WORTH A DOLLAR

   By now all churches are "denominations" with some more nominal than others.

(Yes even Churches of Christ.)

Let's say a divine "Dollar" is the whole; then denominations are less than one Dollar, and each have less value than the original Dollar. The Church of the New Testament would be the original "Dollar" but because of conflation in the mixing of it with the world view; each denomination has less value than the original Dollar.

Some churches, even in apostolic times, did not have a Dollar in value, for instance, all the seven churches of Asia.

By now, most church denominations are not worth fifty cents like the church of Laodicea: "I know your works," God said, "that you are neither hot or cold... So then because you art lukewarm... I will spue you out of My mouth" (Rev 3:13-14).

That identifies the modern Church as well. On the whole, all of the denominations are either putrid and stagnant, or are headed that way.

It is our job, through prayer and acts, to keep our church denomination at full value. With that said, "Test all things and hold onto what is good" (1 Thes 5:21).

I do criticize all denominations, even my own, because I want it to be worth a Dollar.

How much do you value your church doctrine? If it has doctrines other than Christ with Him crucified and resurrected, it falls far short of the original Dollar.

THEOLOGY AND SCIENCE

 Theology is the study of both God and the things of God whereas science is the study of things and their origins — “ontology”. The word, “science” stems from the Latin, “scientia” meaning “knowledge” in general in the English.

The study of existence is “metaphysics”, having two parts ontology and cosmology. Metaphysics asks, "What is reality?", while cosmology asks the question, "How did the universe begin and develop?"

The Bible provides answers to those questions; The Book of Genesis is both the cosmology and ontology of the universe. As an ancient book, scientific processes would have been explained using metaphors.

When reading the Bible, especially The Old Testament (Tanakh, an acronym that represents the Hebrew writings); look for metaphors… examples explaining in simple terms complex ideas.  The Hebrew “Torah” is the book of the Law in the manner that physics is a book of natural law.

The original Hebrew letters, or pictographs, would be metaphors for complex ideas. Those strange look symbols in Hebrew dictionaries each have very scientific meanings.

The Torah is a fine example, spelled תורה reading from right to left. There is meaning in those strange looking characters. [1]

Using scientific meanings, תורה which is spelled tav – nun – resh – hey provides answers.

The letter tav presents “scientific information”, or in theology and philosophy “truth”.  The Torah, in the manner of a science book, endeavors to present information.

“Information” is literally factual knowledge… however science is merely theoretical with truth never quite discovered, but only a body of evidence.  

Science is the study of observable or measurable things. In science, truth is supposed, then tested. So is theological truth: “Test all things and hold onto what is good” (1 Thes 5:1). So, there is much commonality between science and theology; even their intent — in search of knowledge.

Ancient men had a much different vocabulary as words like science, processes, quantum, and such did not yet exist. In fact, “The Word” would have been presented in picture graphics (pictographs) — objective images of mental ideas. Truth was represented by the letter tav, so the Torah (תורה) began with the idea of the presentation of truth.

The second letter in Torah is vav; in science, quantum entanglement is represented by a tent peg, the vav. In theology the vav represents the same thing — binding forces, ostensibly binding the letter tav to the letter resh, coming next. The letter resh scientifically represents the emergence of order from an origin point — the “beginning” in both science and theology. Hence, truth and the beginning are entangled as one thought.

The last letter is the Hebrew hey — the picture of a man with hands raised, indicating “beheld” Beholding what? Observing reality, or truth.

Hence, “Torah” is an ancient scientific term that explains the creation. It is not mythology, but the Torah is a way to present observable reality, or the “truth”.

In the beginning would have been, in scientific terms, the zero point energy field. In theology, the point “El” in “Elohim” is where El is God and Elohim his quantum probability function.

God is omnipresent (present everywhere in theology). How can that be? Quantum mechanics is beyond time as the prefix “omni” represents.

Quantum theory is that some particle seems to be right there when it is stopped wherever it is. So, it might be with God (El). In other words, the dynamics of God is very well explained by a quantum probability field, or in theology, either a cloud by day or a fire by night (Exod 33:22); then at rest on the Ark of the Covenant, God appeared as El. His presence follows quantum physics exactly.

That is not to say that God is science, but scientific terms are stated in different ways. Since God is real, then He should be observable scientifically. Quantum physics is a very good lens to observe God in any of His three states: Father (El), the Son (Bet), and the Holy Ghost (Gimmel).

Since science means “knowledge”, is there knowledge in scripture? About everyone has heard of both the Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil:

 

And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.  (Gen 2:9)

 

“Out of the ground” may have some intrinsic meaning.

“Ground” therein is adama. From the man, Adam, God grew things. Hence, Adam was like God, both an individual and a kind as the letter mem implies. Adam would have been scientific and capable of consuming knowledge, requiring intelligence.

Knowledge from God “grew” (tsamach; צָמַח) things: tsade — mem — chet: a quantum path, fluid dynamics, and limits (different states of existence), respectively. In theology, God made things right (righteousness), by “living water” (Elohim), in two different realms, respectively.

“Tree that was pleasant” comes next. Was the author writing about trees or using “trees” as metaphors? Let’s examine that.

“Tree” in that passage is the Hebrew word, ‘es (עֵץ), translated “tree” but more generally it was a firm thing (Strong 2006). Of course, a tree is a firm thing, but so are all things in the Creation.

The first letter in ‘es is ayin, a pictograph of an eye, which means observable. The second letter shin implies fusion by some power. An observable quantumly fused thing is the construction of all firm things.

Hence, in this case, a tree was not only a “tree” but any firm thing, even men as trees, according to the blind man seeing the firm thing of God, Jesus, approaching (Mark 8:24).

