MULTIPLICATION: GLORIOUS TREES OR INCONGRUOUS TARES

  Childbearing is a blessing. In the beginning, God told Adam to multiply. [i] Then, likewise, “God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, ‘Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth.’” (Gen 9:1). Then along came Abram. The directive was slightly different:

⁵ And he brought him forth abroad, and said, “Look now toward heaven, and tell the stars, if thou be able to number them: and he said unto him, So shall thy seed be.” (Gen 15:5)

  Something was different this time; rather than Abram multiplying, God would multiply for him. Neither Eve nor Noah’s wife were barren, so their husbands and them did the multiplication. With Abram, he was eighty-eight and Sarai was barren. God would take care of them!

  But in the interim, Sarai had little faith. How could a barren woman reproduce and how could an old man plant his seed? God had said, “I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing” (Gen 12:2).

  Later, God revealed truth to Pharoah. Abram presented his wife as his sister, which was true. He refrained from telling Pharaoh that Sarai was his wife. If Pharoah had coitus with Sarai, then God’s blessing would have come to naught.

  The Lord God later repeated His blessing: “The Word of the Lord (Jesus [ii]) came unto him, saying, ‘This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir.’” Note that woman came from the bowels of Adam long before (not “rib” as has been translated, but his side.)

  After a futile attempt to provide a righteous heir with Sarai’s handmaiden, Hagar, God reinforced His blessing: “And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee” (Gen 17:6).

  And out of grace, God blessed Sarai. He made her a new person and changed her name to “Sarah.” He included this devious woman in the Covenant and exalted her as well: to wit: “I will bless her, and she shall be a mother of nations” (Gen 17:16). She, like Eve, and like Mary, be the “mother of all living.”

  Time went by; Abraham was no longer eighty-eight but ninety-nine and Sarah ninety. Three “men” came and supped with Abraham and Sarah. One of the men said, “I will certainly return unto thee according to the time of life; and, lo, Sarah thy wife shall have a son. And Sarah heard it in the tent door, which was behind him” (Gen 18:10). She laughed!

  The “Man,” surely “The Angel of God,” healed both Abraham and Sarah, and made them alive again. They once had been fertile and capable of giving life, but both had lost their youth. The Man made them young again (regeneration) so as to fulfill the blessing of God. That Man had the power of life. God manifested Himself as a Man. God, when He is revealed, is called “Jesus.”

  Abraham laughed. What did Sarah do? She laughed as well, and wondered aloud, “After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also?” (Gen 18:12).

  It was certainly not for their pleasure but for God’s Plan for them. Pleasure is for the flesh. They would honor God by being the “rain” and the “vessel” for growing. God would be the Sun. It would not be for pleasure but to make living souls.

  What had Abram and Sarai done many years before? They left Haran and traveled to Canaan. “Abram took Sarai his wife, and Lot his brother's son, and all their substance that they had gathered, and the souls that they had gotten in Haran” (Gen 12:5). “Substance” was their material possessions. Those few who came from Haran were more than flesh. They were “souls.” He headed to the Garden again to recreate it. Like God in the beginning, Abram brought both substance and spirit. [iii]

  Adam had been charged with the same thing. Just as God had made him a “living soul,” “multiplication” would be for God to use him to increase the number of souls in the Garden. In the time of Abraham, he was charged with multiplying souls in the Garden, by then, greatly changed and called “Canaan.”

  The man, Canaan, would be the servant of Semites just as God promised Noah. They would keep the land on which was once a Garden, and serve God by Hagar’s producing adversarial seed to test the Semites. It was all in God’s Plan.

  Abram made souls of men. Since Abram had great faith, those who would follow Abram, would have had great faith. The souls who followed Abram was not the way to multiply. They were adopted sons of God, but God meant Spiritual sons. He planned on having heirs, and Abram was his choice because he had already begun with bringing souls to God.

  Abram was a man who was after God’s own Heart, just like David. But God wanted more than a Man; He wanted a Spiritual Heir who would be called “Jesus” and be both the Son of Man and the Son of God. Abraham was the man and Sarah the vessel for God’s Spirit to hover over. It was not Abraham’s “semen” that produced Isaac, but God’s Living Waters. Perhaps, Isaac was of the “Waters” of God stored in Sarah’s “virgin” womb, just as with Mary.

  But surely Abram had “known” his own wife to understand that she was barren. God made new persons of them, just as when sinners are “born again.” God gave Abraham life again, and He also made Sarah a virgin again. Not that she had not pleasured, but she had never born a child. Sarah had an empty womb without a placenta. What did God do? He gave Sarai the name “Sarah” and provided for her a placenta for His Purpose.

