DIVISION
From childhood, Christians have said, “Peace on earth good
will toward men.” That was why Jesus came. Peace is never forced. Even two
parties to peace contracts most often fail. Why so? Negotiated peace is based
on compromise. Compromise is taunted as good, but it is the way evil gets its
way. Think about the essence of compromise. It is based on those with
dissenting ideas willingness to make concessions. Right and wrong are
absolutes. Compromise away from right is wrong.
Of course, both parties to the agreement believe they are
right, and compromise is away from what seems right to them. Oftentimes
one party knows that they are not right but moving some away from their
position is alright. The Deep State often knows that they are in the
wrong. The Saduccees, and especially the scribes, knew the Law, and knew they
were breaking the Law. To maintain their power, doing wrong was not right
but it was alright in their eyes.
Socialism consists of two types: Those who think their
doctrine is just, and those who know it is not but that is alright
for their purposes. Who is it that really thinks that is just to take
from one group and give to another without compensation? Most do not think
theft is right, but it is alright to achieve their purposes. Civilized people
should know that is wrong, but if they are to gain, it is alright with them.
Compromise is a method to achieve wrong things and
feel alright about it in that socialism legalizes theft. Compromise are
two groups both doing what they know is wrong; moving away from what
should be right to a wrong position. For socialists, that is easy because most
who understand Marxist ideology, know that it is morally wrong, but it is
alright for them. Socialism uses the “Big Lie” to create crises. Their Big Lie for
now is that totally innocent black men have been ruthlessly murdered by the
police, and that the root cause is white privilege. Those who want to defund the
police do not really want them defunded, they want white privilege “defunded.”
How is that done? By putting an end to capitalism.
What if the left came right out and said, “We want whites
dead, and we shall starve them by ending capitalism.” Would civil people buy
into that? Not even Russian socialists thought that was fair with Halodomor. In
Germany, since Jews were the primary capitalists, ending “Jewish privilege”
would be accomplished by the “Final Solution” – ending the existence of Jewry.
Many of the whites — privileged or not — were collateral damage in the Final Solution
because they stood in the way. Dietrich Bonnhoeffer was one devout Christian who
was martyred for true justice.
A contemporary Communist Party leader in Russia recently
explained on camera why it was acceptable that millions were starved to death
during the 1930s Haldomor. It was for the “common good.” The comparison that
she made was that in weeding an overgrown garden, inevitably good plants would
be uprooted along with the weeds. Of course, the “weeds” in her example were
capitalists, and the “good plants” were the Russian kulaks who happened to be too
near the capitalists. Just as a review, “kulaks” were former peasants who used
socialism for their own purposes, and eventually became hated capitalists. Marx
would have called them “petty bourgeois” and they were starved to death because
socialists considered them “petty.”
Why were the handicapped, Jews, and resisters murdered during
the Third Reich? Hitler considered them “petty.” Jews were not even humans to
them, but sub-human parasites who were inconvenient to the insane ideology of
socialism. Why do Democrats favor abortion? Because they are petty in
their eyes; they are not worth living because too many “commoners” are not good
for the “common good.”
Who are the “commoners” most killed with abortion? Like that
Russian Communist woman said, they are “weeds.” Unfortunately, with abortion,
many whites are killed to get at the inferior races (sic). Inferior? Read what
the heroine of the Democrats wrote — Miss Planned Parenthood herself (Margaret Sanger):
“"We do not want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro
population." Her apologists dismiss that as taken out of context. However,
she was known to distribute birth control aimed specifically at the black race.
In context, Sanger thought the black race were “weeds” to be
uprooted or even mashed with the Soviet hammer or slashed with the socialist
sickle. She was doing good deeds… for the Soviet Communists!
How do socialists know who to nourish and who to weed?
National Socialists had the harder task; they had to use eugenic tools to
classify. They used required genealogy back to four generations and often more,
and even measured the craniums to classify people into Aryans and unwanted “beasts.”