Therefore, among moving firm things were mankind “after our likeness” (Elohim), the fish of the sea, the fowl of the air, the cattle, and every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth. (Gen 1:26); with man having dominion — of a higher state — than any of the other moving firm things. Mankind had dominion — the body of knowledge of God — righteousness, or truth.

The other kinds were lacking dominion and would all have been base creatures without righteousness, or the truth non-cognitive. The lower states of animals would have been base creatures that only had the instinct for self-survival. Only Adamic man was like God with a “particle” of Elohim in him.

Scripture was defining the states of firm things and foremost among them was Adam whose spiritual state was God, , within a firm thing, his body, or “Jesus”.

The Tree of Life as it turns out seems to be Yeshua (Jesus; Rev 22:2). Adam would have had the knowledge of God within his mind, hence innocence from doing evil.

Without critically analyzing every word in Genesis 2:9, let’s skip on to “knowledge”.

If you recall scientia in the Latin is “knowledge”, so the alternate tree whose fruit was not to be partaken was the “Tree of Science.”

Both good and evil imply extended knowledge, not just the good body of knowledge but evil as well. Obtaining the full body of knowledge, Adam’s kind lost their innocence and would have become responsible for wrong choices. Hence, the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge would not have been apples nor figs, but “free will” to choose as enumerated in Galatians chapter five.

The two people of Adam’s kind had something the lower states of animals did not — the freedom to choose right from wrong. Now instinctive, Adam’s kind would generally take the path of least resistance; they became instinctual, doing the things that the lower states of existence would do. Sin lowered their state of existence from glorious man to beasts; hence, the term, “the spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak” (Mat 26:41).

Only mankind has three states: thoughts, spirit, and flesh. The other beasts have lower cognition, no spirit, and beastly flesh. By now, as can be seen on the streets of big cities, men are more “beasts” than godly. They are double-minded, holding opposing thoughts at the same time; they are truly deranged and beside themselves.

Now consider, Hebrew daʿaṯ. (It looks like this may have been the Hebrew idea of the English word, “data”.)

Daʿaṯ (spelled דַּעַת) consists of dalet (door) – ayin (eye) – tav (a cross).

Theologically, the letter dalet is the “Way” of Jesus who John described as the “Word” in the beginning (John 1:1-14).

Scientifically, the dalet means a quantum gateway.

As the “Almighty God” the virtue (Greek, dynamos) of Jesus provides the gateway to heaven; and strait is the gate or as Jesus said it, “Strait is the Gate, and narrow is the Way, which leads unto life, and few there be that find it” (Mat 7:14). Hence the quantum gateway very adequately describes the “Way” of Jesus.

Through the door (dalet) leads to ayin, in science “quantum observation” — the ability to see things beyond the naked eye. Adam’s kind were naked while in the Garden. They would have seen things beyond the naked eye. (Sacred literature provides the evidence that that is true.) [2]

In theology, ayin presents divine vision and consciousness. Knowledge made the two salient — aware of themselves as independent consciences from God. They had become the “gods” (Gen 3:5) with a higher state of awareness than God intended. They would have become aware of their flesh and put on aprons of fig leaves (Gen 3:7). They would have been dutiful only to God, but soon, they would have been aware of their flesh and the pleasures it senses.

Lastly, in the word da’at comes the letter tav; in science “completion”, and in philosophy and theology, “truth”.

Literally, then knowledge (da’at) is the “gateway to observe truth”. Therefore, da’at is both science and the Way of Christ Jesus.

Because of sin, you are salient men and women conscious of your existence apart from God but seemingly blind to what small amount of Elohim that remains in you. Born again (John 3:7) is perhaps scientific as well. The Greek word for it means “engendered from above”.  

“Engendered” is both scientific and theological. It is God breathing El into a person, or Elohim in persons. In science, el is Power and elohim the distribution of power (virtue), or perhaps the quantum action of Almighty God.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

---

[1] I have developed two charts to reveal all 22 letters of the Hebrew alphabet and both their theological and scientific meanings. They are shown at the end of this commentary.

[2] The “Books of Adam and Eve” (pseudepigraphal works).

ONCE GOD ALWAYS GOD

"I Am (Ya) Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending," saith the Lord, "which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty." (Rev 1:8)

 In the Hebrew, the Greek alpha and omega is the aleph (aka “el”) and the tav.

El is the Power of God and tav the picture of the cross. The two letters together is “et” which appears firstly in Genesis 1:1. Literally in letters the aleph-tav indicated the Divine Power of the Cross. That Power is “The Word” that also was the Power to Create.

John wrote, ”In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). “Et” (pronounced “ate”) is “The Word of God, so Et must be in Genesis 1:1. It is in the graphic below.

 

Figure 2: Gen 1:1 in Hebrew

Et has no meaning to the Jews. Some will not even pronounce that Word. The first Israel Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion would not even say that Word. Apparently only he knew why, but now I do as well!

“Et” means “The Word” of God in the flesh and called “Jesus.” They can’t say the Name because to them if they say that Name it would be in vain. The “Et” did appear in the beginning sentence of both the Bible and Creation. The last appearance of Et was in Genesis 3:24 which refers to both Jesus and the cross. It is used as the “and” before the phrase, “flaming sword.”

The sword of God is wielded by Jesus, and it appears at the ending in Revelation. (Rev 2:16) "Repent; or else I will come unto you quickly and will fight against them with the sword of My mouth. The sword of His mouth is “The Word,” although Et is not written, it is implied in that passage.

 Revelation is the ending. Thus, the aleph-tav appears both in the beginning and ending just as Jesus revealed. Who would have ever thought that John 1:1 was in Genesis 1:1? John knew that when he wrote John chapter one.

Furthermore, As John said, “The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:14).