  Placentas are temporary “wombs” on loan from God for making and carrying life. God borne (transported) Isaac to Sarah and Sarah, like Mary, born (carried) Isaac.

  Abraham and Sarah laughed. God did not, but with the birth of Isaac, God laughed out loud — Isaac means “He laughed.” Not that Isaac laughed, but God laughed at the naivete of Abraham and Sarah.

  Just as God created mankind from substance and breathed life unto Adam, God did that with Isaac. It seems that Isaac was both body and soul in that Abraham provided the body but God the filled soul. As such, Abraham is antitypical to God, Sarah antitypical to Mary, and Isaac the antitype of Jesus.

  That makes Ishmael another anti-type of Christ — an Antichrist. Perhaps the Antichrist will come from the seed of Ishmael and scripture certainly points to that with the beheadings and restrictive laws in the end.

  Adam begat many generations. Some where righteous but most were not. They were substances of flesh. Adam sowed the seed, but Abel was killed. Purely righteous seed was never used. Adam’s progeny was full of tares that he would care for by the sweat of his face.

  Tares in the world, and even the Garden, were because of original sin. Abraham was called to replant the Garden, not a Garden of trees or any other substance, but a Garden of Living Souls. Israel is just that! But Abraham also planted tares. Ishmael overgrew the Garden along Naral Ha Yarden — the “River of the Garden” or in modern English, the Jordan River.

  How about Noah? He planted both good seed and tares as well. Shem’s seed were the good seed that would enlarge Japheth as well. Shem would grow Gentile seeds in the Garden Paradise. That is why Abraham came to Canaan’s land…  to overcome the tares that had theretofore been planted.

  Unfortunately, or more likely by Plan, God planted tares in the Garden to continue punishing Adam’s kind. The seed of Ishmael were the tares of the Wicked One, and Abraham’s seed would only have to overcome the seed that Ishmael planted.

  Jesus, “the Son of Abraham, Isaac, and Israel” would do that. The man from Kerioth, Judas, would be the sacrifice of the “Ram” (Satan) that Abraham would preview with the sacrifice that God provided. Acknowledge it or not, on the day that Jesus was crucified, God provided two sacrifices just as with Abraham. Isaac was sacrificed but would live, maybe in the same place and as Jesus would live.

  The other sacrifice for Abraham was the “Ram.” The “Aries” stars would keep the seed of Abraham safe until the dawning of Pisces. Then the “Fish” (Jesus) would prevail over Aries.

  Jesus lived but the “Ram,” Satan in Judas, would die as Pisces (Jesus) arose. Jesus multiplied Living Souls to this modern age, but as of December 21, 2021, the world is now in “The New Age.” The faith of Abraham nor faith is Jesus is not enough to change God’s Plan; not because of faith but the faithful few. The dawning of the Age of Aquarius is the Age of the Antichrist.

  How is that? Judas was from Iscariot, east of the Dead Sea. He was of Ishmael’s seed. God selected Ishmael’s seed for a purpose. His is the number of “Man.” Isaac has the number of God. His seed would survive to the end.

  Kerioth has the same root noun as Qu’ran (Abarim Publications). Muslim resources identify the Qu’ran as the number “666.” Satan was in the Man of Kerioth and he will enter the person of another man of Kerioth from Ishmael’s seed.

  Is the vaccine the “mark of the Beast?” or is it Islam? The end-of-time government and religion points toward Sharia Law and Islam. Requirements by laws (obedience) just condition people for the marking.

   If Israel would be the man from whom Christ would come, then does it not make sense that the Antichrist would come from Ishmael? It happened once with Judas, why would it not happen again with the next Beast?

  It turns out that Ishmael planted tares. They have overtaken the Garden Paradise in Israel. They are there among the “good seed” that God planted there through the bowels of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. However, the good seed has gone bad due to spiritual intercourse with “tares.” God will correct that when He pulls the tares from Holy Ground and burns them up in His fiery furnace, ironically, some believe, in the abyss to Hell beneath the Foundation Stone under the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem.

  The end…

(picture credit: "Ocean's Bridge; "Painting of an Arab")

 

 

---

[i] Gen 1:28

[ii] John 3:1-3,14

[iii] Gen 1:1

WHEREVER JUDE GOES ISHMAEL WILL FOLLOW

   Hagar, Sarai’s servant, was an Egyptian. Hagar, it is believed, was a Hyksos princess whose lineage is from Canaan who was the son of Ham by the way of the Levant. Hagar’s genealogy is important because of the curse of Noah: “God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant” (Gen 9:27).

