in the Presence of God.

·         After eating of the “Wisdom Tree, “The eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons, and they heard the Voice of the Lord God walking in the Garden in the cool of the day and Adam and his wife hid themselves from the Presence of the Lord God amongst the trees of the Garden.” (Gen 3:7:8)

 

Before sin, the two would have been glorious and full of glory; כָּבוֹד Kabowd. Within them would have been the “Image” of God, Tselem (צֶלֶם), that provided the Glory of God (Elohim) to them. The essence of the Presence of God would be Kabowd in the form of Tselem.

Now to analyze Kabowd first:

 

·         Qof means in a hidden dimension.

·         Bet symbolizes emergence from hidden probabilities.

·         Vav means bound in both heaven and earth.

·         Dalet indicates entry into what we call the world.

 

In summary, the state of Adam was like one emerging from a non-material world into a material one. The “hidden probabilities,” is perhaps Calvin’s doctrine of “election” for only Adam’s kind would have emerged from the heavens unto the world with God, Elohim, in him.

Now you might see that scripture begins to make sense. Adam was before space/time and matter and of Elohim; and after entry into it, Tselem — the very Image of Elohim in bodily shape as with Jesus (Luke 3:22). That Image would have been “full of glory” of which the apostle Paul wrote to Peter in the case of Jesus by then gone:

 

That the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perishes, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honor and glory at the appearing of Jesus Christ; whom having not seen, you love; in whom, though now you see Him not, yet believing, you rejoice with joy unspeakable and full of glory. (1 Pet 1:7-8)

 

Paul compared to the fullness of glory to the human soul (1 Pet 7:9), “Receiving the end of your faith, even the salvation of your souls” (1 Pet 1:9).

Jesus was the Glory of God in the shape of a man and as such “the last Adam” (1 Cor 15:45), “The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening Spirit.”

Therefore, Yeshua (the last Adam) was the Spirit in the first Adam that was a living soul. Like Jesus, Adam would have had Elohim in his person from the bodily Presence of God (Yeshua).  John described the creation of Adam eloquently:

 

In the beginning was the Word (Jesus to be made flesh), and the Word was with God, and the Word was God; the same was in the beginning with God.

All things (like Adam) were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made, in Him was life; and the life was the Light of men. (John 1:1-3)

 

The substance of God in Adam was His Light as God said it, “Let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give Light upon the earth: and it was so” (Gen 1:15). The lights of heaven (Gen 1:6) would cross the firmament between heaven and earth, and would be the lights of men, most assuredly the immortal souls prepared for only Adam’s kind.

Just as “stars” in Revelation reveal angels, the lights of heaven would surely reveal primordial souls of men.

That action was God’s selection, or “election” as translators called it; “(God) has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love” (Ephes 1:4).

Adam would have been created from the very Light of God. As such, the soul of Adam (Tselem) would be Adam as a “shadow” or “phantom” of God (Strong 2006). God is Light and in Him is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5). Hence, even the shadow of God — the “living soul” of the man, Adam, would have been full of Light as John wrote (John 1:3). [1]

The Light of God within the living soul of the man, Adam, would have been the Glory of God — the Presence of the Light of God within the soul of Adam.

Christians must do the math, so to speak. Since Paul was writing about selection before the foundation of the world, the readers must visit The Book of Genesis to find out how so, when, and why.

John even added where to find that (John 1). Genesis was the beginning of things just as John and Paul revealed. God would not have been a “Particular Baptist” but would baptize all (General Baptists) of Adam’s kind as His people.

Paul wrote:

 

There is one body, and one Spirit, even as you are called in one hope of your calling: one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. (Ephes 5:4-6)

 

Adam was baptized by the Elohim of God and was raised from the waters as a living soul. Baptism of the Spirit (The living waters of God — HaShamayim). The baptism of Jesus was in the same manner as Adam was baptized:

The Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon Him, and a Voice came from heaven, which said, “You are My beloved Son; in You, I AM well pleased. (Luke 3:22) 

 

Adam was also baptized by the Spirit of God in bodily shape when he was made alive.

God provided for Adam a living soul, then put his soul into a material vessel.

For Jesus, it was somewhat different; God Elohim always existed and onto Himself in the womb of Mary, He added the flesh like a sinful man to become sin for us (2 Cor 5:21). As such, Jesus required baptism first to cleanse the disgust from His flesh in preparation for God Elohim to enter His Vessel.