Who would ever thought that Jews would be massed murdered because they were
different? That would be absurd. Nobody would believe that, until the death
camps were exposed after the war. Why did they not seek the truth about the
Fourth Reich and socialism? Because the lie is so much easier to digest! It
takes hard work to find the truth, and people are lazy.
At the present time, most Americans accept the protests all
over the nation as peaceful. However, they are not peaceful; they are
violent protests! What about those who assemble to make a point and watch?
Remember the story of the multitudes who remained silent as Jesus was
crucified? Well, Jesus died for them as well because they too had sinned. How
so? Not only had each and everyone sinned in other ways, but they sinned the
presumptuous sin. “Presumptuous” is “failing to observe the limits of what is
permitted or appropriate” (Merriam-Webster 2003) .
The “peaceful protestors” are guilty of criminal activity
under natural law just because they are there among the lawbreakers. Their existence
at the crime scene is tacit approval for the crime. When Jesus was crucified, few
would have driven the nails with the Jewish “hammer” or slashed Jesus’s gut
with the Jewish “sickle,” but those comrades were just as guilty by their
silence!
Those who killed Jesus did not know what the fuss was all
about. They had killed many, and this was just another inconsequential and inconvenient
Jew to them. Jesus forgave them even though they drove the burning nails into
the Savior’s hands and feet. Their sin was less than those who instigated the plot
(the spiritual Deep State) and even less than those who watched and remained
silent. Why would the apostles love Jesus so immensely? Because Jesus forgave
them the greater sins as Jesus remarked to Pilate. The point is that Christians
who stand by and watch Christ diminished bear more guilt than the socialists. Why
is that? They should know better. If they had studied scripture, they would know
that silence is murderous. It is presumptuous sin.
What “crime” did Jesus allegedly commit? It was what his own
people alleged. They should have known that Jesus was the Savior. They knew
scripture inside and out, especially the Saduccees, Pharisees, and even more
so, the “lawyers” but they all had Jesus crucified while knowing the truth.
They knew the truth but failed to implement it. Knowing the truth should set
free from ignoring or usurping the truth. The technique of socialism is always
to usurp the truth by most and to ignore it by many.
Many know the truth about socialism. They know it is callous
and vindictive, but they think it is alright because it will advance them.
Others perceive socialism as ameliorating. They fail to understand that
the poverty stricken have no intrinsic value for those who do not appreciate
life. The only value that commoners have to socialists is to gain or maintain power.
They are even cheap “slaves” because they bow to Marxists for merely table
scraps as would starving obedient dogs. What about black socialist leaders? Did
not plantations have them as well? They too, do their “masters’ biddings.”
There were many groups in the Bible. Everyone of them turned
on Jesus, even some family members who at the time failed to understand that it
was not a brother who was dying but their Savior. All Jesus’s friends turned on
him. One by sedition and others by their silence. It could be expected that the
multitude would turn on Him, but not those who claimed to love Him most. Truly
Jesus came to bring peace on Earth, but that would be during His thousand-year
reign. Look what he brought:
51 Suppose ye that I am come to give
peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 52 For from henceforth there shall be
five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. 53 The father shall be divided against
the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and
the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law,
and the daughter in law against her mother in law. (Luke 12:51-53)
They supposed wrongly. They presumed that Jesus came to
fight a war and bring peace to the nation of Israel and to the Jews. They
thought that Jesus would be another Hasmonean “Maccabbee” fighting for justice
for the Jews. In other words, they thought that Jesus would be their liberator,
and at that very moment, “liberation theology” was born. “Liberation theology
is synthesis of Christian theology and socio-economic analyses, based on
far-left politics, particularly Marxism, that emphasizes "social concern
for the poor and political liberation for oppressed peoples." (Cook 1998) .