  God knew His Plan all along, and as far back as in the days of Noah, roughly a thousand years before! Canaanites are Philisti, the early Philistines that David overcame. Today, they are called “Palestinians” and they are still at odds with the Hebrews. They are the early Arabs, and their religion since the seventh century has been Islam.

  Muslims claim Hagar as the,  "Grand Mother of Arabians" and her husband Abraham, as the "Grand Father of Arabians". (Wikipedia; Hagar). The key verses for this commentary follow:

⁹ And the angel of the Lord said unto her, “Return to thy mistress, and submit thyself under her hands.” ¹⁰ And the angel of the Lord said unto her, “I will multiply thy seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.” ¹¹ And the angel of the Lord said unto her, “Behold, thou art with child and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the Lord hath heard thy affliction. ¹² And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.” (Gen 16:9-12)

  Compare that vision to Muhammad’s First Revelation, to wit:

  According to Muslim tradition, during one such occasion while he was in contemplation, the angel Gabriel appeared before him in the year AD 610 and said, "Read", upon which he replied, "I am unable to read". Thereupon the angel caught hold of him and embraced him heavily. This happened two more times after which the angel commanded Muhammad to recite the following verses: (Wikipedia; Muhammad’s First Revelation)

    "Read! in the name of your Lord who created Man from a clinging substance. Read: Your Lord is most Generous,– He who taught by the pen– Taught man that which he knew not (Quran 96:1-5)

  “The Angel of the Lord” who appeared to Hagar is commonly accepted as God in the Flesh. That is derived from Jacob’s wrestling with a Man who he said, “I have seen God face to face, and my life is preserved” [i] If that is correct, then Jesus spoke to Hagar. Why would Jesus establish another kingdom? Note that The Angel of the Lord blessed Jacob, the grandson of Abraham, but he cursed the grandson of Noah. Hagar was part of the curse, and she was of the Wicked One through Canaan.

  “Jesus” appeared and spoke with Hagar. The question is, “Did the angel, Gabriel, really speak with Muhammad, or was it some demon? After all, what Gabriel told Muhammad to read is truth, and he did not lie as a demon would do. Perhaps Islam is “The Angel of the Lord” fulfilling His Covenant with Hagar. If so, why would God create a new man with “clinging substance.”

  Of course, that appears to be clay from the dust and mist from the ground as with Adam.  But rather, is it clinging Arabs that just will not go away?

  Hagar had become an Egyptian, although like Abraham, her lineage was Mesopotamian. Because Canaan would serve Shem, and Abraham was of Shem, then this fulfilled the promise. In 70 AD the last of the Hebrews were dispersed from Judea, and in 610 AD, along came Gabriel, and made Muhammad the “keeper” of Israel.

  In 1919, Israel became part of the British Empire as mandated in the settlement after World War I. Canaan served Shem well for 400 years just as God mandated. God had a purpose for Canaan and that would be to preserve the land of Israel until it became a nation again in 1948. The “mandate” by the British was because of Kaisar Wilhelm and the Fuhrer, Hitler. They had allied themselves with Arab madmen, true to the promise: “And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.”

  Of course, that madness began immediately as Ishmaelites plagued the southern regions of Israel from the time of Jacob on. They would all “dwell in the presence” of his brother, “Israel.” They still do that, and many are madmen to this day. The Canaanite rockets red glare can still be seen over the land that belongs to Israel.

  Why would Jesus create a kingdom that would cling to the substance (the land) of Israel? For the same reason that Satan would serve God Himself!

  Jesus said, ““I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven.” [ii]  He also will see Ishmael fall into the pit. Not Ishmael himself, but Asa, the false “Christ” of Islam — the Antichrist. Satan, in the Antichrist will be cast into the bottomless pit. [iii]

  Perhaps the end-of-time religion is an amalgam of heretical Judeo-Christianity and paganism. Indeed, Islam is just that! The Ishmaelite empire would extend from the time of the Covenant with Hagar all  the way to the thousand-year reign of Jesus. Why would “Jesus” ordain that with Hagar? Not that it was a blessing, but more servitude of Canaan’s seed. God would need their Sharia Law for a purpose:

(John) saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. (Rev 20:4)

  Those beheaded will be 12,000 from each of the twelve tribes of Jacob (Israel). The spirit of the Wicked One will be in Asa, the false “Jesus”, will be beheading Jews as zealous Muslims often do. Ishmael will be there in spirit, “And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man.”