Now imagine the Spirit of God (Elohim) in bodily shape (Eloha) entering the man, Adam. Jesus always existed but not in the flesh of a Beast like us. He was glorified (John 7:39) when He received new flesh much different than before the crucifixion.

So, what does all this have to do with “good naked” and “bad naked?”

Tselem was the Image of God and the substance kawbod.

However, the next act of God was a covering for the soul of man. Before that, the substance of Adam would have been the Elohim “Spirit” of God in the shape of a man without a covering. Then “the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Gen 2:7). God then made a vessel and put the Spirit in the shape of a man into the man, Adam.

Adam would have therefore pre-existed as a Spirit-shaped man. In the creation process, that Spirit, shaped like Adam, would have received a covering. Translated “dust” let’s examine the substance. Dust would be the earth, ‘eres in the Hebrew, but Adam was formed from the dust (‘apar) of the ground (adama).

His covering would have been a particle (‘apar) of adama. So, what is the substance adama?

 

Adam is the root word (אֲדָמָה) of “the ground,” thus a material in substance. Let’s examine that material:

 

אֲ represents the Power of God (El) as Light.

דָ symbolizes the Way or process to become matter.

מָ represents the Living Waters, or Holy Spirit Elohim.

ה is symbolized by a man-like figure beholding, or praising, God.

 

Adama would have been Spirit from God in the shape of a man. It would not necessarily have been ground or even clay.

The vessel for the Spirit of God in Adam would have been some divine covering, that Adam was naked and not ashamed tells us much.

Divinely “naked” is symbolized by the Hebrew word ‘arom (עָרוֹם). Without going into all the symbolism, I visulaized naked and not ashamed, as “transparent,” and AI CoPilot^® deduced the same thing.

That situation, with adama as the covering of Adam, makes sense since it would cover the Glory of God in the man-like Spirit.

As a covering, adama can either be full of something, or even empty. Adamic man was surely full of the Spirit of God and was not ashamed. Since Glory is the Goodness of God, adama would have been “good naked” as Seinfeld called it.

Adam was not ashamed because he would have been transparent and the Glory of God revealed within him.

Now for “bad naked” (‘erom; עֵירֹם compared to ‘arom (עָרוֹם). They are both modes of nakedness because they share three letters עָרם. The difference is between the letters yod (י) and vav (וֹ).

The letter vav represents, among other things, the Messiah. That agrees with the relationship between the first Adam and the last Adam of which Paul wrote (from earlier). That would be “good naked.”

Bad naked is not all bad but with the letter yod (י) alone, it is God Ya (the sound of His Voice). Bad naked would be without the quickening Spirit of the last Adam, but only the potentiality of Father God, Ya.

Just as with Seinfeld’s concept of bad naked, Adam had new flesh from the old creature making God within himself hidden… and he was indeed ashamed.

After sin, God Ya would have been hidden by flesh that was acquired from some beast — perhaps an organic covering, containing chromosomes from some beast of the field.

Among the beasts of the field that are listed are the “creeping things” — lower states of men as the Hebrew word Remes indicates (Gen 1:26). (See my book, The Creeping Things of the Bible for more.)

Bad naked, to be ashamed of it, would be God hidden from view with organic flesh as a covering. Therefore, the flesh has become the idols of what was once Adam’s kind but are now Enosh kind — common mortal men.

Cain was the first of that kind, “Ish” as the genetics of Isha (the woman). Before, God had been the Creator “Husbandman,” but after sin, the woman would have become the “husbandman” with her as the creator (Gen 4:1), or as John wrote the words of Jesus, “For all that is in the world: the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world (1 John 2:16).

Of what flesh was Adam ashamed? That with sin, and the flesh of the old creature covering his divine body, Yahweh would have been hidden from sight.

Adam was not totally depraved but ashamed of his flesh.

God remedied that by the grace with which he covered the beastly flesh of Adam and his mate: “Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins and clothed them” (Gen 3:21).

God would have covered bad naked but good naked was also still covered. By grace, we must be born again and engendered with a new Spirit (Elohim) of El of which we are never to be ashamed, as it is written, “For whosoever shall be ashamed of Me and of My Words, of him shall the Son of man (Jesus) be ashamed, when He shall come in His own Glory, and in his Father's, and of the holy angels” (Luke 9:26).

Jesus — God in the flesh — upon death and resurrection was glorified (John 7:39). As “bad naked” creatures, we would be ashamed of a soul covered by the flesh of a beast, but with a particle (Eloha) of God Elohim within us, we should not be ashamed for that one particle (Eloha) of the blood of Jesus would cover the shameful naked flesh of His new creatures. That is the meaning of “born again” (John 3:7).

