In the last few months, I have written about the “son of man” (ben ‘adam; Hebrew) [i] and the “Son of God” (bar ‘elahh; Aramaic) [ii]Jesus was both the Son of Man (yhios anthropos) and the Son of God (yhios theos, [iii] both from the Greek. [iv] For some reason ben ‘elohym (Son of God) is not in the Hebrew anywhere in Scripture. What would be that reason? The language that Jesus spoke was Aramaic, not Hebrew. He did speak Greek so yhios anthropos in in the New Testament.
Yhios means one begotten by a father and born of a
mother” (Strong’s Dictionary). Jesus was begotten of The Father (Yahweh)
[v]and
born of the woman, Mary. [vi] “Begotten”
is transliterated from the Greek word, “monogenes,” meaning one (or the
single) gene. Ironically, when the archeologist, Ron Wyatt, alleged that he had
the blood from the Ark of the Covenant tested by experts in Jerusalem, it was monogenetic on the paternal side. [1] The
blood of “The Messiah” had all the mitochondrial DNA from the mother’s side,
but only the Y component of DNA from His Father. Both men and women can receive
DNA from their mother, so Jesus would have all the mtDNA from His mother.
On the other hand, only males have the DNA of their father,
and in the case of the blood from the alleged Ark of the Covenant, there were
not 23 chromosomes but only genotype. Most genetic types are polygenetic (of
many genes.) Males are of only monogenetic types, and males produce monogenes
(Wikipedia; “genes”).
The point is that Jesus was the Son of Man (‘adam) in
that he had was polygenetic from Mary but only monogenetic from His Father Yahweh.
Why would only Mary’s genotype be presented in Scripture? Because Jesus has one
Monotype and that was from Father God.
But if from Mary, why was Jesus “the Son of Man?” He was the
Son, not of Adam, but ‘adam. Mary had the mitochondrial DNA of Eve who
scripture says was “the mother of all living.” (Gen 3:20). Her kind was the
same as Adam’s; she too was ‘adam. [vii]
So, when scripture calls Jesus, “Son of Man” that is the “Son
of Eve” who was the vessel for the seed of man, thus X-DNA plus Y-DNA yields
XY-DNA.
However, on the paternal side, Jesus would be YY, if my
hypotheses about the DNA of heavenly beings is correct. [2]
Jesus would have the X component of DNA from Mary and the YY component from Yahweh.
What would the man, Adam, have has since he was without an earthly father?
YY-DNA. He would have no paternal DNA. Ironically (sic), or by God’s Plan, glorified
humans shall have no XX-type of DNA because regeneration is made in the Image
of God as was Adam. God will provide the new flesh, and it shall be YY-DNA.
Full regeneration (glorification) is likely without the XX-DNA of the wife-man.
“Wife” is “adulteress” in scripture. (Strong’s Dictionary).
Even women in heaven shall not “couple” [viii]
because they too will be adami as in the Garden, females of ‘adam kind.
Of course, although the genetics of God is hypotheses, this
commentary, as you have seen, is based on Holy Scripture. On a personal level, DNA
is of paramount importance, and that is why the writer would refuse the injection
of mRNA into his veins. God provides natural immunity, and my dependence is on
God, but neither Adam’s foolish kind nor acids put into my bloodstream can
do what God would naturally do!
But what has all this to do with Melchizedek?
1 For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him; 2 To whom also Abraham gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness, and after that also King of Salem, which is, King of peace; 3 Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God; abideth a priest continually. 4 Now consider how great this man was, unto whom even the patriarch Abraham gave the tenth of the spoils. (Heb 7:1-4)
First off, Melchisedec (Greek) is “Basileus Salem.” Not
king of the nation of “Salem” nor even Jerusalem, but “Lord of Peace”
(ibid). Is He the “LORD GOD” or another lord? Test that: He is “Basileus
Dikaiosyne,” or “LORD OF VIRTUE” (aka LORD OF GOODNESS). But only God
IS Good [ix] and
Jesus lost “virtue,” so only He was good. [x] The
obvious conclusion is that God appeared in the Flesh when He sent His Son to
bless (eulogeo) Abraham — to eulogize… or make an honorable name for him.
Hence, the man, “Abram” received the theophoric name, “Abraham” as the “father
of all the living.” His DNA was made of equal par as Eve’s as “the mother of
all living.”