  Ishmael, just like Lucifer, is needed to test the faithfulness of Shem’s kind. As such, Canaan will, indeed, be the servant of Shem as the curse goes. Canaan’s seed is planted all over the Mideast, and there it continues to grow.

  Now, the seed of Ishmael has clung to the seed of Abraham, even coming to America where many of the dispersed Hebrews have come. Wherever they go, Ishmael will follow for the land of Ishmael clings to wherever Jews shall go. 

(picture credit: Wikipedia; "Nation of Islam Flag")

 

 Note the crescent hanging over the Luciferian Pentagram.

---

[i] Gen 32:30

[ii] Luke 10:18

[iii] Rev 20:3

THE GOD WITHOUT A FACE

  Where have we read this before; “And Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai?”  Many years previous God said to Adam, “Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife.” (Gen 3:17). Adam was cursed because Eve, “gave (forbidden fruit) also unto her husband with her; and he did eat” (Gen 3:6).

  What did Sarai say that Abram hearkened? “I pray thee, go in unto my maid; it may be that I may obtain children by her” (Gen 16:2). Abram would bear “fruit” with Hagar rather than his “Eve.”[1]

  For Adam, all the fruit was already his to eat in God’s “Estate” of the Garden. Even the Tree of Knowledge was under his dominion, and he could eat of any of the other trees but that one! [i] Because Adam hearkened unto Eve, the forbidden “tree” had dominion over him.

  Unbeknownst to Eve was that Lucifer was cleverly disguised in the flesh of a serpent. In essence, Eve was saying, There is no danger here, it is just a friendly serpent. Adam bit unto that Big Lie — a lie so big that it was absurd! Adam surely thought, I am not afraid of that snake. I can handle him. I shall not die.

  Adam thought the snake was the problem as he sought to please Eve rather than God. It turned out that Adam did not know whom he feared! Matthew wrote about fear, “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in Hell” (Mat 10:28). Eve was suggesting that brave Adam not fear the snake; that the dominant man should not cringe like a sissy. That snake could only kill the body. However, Adam should have feared God because He can kill both the body and the soul.

  Adam was only worried about the image that Eve could see. He worried not about the image that God could see. He was willing to trade his flesh to please his wife, but unknown to him, he was trading his soul. God knew how naïve Adam was because he had yet to know evil, so God put grace on Adam with a coat of skin from a lamb. God had mercy because Adam was not of the age of accountability, coming fresh from the “womb” of God. Likewise, the young who do not know cunningness, are not held accountable although they are “shapen in iniquity” (Psalm 51:5).

  Abram was an old man (86). He was accountable. That is known because he somehow sensed that his father’s, Terah’s, idols were inert, false gods that could neither help nor hinder him. Abram knew God. God had covenanted with him, and they had even supped together. [ii]

  Abram knew God in the Flesh who served him as Melchizedek, so he was without excuse. But what did Abram do? Repeat the original sin. Adam hearkened unto his wife and so did Abram. But you thought the original sin was eating fruit! Not so. Adam had dominion over all things already, but he hearkened to his wife. The original sin was wanting to please his wife in the Face of God. Does that ring a bell? It should for, “Thou shalt have no other gods before me” (Exod 20:3).

  Adam violated the First Commandment before it was even written. It was written because of Adam. That Commandment in Hebrew is, ‘aher ‘elohim panim… “following rulers’ faces.” The “Thou shalt not” is understood from the context. Adam hearkened unto Eve. God ruled him and Adam ruled her, but Adam allowed Eve to have dominion and be the ruler! Adam obeyed her whim.

  On a whim, Sarai said, “The Lord hath restrained me from bearing” (Gen 16:2). She, like Eve before her, said “the Lord.” That was a tricky saying because theretofore, for Eve, the One True God was called (in English) “LORD GOD” (Yahova ‘elohim).

  When Eve was pregnant with Cain she said, “I have gotten a man from the Lord (Yahova)” (Gen 4:1). Words means things in “The Word.” Yahova means “The Existence” from the Hebrew acronym, JHVH. Eve had as well said, Nature gave me a man. Perhaps, she meant that Cain was from the Tree of Knowledge, and maybe he was because Cain was “of the Wicked One” in the tree. [iii]

  And here we go again… Sarai implied that “mother nature” had restrained her from bearing. She dismissed the Will of God and blamed Mother Nature. Not realizing that Abram and she were “utensils” for God’s Will be done, she credited fate. That is still done today; rather than worship and pray to the LORD GOD, most to this day pray and credit a God with no face — “Mother Nature” herself.