Somehow God shielded Adam and Eve’s corrupted flesh with grace that He provided out of mercy, for in the beginning, they had been His Creatures.

Satan to Job called that shield a “hedge” and surely it was the Garment of Adam that covered Job, and later even John the Baptist, who wore a coat of camel’s skin. (More about that in a future commentary.)

Seinfeld… there does exist both good naked and bad naked. Whereas, good naked is transparency of some sort for God to be seen within, perhaps the very YY-chromosomes of God; bad naked means “exposed” to the sin within mankind, not even covered with the flesh of beasts (John 8:44). Grace covers all sin and it is a from God for us to not be ashamed of Him in our souls, for those who belong to Him.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

[1] Modern quantum mechanics have now found that light is even in the darkness of the vacuum of space, thus verify God’s Words.

COMING SHORT OF GLORY

 Speaking of righteousness and faith, Paul wrote:

For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: (Rom 3:23:4)

Sinned is trespassed or missing the mark. A mark is required for entry into Paradise.

 The mark was to be in the Image of God. Remade (regeneration) is “born again” (engendered from above). 

A mark must be on you to find the Way to Paradise.

 

Difference between heaven and Paradise: 

Man was made in the Image of God. That is gloriousness. 

Coming short of the glory of God is no longer in His Image — naked and ashamed.

 

Nakedness: 

Gloriousness is naked without shame. (Gen 2:25). “Uncovered” (transparent). 

Whatever flesh they had was transparent. They were “very good” (Gen 1:29) or glorious (splendor) because within they were the Image of God.

 Then the two were ashamed of their nakedness (blushing: their Image concealed). 

Concealed with what? Fig leaves. (Not enough) 

They had lost their glory. No longer could the Image of God (His Genome) be seen because it had changed to be like the old creature.

 

Flesh:

 

Apparently, the flesh of the Serpent (Lucifer) was inglorious and the image inside cunning. 

Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins and clothed them. (Gen 3:21) 

God by grace clothed them; perhaps with both lambs skins and with grace.

 

Grace: 

Grace is unmerited favor, and it was not by their own hands but a gift of God: “For by grace are you saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God” (Ephes 2:8). 

Because God made them flesh, they would trust in Him which is exercised as faith. 

They could now eat firm things (Gen 3:17) and became foragers like the beasts of the field because inwardly they were vipers — cold blooded. 

They came short of the glory, or Image, of God (selem). 

They had acquired the image of Satan (nahas).

 

The images: 

Mankind would become first an eater of herbs and meat, not manna from heaven as before. 

When some look into a mirror; they see beautiful. I see myself as ugly! I know what is within and for that I am humble. 

We are to, “Humble yourselves in the sight of the Lord, and he shall lift you up” (Jas 4:10)

 

Glorification: 

We are to admit our ingloriousness, and God will glorify us. 

Regeneration (re-glorification): 

“If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new” (2 Cor 5:17) 

Glorification is an inside out process beginning with rebirth and with completion at the rapture. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Abortion and What It Does

 I was awakened this morning by a terrible thought — a man who I have respected for years, and I, were discussing the candidates for governor of Kentucky. He said, “I am voting for him even though I am pro-choice.”  

His reference was to Daniel Cameron. His statement made it sound like being pro-life was negative! Indeed, most voters do consider pro-life in the negative sense. That is scary.

Many will stop reading but the subject is not political, as you shall see, but even many Republicans are guided by Democrat principles. Abortion is wrong, even when people vote Republican. It is not the doctrines of the parties that are sacrosanct but life itself, and that is supported by truth.

We have been told millions of times recently to trust the science. “Science’ is not opinion, but factual information. The slogan of the majority is focused and many vote their minds. That slogan fails on both science and religious principles.

Science indicates that an unborn baby is a separate and discreet organism. They can even be conceived in the laboratory outside any person’s body. They are at most dependent on the body of the mother for sustenance and safety until they are born.

Birth reveals that an unborn child is not her body but her offspring. The unborn is genetically an admixture of the genes of the father and the mother. At best they are only half the genetics of the mother, but even the mother is an admixture of ancient genes. Those genes are from some original human being, so it is obvious that the fetus is not the body of the mother but a separate organism. Then, ‘my body my choice’ is obviously untrue, but with billions of repetitions, naïve people accept it as truth.

