Why is the death of an African American man only important when it happens at
the hands of someone of another race, especially a cop? It could be racially
motivated, you say. It could be a hate crime.
What non-accidental killing isn't a hate crime? Remember that term "malice a
forethought?"
When one gang member kills a rival gang member, that occurs because of malice-
hate. Gang members hate rivals. Gang related murders often involve people of the
same race. Is there any less hatred involved?
Why does an event like the death of Michael Brown in the small town of Ferguson,
MO, dominate the news while the death of two dozen Michael Browns in Chicago
over a single weekend barely get a mention? Are those live less important?
What raises Brown's death to such awareness and creates so much unrest?
It gives the outside agitators who make up the majority of those arrested in
Ferguson a chance to create pandemonium. They live for chaos and destruction.
It's not their community, so why should they care?
It gives Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson someplace to be seen. They use the Brown
family's tragedy for their own purposes. They create "racism" even if there is
none. They're just agitprops in suits.
The big city mass tragedies get no mention by Obama or a visit by Eric Holder
like the Ferguson incident. Our Agitator in Chief can use Brown's death to
promote racial division. It gives Holder a chance to put on his "activist" hat.
African-American columnist and author Jason Riley said, "Let's not pretend that
morgues are full of black men because of cops." I would add, "or because of
people of other races," but it is a problem in desperate need of a solution!
No comments:
Post a Comment