ON TRANSHUMANISM - Part 25

 THE APOCALYPSE 

Thus far, this book has been about the ontology of the world — its beginning and existence. People, even Christians, roll their eyes at even the mention of the apocalypse as if it will never take place — it is the complete and final destruction of the world. They miss the point about the restoration of the world as it will be as in the beginning… with a new heaven and a new earth, as the prophet, Isaiah called to mind: “For, behold, I (God) create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind” (Isa 65:17). John was revealed that new heaven and earth (Rev 21:1) in much the same manner that Enoch was revealed the existing heaven and earth.

Christians ought to look forward to the end because on the other side of the ending is a new beginning, The “Utopia” that Marx dreamed of on Earth is not that Paradise. Marx’s “paradise” will go up in flames! People generally look toward the land and prosperity (“It is the economy, stupid,” as Bill Clinton declared), but it is a brand new economy to which Christians should look forward.

The economy of the world is obvious; What is in it for me? as each asks himself. Everybody has devolved to that state.

In the beginning, the economy was already free things: “Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat” (Gen 2:16), people would have eternal lives, and both men and women would have dominion above all the others of the animal kind (Gen 1:26).

Adam and Eve lived in the perfect economy and all things were “very good” (Gen 1:31). However, sin revealed that they were not happy with that economy because there was a forbidden economy available “beautiful, pleasant, good-testing things that belonged to God that Lucifer would take from God and freely redistribute. Right then, the concept of socialism was created, and the Jew, Marx, may have understood that; that essentially shiny things will distract about anybody whether they are good or not!

The economy after the apocalypse will not be “very good” but totally good because there will only be one economy to desire, and that is God the Provider of all things.

The LORD GOD was the “Lord” in the original economy and Adam and Eve desired to obey Him, but the shiny objects were just too attractive. After sin, it is implied that the economy changed: Lucifer — the other “image” became her new lord (Gen 4:1).

Thereafter, until God covered her with a coat of skin alongside Adam, Lucifer was her “lord” and afterward Lucifer often endeavored for them to take off the Garments of God so that his fiery darts could further alter their nature. With sin, the “natural man” was created from the “divine man” and the economy altered to suit the new nature of the two human beings.

The economy of post-sin Eden is described in Genesis chapter three, and it was not good at all, but hard work just to exist.

First off, the change was their flesh. Before sin, their flesh was divine like Jesus (Gen 1:26). It would have been incorruptible flesh like at the Resurrection of Jesus and would be eternal. Something huge happened to Adam and Eve. Their flesh changed, and it was no longer in the Image of God but the very image of the Wicked One. (The Hebrew word for “serpent” corresponds with “image” as well.)

That their flesh changed is significant! Before their genes were dominant and there were no recessive genes to be found in them. I propose that the fiery darts of the Wicked One penetrated the flesh of Adam and Eve with some newfound carnal knowledge. That Cain is of the Wicked One (1 John 3:12) validates that hypothesis. The assumption is that since Eve was directly from the image of Adam that God engendered her from the genome of the man, and was thus “woman.” They were both engendered with the Genome — the Image of God — but with a slight difference. As one flesh they must complement each other, and the female’s purpose was to complement the male’s (Gen 2:18). Their genders were not important because in that economy, reproduction would be genetic in a sort of “cloning” process.

With sin and new flesh of which they felt guilty, especially of their newly acquired pudenda, they felt shame and covered it with fig leaves. (Gen 3:7). The reproductive activity would be altered with sin, and the natural man would become as the beasts that copulate instinctively. [1] Hence, the natural man is still of the Genome of God but with the recessive genes of that unholy “awful image” called the “Serpent.”

So, what is a recessive gene and why should anyone care? 

