Monday, June 29, 2020

SPIRITUAL "DEEP STATE" - DEEP'S LEADER


LEADER OF DEEP STATE

  The people indicted Jesus in the Kidron Valley. Jesus was accused by a jury of His own people; not His peers, because Jesus was rational, and they were emotional. At first, it was party time! Only the leaders, directed by Caiaphas knew the plan. The others merely went along for a distraction from daily life. They were much like bored people who bog down the interstate highway just for a glance at a wreck, and perhaps to see if someone was injured. When people trouble themselves to go to a party, they expect a party. The multitudes were not disappointed; there would be a party… a “lynching” party.
  Of course, in those days, the mob was less civilized; there would be no lynching, just a crucifixion, thanks to the Romans. Crucifixion was unknown to the Middle East until the Greeks used it on occasion. For the Hebrew people, the law limited capital punishment to stoning, burning, strangulation, and decapitation. They would never have crucified Jesus because it would be unlawful! According to Scripture, Jesus would be crucified (pierced) (Zech 12:10).
  The Jews broke the Law when Jesus was crucified, but what excuse would they have? We did not do it; the Romans did! What excuse did Christians use to persecute the Jews? They killed Jesus; our hands are clean!  Blame is an innate response ever since Eve blamed the Serpent and Adam blamed Eve. Today, the mob does the same, One white cop did not kill George Floyd; all white people did!
Rational people would ask themselves, Why are so many policemen needed in metropolitan areas? Of course, the answer is: that is where there is the most crime. Why waste police resources in areas with a low crime rate? Cops must be placed according to crime statistics. Who commits the most crime in metropolitan areas? Data indicates that black on black crime is the most rampant. Why, then, are there more policemen in big cities? To protect peaceful blacks from uncivil blacks. Those of the black race who break the law are the reason for so many policemen in their neighborhoods. It seems that black crime is why excessive numbers of police are required, and that increases the possibility for a bad cop.
  Since black crime is the reason for so many policemen, they are there because that is where the crime is. What would happen if the police were removed? Would people become less criminal? Seattle demonstrated the answer with their “autonomous zone;” with no police, crime increases. With no police, there are more victims. The autonomous zone became as uncivil as the wild west.
The liberal mayor of Seattle referred to it as a party… a love fest, “We could have a summer of love!” (Durkin 2019). Of course, she thought they were there for love, they mostly came for the party (not to riot), but some came there to indict the nation. The leaders of Black Lives Matter, it seems, think whites and cops lives do not matter. It would not be a “summer of love” but several weeks of chaos. That is what happens when the mob takes control.
  Policemen are numerous because people are irresponsible. They are what stands between civility and barbarianism. The lame game requires that everyone preface their remarks with, “Although there are some bad cops, most are good.” Why do they not do that when they refer to minorities? “There are some bad blacks, but most are good?” That would seem racist. Do you think not? Well, when candidate Trump said something like, There are some bad Latinos crossing our borders, but there are good ones too, the left called him “racist.” Most cops are good, most blacks are good, and most Latinos are good are sufficient comments. Rational people understand that in a crowd there exists many undesirable people.
  Hillary Clinton made that stereotypical comparison when she said, “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. (applause and laughter) Right? They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic – Islamophobic – you name it” (Clintom 2016)
  It goes without saying that evil people exist in every group. Hillary’s crowd laughed and applauded at her lies and evil remark. There were bad people in the LBGT group! That never needs qualification and is merely a technique to gain creditability. It is a waste of words.
  Most of the crowd is not there to cause trouble but to be there either to support the troublemakers or for the “party.” The multitudes, many who had favored Jesus only a week before, turned on him because their emotions were aroused by those who were inflamed with hatred. The mob could as well have said, “Jesus is deplorable; He claims to be God!” (applause and laughter here). People are instigated to be rowdy. That is why some authority is needed. People do cruel things when left to their own devices.
  The Kidron Valley was the Jewish “autonomous zone” that night. The Romans cared little if they persecuted their own people. The centurions were likely out where the criminals were, and they were out that night because of the zealots who were the Roman Deep State. The Romans thought all would be well in the Valley — just a bunch of Jews out partying! That is what the multitude were doing, but some were out to take their own version of the law to their “autonomous zone.” The religious law that someone had to die for claiming to be God. Using their own misguided rules, Jesus had to die because blasphemy is capital offense in Mosaic Law. Romans ruled, and in their realm, death for blasphemy was laughable. For rational people who had seen Jesus work miracles that only God could, their sense of justice was pitiful. Mobs are never just; they are just emotional!