  Abram hearkened unto his wife. God’s Will was that Sarai be the “mother of all spiritual living” but was like Eve with Adam; who would not be the “father of all living.” Sarai again took on the dominant role. She would sacrifice her position as “mother of all the spiritual living” for Abram to be “Father Abraham.”

  It was Sarai who was working the miracle, but it turned awry. Abram needed and heir and God would provide. Abraham and Sarah’s son was Isaac, which means “to laugh” — “to express delight” (Abarim Publications). Isaac would be to God’s delight because the LORD GOD transported Isaac to the vacant womb of Sarah. As a side note, There was a womb at the end.

  Sarai, before the change in her name, said, “I pray thee, go in unto my maid” (Gen 6:2). She prayed about it, not Abram. She had become priestess in her own eyes. Like Eve before her, Sarai was a feminist and required a change in her disposition! She was also a “goddess” — “I pray” as if she was responsible for everything thereafter, and she certainly had her prayer answered, but not by the LORD GOD but by her own devices. She played God by providing a womb. That’s right; Hagar was nothing more than a womb for Sarai to do with as she pleased, not even considering what would please God.

  Hagar was the servant of Sarai, but Sarai would diminish her even more, “That I may obtain children by her.” Not that God would have an heir or even Abram, but that she might have children. Having children was a privilege in those days, unlike now, and especially providing an heir to the husband. God would provide an heir in His own time, and it would not be by Hagar but by His “womb.”

  Sure, Sarai carried Isaac, but God conceived him by His Spirit hovering over Sarai as He did much later with Mary. Then, as with Mary, God delivered Isaac to the world from Paradise in Heaven.

  The story of Abram and Sarai was Adam and Eve all over again. Ishmael was the new “Cain” and Isaac the new “Abel.” Cain in Ishmael to this day still tries to kill Isaac. That is in reference to Muslims killing Jews. Again, as before, the spirit of “Abel” in Isaac would not die!

  Abel was destined to be the spiritual father of Adam’s kind. Eve caused that to go awry by providing a son of the Devil.

  This time the new “Abel” would not be killed. The blood of Abel cries out from the earth as the voice of Isaac. The intent was for the LORD GOD to be the God of Adam, Abel, and Jesus; but he deferred to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob because Cain killed the body, but not the spirit of Abel! The Spirit of Abel would live until God put Flesh on him: “And to Jesus the mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling, that speaketh better things than that of Abel” (Heb 12:24).

  Because of his own shenanigans, Cain lost his legacy as oldest son (The Law of Primogeniture). He killed the body of Abel, or Abel would have been heir. Seth was begotten by Adam to replace Abel, the begotten of God.

  With that repeated, Ishmael, the son that Sarai bore without God, lost his spiritual inheritance. Then Sarah was reformed for what she had done, and only then the LORD GOD would bear Abraham a son inside a barren womb, but without Sarai’s intervention. She had prayed to the wrong god, and Ishmael was the consequence of that. Ismael was like Cain, and he also is of the Wicked One. No wonder that Arabs claim Ishmael as their forebear!

  And just what would Ishmael’s “nature” be like since he was the son of “mother nature?” “He will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren” (Gen 16:12). That is the perfect description of the stereotypical radical Muslim.

  Sarai conjured her “Lord” when she prayed just to “the Lord.” On the other hand, “The Lord appeared to Abram” (Gen 17:1). The appearance of the LORD specifies which Lord. God manifested Himself to Abram. THE LORD GOD said, “He that hath My commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth Me shall be loved of My Father, and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him” (John 14:21).

  Sarai prayed to a god that was invisible. Perhaps she prayed that she would provide a son for God and Abram. That would satisfy Satan who depends on people being “as God.” [iv] Abram prayed to a real God — One who appeared to him out of the unseen realm. Whereas the god of Sarai was as much the gods of Terah, the LORD GOD of Abraham appeared in the Flesh. His Appearance was as the very Face of God.

  Sarai’s unseen God was another god without a face portending to be the Face of the True God. The One True God showed His Face to Abraham, ironically, so that the seed of Abram could live on through Sarai. Sarai violated would become the First Commandment, but Abram did not for he saw God face to Face for his seed to carry on as heirs to God.

  If God had been satisfied with Hagar, then Islam would have been the true Abrahamic religion. Like Sarai’s “god,” the god of Islam (Allah) is not the One True God. The LORD GOD has a Face; Allah does not!