That lie omits the genetics of the father and all those who came before him. Abortion cuts off a branch of the family tree for both the father and the mother. Sadly, many don’t really believe ‘my body, my choice,’ but propagate it as a valid reason for ending life. If the unborn is strictly her body, then why is it that it is another little body — another organism — that suffers and dies.

Trust the science that the little organism is not the body of its mother; it is a separate and unique body that depends on the humanity of the mother for sustenance. For nine short months, the mother is a ‘god’ to the child because the unborn depend entirely on the humanity of the mother.

So, the ‘big lie’ is one so absurd that it cannot be made up is your body, your choice.

The absolute truth is it is not your body, so not your choice.  

So, let’s say that suicide is your choice and it usually is; then abortion would ‘suicide’ your body. However, it is not the mothers’ bodies that die but their offspring. If it was your body, your choice, then you would suicide yourself. Pro-life people would not want that either, so pro-life is humane. The mother is just as wanted as the child and humane people see no reason that either should die.

The word, ‘humane’ introduces religion into the subject. Humane is a characteristic of humans. For the most part, the other kinds are instinctive and not humane at all because their missing ingredient is morality. It is our kind that is the most responsible, or we should be. We are the one species that can consider all things and do what is right.

Animals kill with impunity. It is their nature to survive as it is ours. Sane people do not want to die. Neither do animals. Animals, in general, instinctively protect their young from any perceived danger. People who see themselves as humane will now kill their own offspring  without much thought nor consequences. What if their parents had thought that way?

The point is that the animals seem to be more humane than humans because they take responsibility for their sexual encounters and bring them to maturity. If animals could think, they would think of themselves as more humane than humans who think that the unborn are mere fetal tissue to be tossed in the garbage like a dirty Kleenex. ®

Obviously, unless people are as crazy as Jeffrey Dahmler, they should understand that the other organisms are not their bodies, and are thus, they are not their choices. (Dahmler obviously thought that human beings were expendable for his benefit, and many women think that way as well. Somehow, even the husbands have been misled like the women in a very Adamic fashion.)

The reasons for abortive thinking are three: (1) financial, (2) inconvenience, and (3) lack of responsibility — self-centeredness.  Now, poverty is not even a good reason. The government is there to assist the poor. Having babies is now profitable because the government finances irresponsibility.

Self-centeredness is sexual independence, so that humans can pro-create as the animals do without discreet partners and without regard to planning.

Abortion is one way a mother has to reveal that she is above familial, moral, and civil laws. Her husband (or mate) cannot dictate to her, and neither can the law, nor God.

The choice of abortion makes the women the ‘gods.’ It is her body that she made, and she will do with it as she pleases!

That nature brings up religion again, Eve said to Adam, who saw her engage in intercourse with the Wicked One (whether verbal or physical is not clear), “Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, ‘I have gotten a man from the Lord’” (Gen 4;1).

She had not done that His Way; she had done it her way, and that made her the ‘god.’ Indubitably her new ‘lord’ was herself because she could do it however that she wanted without impunity, or so she thought! The outcome of that was chaotic; her offspring did what was right in their own eyes (Deut 12:8), not in the eyes of Adam nor any of his kind.

The woman, Eve, got her independence from both Adam and the LORD GOD, and to this day, the female of the species dominates the male. Think not? She rules sexually because men sort of worship the bodies of women, if you think not, just ask Google ® what men adore most?

However, not even Eve was beastly enough to discard her ‘mutant’ child! [1] That would come later because sin is passed along in the genes of women (mitochondrial DNA; that is the science!)

So, whose body was Adam’s and Eve’s” They had belonged to God. It was not their choice whether to live or die but the choices of the LORD GOD alone. He wanted them to live and never to perish, “For God so loved the world, that He gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).

Sin changed them and thenceforth all of Eve’s kind would be of the Wicked One. “The tares (those coming short of the glory of God) are the children of the wicked one (Mat 13:38).

The Wicked One — Satan (Lucifer, the Devil, and such), wants your soul to be His so that he will reign on high. (Isa 14:13-14). Thus, human beings are only collateral damage in the battle between good and evil, and it is evil that human beings do. They have lost their humanity; they are neither Adam’s nor God’s children, but the ‘bastard’ children of the Devil (John 8:44).

There goes your self-esteem; you are not what you think of yourselves, and it is yourselves that get in the way of delivering children into the world. For some reason, not your bodies, but their bodies are inconvenient to you!

Politics are part of the problem. The Purpose of our independence and Constitution stand in the way of abortion. The Declaration of Independence and Constitution were meant to be shields against tyranny. The former states its purpose, “for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Did you get that? For life itself! That declaration calls that an “inalienable right’ — one that you are born with, and obviously, life is genetic since it is inalienable. Nobody should have the power to take away that right. That is why the opposition disdains the foundational principles of our nation.