“The Word” is ‘Et.  The ‘Et — the aleph through the tav — was made flesh. In other words, the Hebrew aleph-bet is the Word that was made flesh and called, “Jesus.”

Yeshua, in the Hebrew, is “The Word” and it is formed by the Hebrew alphabet. Yeshua is spelled yod, shin, waw, and ayin.  

As usual the syntax of the Hebrew is in verb, subject, object order. However, the waw, or vav, is a placeholder in this case representing the coming Messiah (ancient Hebrew as you should recall.) Therefore, the yod is the verb, shin the subject, and ayin the object.

Consider firstly the object; ayin is the pictograph of an eye. It infers visibility. The ayin is an object that the eye can see. Jesus is the manifestation of God. John the Baptist said this about the coming Messiah, “After me will come a man which is preferred before me: for He was before me, and I knew Him not: but that He should be made manifest to Israel” (John 1:30-31).

John implied that before since he did not know Him, that Jesus was not visible. Jesus came to manifest the invisible God. God was the same God, not another, but now He could be seen. Hence, He was called “Yeshua” because Yahweh was God revealed to Israel. Jesus is objective Yahweh as His Name means: “Ya(weh) saves.”

The Name “Yeshua” is theophoric which means “bearing God.” Yeshua is a name that bears God. Yeshua is the Person who bears God with His flesh, just like John wrote (John 1:14). Only in English is He called “Jesus.”

The verb is the letter, yod. The pictograph is an arm with a hand and fingers. However, since it came first in ancient Hebrew, it must be a verb. It represents work or deeds as a verb.

Jesus was not a mere carpenter as is thought. In the Greek, Jesus is called a “tekton,” which in the modern era means more than “tradesman.”  Jesus was a technician of the highest order. He was not just the “scientist” but the “Science” since all things were made by Him (John 1:1-3).

Because all things that He made were good (Gen 1:29) and He was God, the Power (Greek Dynamos) of Yeshua was virtue.

Since yod is a verb, then Jesus was the Almighty Dynamic of God and within Jesus was the Power to create, or to make whole. That is where the theophoric aspect comes into His name. “Saves” is the Dynamic verb in the Name, Yeshua. Jesus has the creative Power of God in His flesh.

That takes care of the verb and the object, leaving the letter shin as the subject. The subject of shin is “separate” and can mean divided. Like Adam was separated from the Yod, Yahweh, so was Jesus as the “last Adam,” to wit: “The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit” (1 Cor 15:45).

Adam had “dominion” in the Garden (Gen 1:26) that the other animals did not have. Adam was literally “crumbled” from the Image of God. Adam was separated from the other animals by having God in him.

So it is for Jesus, but He was not crumbled from God but a portion of the living Spirit of God. In other words, Father God, Yahweh, lived in Him, not just a portion. Jesus is entirely God.

Since “Father” God was carried (from the theophoric name) in Him, it had to be in His flesh. The flesh of Jesus was the vessel, or “cup.”

In agony for mankind, Jesus asked to pass the “cup” to another, but it was Him that would bear the vessel: Abba, Father, all things are possible to You; take away this cup from me: nevertheless, not what I will, but what You will (Mar 14:36).

Within the “cup” of Jesus was Abba “Father” that He would bear for 33 years. Abba is much more than the English word, father, for each letter has significance. Abba consists of three letters, aleph, bet, and aleph. The English pronounce the ending “a” but Hebrews do not. Hence, Abba is just the Hebrew alphabet, or “The Word,” (‘ET).  Abba indicates that “The Word” is in the vessel of Jesus, just as John wrote.

The Body of Jesus was the Vessel in which God Existed for the time He appeared on Earth as a man. His flesh was the “son” or genetics of Adam, and His Ghost, the genetics of The Word, Yahweh.

Jesus always existed, according to the writer, John. John the Baptist, born before Jesus, said that Jesus came before himself. Jesus pre-existed John the Baptist, not in the flesh, but in the Spirit. “The Angel of God” was as much Jesus as “The Body of God.”

The Angel of God was the Spirit of God in the bodily shape of the coming Messiah. Luke wrote about the “cup” Jesus being filled for Him to carry the quickening Spirit in His Person:

The Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape (like a dove) upon Him, and a Voice came from heaven, which said, “You are my beloved Son; in You I am well pleased. (Luke 3:22)

Abba, in the bodily shape of a man, filled the vessel, Jesus. The Word (The Voice) came from heaven and called Jesus the “Son.” Jesus was not the biological “Son of God” but the Abba in the vessel of Jesus. The Voice broke off, and from another realm, imbued Jesus with The Word.

As indicated in an earlier chapter came from another realm, not from some distant place. As such, just as at the conception of Jesus, God hovered over the Vessel. What happened to the Voice between the conception of Jesus and His baptism remains unknown, but it seems the “Seed” of God imbued Mary, and the Yeshua Himself imbued the Person of Jesus since Jesus was both wholly man and wholly God.

God was in the Person Jesus, not just a fragment of Him like in Adam.

Adam had the “Shadow” (Selem) of God in Him. Jesus had the Light of God within. There is a difference. Selem is literally, tsade, lamed, closed mem.

The tsade is a seed on a journey, apparently on his belly a going. The lamed is the subject, implying from below to upward, perhaps from earth to heaven. The mem at the end represents the object. It is either water or blood, or perhaps both in the manner of Jesus, “This is He that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ, not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that bears witness” (1 John 5:6).

Hence, the mem represents the spirit within Adam and his kind. The Image of God in man was Spirit — a phantom in the shape of the man, Adam.

As the crucifixion revealed, God using the Allegory of the Cave of Plato, revealed that the Holy Ghost — the Spirit in the shape of the man, Jesus — was indeed a fragment of the real object, Jesus. Because Jesus was nailed still, and because shadows normally move with the motion of the objects, Jesus overcame the world; His shadow moving independent of the object.