  As for “Mother Nature,” she is non-existence. Father God created al things and Isaac as well!

  

---

[1] Perhaps Lilith (the screech owl lilyth from Isa 34:14) is the demoness inside sinful women that bears and devours her own. Would Hagar have Lilith in her and bear the son of the Wicked One? Or is Lilith who we would call, "Mother Nature?"  It is worth considering.

---

[i] Gen 2:17

[ii] Gen 14:7

[iii] 1 John 3:12

[iv] Gen 3:5

(picture credit: Scambusters; "Man Without a Face")

ON THE LAW - Part 2 of 2

  The Law killed Jesus. But He broke no Laws, neither the Law of God nor the law of Caesar: “Pilate therefore went forth again, and saith unto them, Behold, I bring him forth to you, that ye may know that I find no fault in him” (John 19:4). On the other hand, the Jews responded in anger, “We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God” (John 19:7).

  Throughout the Old Testament, the Jews made themselves out to be gods. That was the original sin of Adam, and Satan in the Serpent said it first: “Ye shall be as gods” [i] or more precisely translated “as God.” Why did he know that? Because that was his own aspiration! [ii]

  And there they were, Adam’s kind accusing Jesus of their sins. In fact, crucifying Jesus was them acting as if they are God because only God has authority over life and death. They accused Jesus of exactly what they were doing!

  Jesus told the truth. The truth is that Jesus IS God! Pilate saw that and so did Longinus who said, “Truly this was the Son of God” [iii] Somehow the blood and water from the Messiah persuaded the soldier who pieced him. Perhaps he sensed the virtue that had gone out of Jesus in the Blood and Water; enough Virtue to heal the nations… all the people of the world who ever lived. He may have felt the Good Will of God canceling out the ill will of people. The centurion grasped the meaning of love when he saw that Jesus should have hated them all but died in love for them. His Good Will was that none should perish [iv] and he gave himself to death so that others need not die.

  Again, what is love? Good Will toward God and men. For Jesus, it is “Good Will toward the Father and men.” [v]

  Goodness is “virtue.” Jesus felt virtue gone from Him when he healed the woman with the blood issue. [vi] Sinners have a blood issue as well. They have the DNA of the Wicked One. [vii] The “tares” are the evil DNA in their blood. They had mutated by spiritual devolution from Cain to blind Lamech to Canaan to Ishmael to Esau and onward to Judas who had Satan in him. Good will had devolved until everyone but Jesus had the DNA of the Wicked One, even including Mary, for none are without sin… no not one! [viii]

  Why then was the Law required? For all were sinners and the Law is for wrongdoers. There was no Law back in the Garden because all were without sin. Thy did have free will to do as they pleased, but they knew only good and were virtuous. Virtue had gone out of God unto Adam and from Adam to Eve. God took inert matter, and “breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul” (Gen 2:7).

  Generation of mankind (Genesis) was God breathing life and sharing His Virtue with His creature. Then Adam did the same when, “And the rib (sic; or life from the side of Adam), which the Lord God had taken from man, made He a woman, and brought her unto the man” (Gen 2:22). It was not a “rib” at all, but Adam shared virtue from his side. God flowed His Virtue to Adam and Adam to Eve.

  With only Virtue in the Garden, there was no knowledge of evil. Thusly, there are two kinds of man — righteous and unrighteous — and two kinds of knowledge — good and evil. “Good” was at one time in their DNA from God. Then along came Satan in the Serpent who knew Eve.

  Cain was of the Wicked One [ix] and he knew evil. Adam and Eve were shielded from the Law with coats of skin [x] but neither Cain nor Abel had coats. Abel was righteous. He was perhaps the Son of God and Eve. He was born to save Cain from sin, but Cain murdered his “savior” just as Cain’s kind would murder their Savior.

  Cain needed a Coat from the Lamb of God. Abel brought that “coat” to sacrifice for the nature of Cain. Rather than have a new nature, Cain rebelled. He “wandered” (the meaning of his name) from God and Paradise until he perished near but not on the Holy Mountain. Without a coat from God to protect him from the Wicked One, Cain would need laws to do that.

  Abel had been his brother’s keeper, but Cain denied being his brother’s keeper. [xi] Unlike Adam, who was to dress and keep the Garden (of Living Souls), Cain was not a keeper of souls. He was the opposite; he endeavored to perish the living soul of Abel but even failed that: “The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground” (Gen 4:10) and it was still crying out in apostolic times! Cain had murdered the flesh of Abel but was unable to kill his soul. Cain should fear God who can kill both the body and the soul in Hell. [xii]

  Why is the Law necessary? Cain killed Abel because he hated his brother. In that
love” is Good Will, then hatred is ill will, and anyone with ill will toward another is a murderer: “The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground” (1 John 3:15).