What about freedom of speech provided for in the Constitution? According to the ‘cornerstone’ of our nation, citizens are born with that right. Birth makes the unborn citizens of this free nation. The wrong thought is that those freedoms can be taken away by abortion, and indeed they can be, if it was not the legal right to assembly and free speech.

Those aborted not only lose their lives but speech as well. The notion of “Pro-choice’ is another of those Big Lies; it sounds so democratic, but is in fact, totalitarian in that the very life in question has no choice in whether to die or not.

The same notion was used for the genocide of Jews in the Nazi regime. The Jews were considered sub-human parasites partaking of the flesh of Aryan people, and that insane idea still exists to this day!

How inhumane it seems that so many think that the barbaric Hamas deserve consideration and that the decapitated Jews were not even important. That is Nazi thinking and much the idea of Marxism; to give to the needy is so much easier when there is less of them in which to provide.

One businessman revealed progressive thinking when he told me, “If not for abortion, how would we rid ourselves of undesirables?” Who makes that decision? In our country, the women. Who makes that decision in Marxist China and Nazi Germany? The government. ‘Undesirables’ come in many colors but usually black or brown. The rest of us are merely deplorables in their basket that they call a colorful ‘umbrella.’

Can you not see? Women are blindly doing the will of the government all the while they are convinced it is their sole decision.

Whose will was Eve doing? Her lord’s. She failed to understand, but she had not made Cain but the ‘governor’ in the middle of the Garden had done that —  her new ‘lord’ the Devil.

So, it seemed to Eve and her kind that it is their bodies and their choices. Is that the way that God thinks? Well, God said, “My Thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my Ways” (Isa 55:8). Thinking about abortion?  If so, those thoughts are not from God. You tell me from whence they came!

The Devil is the ‘father of lies’ and he is your father; it is his will that you will do. So, you think that the little child within you is you? You are deluded. That lie is from the Devil and it is through your genes since the beginning. That is because you are not of Adam but the ‘Wicked One.’ You are genetically gullible to lies because Eve was beguiled. (You will find out upon dying the truth of that unless you become adopted by God.)

Is that child within you a human or just another worthless organism to be disposed of? Use the science, use religion, use the Constitution, or use any humane notion. Either way, that child is not your body but a separate organism that cannot be converted to anything else by silly chanting!

So, what does God think about you? Paul revealed His Thoughts: “Your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which you have of God, and you are not your own.” (1 Cor 6:19). Your body — mother, father, man, woman, teen, the pre-pubescent, infant, newborn, or even the unborn — are bodies that belong to God. Hence, it is not the mother’s body but the body of Father God, the LORD GOD.

Abortion steals from God what belongs to Him. Ironically, only the sin belongs to the person, as it is written, “Flee fornication. Every sin that a man (or woman) does is without the body; but he that commits fornication sins against his own body” (1 Cor 6:18). Hence, you do not own your body, nor the unborn baby’s, but you do own the sin. Sin cannot be disposed of by murdering it; it is Christ’s whose blood cures all sin (Rom 2:23).

Pagans disposed of sin by offering their infants to the belly of Molech to burn in the fire. That did not work; their sins still belonged to them, and infanticide made it worse! Saline abortion is the modern ‘fire’ that is meant to do away with sin. That too is infective because even with the child dead the sin still lives in your body. It is the sin that is you, not the child!

Many think of abortion as the humane thing to do.

Nazis thought that disposing of the Jews were the humane way, and Heinrich Himmler even sought the most humane way of killing. That would consist of four things: (1) death would be painless as possible, (2) the dying would not be aware that they were about to die, (3) they would not know who it was that killed them, and (4) lastly, that the perpetrators could emotionally distance themselves from the act.

Himmler knew that abortion met all that criteria to a tee and he sought to eliminate Jews by aborting them in a different manner — only Aryans could have children because Jews would all die. To him, that was humane. Abortion fits all the Nazi criteria, does it not? The woman can even deny that she is the perpetrator because those of Planned Parenthood did the “bloody deed” as Moses’s wife Zipporah implied about cutting off the flesh of an infant. (Exod 4:25).

The murder of Jews is abortion. The ‘final solution’ was to cut their branch from off the Tree of Life. Abortion is, not only ending the sprout, but terminating the very seed of life. Abortion cuts off your branch from the family tree as well as the Tree of Life.