Recessive, as related to genetics, refers to the relationship between an observed trait and the two inherited versions of a gene related to that trait. Individuals inherit two versions of each gene, known as alleles, from each parent. In the case of a recessive trait, the alleles of the trait-causing gene are the same, and both (recessive) alleles must be present to express the trait. A recessive allele does not produce a trait at all when only one copy is present. This contrasts to a dominant trait, which requires that only one of the two alleles be present to express the trait. (US Gov 2022)

 Adam and Eve while in the Garden both would have dominant genes — two versions of the same gene (ibid) and with them both different than the other species. With that said, natural man cannot even mate with beasts, although some tried mating humans to gorillas. The result was death! In other words, physical “death” in the eyes of God is transhumanism and as such bestiality is offensive to God, and “Whosoever lieth with a beast shall surely be put to death” (Exod 22:19).

Not only will copulation cause the offspring to die but by that offense the “beast” in the woman or man deserves death. By this time in history, pornography is the new economy of doing such things. Whereas beasts have coitus without shame, mankind is worse; they even film it!

God desires to protect what of His Genes that still resides in us, even recessive genes. He wants His experiment in human beings to be so successful that he will provide grace to all who seek it… even transsexuals and trans-kinds.

When Abraham and Lot ventured north out of Egypt, they stumbled upon Sodom and Gomorrah, “even as the Garden of the Lord” (Gen 13:10). Not only that, they saw the River of the Garden (the Jordan) and its valley. Abraham had been drawn to the Garden of Eden and what he found there was disgusting: 

¹ There came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground… ⁴ But before they lay down (later that evening), the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: ⁵ And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them. (Gen 19:1,4-5) 

There were two offenses in one: homosexuality and bestiality, not that the holy angels were “beasts,” but the men of Sodom were. Like lions in the prowl, they encircled the men-angels to have sex with them… right there in the Garden of Eden that had devolved to that degree.

God never intended for recessive genes to be in humans. They were dominant; both Adam and Eve and with sin, recessive genes were introduced, referring “to the relationship between an observed trait and the two inherited versions of a gene related to that trait.”

The observable trait of Adam and Eve was that they were human beings. They were not angels, either good or demonic. However, lying within their alleles were two inherited traits of both good and evil. Rather than divine, after sin, they retained the Genome of God which is “good” but were somehow regenned by the other “Image” with evil.

Sin should be recessive and may even be in children. On the other hand, even tame animals revert to a feral nature when released into a new economy. That is what God did to Adam and Eve; God gave them their freedom and in the wild, and before long, mankind had all become feral thanks to the recessive gene from the “Serpent.”

When I write “Serpent,” I am not writing about a snake at all, but the nature of the “Shadow” of Lucifer. Snakes are deaf and dumb, but their nature is for survival. They will mate at will and kill with impunity! Mankind has received the nature of the beasts and would fight for their own survival to remain the dominant species. Hence, mankind is much more like the animal kingdom than we think!

Cain was of the germline of Lucifer and Eve. He was the first “transhuman.” It appears that Abel was the son of God and Eve, and he transcended sin because the Genome of God was multiplied in him.

Seth was the son of Adam and Eve — the replacement for Abel who died for the sin of Cain. What was the sin of Cain? He cut off the righteous branch from the Tree of Life and left his intact. Grace could have increased with Abel, but Cain cut off his genome with the divine Genome of God within. With that, Adam and Eve created their own kind, recessive genes and all, and grafted Seth’s genome back onto the Tree of Life. They did that, not God. Adam became the “husbandman” in the place of God.

The germline of Seth lived righteously on Holy Mount Herman until they saw the “shiny objects” on the plain below: hard alcohol, hard music, Hedonism, homosexuality, pedophilia, and the mixing of the genes of Cain, possibly marked with giantism and angelic beings from above. [2]

All those sins would be abominations, but depravity is associated with the genome of the people. The worst depravity, total or not, was symbiosis: “the living together in more or less intimate association or close union of two dissimilar organisms” (Merriam-Webster, Inc. 1982). The angels and humans were dissimilar and so were the giants and the natural men and women.

The disgusting things of the days of Noah appear to be many, but more predominantly, the mixing of recessive genes with dominant ones seems to cause total depravity.