  If Cain had found grace, then he too would have on the Lamb of God. He found no grace because he was not like Adam because he was not of Adam. Adam found grace; Jesus was there all the time in Spirit. But the Son of God, Abel, was there in the Flesh, but Cain did not find him to be of God! Cain killed the Son of God and Cain’s kind killed Jesus, the Son of God. Jesus died for what reason? Jesus declared that:

I write unto you, fathers, because ye have known him that is from the beginning. I write unto you, young men, because ye have overcome the wicked one. I write unto you, little children, because ye have known the Father. (1 John 2:13)

  Cain failed to overcome the Wicked One who was in him. That was known from the beginning! Abel would help Cain overcome the Wicked One, but Cain murdered him. Is that not what happened at the crucifixion of Jesus? “Abel” cried out from the ground when the Blood of Jesus was spilled. That blood overcame the Wicked One. Cain would have needed to do nothing but allow Abel’s sacrifice to atone for his wrathful nature that was inherited from his “father the Devil.” [xiii]

  The “adopted” sons of God overcome the Wicked One because they have known the Father. When they saw Jesus, they saw the Father, and they also had out on “Coats” provided by the Lamb of God when the Holy Ghost left Jesus and came down on those whose image was as Jesus. Jesus regenerated Adam on the Cross when Blood and Water from His side sprinkled on Adam in his tomb below — in the “Place of Adam’s Skull.” [1]

  It is to be noted, that “Cain” was in Gehenna at the Potter’s Field. The “blood” of Cain cried out and filled the body of Judas as Satan was in them both. Cain could have been redeemed along with his ‘adopted” father, Adam, but genetically he remained of the Wicked One.

  By killing himself, Judas who “raised Cain” blasphemed the Holy Ghost of Jesus just as Cain had the sacrifice of Abel. Judas took the Name of God in vain, thinking his self-righteous works was enough to save himself. The blood of Judas would not suffice. It was no more effective than the grain from Cain because salvation is only by blood, and specifically, only the blood of Jesus! [xiv]

  Without the Holy Spirit (coats from sacrificed lambs) to protect sinful men of Cain’s kind, only the Law would do so. The Law would keep them safe until Jesus came with His Flesh to cover the sins of the Wicked One. The Law is for Evil Ones; not for righteous ones. Scripture is the Last Will and Testament of God to His heirs. [2]

  The first Law in the Garden of Eden was not a command. It was a warning that there are wages for sin. The “wages” are deaths for sinners. [xv] “Wages” are what is deserved for works. Works are unnecessary to enter unto Paradise but by the Way of the Tree of Life — Jesus. [xvi] The Law is the heavy hand of cherubim to keep the Way to that “Tree.” The Decalogue (The Ten Commandments) kept the Way until Jesus came to stand-in for the cherubim. He looked at the Law much differently than the cherubim. It is the same Law but expressed differently:

“Master, which is the great commandment in the law?” Jesus said unto him, “Thou shalt love (agapeo) the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love (agapeo) thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” (Mat 2:36-40)

   They were the same commandments but expressed as love, specifically agape-type love. The Greatest Commandment summarized “Sayings” 1-4 of the Decalogue. The second Commandments summarized “Sayings” 5-10 of the Decalogue. The Decalogue (Ten Words of the Logos, Jesus) are a list of ten “Good Wills” for God and man. For instance, “Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord in vain” is Good Will toward God. [xvii] “Thou shalt not steal” [xviii] is good will toward others. In other words, the Decalogue is a list of sharing the Virtues of God; ones that breaths life from God unto others! The Great Commission is sharing the love, or good will toward men.

  What was the sin of Cain? “Thou shalt not covet… any thing that is thy neighbour's.” [xix] God looked highly at Abel’s offering but rejected Cain’s. Cain coveted the grace that Abel obtained from God, but he received no grace because of his attitude. Because he, by the law of primogentiture, would deserve Adam’s and God’s blessing, but by grace Abel got his blessing, is sort of a prelude to almost all cases of that in scripture (for instance Jacob over Esau and Isaac over Ishmael).

  Good Will was Abel’s attitude toward Cain, Adam, and God. Ill will was Cain’s attitude toward Abel, Adam, and God.