What is the most effective way of killing? To make a person so miserable that he or she kills themselves. If that is her body, her choice; then she is ‘suiciding’ herself. By grace, she is not, but she is cutting the main branch off her own genetic tree. She is killing her posterity that will no longer flourish… she is killing off one of the ‘plants’ in the Garden of God!

Abortion can be rationalized but it is irrational. Think about yourselves. Would you want to be aborted? That is still what some plan to do with us. It is never too late to be aborted. Euthanasia is the next ‘final solution’’ when they come to get you because you are a little inconvenient. Euthanasia is a ‘easy death;’ in whose opinion? The Nazi Heinrich Himmler.

(picture credit; Sciepro/Science Library)

 

 

 

 

---

[1] Mutant because from the Hebrew, Cain was not an ‘Adam’ but an ‘Is (pronounced eesh), an extant being — another existence. (Strong 2006)

ON NON-HUMAN BEINGS - Conclusion

 

Today, I continue where I left off yesterday and conclude my argument.

The previous commentary was about alien life, specifically the ‘non-human’ life revealed recently in Mexico.

The point made yesterday was that if human beings are what God made, and they are, that homo sapiens are quite different than what they were in the beginning.

In that God is glorious, and man was made in the Image of God, mankind should be glorious as well. We are not, me included. We are inglorious and debased; we are depraved beings that are quite satisfied, even impressed with our own looks and thoughts. In fact, the problem with mankind is self-adoration, even though we are not the creatures that God intended.

God intended us to be like Him, only with incorruptible flesh. We were to be His prime organism and the most peculiar of all the other kinds. We were to be wise men — homo sapiens — that walk upright and bow only to Him. Mankind (Adam’s), were created with flesh, but it was of a special kind.

God put skin on Adam and Eve where before they had a non-material flesh. After they sinned, they changed, and Adam was wrought. God told him why; his punishment would be the same as Lucifer’s: 

² "O Adam, so long as the good angel (Lucifer) was obedient to Me, a bright light rested on him and on his hosts. ³ "But when he transgressed My commandment, I deprived him of that bright nature, and he became dark. ⁴ "And when he was in the heavens, in the realms of light, he knew naught of darkness. ⁵ "But he transgressed, and I made him fall from heaven upon the earth; and it was this darkness that came upon him. ⁶ "And on thee, O Adam, while in My garden and obedient to Me, did that bright light rest also. ⁷ "But when I heard of thy transgression, I deprived thee of that bright light. Yet, of My mercy, I did not turn thee into darkness, but I made thee thy body of flesh, over which I spread this skin, in order that it may bear cold and heat. (1 A & E XII:2-7)

 It is inferred therein that Adam and Eve had become more like Lucifer than God. Just as Lucifer was changed from light to darkness, with a corresponding dark nature, both Adam’s were changed and God provided for them human flesh, “Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins, and clothed them” (Gen 3:21). (An archaic meaning of ‘wife’ is ‘adulteress.”)

Those ‘coats’ are the flesh that mankind wears to this day. It appears that before sin, the first human beings resembled Lucifer before he too fell. After sin, mankind looks as they do now, everyone wearing inglorious flesh that covers our dark nature within.

Mankind did not evolve, they devolved! They once were beautiful but now they are ugly. Can you not understand how alien mankind looks to the good angels and God who see our flesh and know that we are as the Beast?

We worry about self-esteem, but already we esteem ourselves too highly. We are alien beings who have been cast out of Paradise into this world.

Who is to say that we are the only beings that degenerated? We are not; all types of angelic kinds, even horrid ones, exist in other realms, according to Enoch. Who can say that even more mutated beings have been cast out of heaven?

Even before that, God had revealed to Adam his transformation: 

When you were under subjection to Me, you had a bright nature within you, and for that reason could you see things far away. But after your transgression your bright nature was withdrawn from you; and it was not left to you to see things far away, but only near at hand; after the ability of the flesh; for it is brutish. (1 A & E VIII:2)

 Not only are people brutish inwardly but outwardly as well. Humans, after sin, degenerated — devolved — into animals; we became one of them and soon, the other animals dominated mankind. They too got a ferocious nature so to keep man in his place.

We have seen those alien people from Mexico, and they are us! They are much the same as we would look to the good angels. We are as ugly as they are from the perspective of heaven!

However, once God provided flesh to cover our shame — our inward bestiality — our flesh craved other flesh just like the beasts.