No longer would mankind be the seed of sinful Adam and Eve,
but of “father Abraham” and Sarai, the virgin woman from whom Isaac would have
no DNA. “Genesis” had commenced again when Melchizedek blessed Abraham. Even Mary
was of the seed of Isaac, who had no mitochondrial DNA at all!
Why are Israelites hated so much? Because their seed was
chosen over all other seed. Because they have the DNA of God. They are His biological
children, and Gentiles merely God’s adopted sons and daughters through the Covenants.
[xi]
Melchizedek, as pre-incarnate Jesus, gave Abraham brotherly
love. Abram, just as Noah long before, found grace when “Jesus” in the form of Melchizedek
blessed him.
But how can that be when Jesus had not yet been born? Jesus
said, “The Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me.” [xii]
Mary bore God’s Son in the sense that she carried (beared) him for nine
months. However, God “borne witness” of Jesus. The Father transported Jesus
to Mary’s womb instantly one day. Jesus was truly without biological father
nor mother. Likewise, for Melchizedek: “Without father, without mother, without
descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto
the Son of God.”
Adam was the Image of God, but that “Image” was toppled when
he sinned, just as the idol, Dagon, was toppled. [xiii]
Then Abel was made in the Image of God when God may have come down on theretofore
biologically “virgin” Eve. [3] Abel
was called what? “Righteous Abel.” [xiv] He was called “Dikaios Abel” or “Virtuous
Transition” (ibid). Hence, Virtuous
Mechizedek would be the transition of God from ‘adam just as Abel was a
transition of God’s second son from Himself. Scripture implies that Abel was “of
God” just as Cain was “of the Wicked One.”
Also implied by scripture is that Abel was the Son of Man (through
Eve, the female of that kind) and from the Virtue flowing out of God. Likewise,
Melchizedek may have been born (carried) by some uncertain woman, but he
was borne (transported) to Abraham in Canaan’s land from the Place of Peace
in Heaven!
Paul said of Melchizedek “how great (pelikos) this
man was.” That Melchizedek was dignified, and I assert that was in a
divine sense! So dignified that there was an exchange: Melchizedek blessed Abraham
and Abraham tithed, not paid taxes, to Him; to wit: “(Him) to whom also Abraham
gave a tenth part of all; first being by interpretation King of righteousness.”
Not king of Canaan or even Jerusalem, but “King of Righteousness.”
Of course, “righteousness” is not only right spiritually and
morally, but Melchizedek was the rightful heir of Lord God. (Remember
that the story is about the distribution of the forthcoming inheritance from
the Father.)
Abraham gave Melchizedek His due upfront. It was not a gift,
but a distribution to God’s other Son even before the inheritance was probated.
Melchizedek would come again as the Priest who would probate the Will of God
when God suffered death.
It was not just the Flesh of God on the Cross. God never
died, but His three “Substances” (homeostasis) were on the Cross. The Father,
the Son thought, had forsaken Him, but God never leaves nor forsakes. The
Father suffered with the Son, and so did the Holy Spirit of God because at the
immediacy of death, Jesus gave up the Ghost. [xv]
When the Covenant was written, it was a special occasion.
First off, there was a war going on between the squatters on that land, and its
rightful heirs — Abraham and his seed. Abram did not fight for the land
because it had already been entrusted to him by God. He fought for the very
life of Lot to save his spiritual “brother.” God saw that Abram loved others
more than things, and consequentially, Abram got the “things” as well, but only
after he shared the profits with the Father.
Just as on the Cross where the Will of God was probated, God
in three Substances was there when the Will was entered into “Court” records.
The Supreme Judge came to judge the rightful heir right after He had exposed the
hatred and violence of those who presumed to own the land and be king over it.
It would be neither Lagamar nor Chadorlaomer, or to this day, we would all be pagans,
or even Muslims!
God served Abram with His hand. Abram drank the “Body” and “Blood”
of the Messiah. Melchizedek did what Jesus would do two-thousand years later — He
served others. Just as Paul wrote, Jesus was a priest on the order of
Melchizedek. How did that differ from the Levitical and Aaronic priesthoods?
Before the time of Jesus, the High Priests were from the
line of Zadoc, the priest who descended from Aaron. Afterwards, the High Priest
could be of any lineage. The High Priest at the time of Jesus was Joseph ben
Caiaphas. He had been appointed, according to Josephus, by the Roman procurator
Valerius Gratus after the former High Priest has been deposed. Thus, Caiaphas
was a High Priest in name only since he was appointed by Rome. His
father-in-law was Annas, who had been High Priest before Caiaphas’s
predecessor. He was the real influencer. So here we have it: Annas, likely a Priest
in the order of Aaron through Zadoc, and Caiaphas, an interloper much like Chadorlaomer
way back then!
