2 Now when John had heard in the prison the works of Christ, he sent two of his disciples, 3 And said unto him, “Are you He that should come, or do we look for another?” (Mat 11:2-3)
This John was the Baptist, so
this would have been circa 30 AD because John was beheaded at that time
under the reign of Herod Antipas. (He was not king of Judea; there was no king
there at that time, but he was only king of Galilee and Perea.)
This may be important! — There
was no king in Judea.
From scripture that has great
significance; “In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did
that which was right in his own eyes” (Jud 17:6). That was before there were
kings in Judah. Micah made graven images of silver and made a man, the ‘son’ of
a Levite of Bethlehemjudah to be the Levitical priest. Micah as such made
himself ruler and made the man a priest of the occultic. Indeed, there was no
king in Bethlehem, Judah, so Micah was able to do as he pleased. That he was
from Bethlehem, the birthplace of Jesus, hints that he was an ‘Antichrist.’
“And it came to pass” with Jesus (Mat
11:1); things began to happen in the ministry of Jesus, ironically, when
there was no king in Judea.
It came to pass is ‘ginomai’
in the Greek, meaning that it was brought into existence, or generated from
another event. Jesus was making this occasion like the one in ancient Judea because
now there was no king in Judea and Antipas could do as he pleased.
That situation had to be! Since
Jesus was the ‘son of David,’ he was the legitimate heir to the throne through
Joseph, His supposed father.
John saw Jesus as the king, when
he asked, “Are you He that should come, or do we look for another?”
John had added one plus one. There
was no king in Judea and the priests were only of the occultic. At this time,
Joseph, the son-in-law of Annias, was already High Priest even though Annias
remained alive. Annias had been deposed by Quirinius, the Roman governor, and in the same manner
as Micah appointing the chief priest in the time of the judges.
What is happening in the time of
Jesus? Jesus is generating the same scenario as long before when there were no
kings in Judah!
Quirinius was the new ‘Micah’ and
the sacerdotal dynasty of Annias were the priestly rulers over kingless Judea. They
were essentially the ‘kings’ as the crucifixion proved.
Again, the occultic priestly line
of Levi had created a lawless Judea. It was again as in the days of Judah when
there was no king in Judah.
The sacerdotal (priestly) rulers
were ‘kings’ and were allegiant only to Caesar. Because the priestly rulers
killed Jesus, one of them must have had Satan in him. Annias was a type
of ‘father’ in that occultic reign and Caiphas an ‘adopted’ son to replace the
real sons of Annias each who had consecutively reigned before. Yes, there was a
‘Deep State’ and John the Baptist was one of its victims, but the real threat
to their conspiracy was Jesus!
Am I proposing a conspiracy theory
even with the crucifixion? I certainly am! Annias was antitypical of the ‘Father’
and Caiphas antitypical of the ‘Son.’
Satan must have a body at all
times for there are “many Antichrists” (1 John 3:12). Since there is only one ‘Christ,’
then there can only be one ‘Antichrist’ at any given time. Until the
crucifixion, Satan was in Judas (Luke 22:3). With Judas dead only ‘moments’
before, Satan would have acquired another body to possess to perish the Christ.
I submit that as the ‘son’ Caiaphas was the Antichrist who would be deposed
soon after (40 AD).
The sacerdotal dynasty was a must
have for the scene presented in Judges to be played out. God had
planned this exact age, ages before, knowing full well that the time of the
judges was in preparation for the ‘fake Jesus’ dynasty prior to the crucifixion.
Jesus was the ‘one to come’ and
John had some insight into that. He was to finish off both the Levitical and Danite
priesthood and replace it with one in the manner of Melchizedek, a preincarnate
“Jesus.’
As it turned out, the young man
that Micah appointed became the occultic priest to the tribe of Dan, and that
young man abandoned Micah. He cared not whom he served.
The Danites deposed that nameless young priest and named their own, to wit:
30
And the children of Dan set up the graven image: and Jonathan, the son of
Gershom, the son of Manasseh, he and his sons were priests to the tribe of Dan
until the day of the captivity of the land. 31 And they set them up
Micah's graven image, which he made, all the time that the house of God was in
Shiloh. (Jud 18:30-31)
So, just what was the conspiracy in reality?
13
…thou (Lucifer) has said in your heart, “I will ascend into heaven, I will
exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the
congregation, in the sides of the north: 14 I will ascend above the
heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.” 15 Yet thou
shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. (Jud 14:13-15)
What happened to Micah’s priest?
He was brought down to Hell when the Danites killed him because he had Satan in
him.
What happened to Judas who Satan
had entered? He was brought down to Hell (Gehenna) where he fell from the hanging
tree, indubitably because the Holy Ghost got to him. He was delivered to the
sides of the pit — the debris and garbage dump of Gehenna.
Satan is always foiled in his
plans but why do the lost still cling to such a pitiful figure? Because they
want to do what is right in their owns, and them be the priests and kings in
their own very small domain.
No comments:
Post a Comment