Food in the Garden Paradise had not been herbs. Adam and Eve, having eaten for the first time, complained to God. Here lies the conversation: 

² But as they felt great trouble from the food they had eaten, and to which they were not used, they went about in the cave saying to each other:-- ³ "What has happened to us through eating, that this pain should have come upon us? Woe be to us, we shall die! Better for us to have died than to have eaten; and to have kept our bodies pure, than to have defiled them with food."

 ⁴ Then Adam said to Eve, "This pain did not come to us in the garden, neither did we eat such bad food there. Thinkest thou, O Eve, that God will plague us through the food that is in us, or that our inwards will come out; or that God means to kill us with this pain before He has fulfilled His promise to us?"

⁵ Then Adam besought the Lord and said, "O Lord, let us not perish through the food we have eaten. O Lord, smite us not; but deal with us according to Thy great mercy, and forsake us not until the day of the promise Thou hast made us."

⁶ Then God looked upon them, and at once fitted them for eating food; as unto this day; so that they should not perish.

 ⁷ Then Adam and Eve came back into the cave sorrowful and weeping because of the alteration in their nature. And they both knew from that hour that they were altered beings, that their hope of returning to the garden was now cut off; and that they could not enter it. ⁸ For that now their bodies had strange functions; and all flesh that requires food and drink for its existence, cannot be in the garden. (1 A & E LXV:4-8)

 Before they fell away (became demonic), they had not eaten anything until the fig from the Tree of Knowledge. They ate things not meant for them! God did not forbid them from eating of that tree as a test of some sorts, but because it would harm them! It did just that. If it had not been for grace, they both would have died and remained dead — ‘dead, dead’ as the Hebrew scripture indicates.

So, what was the ‘herb’ they ate in the Garden that did not make them ill? It was not an herb; whatever it was, it merely glistened (Strong 2006). The only thing in scripture that fits that description is manna, to wit: 

¹³ And it came to pass, that at even the quails came up, and covered the camp: and in the morning the dew lay round about the host. ¹⁴ And when the dew that lay was gone up, behold, upon the face of the wilderness there lay a small round thing, as small as the hoar frost on the ground. ¹⁵ And when the children of Israel saw it, they said one to another, “It is manna: for they knew not what it was.” And Moses said unto them, “This is the bread which the Lord has given you to eat.” (Exod 16:13-15)

 That same ‘bread’ was the ‘bread’ that fed Adam and Eve in the Garden. They ate manna which had very peculiar characteristics, as the Hebrews soon discovered. It digested itself! It simply disappeared after it had nourished the people. The same thing applies to Adam and Eve.

The digestive system is all about decay. There can be no decay in the Presence of God.

Within the cavity of our bodies is a ‘septic system;’ the same one that all the other animals have. Think how disgusting that is — sucking on the end of a tube (the intestinal tract) that is twenty-feet long; yet we find it exciting. Now are you beginning to get it; we all are alien beings and strangers to God!

Paul wrote to the Gentiles that were in the flesh: 

¹² At that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: ¹³ But now in Christ Jesus you who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ. (Ephes 2:12-13)

 How alien the Gentiles were! The gens of the Hebrews had been improved by God at the time of Abrahamic Covenant, but the Gentiles remained alien to God.  There have always been alien people and the Mexican aliens are no different, but more obvious.

As was written in the earlier commentary, Cain was of Eve and the wicked one, and as the ‘mother of all the living,’ so is all her kind. We are all born of Satan, and he is our ‘father’ (John 8:44) in the sense that everyone has his genetics, as well as Eve’s. Everyone, after the fall, became symbiotic — half sons of God and half sons of Satan in a genetic model.

That would not be depraved enough for Lucifer as you soon shall see.

Cain, out of fear that he would be killed because he was so different, sought mercy from God. “And the Lord said unto him, ‘Therefore whosoever slays Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him” (Gen 4:15).

The mark of Cain is unknown but there is a clue elsewhere, Before the flood, scripture says, “There were giants in the earth in those days…” (Gen 6:4). From where did giantism come? The Book of Enoch specifies its origin, from Grigori giants in the Fifth Heaven.

From where would that gene come? From Lucifer, cleverly disguised not as a ‘Serpent’ but a beautiful angel. The Serpent was surely ‘its’ innermost identity — its ‘shadow.’ The darkest of the dark angels had disseminated its awful genes and voila, Cain was not an ‘Adam’ but just an “extant’ (Strong 2006); Cain was another kind of existence — one that stood out from the rest of them: Adam, Eve, Abel, and Abel’s twin sister.