The Holy Ghost of Jesus was the fragment of God in the Person, Jesus and that day, the Holy Ghost performed the burden of God on its back, delivering the repentant sinner to Paradise and sin and Satan to Hell.

The shape of God changed with time, but God was always the same. Christ in us is the Holy Ghost of Jesus in Christians. The Holy Ghost is as much Yahweh as Jesus and Yahweh is as much Jesus as He is Himself.

IDENTITY OF THE ALPHA AND OMEGA

NIMROD'S ROCKET TO HEAVEN

 Artifacts from the paleolithic culture have been found of a rocket with a man inside. I don't believe intelligent life on other planets, but I do believe in alien life in another realm. Enoch called them "Watchers." 

Today I present a short chapter from my latest book, untitled at the moment. It is about the contraption that Nimrod built not to find God in heaven.

The people of Shinar were to make a name for themselves — they would venture into the heavens and make them the “Name” displacing God. As the “great hunter,” Nimrod would be the “Name.” Nimrod was not so much out to kill God but to not find Him.

The “name” is sem (pronounced shame) in the Hebrew consists of two letters. The second letter is the mem whose pictograph is water. It appears that sem is dividing the waters, and of course that is what God did.

In quantum theory, “Young’s Double Slit Experiment” divided the waters (light) from the waters (light) to reveal either waves or photons that only appeared when stopped. The fact that there were only two letters rather than the usual three, the “stop” is implied. The pictograph of sem is more than teeth but indicates God’s creativity.

Nimrod was creative as well. He was perhaps a “rocket scientist” who made inventions from the clay in the same manner as God.

Perhaps the “tower” of Shinar was more than a tower. Usually, the ancients in scripture went to high places to come closer to God. Nimrod constructed his tower on a plane in the same manner as NASA and little ‘Rocket Man” of North Korea.

The tower may have had an engine as well because, from the Book of Jasher, Abram was put into a furnace. Was the furnace to harden bricks or was it a passenger compartment because twelve men plus Abram were put inside the furnace for three days and only Abram came out alive. 

Perhaps Genun, the man with Satan in him, had secrets to the space age and Nimrod had access to the mysteries of God! He sought to find the answer to why twelve men plus one would survive a voyage to the heavens. Only Abram did that, and he brought back proof of God. His journey, if it was a journey, may have been to the third heaven that made him incorruptible, and him alone, for even his brother Haran was burned to death in the contraption of Nimrod.

(Note that there are artifacts from that age that has men within rockets. They may have been made by Grigori giants that mated with humans from the episode in Genesis chapter six.)

The people of Shinar said, “Go to, let us build us a city and a tower, whose top may reach unto heaven” (Gen 11:4). Tower in the Hebrew is a “migdal” Literally it was a tower but so are rockets.

Rockets are built in sections; the powerhouse below and the compartment below. Nimrod’s tower was not to reach the heavens, but its “top,” or ro’s in the Hebrew: resh – aleph – shin. Resh is the head, or top, itself. The aleph is the power that would propel it, and the shin the separation of the top from the tower. Surely Nimrod had fashioned a rocket.

Let’s see if the aleph-bet confirms that:

מִגְדָּל reading from right to left is migdal, Hebrew for “tower.”

Mem-gimmel-vav-lamed whose pictographs are in order right to left: water-foot-nail-staff

The staff represents teaching for learning. The tower was to learn whether God is up there.

Water (mem) refers to the heavens as well; that God divided in two with the shin in the Name. The learning had something to do with the heavens because they were to look unto the heavens for God.

Vav in “tower” has something to do with a nail — to secure as the pictograph indicates. Since the object was to find God, if found, God would have been captured by the “Great Hunter’ Nimrod.

Most important is the “foot” gimmel. It not only represents a foot but the foot of a camel. What do camels do? They kneel to the ground, are loaded, and then they rise slowly and gently like a rocket.

There you have it. The so-called “tower” was a tower indeed, according to the letters of the word. Nimrod was building the tower on a plane for a purpose; he was about to launch his rocket, and perhaps it did rise for three days just as Jasher said, but the rocket exploded, securing only Abram!

Words means things and tower is a fine example. Abram was saved from the fire of Ur

God said to Abraham, “I AM the Lord that brought you out of Ur of the Chaldees, to give you this land to inherit it” (Gen 15:7).

Ur was in Shinar. Nimrod was going to send Abram to the Third Heaven where there was Hell and Paradise, separated by a great gulf (Luke 16), hoping that He would be gone wherever, but ironically, Abram ended up in Paradise and the twelve in Hell.

Nimrod’s invention failed, but God directed the thirteen to their places, proving that He is God, and the tower was a rocket, if my discernment is true.

A + B + C = V

 

 

The AB to the C

 

"V" is the English rendition of the Hebrew letter vav. Keep that in mind as you read.

Before the letter gimmel, the AB was discussed. Now comes the relationship of the C (gimmel) to the AB (Aleph-Bet).

Emanation has been an issue with theologians since apostolic times. Some believe that light emanates from Father God alone (Aleph to the Bet) and others that the Light of God emanates from the Son as well.

Another reason for the seemingly backward aleph-bet may be that emanation is always from right to left. Who knows? Just as water won’t flow uphill without power, neither will living water flow backwards without Power. God designed the aleph-bet to flow right; each letter precedes the next and points toward the subsequent letter. Think of the aleph-bet as a fluid flowing from right to left and from before time throughout time. When God said, “I am the Alpha and Omega (The Aleph and the Tav in the Hebrew), and the beginning and the end” (Rev 22:13), shows that  the aleph-bet is obviously time related. Aleph is God before time and throughout time and Bet and Gimmel are how God appeared whenever time was stopped.