When theologians refer to Adam’s sin, it is called “original sin” and since “all have sinned and come short of the glory of God” (Rom 3:23), original sin changed the nature of man from glorious to inglorious. Implied is that sin is genetic and that we all have the genome of Lucifer in us. His nature is ours, and the Shadow of the Wicked One is in our recessive genes. It is the nature of man to be as beasts!

Generally, our nature is to act righteous in one economy and act the beast in another economy. Just as the economy of Sodom was paradisical in the beginning and disgusting by the time Abraham arrived, even the Church is suffering in this day from carnality!

When the Church becomes as the world, then it must be by the Great Reset of God — destruction followed by a new heaven and a new earth. The modern church will go up in flames with the destruction of the world. When? In God’s time not ours!

“Germline” has been mentioned several times. I end this chapter with a personal account.

A germline is “the population of a multicellular organism's cells that pass on their genetic material to the progeny (offspring)” (Wikipedia 2001). For humans, our germline is our offspring. They share the genome of both the mother and the father and are a symbiotic representation of the two. They are little you’s whether male or female. Your germline is the planting of your seed into the world. If that germline is interrupted, one branch of the Tree of Life is pruned off for good and the “germ” from you dies.

Mankind is the Tree of Life and Jesus is the “Vine” and we are the “branches” (John 15:55). The Tree of Life is the very Genome of God, the “Husbandman.” That Jesus is the “Vine” from which all mankind has sprung, then we all had a figment of Jesus in us from the start.

“In Christ” is in the Genome of the Flesh of God, albeit we remain endangered because of the recessive genes of Lucifer. Like Seth’s germline, we can be attracted to the world and fall away.

The point there is that the germline of mankind is imperative doctrine. Murder is an offense because it is us who become the “husbandman” rather than God. We become “as God” just as the Serpent said (Gen 2:5).

Murder is cutting off a branch of the Genome of God. He can do that as the Husbandman, but our responsibility is to “dress and keep the Garden” (Gen 2:15) (That would be God’s Genome that He planted). But death is more than killing the flesh but cutting off the soul. The soul is the inner nature of man, and only God has the right to perish the soul (Mat 1:28).

Murder is cutting off human potential in that God planted immortal souls in the Garden of God. He planted His on “Seed” — the very “Semen” of God as the figurative meaning of “waters.”

Nobody has the right to prune from the Tree of Life but God. Murder violates that authority. Lucifer violated that right when he “murdered” Cain, so to speak. Cain’s genome was different, and Lucifer became the recessive gene in him, and by the time of the flood, Cain’s germline had become dominant.

With that background, my own doctor yelled with arrogance when I mentioned the dangers of CRISPR technology. CRISPR are synthetic genetics that are passed down to the germline. Even fools who take illicit drugs would not endanger passing along addictions to their offspring… until now that is common because they do not care about their own germline!

When I told the doctor that, he responded, “I don’t care about the germline!” He said that harshly and angrily. Indeed, I got the point; he does not care about potential life, and he calls himself “doctor”!

The problem with abortion fanatics is that they do not care about their own germline, and especially not your germline. Because humans are nothing more than “organisms” in their domain, then organisms are inhuman. To them, our souls are not worth the genes that they are imprinted upon.

My doctor may as well have asked, “Who cares about human life?” His obvious answer, would be “Not me!”

I did not ask, but that declaration seemed to make him an abortion proponent as well as favorable to CRISPR. CRISPR cuts and pastes in synthetic DNA which results in a person and a potential child a little less than human. How much less depends on how many generations use CRISPR. The good doctor said, “That is the future, so get used to it!”

“Not me!” I responded as he rolled his bulging eyes.

---

[1] I doubt that you will ever hear a sermon that may tell it like this, but about anyone knows how powerful the sexual instinct can be, and there was no such instinct while in the Garden.

[2] This economy was not assumed by the writer but collected from the various sources of pseudepigrapha.

(picture credit: expii.com; "Alleles")