  Cain had to have laws to contain his arrogance and animosity that he had inherited from the Wicked One. Because sinners are “tares” of the Wicked One, Cain’s kind still needed Laws until Jesus came, then God would provide “coats” made from His Holy Ghost — the Spirit of the Lamb of God. He fulfilled the Law because His death and Virtue was enough to cover the Law.

  With that said, the Decalogue is no longer considered Law, but it remains God’s Will to obtain the prize of inheritance of which Paul wrote. [xx] The unconverted need the Law that they may obtain, but the righteous do not need the Law. Of course, the Law can never attain, but that is deception from the Evil One. Only love (Good Wil) can deliver the prize of salvation.

  How is it known that the Holy Ghost covers a Christian? Their nature changes. No longer do they need the Law because their desire is to please Jesus. The Decalogue does that. Like any good father, God is pleased when He, His Son, and His creatures are looked on with good will. The Decalogue is not a list of restrictions but purveyance of Good Will transferred from God to His “children” when they are born again.

  Since love is good will from God unto us and shared with others (The Great Commission), then hatred is ill will toward God and others. Ironically, Judas had no ill will toward God, but good will toward money. In effect, ill will is also usury – oppressing others for personal gain. Jews were noted for loving their Jewish “brothers” but using their Gentile “brothers” for gain. Why have Jews been hated ever since Shem was chosen? Because of jealousy from the DNA of Cain.

  Why were the Semites inclined to sin? They too are of the Wicked One because of Terah, Abraham’s father. Somehow, sin got through the Abrahamic Covenant through Hagar, the Egyptian.

  So, the conclusion is that love is not an emotion but an attitude of God’s Good Will obtained through the shedding of the Blood from God’s Son. Likewise, neither is hatred an emotion, but the attitude that God’s Name, “Jesus,” is for a vanity. Just what is expected from those with new natures? To take the Name of Jesus with empathy.

  The decalogue is, therefore, “Ten Ways” to empathize with God and “Six Ways” to empathize with others. (Because love of others is also God’s Will).

  Empathizing only with others (the social gospel) is not even half the gospel. The rich man told Jesus that he did all those things. Jesus said to the rich young man, “Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother” and the man replied, “All these have I kept from my youth up” (Luke 18:20-21).

  What was he missing? The Greatest Commandments: to love God with all his heart, mind, soul, and strength! [xxi] His was the social gospel. Not just some of the Commandments are necessary, but all of them; not as Laws but a new nature of loving-kindness. Again, the Decalogue is viewed as “Laws” by those who are criminal, or have ill will, toward God and others, but as characteristics of virtues by those with good will emanating from God.

  Christians have liberty to sin. God is a permissive God, but if truly children of God, they would desire to please the Father.  Of course, they cannot see the Father, so they would want to please the Son who gave His life to free the criminal minds of Cain’s kind from sin.

  Just what did Jesus do on the Cross? Of course, He suffered death and Virtue flowed from His Flesh to Adam’s kind, but also Satan was cast out of the flesh of Judas. That was what the Hebrews envisioned when Moses held up the “tree” with the dead Serpent thereon. [xxii] Can you see that Jesus did that? If you do, then you are born again with new DNA, a new attitude, and as a child of God. [xxiii]

  If the Decalogue still seems too cumbersome, then perhaps the nature of the Beast remains intact. Taking the Lord’s Name in vain diminishes the length of life. Therefore, it diminishes the longevity of the living soul on Earth. Taking God’s Name vainly diminishes both Him and you. God’s “Name” died so that you would not. Is that not a great reason to magnify the Name of God? God will not be trivialized but is patient while we are yet sinners who need only to see the Light. The Decalogue are great Prescriptions for Eternal Health!

(picture credit: prescriptionmaker.com)

 

 

---

[1] See my book, The Skull of Adam, for more on that. Available on Amazon Books.

[2] See my Facebook video (7) Facebook

---

[i] Gen 3:5

[ii] Isa 14:12-14

[iii] Mat 27:54

[iv] John 3:16

[v] Luke 2:14

[vi] Mark 5:30

[vii] Mat 13:38

[viii] Rom 3:12

[ix] 1 John 3:12

[x] Gen 3:21

[xi] Gen 4:9

[xii] Mat 10:28

[xiii] John 8:44

[xiv] Acts 14:12

[xv] Rom 6:23

[xvi] Gen 3:24

[xvii] Exod 20:7

[xviii] Exod 20:15

[xix] Exod 20:17

[xx] 1 Cor 9:24

[xxi] Mark 12:30

[xxii] John 3:14

[xxiii] John 3:7