“The beginning” (Gen 1:1) is re ‘sit in the Hebrew. That was the first state, or status, of Aleph. Since the Word was there in the beginning, then the first state of God was Aleph, the second state, Bet, and the third state, Gimmel.

 States together in union is “homeostasis” and each has the authority, or power, of the other. Hence, the Aleph, Bet, and Gimmel are equal in power and in the process of time, each State had the Power of the first state. In Power, aleph + bet = gimmel.

In gematria, letters are numbered. The number of aleph is one, bet two, and gimmel three. Not only do they follow in 1,2 and 3 order, but the sum of aleph + bet = gimmel.

The Gimmel has the Power of God and is in the Image of Bet; the Gimmel representing the Holy Ghost. Before conception the angel of God said to Mary: 

The Holy Ghost shall come upon you, and the Power of the Highest shall overshadow you; therefore also that Holy Thing which shall be born of you shall be called the Son of God. (Luke 1:35) 

God was building a House for Himself to sojourn; Gimmel shall come upon Mary and the Aleph shall cloud over her and the Bet (The Holy Thing) shall be revealed (hey). Using gematria Aleph + Bet + Gimmel = some thing. Does it? 1 + 2 + 3 = 6. What is the letter for number six? Vav.

The vav letter is a picture like a tent peg. It reveals a connection. Indeed, it does. A + B + C indeed equals vav and it implies security. Then Jesus (Yeshua) should be some form of Yod Vav. It is: Yod-Shin-Vav-Ayin:

 Vav characterizes the Messiah. (I submit that the gematria scientifically reveals the gospel truth and that Yeshua was the “Mystery of God” all along.)

 So, you want the science; there it is! God used mathematics to define His Existence and if an overly-intelligent Hebrew would have done the math, he could have beheld (hey) Jesus.

Algebra is strange. Equals is beholding something — answers to the question. Vav revealed the House that God built that they called the “Messiah.” The men in “Messiah” is of great significance as well; it represents both water and the blood. Where has that been heard before? John wrote the following about water and the blood. 

This is He that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that bears witness, because the Spirit is truth. (1 John 5:6)

Jesus is the Messiah. He came by the Mem in that Word. Jesus came by the water and the blood of Mem. The Spirit (Aleph) is the one that bears (hey) witness (Vav) because the Aleph is real.  How does the Yod reveal itself? By the Aleph in each member of the Godhead, or Holy Trinity — the ABC Word of God.

Credit: Alamy

WHAT IS MAN?

Man (Adam): 

God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion” (over every earthly creature). (Gen 1:26) 

Note than man did not have dominion over creatures not of this “earth,” the latter used in a material sense more so than a place. 

David pondered these thoughts: 

What is man, that You are mindful of him? and the son of man, that you visit him? For You have made him a little lower than the angels, and have crowned him with glory and honour. You made him to have dominion over the works of Your hands; You hast put all things under his feet. (Psalm 8:4-6) 

… and Paul concurred in Hebrews chapter two. He quoted that soliloquy twice.

“What is truth?” is the most sought answer to a question. “What is man?” may be the next most sought-after answer!

Well, what is man?

Man is a lower form of creature than the angels in whose Image his soul was made — a phantom — “selem” in the Hebrew. That is the “our image” in Genesis 1:26. Note that angels can appear as either in spirit or the image of about anything.

The “our likeness” in that passage is demut’ in the Hebrew, meaning in appearance. In those two words — selem and demut’ The “phantom” had appearance. Mankind was made in the image of a man, but in phantom. That is implied when Paul wrote, “For the Law having a Shadow of good things to come, and not the very Image of the things” (Hen 10:1).

Just as the Law was the Shadow of Jesus, the soul of man was the shadowy image of the first man since the “Law” was the Word of God; it was that Image whose substance was phantom-like. “Shadow” is the literal meaning of the Hebrew Word, Selem.

Glorious man — man before the original sin — was glorious like God. Adam was the “son of God” in Psalm 8 above. He was not the biological, carnal “son” but of the genetics of God. Implied in that is that when Adam was overlaid with clay (adam), his substance was different. He was like the earth but with living tissue.

Scripture, therefore, describes the original man, Adam, and his kind. God meant for mankind to be glorious like Adam, and Christians, in the end, will be glorified and made a new creature (aka Adam.).

So, what is glorification? It is indeed “splendor,” but when Jesus was glorified, He could walk through the walls of the ground from His tomb and through walls of locked rooms. He had been glorified and could overcome the world (John 16:33). Therefore “glorification” is the world having no effect, nor affect, on Christians, to wit: 

In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. (1 Cor 15:52) 

“Glorification” is therefore incorruptibility; there will be no more deterioration of the carbon in us (our DNA will exist forever as a new creature.)

Scientifically, it seems that the carbon-14 that was in our fleshes at the end of time, will all be changed to some other substance that cannot decay.

That means that the first Adam, like the last Adam, Jesus, (1 Cor 15:45) will be a lively spirit forever. Jesus is the “Last Adam” and the pattern for the new creature — those in Christ.

Jesus was the last of Adam’s kind. Temptation would not spoil Him, and it gave those in Christ the opportunity to never be spoiled again by the old creature that was the phantom image of the first phase of the creation; namely the creation of the heavens before the earthen things were founded.

Now for the boring but insightful part, of this commentary; man was created an adam. That was his kind and because there was only one of his kind in the beginning, God called him “Adam” because his visible image that covered his invisible image was from the “ground;” ground is also adam in the Hebrew. The original woman was the symbiosis of Adam — like him but of opposite “spin,” or gender.

Man’s kind existed through the flood of Noah’s day when the “kind” (or genetic family) became Noahic by the Noahic Covenant when Adam’s progeny was restored and the other kind dispensed of in the receding waters of the flood.