Cain was born an alien being different than mankind, and in some manner, his image would stand out. Certainly, a giant fits that contention, but does ‘giant’ always mean tall? As it turns out, the word translated ‘giant’ is napil from which ‘Nephilim’ comes. It’s root verb is to “fall short.” As such, those ‘giants’ may have been giants, but they may have been those who fall short in some manner as well.

Sinners are what? “All have sinned and come short of the Glory of God” (Rom 3:23). Hence, those ‘giants’ were anyone who came short of the ‘Gory of God,’ meaning the Image in which Adam was created.

With that explained, not were only giants extant in Noah’s day, but any one of various short-comings; perhaps coming short in the manner of the Mexican non-human creatures. Like it or not, they were more like humans as we look today, than God who appeared as Jesus, the man of Light.

Genun, “whom Satan came into him in his childhood” (2 A & E 20:2), as it is written, “After Cain had gone down to the land of dark soil, and his children had multiplied therein, there was one of them, whose name was Genun, son of Lamech the blind who slew Cain” (2 A & E 20:1).

Blind Lamech killed Cain because he obviously could not recognize who he was. Cain was physically different, Either he was a giant or some other type of genetic deformity. Perhaps Cain had three fingers and a fish-like mouth and that rather than tall, he was extremely short. Perhaps Nephilim of one genome were gigantic compared to grasshoppers and another short like grasshoppers.

Those giants that drowned in the flood were not just giants, but any type of degenerates. That must be because God is not a respecter of persons, so not only giants were Nephilim, but any deviation from the Glory of God. In fact, all mankind are now ‘Nephilim’ who deviate and come short of God’s Glory.

Genun was the new ‘Satan’ figure, if the pseudepigraphic literature is correct. His goal was to further diminish the Glory of God in mankind, and he had a plan; he would further dilute the genetics of God in man and make humans even more like himself. His tactic was to attract the ‘sons of God’ — Seth’s good genetics — and degenerate them as well. (Seth was not like Cain, the wicked one.)

Genun’s name even hints at his purpose. In his childhood, Satan selected him and his seed to disfigure mankind even more. He had to dispose of the genes of God and miscegenation was his way. The name ‘Genun’ implies genetics. His demon seed would reduce mankind even further.

Seth’s seed came unto the daughters of Adam, not to male, ‘Adam,’ but the female of the species. (Remembering that Adam was not the prototype man’s name but his kind.)

Genun made the plan and the plan happened. The result was that God destroyed all the people of the world, save eight, by a type of baptism. He flooded the world, and sucked all the deviates, some say to the abyss beneath the foundation stone, into the earth.

So where are giants and other extinct creatures found? In the earth, usually in sediment deposited by moving waters. Where were the aliens in Mexico found? Beneath the earth where you might expect them to be!

In other words, those alien creatures that were revealed are some type of alien beings. They would be at least part ‘demonic’ to be precise, not creatures from another planet.

Consider the platypus. It is also an alien creature as so many believed when it was discovered. That was a reasonable conclusion because platypuses provide milk without teats, lay eggs like no other mammal, and emit poisons like scorpions. They look like a duck but are not ducks, and their tails are like beaver’s tails, but they are not beavers. Lastly, their feet look like otter’s feet, but they are not otters. They are extant creatures, obviously because of genetics. They look alien to this world, but they are not. They are what they are by genetic flow! Perhaps that is the case for the Mexican aliens as well.

We often think of demons as evil, but that applies only to dark angels. According to linguists, all angels are demons (Abarim Publications 2023).

Perhaps those non-humans were demons from beneath the earth, or perhaps they were demons from another realm. Paul wrote, “Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares” (Heb 13:2).

Angels entertained the household of Lot, and they looked like men. Men even sought to have pleasure with them (Gen 19), but they would not have been capable of that for they were good angels, having no reproductive organs (Mark 12:25). They would be glorious like Adam, the man.

Angels have different forms. They can shape-shift to suit the occasion. The point is that angels can take on any shape they please, but good angels would have no organs, and thus no eggs.

It was reported that at least one or the alien beings had eggs. If my theory is correct, then they would have been evil demons, perhaps demons that conducted human sacrifices in ancient Mexico.

Now use your reason and logic. I have presented the theological explanation; now consider the popular thought; that somehow highly intelligent (dominant) men came from millions of light years away to visit tropical Mexico. How would they do that? And why would they be so dedicated to spend eternity traveling to and fro, if that was even possible, if not for heaven?

  

(picture credit; BBC Wildlife Magazine)

Platypus

 

---