Christians, in liberation theology, think they are doing the
Christian thing. However, it is a synthesis — a manufactured false doctrine
combined with good intentions. It is the ideology of the far left, not the doctrine
of God but of those who have left that doctrine. Progressivism does not mean “progress,”
but progressively away from extant institutions, and mostly Holy Scripture.
Liberation theology is Marx’s communist doctrine which depends on violent
revolution against most institutions, and especially those in authority. It
does emphasize “social concern for the poor” but that emphasis is necessary to
change the system. Why would even “stupid American voters” as leftists call
them want change? Because they believe that socialism is for their good.
Hence, the emphasis on social concern, or the common good, is a ploy to change
the system. Stand back and look who has historically benefitted from socialism.
It has always been the socialist ideologues, not the common people.
Socialists divide. Two macro-divisions are the oppressed and
the oppressors. Socialists needed the institution of slavery to provide an oppressed
category. Slavery was one of those serious crises that was put to good use. Abolitionists
caused the end of slavery all the while Democrats fought for its continuation;
first with war and then with the “Deep State” of the Klan. The pressed must eb
convinced that the system has victimized them. Capitalism is the system, and whites
historically the capitalists. Even loving and kind whites must be identified as
privileged!
When people began to see through that ploy, they turned to
Jim Crow laws and now right out patronization. It is not guilt that the
Democrats feel for their sins against humanity, but remember that the best
slaves in antebellum times were those who were deceived into believing how much
better off they were from the slaves of others. [1]
Obama’s father had audacity. The audacity of Democrats and the left is to
propagate the notion that blacks are better off under their new plantation
system; the one that they finally admit is socialism!
Democrats have more than an ideology problem, they have a
spiritual problem! Their attitude and arrogance can never be changed until
their hearts are changed. What can Christians do? Certainly not be duped by a
slogan. Why should they chant the obvious? Black lives matter, and like it or
not, cops lives matter, unborn babies lives matter, and even rotten to the core
Democrat lives matter. Jesus died for all mankind, and never even thought to
create classes of people outside two: those who sought peace through Him, and those
who failed to.
The Doctrine of Christ is divisive, but it is not Christ who
divides but Satan. Socialism depends on division and class warfare and even
those who claim to be Christians are tricked into being part of the opposition
to godliness. Many are among Christ’s adversaries, either by their approval of
the mob or standing amongst them, even as they remain silent. Why did the
Germans vomit when they saw the atrocities of the German socialists? Because
they remained silent. Why do Russians continue in guilt because Tsar Nicholas
II and his innocent family were murdered by socialists? Because they remained
silent.
Many times, Christians harshly criticize President Trump,
but Jesus said to honor “Caesar.” That would not be so bad, but they fail to
criticize the socialist Deep State. Their anger over civility speaks much about
their silence about corruption. Note that none of the Christians criticized Judas,
some even called for Jesus to be crucified, and most remained silent. A silent
Christian in the face of mob violence is not much of a Christian.
Recently, many Christians praised the actions of Democrat
governors and such for their pandemic regulations. On the other hand, they said
nothing about the abortion governor’s killing of the innocents. It makes one
wonder whose side they are on — evil or righteousness. Their thought process
was what socialist George Orwell called “doublethink” as they thought freedom
was okay to kill babies, but liberty to move freely was wrong. Rational people
should not think so irrationally, and Christians are expected to be more
discerning.
Many to this day fail to realize that they killed Jesus.
When anyone chooses sin over righteousness, they are accomplices. Not that
Jesus can be crucified all over again, but that He still agonizes when Christians
even diminish Him. Joining the mob whether they join in the violence or not is
irrational because they become “cheerleaders” for the mob, but also because it
diminishes Jesus. Rather than depend on Jesus for peace, they depend on socialism
and its liberators.
[1]
For more on that, the author’s book, A Day on the Democrat Plantation,
provides more information.
(picture credit: IMDb "Chaos and the Creation of the World: Greek Mythology (2015))
No comments:
Post a Comment