Covenants in the Bible are much more than agreements but each a re-genesis. Noah was the “second Adam,” meaning that his genetics had been improved. Noah, according to the Book of Jasher, was born a different creature, perhaps glorified in the womb of his mother.

In like manner, when Noah’s kind failed, even the Semites, Abram in the fiery furnace of the tower, became incorruptible and his kind became the last re-genesis until Moses was transfigured on Mount Horeb.

The Covenant of Grace by the blood of Jesus was the last time the genes of Adam would be restored to us creeping creatures. Indeed, Jesus was the “Last Adam” and He was gloried by His death and Resurrection (John 7:39).

“Adam” throughout history was any creature that was glorified of which the blood of Jesus would correct.

“Born again” (John 3:7) is literally engendered from above, ostensibly from Jesus on His throne in the realm of heaven.

When the daughters of man were overcome by the “sons of God” (angelic Grigori and corrupted sons of Seth), degeneration evolved.

The Hebrew word, adam, in addition to “earth,” means the human species — anthropoidal upright beings with a soul and without a tail to balance them. Coupled with that is man was homo sapien — “wise man.”

Now look at the Hebrew word “Adam” and the pictographs from the word in which that name was written: 

אָדָם

Ignoring this diacritical marks below that were added for pronunciation, that leaves three symbols: aleph which is not pronounced, dalet, and mem.

Aleph represents the invisible power of man. Unlike Darwinian theory that boasts the most numerous are the fittest, God made man the fittest in the almighty image of Himself. It is mankind that was made the dominant species over all the others.

We have not evolved from stooped, stupid apes, but apes may have mutated from glorious, upright Adam. Hence, the Bible is not a book of evolution but devolution!

Aleph would be the “shadow” (selem) within Adam’s body.

The pictograph for the dalet is a door. A door represents movement (dynamics), and entrance (opportunity), and a transition from one realm to another, just as Jesus is the “door” to another realm (heaven; Rev 3:20).

Sacred literature reveals that Adam was privy to both the realms of heaven and earth and could move freely between them because He was like God.

Mem, the last of the three letters whose pictograph is a wave; represents water, change, and blood. Genetics is in the blood… in every nuclear cell of both flesh and blood. Quantum theorists say that genetics is like the motion of  waters that when stopped, appear as either a gene, or a genetic wave.  Adam was both man and the genetics of all mankind.

Adam was changed in Genesis chapter one from a “phantom” being to a material being in chapter two. God made the change, so Adam, the visible man, was a living Image of God; or at least he was until sin entered in. 

Simply stated is that the phantom existence of the first of the kind was changed into another genetic kind. Adam, the phantom, had the genes of God (his “son”) and his flesh the genetics that would make him a visible creature.

Adam, in typical quantum fashion when it was finished, became both the person and his kind.

(Next the topic will be about the second kind of man from the womb of Eve.)

MAN BEFORE TIME BEGAN

 Eastward:

(as in the Garden Eastward in Eden; Gen 2:8)

 

There He put the man (Adam). Where Adam was formed is known. It was in Eden. The when is the question. 

The direction of anything then is questionable because the Earth was developing. In the beginning there was one land mass and now there are ostensibly seven continents. As Jerusalem is the “navel of the world” then the continents would have drifted apart in a spiral pattern. Indeed Pangea — the land before continental drift — drifted apart in s spiral around the navel, Jerusalem. 

Ancients, since the Sun came up in what is now known as the “East,” time is associated with direction. 

Translated “eastward” the Hebrew word is qedem. Since Hebrew does not have vowels, then as usual, the word is trinitarian: QDM. In the Hebrew that is qof-dalet-mem.

The pictographs are the sun, door, and water respectively. The idea behind each character is both behind and time, entrance, and water.

Remembering that God divided the waters from the waters, mem also represents blood with its genetics. Therefore, Adam and his kind (blood) were created before time began. That agrees with scripture, to wit: 

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ: according as He has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before Him in love: having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the good pleasure of His will. (Ephes 1:3-5) 

The ”predestination” is that Adam with his genetics were chosen before time ever began in agreement with “Eastward” in Eden. It was Adam’s blood that would be dominant (Gen 1:26), literally “crumbling” off of the Image of God Himself (Gen 1:27)/

Implied in “eastward” is that the Garden in Eden pre-existed time. Time seem to have begun for Adam and his kind beyond Eden when the two were cast out into the world. 

Eden: 

Again, the trinitarian value of Eden is without vowels ?DN in English letters and pronounced ay-den: ayin, dalet, and nun, respectively.

The pictograph of ayin is the eye. It represents things seen or experienced. Ayin would represent the realm in which mankind experienced life.

The dalet pictograph is a door portrayed as an entrance into a tent or other place. Perhaps even another realm as Jesus implied: “I AM the door, by Me if any man enter in he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture. (John 10:9).

Jesus was speaking of dalet and another realm — back into the Garden Paradise.

The “pasture” of which Jesus spoke would have been the Garden wherein man was placed. The Hebrew points to the abode of Adam before sin to be in another realm with real objects just like on Earth but all good things (Gen 1:29).

It seems that the first Creation was in another realm, and that makes sense because the Image of God was Selem in the Hebrew which is a phantom, or ghostly appearance.

Only later in Genesis two were Adam and his woman made material with clay, which has not carbon in it. That indicates that mankind was not created organic, and that worldly DNA began outside the Garden after they were cast out into the world (Gen 3:24).

Indeed, the “process of time” began outside the Garden of Eden.