Jesus was a priest on the order of Melchizedek, who reigned
forever, and unlike Annas whose term would end, and unlike Caiaphas who was not
an heir to that position. In 70 AD the Romans would destroy the Temple and
there would be no need for a High Priest, let alone two. Melchizedek came for
that reason. Jesus is the High Priest and Supreme Judge of Christians, and
there is no need for neither a false priest nor one who inherited that priesthood.
After the Temple was destroyed, people became the Temple in the absence of the
Body of Jesus.
Perhaps when Jesus asked the Father to pass the cup from Him,
He was humble. Rightfully, the High Priest would have made the sacrifice as
they always had before! The High Priest, either of them, were unworthy. Only the
“Cup” of Jesus was clean enough to drink from! That is the cup that Melchizedek
passed to Abram before there were High Priests. Melchizedek had always been the
High Priest; it is just that He remained unseen much of the time. He revealed Himself
to Noah as the Bow in the sky. Next time, it would be the Lofty Priest from heavenly
places — the Place of Peace in Heaven.
What am I saying? That God translated Himself from heaven to
earth. He changed Substances, not locations or placenames. Before His
Substance was seen by faith as the Bow in the sky. This time, Abram saw the “Face
of God” with Flesh, and in another Image of Jesus. He was transfigured, “like
unto the Son of God; (and) abideth a priest continually.” Melchisedek remains the
Priest of the Most High God to this day; for He is Jesus!
Is that not heretical in that, “It shall come to pass, that
whosoever shall call on the Name of the Lord shall be saved” (Acts 2:21)? Well, that is true, regardless, for Melchizedek
is “my King Sedek” (Britannica). Jesus is, Adoni-zedek, “Mister Righteous.”
(Abarim Publications). That would be Jesus, the only “Mister Righteous!” Pilate
declared Jesus to be innocent of all charges and those went from drunk, to crazy,
to traitor, to Satanic, and the craziest thought of all… that He IS God in the
Flesh.
The only charge of which Jesus was “guilty” is that He Is
God. All the while, Satan was hung in another tree in the Potter’s Field of
Gehenna, but Pilate believed that Jesus Is God! That was the accusation, was it
not, but Pilate said, “Behold, I, having examined Him before you, have found no
fault in this man touching those things whereof ye accuse him” (Luke 23:14).
That Jesus is God remains so preposterous that most deny
Him. Even Peter must have thought that preposterous because he had denied Him
as well. Pilate, on the other hand, believed that Jesus was innocent on all
accounts, even that He Is God!
That Melchizedek was God would be preposterous as well.
Chadorlaomer worshipped the chief goddess, Lagomar, although she was unseen. And
here we have Melchizedek, who showed Himself, and only Abram praised Him. The
Invisible God had showed Himself, but still, Abraham’s seed would not follow Him
wherever they would go… except to the Cross to die. That would be a reversal of
the Spirit of God showing Himself as a Man.
So, you think that is preposterous? Well, even Babylonian King
Nebuchadnezzar saw Melchizedek and he believed. [xvi]
Then Jacob wrestled with the same Man and won the match, of course by the grace
of the Man. Jacob wrestled with Melchizedek who served Israel (Jacob) grace. In
all instances, the Son of Man was The King of Righteousness! And on top of
that, Melchizedek is “the Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End” [xvii]
in that He IS, “Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither
beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God.”
No, Melchizedek was not God’s Name. Jesus is His
Name! “Melchizedek” is the Title of Jesus to which He is entitled! Just as “Adam”
was not the first man’s name, but his kind, Melchizedek is not the Name
of God, but His Kind, and that would be “Righteous.”
What does God want for us? To be “His Kind.” Like the Most
High Priest, Melchizedek, “King of Rightousness,” Christians are ordained to be
“Royal Priests.” [xviii]
on the order of Melchizedek! We are to be like Jesus… in the very Image of Him!
[1]
See the video on YouTube about the Blood of Jesus on the Ark: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8TRoQk6WUE
[2] See
my book, On the Origin of Man and the Universe, available at Amazon Bookstore.
[3] My
supposition is that the spirit of Lucifer violated her spiritually as Cain was “of
the Wicked One.” (1 John 3:12)
No comments:
Post a Comment