  The root cause of Jesus’s death was not Roman law, it was Jewish autonomy because Romans were apathetic to laws that they considered ridiculous. As it turns out, mobs make even sound laws seem ridiculous! For instance, a few weeks ago, Black Lives Matter insisted on justice for the death of George Floyd. Officer Chauvin had already been judged “guilty” by the mob and the liberals in society. They wanted one white man “lynched” for the crime. Now, the belligerent Antifa faction of Black Lives Matter wants that all white people be “lynched!” [1] Can you not see the absurdity of mob justice, and that Black Lives Matters is merely a mob with many along for the “party.” It is ridiculous that Democrats and corporations go along with the absurdity!
  Are cops to blame when blacks who commit crimes are killed in the process? Perhaps Officer Chauvin was overly zealous. That is for the authorities to decide. Emotional decisions are unjust. Where in the world would Chauvin actually obtain a fair trial? Nowhere! Mob justice will reign supreme. Where would Jesus get a fair trial? The mob (“Judge Lynch”) to him, then next to the “Roland Freisler” of that era, Caiaphas the high priest, or in KKK terms, the “grand wizard.”
  Caiaphas and his father-in-law Annas, had been joint high priests up until A.D. 15. At that time, Annas had been removed from the position by Quirinius, the first royal governor of Syria (including Judea). Annas was the deepest person in the out-of-power Deep State, and the governor had demonstrated who really had the power. It seems that the real decision-maker on the fate of Jesus was a person out of power.
  Perhaps a modern analogy would be former President Obama. Perhaps Annas had made his decision long ago with the “Jesus Problem” as Obama had with his “Trump Problem.” What to do about Jesus? Go to the former chief priest for the ultimate decision. What to do about Trump? Go to the former president for the ultimate decision. Of course, it remains unproven, but from the evidence so far, it appears that Mr. Obama may have been the chief instigator for the fake trials that laid ahead just as Annas was the chief instigator for the fake trials of Jesus. With the trial of Caiaphas, Jesus did not deny what he had done, but that what He had done was according to the Law and prophecy. They knew that, and even Caiaphas ignored Holy Scripture. What came out of the trial with Caiaphas?   Well first, Jesus told him the truth: 
19 The high priest then asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his doctrine. 20 Jesus answered him, I spake openly to the world; I ever taught in the synagogue, and in the temple, whither the Jews always resort; and in secret have I said nothing. 21 Why askest thou me? ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I said. (John 18:19-21)
  The multitude had known the Doctrine of Jesus all long and liked it. The people had not complained; only the bureaucrats and their leaders in the Sanhedrin (their “congress”). The problem with Jesus was not Jesus but four things: (1) People would grant that He was powerful, (2) His Doctrine, (3) the multitude up to that point had praised Him, and (4) that He would upset the system that had been there so long.
  What is it that the left-wing do not like about Donald Trump? (1) Fear his power, (2) fear his ideology, (3) resent his popularity, and (4) that he will be successful in usurping the current system by “draining the swamp.” It was not because Jesus was guilty of anything, but any accusation would suffice. Annas sent the mob on to Caiaphas, hoping that he would come up with something, but he did not!
  What did the liberals do with General Flynn? They hoped he would be their “Judas” who would turn on Trump to save his own situation. The good General stayed true. They had no “Judas” but continued in their quest to find one. They could not, so they created a “beast” that looked like Judas. His name was Robert Muehler. He was not truly a “Judas” but could be remolded by clever hands to do the dirty deed.
  The mob then grew. Those in the shadows of the FBI came to Muehler for his decision. Annas was the Bible version of Muehler since the Democrats would not find their “Judas,” still unidentified until a much later time after the “Annas Committee” failed to find a thing against innocent Trump (even after spending millions of dollars, two years, and more high level members of the mob).
  In scripture, Annas, at that time, was referred to as “High Priest” (John 18:19). He was not high priest at that time, but Caiaphas seems to be his “puppet.” In other words, Annas had the power in the eyes of the mob, but that was kept secret from the multitudes. Someone created a puppet for US president back when they took a mere community organizer and made him US senator. Just as God needed Annas to fulfill His Purpose of crucifying Jesus, God allowed an individual, also in the shadows, to create his own puppet. Many believe, and perhaps it was, George Soros who was and still is the puppet-master. He plays the role of Annas in the plot to “crucify” the President. Annas thought of something, he would let the real chief priest decide the fate of Jesus, and with that Annas sent Jesus to Caiaphas.
  In the meantime, Peter denied that he even knew Jesus. Perhaps General Flynn played that role, but it failed. Flynn never denied Jesus, but the FBI agents led by Comey, tried to coerce him unto turning into a “Peter.” Peter never lied; he denied. It was to save his skin. Flynn lied, but it was to save his own son from the mob.
  Is it obvious yet? Satan always directs his “choir” in the same manner. When will people ever catch on? He tempted Jesus the same way he tempted Adam and tempts everyone the same cunning way. There is a Deep State and there has always been. To deny that is foolishness yet even Christians deny it!


[1] Beware of “fact checkers” because those like Snopes are perhaps liberal tools for disinformation. Never use their short-cut for truth. Use your own ears and eyes.

(picture credit: "George Soros" Zimbio)

George Soros Pictures, Photos & Images - Zimbio

No comments:

Post a Comment