The last letter in Eden is nun. The pictograph for nun is a snake (serpent) but it could be something else; a sperm perhaps which makes sense since the idea behind the nun is seed or genetics. Sperm is the carrier for YY DNA, I believe, to the woman’s XX. When combined perhaps X came from the woman and Y from the so-called “Serpent” which was the seed of Lucifer. From XX and YY would have come the male’s XY since the female of the species is the source of the mitochondrial X-chromosome.

You see, the Bible makes genetic sense!

Nun before sin, represented faithfulness, obviously to God or a god. In the Garden, the faithfulness was to be for God, but it is implied in Genesis 4:1 that the “Serpent” became the true Lord of the woman. She became a carrier of the genetics from the evil one so Cain was of the Wicked One (1 John 3:12).

Cain was born outside the realm of the Garden, so he was not created but combined, as in recombinant DNA. AI says: 

Recombinant DNA is DNA that's created in a lab by combining DNA from different sources. This process is called genetic recombination.

 Not by coincidence, one meaning of the name, Eve, is symbiosis: “the close union of two dissimilar organisms” (Merriam-Webster).

Therefore, human flesh as we know it now did not exist and carbon was not in the two glorious beings. Sin brought on a new seed with alien DNA from the Beast that was united with Adam’s glorious Y-DNA is that is true.

Time began with the advent of carbon-14 in humans. That began when carbon-14 was imbued within the new flesh of Adam’s kind that would begin to degenerate over time. Adam’s time was 930 years until is carbon-14 was depleted.

Hence, time began for man to function in the world which means that the experience in the Garden of Eden was before time.

The world (cosmos)  would have been created parallel to Eden it too before time. Time would have only begun in the world when Adam and Eve were cast out of the Garden into time.

The Garden is shown with transparency to represent that it was a phantom of the real objective world.

THE TRUTH ABOUT JESUS - final

So, Jesus was a scholar and philosopher who revealed the truth to the greatest minds in Jerusalem. He would have been prestigious in the eyes of the intellectuals. He is endowed “rich” in mind and even independent of His believed to be parent, Joseph and mother, Mary.

Jesus was not the mother of God. God is Supreme. She was more so the vessel in which God walked. God had no need of anything. He just thought divine thoughts and they were there. If He had been thirsty, that would have been no issue. He was the fount of living waters.

If He was hungry, that would not be an issue for He is the bread of live. He would have provided for Himself manna from heaven. My point is to dispel the idea that Jesus was poor as anything He ever needed was right there, right then.

Anything that Jesus was, He chose to do… even His own death. He was never in agony for Himself but for all of mankind. Never underestimate the riches of Jesus; even riches He would never spend.

For example, the kings brought to Him at His birth, a tribute of gold, incense, and myrrh like they would a Caesar to whom they paid tribute.

Everybody knows the value of gold, but frankincense were very expensive and so were oils. They represented wealth; wealth which Jesus would never use nor waste.

Unknown is whatever happened to that cache! Perhaps Mary supplied the ointment for the burial of Jesus from those gifts (Luke 23:56) — literally aromatics and flowing juices. Incense is an aromatic and myrrh a sap that flows along the stripes cut on a tree.

Unknown is the amount of incense and myrrh that the kings brought but perhaps they were meant to be used on the body of Jesus. If so, since Jesus was not found in the tomb, the ointments, costly as they were, had gone unused. Their whereabouts, like the gold, remains unknown. The family of Jesus had gifts fit for a king, but Jesus never spent anything on Himself. He was not a “poor” anything!

Tradition has it that the gifts were chests for of each substance. If so, then Jesus was an extremely rich man who had no use for money. He even preached against the love of money as the root of all evil (1 Tim 6:10), but as rich as He was, Jesus told the scribe before His death, “The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the Son of man has not where to lay His head” (Mat 8:20).

God (Himself) would provide. At last, Jesus had a place to lay His head, and that was in the unused, and quite expensive tomb of the upper crust man, Joseph of Arimathea. Jesus found a place to lay and bought it, not with the riches that He had, but the payment was His own life. Jesus died a wealthy, wealthy man in a small, small country, but His riches were in Paradise wherein there was a throne and great city.

Like George Washington long after, Jesus was land poor for His inheritance lied in another kingdom (John 18:36).

The Devil even offered Jesus a kingdom here, but Jesus refused the temptation. His riches were the vast Estate of God probated to Him when God suffered death on the Cross. Jesus’s supposed father, Joseph, may have been taxed for some small property in Bethlehem, the city of David, but Jesus would pay the “taxes” on His real, Real Estate (Paradise) with His own body — the most expensive sacrifice ever, and He paid that tax because He was both a Jew and the Son of God!

Now about the Cyrenius (Latin Quirinius) tax. The Roman tax could either be a head (poll) tax or a property tax, depending on the needs of the Romans.

There is a timing issue about the taxes of Cyrenius, but that may not be literal. Rather than Him collecting taxes as a prelate in 6 ACE. “Quirinius” fought wars in the mountains of Celicia, apparently to capture the rebels in the mountains near the boundary of Syria which at that time included all of Galilee and Judea in the time of the birth of Jesus. Perhaps he did tax, but not as governor, but as a general who needed to pay his troops; so don’t get caught up in accusations that the Bible is wrong.

Poll taxes are taxes just because a person exists. It makes sense that THE EXISTENCE (Yahweh) would be taxed. Usually, in the US, poll taxes were only on adults, but if Quirinius needed money for his armies, then the birth of Jesus would add a poll tax. In other words, the world taxed Jesus, if that is true, just because He was born.

The other tax enumerated by Quirinius was property tax. Joseph and Mary both went to Bethlehem — apparently their home city — to pay property taxes which were very expensive in contrast to Jewish taxes (perhaps a farthing or so that would be used oftentimes for sacrificial purposes and Herod’s building projects.)

Joseph, as scripture indicates, was the “son of David,” meaning that He was of David’s family. That Joseph owed taxes in Bethlehem implies that Joseph had land there. Since he was of David, perhaps Joseph had inherited some quantity of David’s land, and if so, Joseph perhaps owned property in both Nazareth and Bethlehem, Nazareth, being in Galilee near where Quirinius was fighting a war. It can be reasonably assumed that, that taxation was for conducting a war and any wrongness of scripture is dispelled.

Jesus was known as the “son of David” — “When Jesus departed thence, two blind men followed Him, crying, and saying, ‘You son of David, have mercy on us” (Mat 9:27). Even poor beggars knew that Jesus was a pretender to the throne and perhaps even knew, because it was published as was the custom of the Romans, that He was royalty. No wonder Herod sought to kill the young Jesus. Since blind men that could not read knew the genealogy of Jesus, then educated men would certainly have known. In modern times, Joseph would be called a member of the “landed gentry.”

However, theologians have portrayed Joseph as a poor carpenter. Those in His own country (Galilee) were astounded at His mighty works and asked, “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at Him?” (Mark 6:3).

Would a poor family offend the common men and women in His home state? No, but wealthy men might very well. Was Jesus really a carpenter known by his structures or a Technician known by His astonishing miracles?

By now, everyone should know that wealth offends more so than poverty. Perhaps they were offended because the family of Joseph was too well off! Their wealth would support wars; perhaps that is why they shunned Him.

Joseph and Mary as righteous people would have hated war, but their taxes would have gone toward supporting the battles of Quirinius. That would explain why Jesus’s own people would reject Him; He may have been considered just part of the wealthy elite by His own people. Of course, those who were fair, knew that Jesus was a humble, humble man in His own land at Bethlehem.

Yes, there is speculation herein, but I do support the biblical account of things because they were inspired by God (2 Tim 3:16), meaning Jesus Himself. Jesus was not a liar! The writers were giving Jesus’s account of things.

Now consider the trade of Jesus and Joseph — a “carpenter.” They may have been but there is no evidence of any carpentry they may have done either in scripture or in archeology. Literally, in the Greek, they were “tekton” or “tradesmen” as they are called to this time.

In my book about, An Awesome Quantum God, I suggested that Jesus was a “technician” and because He made all things, He knew all things inside and out because He made them from nothing. Jesus was indeed a highly skilled, miraculous “Technician” who may have never sawed wood but in the genesis of all things, He literally cut firm things (Gen 1:1). He cut atoms and made sub-atomic particles. Nobody ever taught Jesus anything! In fact, Genesis is the only place that it is implied that He sawed anything.

However, admittedly Joseph was a tradesman of some sort, by why a carpenter? Because carpentry was a skill done by tradesmen in James’s England when the Bible was translated.

So, what happened to the gold? There may be explanations. Perhaps Joseph used part of it to pay for the head tax of the “Godhead” Jesus. Perhaps He paid property tax on the property he had inherited as the seed of David; or perhaps Jospeh was a jeweler, as many Jews are to this day! Perhaps that is part of the sin of envy that his people portrayed.

Did Joseph make jewelry from the gold the wise men brought? Had he made a crown of gold in preparation for the kingship of Jesus which he knew was planned because the kings revealed to Jospeph that Jesus would be king? Did Joseph fail to understand that gold would not be the crown of Jesus but thorns from a bramble bush like the ram of Abraham’s sacrifice?

Something did happen to the gold, expensive aromas, and ointments that the kings brought. My reasoning is as plausible as the next.

Why gold? Sacred writings explain that: 

After these things God said unto Adam, "Thou didst ask of Me something from the garden, to be comforted therewith, and I have given thee these three tokens as a consolation to thee; that thou trust in Me and in My covenant with thee. "For I will come and save thee; and kings shall bring me when in the flesh, gold, incense and myrrh; gold as a token of My kingdom; incense as a token of My divinity; and myrrh as a token of My suffering and of My death. "But, O Adam, put these by thee in the cave; the gold that it may shed light over thee by night; the incense, that thou smell its sweet savour; and the myrrh, to comfort thee in thy sorrow." (1 Adam & Eve XXXI:1-3) 

The gold was for the kingship of Jesus if that is true. A crown is a token of any kingdom. Kings brought the gold for something. A crown makes sense. If Jospeph was indeed a jeweler as many Jews have been, then perhaps he did use the gold to fabricate a crown as a “tekton” of sorts himself.

If so, then Jesus never wore the crown of gold for as a modest man he wore a crown of thorns.

The point is that Jesus was likely a wealthy propertied man who had riches that meant nothing to Him. God, His Father, had made for Him the gold, incense, and myrrh; making Him the Son (gens) of God as well as the gens of David.

Through the line of David, Jesus was king of Judea for only a few weeks, then He abdicated by death to be King of kings, and Lord of lords in the real, real estate in Paradise. If anybody used the crown, his successor, Herod Agrippa II would have. He was the last Herodian king of Judea, and it is likely that the Romans ended up with the crown made for Jesus.

Caesar, Caligua, so says AI Overview, gave Agrippa II a gold diadem (crown) when he made him king of Judea. It remains unknown who made that crown, but the Romans got the gold when Jerusalem fell. Did Jospeh make the crown that went unused until his son was deposed? We will probably never know!

With this commentary, perhaps we should quit thinking of Jesus as a man of poverty but one of prudence. He indeed could have had anything that He wanted, but all He wanted was that none who believed in Him should perish (John 3:16). Riches meant nothing to Him, so why would He be considered poor?

So, in summary, Jesus was not the son of Joseph, not a poor man, not a carpenter, not a king here but just as His Name suggests: “Ya(hweh) saves” and even at no charge because He pays by grace. And to the Jews, He was Teacher whose class mostly failed.